Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Immunol., 03 September 2020
Sec. Microbial Immunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Immunotherapeutic Approaches to Tuberculosis View all 17 articles

Harnessing Unconventional T Cells for Immunotherapy of Tuberculosis

  • 1Central Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Biomedical Research, Palermo, Italy
  • 2Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Even if the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) has been decreasing over the last years, the number of patients with TB is increasing worldwide. The emergence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant TB is making control of TB more difficult. Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine fails to prevent pulmonary TB in adults, and there is an urgent need for a vaccine that is also effective in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection. Therefore, TB control may benefit on novel therapeutic options beyond antimicrobial treatment. Host-directed immunotherapies could offer therapeutic strategies for patients with drug-resistant TB or with HIV and TB coinfection. In the last years, the use of donor lymphocytes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has emerged as a new strategy in the cure of hematologic malignancies in order to induce graft-versus leukemia and graft-versus-infection effects. Moreover, adoptive therapy has proven to be effective in controlling cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in immunocompromised patients with ex vivo expanded viral antigen-specific T cells. Unconventional T cells are a heterogeneous group of T lymphocytes with limited diversity. One of their characteristics is that antigen recognition is not restricted by the classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC). They include CD1 (cluster of differentiation 1)–restricted T cells, MHC-related protein-1–restricted mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, MHC class Ib–reactive T cells, and γδ T cells. Because these T cells are genotype-independent, they are also termed “donor unrestricted” T cells. The combined features of low donor diversity and the lack of genetic restriction make these cells suitable candidates for T cell–based immunotherapy of TB.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is the deadliest infectious disease worldwide, even if the global incidence has declined over the past decades. The etiologic agent Mycobacterium tuberculosis still causes more than 10 million cases and 1.5 million deaths every year. Although drug treatment usually provides microbiological cure in patients treated with 6-month regimen for drug-sensitive strains, 1.1 million people remain sick (1), because of the spread of strains resistant to multiple drugs. Moreover, it is estimated that one-quarter of people worldwide are latently infected, and of these, 5 to 15% will develop TB during their lifetimes, due to the higher risk for people with immunocompromised system, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malnutrition, or diabetes, or people who use alcohol or tobacco (2). Treatment for latently infected people is necessary for the global control of TB. The emergence of multidrug-resistant TB remains a growing threat to global public health; in fact, in the absence of a vaccine more efficient than Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine to prevent primary infection or progression to active TB in latently infected people, TB global control needs novel therapeutic strategies in order to improve M. tuberculosis eradication and limit the excessive pathology.

In this context, the research of more effective and cheaper drugs represent one of the solutions (3, 4), while therapeutic interventions that can modulate the immune response have been proposed (57).

These interventions, termed “host-directed therapies” (HDTs), are directed to evaluate different aspects in order to better understand the inflammatory and immune pathways governing protective or detrimental outcomes of the disease. HDTs consider several mechanisms of action: the research of biological drugs useful to reduce treatment regimens strategy to reduce TB pathology targeting M. tuberculosis such as granuloma structure, autophagy induction, anti-inflammatory response, and cell- and antibody-mediated immune responses (810).

We review here developments and current advances in adoptive T cell therapy; in particular, we will focus on the role of unconventional T cells and discuss whether such approach may be helpful to offer a valid strategy for the cure of TB applicable also to other infectious diseases.

As the role of CD4 and CD8 T cells has been largely studied in TB, highlighting the limit of the high most polymorphic presentation of peptides antigens by MHC classes I and II molecules, the donor unrestricted nature of antigen presentation by molecules that are apparently non-polymorphic, elicits strong interest for vaccine or T cell immunotherapeutic approaches to target the entire global population without respect to host genetic factors.

Natural Killer T and Mucosal-Associated Invariant T Cells

Natural killer T (NKT) and MAIT cells constitute a subset of T cells that recognize antigens of non-peptidic nature. These cells are named as unconventional or “innate-like” T cells for their distinct features (11, 12). These cells have different memory, kinetics, and ligand recognition compared to conventional T cells (13).

MAIT and NKT cells recognize microbial metabolites and lipids presented by MHC-related protein 1 (MR1) and cluster of differentiation 1d (CD1d), respectively (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Unconventional T cells, grouped on the base of their restriction elements. α-GalCer, α-galactosyl ceramide; 5-OP-RU, 5-(2-oxopropylideneamino)-6-D- ribitylaminouracil; unknown, insufficient or very limited data.

In M. tuberculosis infection, the role of NKT cell subsets has been investigated; here, we report some evidences of their role depending on the type of mycobacterial antigens specifically recognized.

NKT Cells

It has been shown that NKT cells play a key role in a variety of infectious and autoimmune diseases and cancer (14). NKT cells express a rearranged αβ T cell receptor (TCR) and NK cell receptors, which confer the capability to exert several effector functions in immune surveillance. Based on their TCR repertoire and antigen recognition, NKTs can be split up into invariant (iNKT) and diverse (dNKT). Both cell types are CD1d-restricted and respond to glycolipid and lipid antigens/CD1 complexes, respectively.

Invariant NKT

Invariant NKT cells, also termed classical type I cells, use an invariant TCRα chain (Vα14-Jα18 in mice, Vα24-Jα15 in humans) paired with limited TCRβ chains (Vβ7, 8.2 or 2 in mice, Vβ11 in humans), and constitute a majority of the overall CD1d-restricted repertoire (15, 16). iNKT cells specifically recognize the endogenous α-linked monoglycosylceramides, α-galactosyl ceramide (αGalCer) and α-glucosylceramide (αGalcCer). Similar to helper CD4 T cells, notwithstanding their specificity for αGalCer recognition, they are able to produce different cytokines such as interferon γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 4 (IL-4), or IL-17A, which designate them as iNKT1, iNKT2, and iNKT17.

Diverse NKT Cells

Diverse NKT cells have a more diverse repertoire and recognize a wider range of self and non-self lipids such as sphingolipids (e.g., sulfatides and βGalCer) and phospholipids (e.g., phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidylethanolamine).

Mycolipids, lipids belonging to the mycobacterial cell wall, can bind CD1d molecules and activate human NKT cells. dNKT cell activation in responses to different antigens has been detected in individuals infected with M. tuberculosis (17).

Their role has been investigated in in vitro, in vivo, and in preclinical models of M. tuberculosis infection (1822). Active TB patients had a decreased percentage of iNKT cells in peripheral blood or bronchoalveolar lavage samples (23, 24), with respect to subjects with latent TB infection (2530), even if these cells still maintained the capability to secrete high amounts of IFN-γ and displayed an activated phenotype (30, 31).

However, NKT cells from active TB patients express programmed death 1 (PD-1) molecule at cell surface that leads to their subsequent apoptosis, an event that can be abrogated through PD-1 blockade (23, 32). This finding is highly suggestive of an immunological approach to achieve a protective immune response against M. tuberculosis. In addition, iNKT cells present in pleural effusion in TB patients produce IL-21 and can then participate to local B cell activation and humoral immune response to M. tuberculosis (33).

While these studies do not clarify a key role for NKT cells in human TB, their rapid activation and the different role they can exert in TB infection poise them as an intriguing target for cell-based therapies (34).

Finally, results from non-human primate (NHP) models of M. tuberculosis infection have demonstrated that CD8+ iNKT cells play a protective role in preventing lung pathology (19, 35).

Altogether, these cells are promising tools for potential use as HDT in human TB, in a similar way to their use in cancer immunotherapy (36).

MAIT Cells

MAIT cells recognize very rapidly non-peptidic antigens presented by MR1 molecule (37). MAIT cells respond to Ag stimulation rapidly either because they are constitutively activated by Ags derived from commensal bacteria and maintain activated/memory phenotype, or their clonal size is larger than conventional T cells (38). In humans, MAIT cells express a Vα7.2-Jα33/12/20, TCRα chain preferentially paired with Vβ2 or Vβ13 (3941). In their structure and function, MAIT cells represent a bridge between the innate and adaptive immunity. They are αβ T cells whose TCRs have restricted diversity and recognize small microbial metabolites. In the riboflavin synthesis process, many bacterial and fungal organisms produce small intermediates able to activate MAIT cells (4245). There is also evidence that non–riboflavin-based antigens, also of microbial origin (46) and tumor cell–derived molecules (47), can bind to MR1 and activate some MR1-restricted T cells, although the identity of these antigens remains to be defined. MAIT cells comprise 1 to 10% of circulating CD3+ T cells in healthy adults (48, 49) and have also been found in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and airways (5054).

The role of this population of T cells in the response against microorganisms is still a matter of studies. TCR-mediated activation of MAIT cells leads to cytokines production, cytotoxic effector function, migration, and proliferative expansion (12, 39, 55).

Because MAIT cells can respond to a range of bacteria and yeasts, several studies have supported the proposal of a peculiar and non-redundant role in protection against infectious diseases.

In particular, MAIT cells can contribute to the destruction of infected cells and activation of other immune cell types (56) through the release of perforin and granzymes; moreover, they are a source of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), IFN-γ, IL-17A, and MIP-1α. MAIT cells can also produce IL-22, IL-13, IL-26, or IL-2, depending on the different cytokine milieus and tissue localization (5760). Indeed, MAIT cells can even be activated by inflammatory stimuli in the absence of TCR-mediated antigen recognition (5759, 6168).

In animal models of mycobacterial infection, MAIT cells are able to reduce mycobacterial burden and increase the ability of macrophages to inhibit the growth of intracellular bacilli (56). MAIT cells were demonstrated to protect mice against mycobacterial infection (55, 69).

In human TB infection, several studies have evaluated MAIT cell frequencies in peripheral blood or in inflamed tissues, demonstrating that this cellular population decreases during active TB in diverse geographic settings (55, 7072). Moreover, this decrease is paralleled by their enrichment in the inflamed tissue such as that found in the lungs and pleural effusions of TB patients (73), where they displayed a phenotype of activated/memory cells and a higher capacity to produce cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α (74).

Studies have evaluated the relative increase or decrease of the absolute number or percentage with the progression of TB infection. In fact, in some circumstances, MAIT cell deficiency has been associated with the different clinical TB conditions. Moreover, their decrease has been inversely correlated with other biological parameters, such as high levels acid–fast bacilli in sputum of TB patients or with systemic markers of inflammation (72). Additionally, peripheral blood MAIT cells showed an impaired production of cytotoxic molecules and cytokines such as IFN-γ in patients with active pulmonary TB (75). These functionally impaired MAIT cells express higher levels of proapoptotic markers and PD-1 than MAIT cells from non-TB patients (71, 72, 74). PD-1+ MAIT cell expression has been related to active TB status and declines with TB treatment (74, 76).

In vitro blockade of PD-1 can increase IFN-γ production in circulating MAIT cells from patients with TB, thus resembling the data obtained in studies on NKT cells.

Human data about MAIT cells still gave incomplete information about the role these cells play in bacterial disease, but it was stated that in active TB disease MAIT cells decrease in peripheral blood and those that remain show a dysfunctional, yet reversible phenotype. An immunological approach could be to use MR1 ligands in therapeutic settings, in order to potentiate the functional activities of MAIT cells in M. tuberculosis infection. This therapeutic approach would be applicable in the heterogeneous human populations because of the monomorphic nature of MR1, which displays very limited restriction barrier in human populations.

γδ T Cells

T cell receptor (TCR) of γδ T cells in humans consists of a γ and a δ chain; they are usually identified on the base of the δ chain expressed on the surface, Vδ1+, Vδ2+, and a minor subset Vδ3+. The knowledge about their antigen recognition repertoire is not fully elucidated; in fact, some TCRs specifically recognize soluble antigens in the absence of Ag presentation, whereas other can bind antigens presented by MHC-I like molecules such as MICA, CD1, and EPCR (77, 78) (Figure 1).

The Vδ2+ T cells are the major γδ subset in the blood, and their TCR consists of a Vδ2 and a Vγ9 chain that recognize microbially derived phosphorylated antigens associated with the monomorphic butyrophilin 3A1 (BTN3A1) molecule (79). Metabolites known as phosphoantigens (PAgs) activate Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (80, 81). One of these metabolites is isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), produced in eukaryotes through the mevalonate pathway, a pathway involved in protein prenylation, and in cholesterol synthesis (82). A dysfunction of this pathway can lead to overproduction of endogenous IPP, as occurs in stressed cells (83, 84). Moreover, some drugs can manipulate the production of endogenous IPP. Another metabolite able to activate Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is hydroxymethyl-but-2-enylpyrophosphate (HMBPP), an intermediate of the alternative, non-mevalonate pathway of cholesterol used by some Eubacteria and by Plasmodium falciparum, the etiologic agent of malaria (85, 86).

Pags are recognized in a TCR-dependent manner, and very recently, the molecule BTN3A1, belonging to the butyrophilin (BTN) protein family, has been implicated as essential molecule in the PAgs activation pathway of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (8789).

BTN3A proteins are receptors expressed in several cell types, including immune cells and some malignant cells such as ovarian cancer. Even if the prominent role of BTN3A1 in PAg-induced Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation is well documented, the mechanism of recognition of the PAg has not been fully delineated. There is strong evidence that Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation is due to an intracellular sensing of PAg through the interaction with the B30.2 domain of BTN3A1 molecule (9093).

Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can recognize another antigen belonging to M. tuberculosis, the 6-O-methylglucose-containing lipopolysaccharides.

Even if other two minor subsets of γδ T cells are less represented in blood, they are able to recognize mycobacterial lipid or glycolipids antigens presented by CD1c and CD1d molecules. Interestingly, some Vδ1+γδ T cells are activated following recognition of α-GalCer presented by CD1d molecule (94), which might be relevant in human clinical trials.

Generally, any γδ T cell antigen could be used to design TB vaccines due to their ability to drive in vivo expansion of M. tuberculosis–reactive γδ or to generate in vitro γδ T cells to be used in adoptive cell therapy.

In human blood, γδ T cells are relatively abundant, so it is possible to isolate them in large numbers and characterize their effector mechanisms such as the ability to produce TH 1-, TH 2-, or TH17-type cytokines and to exert potent cytotoxicity, this latter function being closely correlated to the elimination of infected or tumoral cells. These findings, together with their capacity to rapidly migrate to peripheral sites suggest that γδ T cells are good candidates for adoptive transfer models of therapy.

They are included in the cluster of unconventional T cells, because of their MHC unrestricted antigen recognition; therefore, they have been used and transferred from an MHC mismatched background without causing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which can be a life-threatening complication with adoptive transfer of conventional αβ T cells (95).

In M. tuberculosis infection, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are activated rapidly after PAg stimulation, exerting effector mechanisms such as release TNF-α and IFN-γ (96), and cytotoxic molecules such as perforin, granzymes, and granulysin that are involved in the killing of M. tuberculosis–infected macrophages and in the reduction of the viability of intracellular and extracellular M. tuberculosis (97). In humans, BCG vaccination determines in vivo expansion of γδ T cell population with a memory phenotype, and similar findings have been observed in BCG or M. tuberculosis–infected rhesus macaques.

Moreover, adoptive transfer of activated Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in M. tuberculosis–infected macaques has demonstrated protection against this intracellular pathogen (79, 96). The adoptive transfer of γδ T cells in NHP reduced the bacterial burden and limited disease to the infected lobe by prevention of dissemination (98). In primates, this expansion is clonal and selects for Vγ9+Vδ2+ TCR usage (79). This clonal expansion is due to the specific recognition of PAgs conserved among mycobacteria (99), recognized by butyrophilin-dependent manner (96, 100). Further advances in the use of γδ T cells, derived from the study in which responses in NHP can specifically be boosted by addition of PAgs to protein subunit vaccines are needed (101).

Therefore, clinical trials targeting γδ T cells may offer improved outcomes that can best be harnessed for immunotherapy approaches, as widely experienced in cancer immunotherapy (102).

HLA-E–Restricted T Cells

HLA-E has been classically defined by the ability to present signal sequence peptides from HLA class I, which inhibit NK cells cytolytic activity upon interaction with CD94/NKG2A receptors (103). However, it has been shown that HLA-E molecules are able to bind and present other self or pathogen-derived peptides, including M. tuberculosis, and can be recognized by adaptive T cells (104106) (Figure 1).

HLA-E/mycobacterial peptide complexes are recognized differently from HLA-E/self-peptides; in fact, in our previous study, we have demonstrated that the latter are predominantly recognized by NK cells in a CD94 dependent manner; the former are specifically recognized by CD8+ T cells in a CD3/TCR αβ-dependent manner (106).

The binding of peptides to HLA-E molecule has been described (107). The peptide-binding motif reveals that most of the peptides that bind to HLA-E are similar to HLA I leader sequence with P2 Met and PΩ Leu. This motif has been identified for 21 peptides, but the discovery of new HLA-E–specific peptides needs to be characterized in sharing anchor residues or motifs. In fact, the crystal structure analysis of HLA-E- bound to a mycobacterial peptide has revealed that the flexibility of the conformation of the bound peptides is also critical in the activation of CD8 T cells despite the preferred anchor residues (108).

Therefore, HLA-E plays a role in both innate and adaptive immune response, thanks to their interaction with both NK cells and antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. One important aspect of HLA-E molecule is its low allelic variability, rendering this molecule an interesting candidate antigen-presenting molecule for peptide-based vaccination strategies (103, 109111). These T cells can inhibit intracellular M. tuberculosis growth in human macrophages. Moreover, compared to class Ia molecules, HLA-E molecule is enriched in M. tuberculosis phagosomes and accessible for loading with M. tuberculosis peptides generated into the phagosome (112, 113).

Studies in mouse and NHP suggest a contribution of HLA-E–restricted T cells to protective immunity against TB.

It was found that the murine homolog of HLA-E, Qa-1 molecule, can bind and present human HLA-E–binding peptides to murine CD8+ T cells, which display cytolytic and regulatory activities (114). Moreover, knockout studies confirmed a direct role for Qa-1 in regulating histopathology and bacterial burden and contributing to protection against M. tuberculosis (114).

MHC-E–restricted CD8+ T cell responses are elicited in rhesus macaques (Rh) by an experimental rhesus cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine, which express genes coding for proteins specific for simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). This attenuated Rh CMV vaccine showed strong protection against a subsequent challenge with SIV infection, and protection was due to activation of CD8+ T cells that recognized SIV peptides bound to either MHC class II or MHC-E molecules, but not conventional MHC class Ia molecules, explaining in part the involvement of MHC-E–restricted T cells in protection (115117). Further investigation revealed that naturally occurring SIV epitopes matched the Rh CMV vector–elicited CD8+ T cell–restricted epitopes contributing to protection against a subsequent SIV challenge (112). Similarly to the model described above, Rh CMV-TB antigen vectors induced strong protection against TB following vaccination in 41% of treated NHPs (118). Moreover, Hansen et al. (118) demonstrated that one of three tested Rh CMV strain 68-1 vectored vaccines expressing six or nine protein from M. tuberculosis was able to elicit unconventionally restricted MHC class II and MHC-E restricted CD8+ T cell responses. Therefore, viral-vectored vaccines can be developed in order to induce immunogenicity of HLA-E–restricted T cells against many pathogens in human patients.

Recently, we have demonstrated that M. tuberculosis–specific and HLA-E–restricted CD8+ T cells are abundant but exhausted in peripheral blood of TB–HIV-1–coinfected patients, and this dysfunctional phenotype is correlated with high levels of PD-1 molecule expression. The use of anti-PD1 mAb may restore, even partially, the number and the functions of M. tuberculosis–specific and HLA-E–restricted CD8+ T cells (119). Like NKT and MAIT cells, HLA-E–restricted CD8+ T cells are associated with exhaustion. This abnormal phenotype is probably caused by the direct recognition of M. tuberculosis–infected cells and the exposure to high levels of inflammatory cytokines. Further research is needed to develop strategies for restoring this subset in patients with M. tuberculosis infection/disease, with or without HIV coinfection, in order to better define the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint blockade.

Taking advantage for the relative monomorphism of HLA-E molecule and for its stable expression in HIV–M. tuberculosis infection, which represents an important issue of global health, the use of antigen recognition through HLA-E molecule, should be considered as another valuable approach to promote or boost activation of CD8+ T cells in vaccine formulation or immunotherapy.

Perspective

Translational research can begin to use the knowledge of unconventional T cell biology to develop new immunotherapeutic approaches. Vaccine or immunotherapy development could represent a good strategy in infectious diseases prevention, but obviously, it is very important to demonstrate that identified ligands for unconventional T cells are expressed at the surface of infected cells at densities and durations that are able to engage TCRs and induce T cell activation and immunological memory phenotype. In fact, the efficacy of vaccine or immune protection in case of the re-encounter with the same pathogen could be reached by the induction of memory T cells.

Therefore, unconventional T cells can be used to improve T cell immunotherapy, thanks to several aspects, such as the rapid cytokine release without the need to previous clonal expansion due to their presence at high number of available experienced antigen-specific cells that have developed as memory-like state (77). Another important aspect is represented by the monomorphic model of antigen recognition by unconventional T cells that could be universally effective in human infectious diseases and cancer context. Moreover, their TCRs will not be able to give alloreactive responses and to cause GVHD, making these cells more suitable in cellular therapy such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (120, 121).

MAIT, NKT, and γδ T cells are crucial players in the development and maintenance of immunity. These aspects have been demonstrated by the array of infectious, inflammatory, and malignant diseases in which they play diverse roles (81, 122127).

Depending on the nature of the infectious or inflammatory setting, these can range from host protective functions, for example, antimicrobial or antitumor responses, to the augmentation of disease (122126). A number of clinical trials based on γδ T cell therapy have been conducted or are ongoing to evaluate the safety and antitumor efficacy (128). Moreover, several clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells for immunotherapy. Because of their high plasticity, studies using CAR- γδT cells could be of great interest also in infectious diseases.

Until now, no clinical trials have investigated on the efficacy of unconventional T cells in inducing protection toward M. tuberculosis disease.

Because of the role that these cellular populations play during the early stages of infection, they could be studied as promising tools in immunotherapy against the intracellular pathogen.

Finally, therapy using anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies, important checkpoints of the immune response, has demonstrated to play an important and valid approach to treat some types of cancer (129), where it is assumed primarily to enhance CD8+ T cell–mediated tumor destruction.

Given that unconventional T cells also express the inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 upon activation and that blockade of these receptors can enhance their effector activities and antitumor capacity (74, 130132), the potential role that unconventional T cells play should be considered in infectious disease and the immunotherapy for infectious diseases, and the incorporation of unconventional T cells into these studies has the potential to provide novel approaches to this important area of medicine.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

FD and NC wrote the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and have made intellectual contributions to the work.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the European Commission within the Horizon 2020 Program TBVAC2020 (contract no. 643381) and EMI-TB (contract no. 643558). The text represents the authors’ views and does not necessarily represents position of the European Commission, which will not be liable for the use made of such information.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization (2019).

Google Scholar

2. UNOPS. Stop TJUNOfPS, UNOPS, Geneva Switzerland. Partnership: The Paradigm Shift. 2016-2020. Global Plan to End TB. Geneva: UNOPS (2015).

Google Scholar

3. Andronis C, Sharma A, Virvilis V, Deftereos S, Persidis A. Literature mining, ontologies and information visualization for drug repurposing. Brief Bioinform. (2011) 12:357–68. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbr005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Rani J, Silla Y, Borah K, Ramachandran S, Bajpai U. Repurposing of FDA-approved drugs to target MurB and MurE enzymes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biomol Struct Dyn. (2019) 38:2521–32. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1637280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nunes-Alves C, Booty MG, Carpenter SM, Jayaraman P, Rothchild AC, Behar SM. In search of a new paradigm for protective immunity to TB. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2014) 12:289–99. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Raviglione MC, Ditiu L. Setting new targets in the fight against tuberculosis. Nat Med. (2013) 19:263. doi: 10.1038/nm.3129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zumla A, Maeurer M. Rational development of adjunct immune-based therapies for drug-resistant tuberculosis: hypotheses and experimental designs. J Infect Dis. (2012) 205(Suppl. 2):S335–9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sachan M, Srivastava A, Ranjan R, Gupta A, Pandya S, Misra A. Opportunities and challenges for host-directed therapies in tuberculosis. Curr Pharm Design. (2016) 22:2599–604.

Google Scholar

9. Kolloli A, Subbian S. Host-directed therapeutic strategies for tuberculosis. Front Med. (2017) 4:171. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Young C, Walzl G, Du Plessis N. Therapeutic host-directed strategies to improve outcome in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. (2020) 13:190–204. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0226-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Beckman EM, Porcelli SA, Morita CT, Behar SM, Furlong ST, Brenner MB. Recognition of a lipid antigen by CD1-restricted αβ+ T cells. Nature. (1994) 372:691–4. doi: 10.1038/372691a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kjer-Nielsen L, Patel O, Corbett AJ, Le Nours J, Meehan B, Liu L, et al. MR1 presents microbial vitamin B metabolites to MAIT cells. Nature. (2012) 491:717–23. doi: 10.1038/nature11605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Godfrey DI, Uldrich AP, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J, Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol. (2015) 16:1114–23. doi: 10.1038/ni.3298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dhodapkar MV, Kumar V. Type II NKT cells and their emerging role in health and disease. J Immunol. (2017) 198:1015. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Park S-H, Weiss A, Benlagha K, Kyin T, Teyton L, Bendelac A. The mouse Cd1d-restricted repertoire is dominated by a few autoreactive T cell receptor families. J Exp Med. (2001) 193:893–904. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.8.893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cardell S, Tangri S, Chan S, Kronenberg M, Benoist C, Mathis D. CD1-restricted CD4+ T cells in major histocompatibility complex class II-deficient mice. J Exp Med. (1995) 182:993–1004. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.4.993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sieling PA, Chatterjee D, Porcelli SA, Prigozy TI, Mazzaccaro RJ, Soriano T, et al. CD1-restricted T cell recognition of microbial lipoglycan antigens. Science. (1995) 269:227. doi: 10.1126/science.7542404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Huang S. Targeting innate-like T cells in Tuberculosis. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:594. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Dieli F, Taniguchi M, Kronenberg M, Sidobre S, Ivanyi J, Fattorini L, et al. An anti-inflammatory role for Vα14 NK T cells in Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus calmette-Guérin-infected mice. J Immunol. (2003) 171:1961–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.1961

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kawakami K, Kinjo Y, Uezu K, Miyagi K, Kinjo T, Yara S, et al. Interferon-γ production and host protective response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice lacking both IL-12p40 and IL-18. Microb Infect. (2004) 6:339–49. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Emoto M, Emoto Y, Buchwalow IB, Kaufmann SHE. Induction of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ natural killer T cells by Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette Guérin. Eur J Immunol. (1999) 29:650–9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4141

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Sada-Ovalle I, Chiba A, Gonzales A, Brenner MB, Behar SM. Innate invariant NKT cells recognize Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages, produce interferon-gamma, and kill intracellular bacteria. PLoS Pathog. (2008) 4:e1000239. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kee S-J, Kwon Y-S, Park Y-W, Cho Y-N, Lee S-J, Kim T-J, et al. Dysfunction of natural killer T cells in patients with active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun. (2012) 80:2100. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06018-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Paquin-Proulx D, Costa PR, Terrassani Silveira CG, Marmorato MP, Cerqueira NB, Sutton MS, et al. Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is associated with a higher frequency of mucosal-associated Invariant T and invariant natural killer T cells. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1394. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Montoya CJ, Cataño JC, Ramirez Z, Rugeles MT, Wilson SB, Landay AL. Invariant NKT cells from HIV-1 or Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected patients express an activated phenotype. Clin Immunol. (2008) 127:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Snyder-Cappione JE, Nixon DF, Loo CP, Chapman JM, Meiklejohn DA, Melo FF, et al. Individuals with pulmonary Tuberculosis have lower levels of circulating CD1d-restricted NKT cells. J Infect Dis. (2007) 195:1361–4. doi: 10.1086/513567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sutherland JS, Jeffries DJ, Donkor S, Walther B, Hill PC, Adetifa IMO, et al. High granulocyte/lymphocyte ratio and paucity of NKT cells defines TB disease in a TB-endemic setting. Tuberculosis. (2009) 89:398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Berzins SP, Smyth MJ, Baxter AG. Presumed guilty: natural killer T cell defects and human disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2011) 11:131–42. doi: 10.1038/nri2904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Im JS, Kang T-J, Lee S-B, Kim C-H, Lee S-H, Venkataswamy MM, et al. Alteration of the relative levels of iNKT cell subsets is associated with chronic mycobacterial infections. Clin Immunol. (2008) 127:214–24. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Veenstra H, Baumann R, Carroll NM, Lukey PT, Kidd M, Beyers N, et al. Changes in leucocyte and lymphocyte subsets during tuberculosis treatment; prominence of CD3dimCD56+ natural killer T cells in fast treatment responders. Clin Exp Immunol. (2006) 145:252–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Li Z, Yang B, Zhang Y, Ma J, Chen X, Lao S, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific memory NKT cells in patients with Tuberculous pleurisy. J Clin Immunol. (2014) 34:979–90. doi: 10.1007/s10875-014-0090-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Singh A, Dey AB, Mohan A, Mitra DK. Programmed death-1 receptor suppresses γ-IFN producing NKT cells in human tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. (2014) 94:197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wu C, Li Z, Fu X, Yu S, Lao S, Yang B. Antigen-specific human NKT cells from tuberculosis patients produce IL-21 to help B cells for the production of immunoglobulins. Oncotarget. (2015) 6:28633–45. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhao J, Siddiqui S, Shang S, Bian Y, Bagchi S, He Y, et al. Mycolic acid-specific T cells protect against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a humanized transgenic mouse model. eLife. (2015) 4:e08525. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Chancellor A, White A, Tocheva AS, Fenn JR, Dennis M, Tezera L, et al. Quantitative and qualitative iNKT repertoire associations with disease susceptibility and outcome in macaque tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis. (2017) 105:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhang Y, Springfield R, Chen S, Li X, Feng X, Moshirian R, et al. α-GalCer and iNKT cell-based cancer immunotherapy: realizing the therapeutic potentials. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1126. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hashimoto K, Hirai M, Kurosawa Y. A gene outside the human MHC related to classical HLA class I genes. Science. (1995) 269:693. doi: 10.1126/science.7624800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Godfrey DI, Koay H-F, McCluskey J, Gherardin NA. The biology and functional importance of MAIT cells. Nat Immunol. (2019) 20:1110–28. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0444-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Reantragoon R, Corbett AJ, Sakala IG, Gherardin NA, Furness JB, Chen Z, et al. Antigen-loaded MR1 tetramers define T cell receptor heterogeneity in mucosal-associated invariant T cells. J Exp Med. (2013) 210:2305–20. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Porcelli S, Yockey CE, Brenner MB, Balk SP. Analysis of T cell antigen receptor (TCR) expression by human peripheral blood CD4-8- alpha/beta T cells demonstrates preferential use of several V beta genes and an invariant TCR alpha chain. J Exp Med. (1993) 178:1–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lepore M, Kalinichenko A, Colone A, Paleja B, Singhal A, Tschumi A, et al. Parallel T-cell cloning and deep sequencing of human MAIT cells reveal stable oligoclonal TCRβ repertoire. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:3866. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hinks TSC, Marchi E, Jabeen M, Olshansky M, Kurioka A, Pediongco TJ, et al. Activation and in vivo evolution of the MAIT cell transcriptome in mice and humans reveals tissue repair functionality. Cell Rep. (2019) 28:3249–62.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Kelly J, Minoda Y, Meredith T, Cameron G, Philipp M-S, Pellicci DG, et al. Chronically stimulated human MAIT cells are unexpectedly potent IL-13 producers. Immunol Cell Biol. (2019) 97:689–99. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Leng T, Akther HD, Hackstein C-P, Powell K, King T, Friedrich M, et al. TCR and inflammatory signals tune human MAIT cells to exert specific tissue repair and effector functions. Cell Rep. (2019) 28:3077–91.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Serriari N-E, Eoche M, Lamotte L, Lion J, Fumery M, Marcelo P, et al. Innate mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are activated in inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. (2014) 176:266–74. doi: 10.1111/cei.12277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Meermeier EW, Laugel BF, Sewell AK, Corbett AJ, Rossjohn J, McCluskey J, et al. Human TRAV1-2-negative MR1-restricted T cells detect S. pyogenes and alternatives to MAIT riboflavin-based antigens. Nature Commun. (2016) 7:12506. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Lepore M, Kalinichenko A, Calogero S, Kumar P, Paleja B, Schmaler M, et al. Functionally diverse human T cells recognize non-microbial antigens presented by MR1. eLife. (2017) 6:e24476. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lee OJ, Cho Y-N, Kee S-J, Kim M-J, Jin H-M, Lee S-J, et al. Circulating mucosal-associated invariant T cell levels and their cytokine levels in healthy adults. Exp Gerontol. (2014) 49:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Treiner E, Lantz O. CD1d- and MR1-restricted invariant T cells: of mice and men. Curr Opin Immunol. (2006) 18:519–26. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Dusseaux M, Martin E, Serriari N, Péguillet I, Premel V, Louis D, et al. Human MAIT cells are xenobiotic-resistant, tissue-targeted, CD161hi IL-17–secreting T cells. Blood. (2011) 117:1250–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kawachi I, Maldonado J, Strader C, Gilfillan S. MR1-restricted Vα19 mucosal-associated invariant T cells are innate T cells in the gut lamina propria that provide a rapid and diverse cytokine response. J Immunol. (2006) 176:1618–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Billerbeck E, Kang Y-H, Walker L, Lockstone H, Grafmueller S, Fleming V, et al. Analysis of CD161 expression on human CD8 T cells defines a distinct functional subset with tissue-homing properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:3006–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914839107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Jo J, Tan AT, Ussher JE, Sandalova E, Tang X-Z, Tan-Garcia A, et al. Toll-like receptor 8 agonist and bacteria trigger potent activation of innate immune cells in human liver. PLoS Pathog. (2014) 10:e1004210. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Leeansyah E, Loh L, Nixon DF, Sandberg JK. Acquisition of innate-like microbial reactivity in mucosal tissues during human fetal MAIT-cell development. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:3143. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Le Bourhis L, Martin E, Péguillet I, Guihot A, Froux N, Coré M, et al. Antimicrobial activity of mucosal-associated invariant T cells. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:701–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.1890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Kurioka A, Ussher JE, Cosgrove C, Clough C, Fergusson JR, Smith K, et al. MAIT cells are licensed through granzyme exchange to kill bacterially sensitized targets. Mucosal Immunol. (2015) 8:429–40. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.81

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Ussher JE, Bilton M, Attwod E, Shadwell J, Richardson R, de Lara C, et al. CD161++CD8+ T cells, including the MAIT cell subset, are specifically activated by IL-12+IL-18 in a TCR-independent manner. Eur J Immunol. (2014) 44:195–203. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Sattler A, Dang-Heine C, Reinke P, Babel N. IL-15 dependent induction of IL-18 secretion as a feedback mechanism controlling human MAIT-cell effector functions. Eur J Immunol. (2015) 45:2286–98. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Leeansyah E, Svärd J, Dias J, Buggert M, Nyström J, Quigley MF, et al. Arming of MAIT cell cytolytic antimicrobial activity is induced by IL-7 and defective in HIV-1 infection. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1005072. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Tang X-Z, Jo J, Tan AT, Sandalova E, Chia A, Tan KC, et al. IL-7 Licenses activation of human liver intrasinusoidal mucosal-associated invariant T Cells. J Immunol. (2013) 190:3142–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Chen Z, Wang H, D’Souza C, Sun S, Kostenko L, Eckle SBG, et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T-cell activation and accumulation after in vivo infection depends on microbial riboflavin synthesis and co-stimulatory signals. Mucosal Immunol. (2017) 10:58–68. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.39

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Slichter CK, McDavid A, Miller HW, Finak G, Seymour BJ, McNevin JP, et al. Distinct activation thresholds of human conventional and innate-like memory T cells. JCI Insight. (2016) 1:e86292. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.86292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Turtle CJ, Delrow J, Joslyn RC, Swanson HM, Basom R, Tabellini L, et al. Innate signals overcome acquired TCR signaling pathway regulation and govern the fate of human CD161hi CD8α+ semi-invariant T cells. Blood. (2011) 118:2752–62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Salio M, Gasser O, Gonzalez-Lopez C, Martens A, Veerapen N, Gileadi U, et al. Activation of human mucosal-associated invariant T Cells induces CD40L-dependent maturation of monocyte-derived and primary dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2017) 199:2631. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Havenith SHC, Yong SL, Henson SM, Piet B, Idu MM, Koch SD, et al. Analysis of stem-cell-like properties of human CD161++IL-18Rα+ memory CD8+ T cells. Int Immunol. (2012) 24:625–36. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxs069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. van Wilgenburg B, Scherwitzl I, Hutchinson EC, Leng T, Kurioka A, Kulicke C, et al. MAIT cells are activated during human viral infections. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:11653. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Gracey E, Qaiyum Z, Almaghlouth I, Lawson D, Karki S, Avvaru N, et al. IL-7 primes IL-17 in mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, which contribute to the Th17-axis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75:2124. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Gold MC, Eid T, Smyk-Pearson S, Eberling Y, Swarbrick GM, Langley SM, et al. Human thymic MR1-restricted MAIT cells are innate pathogen-reactive effectors that adapt following thymic egress. Mucosal Immunol. (2013) 6:35–44. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Chua W-J, Truscott SM, Eickhoff CS, Blazevic A, Hoft DF, Hansen TH. Polyclonal mucosa-associated invariant T cells have unique innate functions in bacterial infection. Infect Immun. (2012) 80:3256. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00279-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Sharma PK, Wong EB, Napier RJ, Bishai WR, Ndung’u T, Kasprowicz VO, et al. High expression of CD26 accurately identifies human bacteria-reactive MR1-restricted MAIT cells. Immunology. (2015) 145:443–53. doi: 10.1111/imm.12461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Jiang J, Yang B, An H, Wang X, Liu Y, Cao Z, et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells from patients with tuberculosis exhibit impaired immune response. J Infection. (2016) 72:338–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kwon Y-S, Cho Y-N, Kim M-J, Jin H-M, Jung H-J, Kang J-H, et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells are numerically and functionally deficient in patients with mycobacterial infection and reflect disease activity. Tuberculosis. (2015) 95:267–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2015.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Gold MC, Cerri S, Smyk-Pearson S, Cansler ME, Vogt TM, Delepine J, et al. Human mucosal associated invariant T cells detect bacterially infected cells. PLoS Biol. (2010) 8:e1000407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Jiang J, Wang X, An H, Yang B, Cao Z, Liu Y, et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T-cell function is modulated by programmed death-1 signaling in patients with active tuberculosis. Am J Respir Care Med. (2014) 190:329–39. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201401-0106OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Meierovics A, Yankelevich W-JC, Cowley SC. MAIT cells are critical for optimal mucosal immune responses during in vivo pulmonary bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E3119–28. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302799110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Sakala IG, Kjer-Nielsen L, Eickhoff CS, Wang X, Blazevic A, Liu L, et al. Functional heterogeneity and antimycobacterial effects of mouse mucosal-associated invariant T cells specific for riboflavin metabolites. J Immunol. (2015) 195:587–601. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Godfrey DI, Le Nours J, Andrews DM, Uldrich AP, Rossjohn J. Unconventional T cell targets for cancer immunotherapy. Immunity. (2018) 48:453–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:88–100. doi: 10.1038/nri3384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Shen Y, Zhou D, Qiu L, Lai X, Simon M, Shen L, et al. Adaptive immune response of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells during mycobacterial infections. Science. (2002) 295:2255–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1068819

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Kabelitz D, Glatzel A, Wesch D. Antigen recognition by human γδ T lymphocytes. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (2000) 122:1–7. doi: 10.1159/000024353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Chien Y-H, Meyer C, Bonneville M. γδ T cells: first line of defense and beyond. Annu Rev Immunol. (2014) 32:121–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120216

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Gruenbacher G, Nussbaumer O, Gander H, Steiner B, Leonhartsberger N, Thurnher M. Stress-related and homeostatic cytokines regulate Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell surveillance of mevalonate metabolism. OncoImmunology. (2014) 3:e953410. doi: 10.4161/21624011.2014.953410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Tanaka Y, Morita CT, Tanaka Y, Nieves E, Brenner MB, Bloom BR. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human gamma delta T cells. Nature. (1995) 375:155–8. doi: 10.1038/375155a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Gober H Jr., Kistowska M, Angman L, Jenö P, Mori L, De Libero G. Human T cell receptor γδ cells recognize endogenous mevalonate metabolites in tumor cells. J Exp Med. (2003) 197:163–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Eberl M, Hintz M, Reichenberg A, Kollas A-K, Wiesner J, Jomaa H. Microbial isoprenoid biosynthesis and human γδ T cell activation. FEBS Lett. (2003) 544:4–10. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00483-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Morita CT, Jin C, Sarikonda G, Wang H. Nonpeptide antigens, presentation mechanisms, and immunological memory of human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells: discriminating friend from foe through the recognition of prenyl pyrophosphate antigens. Immunol Rev. (2007) 215:59–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00479.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Abeler-Dörner L, Swamy M, Williams G, Hayday AC, Bas A. Butyrophilins: an emerging family of immune regulators. Trends Immunol. (2012) 33:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.09.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Afrache H, Gouret P, Ainouche S, Pontarotti P, Olive D. The butyrophilin (BTN) gene family: from milk fat to the regulation of the immune response. Immunogenetics. (2012) 64:781–94. doi: 10.1007/s00251-012-0619-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Vavassori S, Kumar A, Wan GS, Ramanjaneyulu GS, Cavallari M, El Daker S, et al. Butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphorylated antigens and stimulates human γδ T cells. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:908–16. doi: 10.1038/ni.2665

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Palakodeti A, Sandstrom A, Sundaresan L, Harly C, Nedellec S, Olive D, et al. The molecular basis for modulation of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cell responses by CD277/Butyrophilin-3 (BTN3A)-specific antibodies. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:32780–90.

Google Scholar

91. Peigné C-M, Léger A, Gesnel M-C, Konczak F, Olive D, Bonneville M, et al. The juxtamembrane domain of butyrophilin BTN3A1 controls phosphoantigen-mediated activation of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. J Immunol. (2017) 198:4228–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Sandstrom A, Peigné C-M, Léger A, Crooks James E, Konczak F, Gesnel M-C, et al. The intracellular B30.2 domain of butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphoantigens to mediate activation of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Immunity. (2014) 40:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Harly C, Guillaume Y, Nedellec S, Peigné C-M, Mönkkönen H, Mönkkönen J, et al. Key implication of CD277/butyrophilin-3 (BTN3A) in cellular stress sensing by a major human γδ T-cell subset. Blood. (2012) 120:2269–79. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-430470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Uldrich AP, Le Nours J, Pellicci DG, Gherardin NA, McPherson KG, Lim RT, et al. CD1d-lipid antigen recognition by the γδ TCR. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:1137–45. doi: 10.1038/ni.2713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Godder KT, Henslee-Downey PJ, Mehta J, Park BS, Chiang KY, Abhyankar S, et al. Long term disease-free survival in acute leukemia patients recovering with increased γδ T cells after partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2007) 39:751–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Chen CY, Yao S, Huang D, Wei H, Sicard H, Zeng G, et al. Phosphoantigen/IL2 expansion and differentiation of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells increase resistance to tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. PLoS Pathog. (2013) 9:e1003501. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Meraviglia S, Caccamo N, Salerno A, Sireci G, Dieli F. Partial and ineffective activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2010) 185:1770–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Qaqish A, Huang D, Chen CY, Zhang Z, Wang R, Li S, et al. Adoptive transfer of phosphoantigen-specific γδ T cell subset attenuates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in nonhuman primates. J Immunol. (2017) 198:4753–63. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Huang D, Chen CY, Zhang M, Qiu L, Shen Y, Du G, et al. Clonal immune responses of Mycobacterium-specific γδ T cells in tuberculous and non-tuberculous tissues during M. tuberculosis infection. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e30631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Pinheiro MB, Antonelli LR, Sathler-Avelar R, Vitelli-Avelar DM, Spindola-de-Miranda S, Guimarães TM, et al. CD4-CD8-αβ and γδ T cells display inflammatory and regulatory potentials during human tuberculosis. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e50923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Cendron D, Ingoure S, Martino A, Casetti R, Horand F, Romagné F, et al. A tuberculosis vaccine based on phosphoantigens and fusion proteins induces distinct γδ and αβ T cell responses in primates. Eur J Immunol. (2007) 37:549–65. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Caccamo N, Todaro M, Sireci G, Meraviglia S, Stassi G, Dieli F. Mechanisms underlying lineage commitment and plasticity of human γδ T cells. Cell Mol Immunol. (2013) 10:30–4. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2012.42

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Braud VM, Allan DSJ, O’Callaghan CA, Söderström K, D’Andrea A, Ogg GS, et al. HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature. (1998) 391:795–9. doi: 10.1038/35869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Prezzemolo T, van Meijgaarden KE, Franken KLMC, Caccamo N, Dieli F, Ottenhoff THM, et al. Detailed characterization of human Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific HLA-E restricted CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. (2018) 48:293–305. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. van Meijgaarden KE, Haks MC, Caccamo N, Dieli F, Ottenhoff THM, Joosten SA. Human CD8+ T-cells recognizing peptides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) presented by HLA-E have an unorthodox Th2-like, multifunctional, Mtb inhibitory phenotype and represent a novel human T-cell subset. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1004671. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Caccamo N, Pietra G, Sullivan LC, Brooks AG, Prezzemolo T, La Manna MP, et al. Human CD8 T lymphocytes recognize Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens presented by HLA-E during active tuberculosis and express type 2 cytokines. Eur J Immunol. (2015) 45:1069–81. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Grant EJ, Nguyen AT, Lobos CA, Szeto C, Chatzileontiadou DSM, Gras S. The unconventional role of HLA-E: the road less traveled. Mol Immunol. (2020) 120:101–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.02.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Joosten SA, Ottenhoff THM, Lewinsohn DM, Hoft DF, Moody DB, Seshadri C. Harnessing donor unrestricted T-cells for new vaccines against tuberculosis. Vaccine. (2019) 37:3022–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Ulbrecht M, Honka T, Person S, Johnson JP, Weiss EH. The HLA-E gene encodes two differentially regulated transcripts and a cell surface protein. J Immunol. (1992) 149:2945–53. doi: 10.5282/ubm/epub.3019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Grimsley C, Kawasaki A, Gassner C, Sageshima N, Nose Y, Hatake K, et al. Definitive high resolution typing of HLA-E allelic polymorphisms: Identifying potential errors in existing allele data. Tissue Antigens. (2002) 60:206–12. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.600302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Robinson J, Halliwell JA, Hayhurst JD, Flicek P, Parham P, Marsh Steven GE. The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: allele variant databases. Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 43:D423–31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Grotzke JE, Harriff MJ, Siler AC, Nolt D, Delepine J, Lewinsohn DA, et al. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis phagosome is a HLA-I processing competent organelle. PLoS Pathog. (2009) 5:e1000374. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Cohen GB, Gandhi RT, Davis DM, Mandelboim O, Chen BK, Strominger JL, et al. The selective downregulation of class I major histocompatibility complex proteins by HIV-1 protects HIV-infected cells from NK cells. Immunity. (1999) 10:661–71. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80065-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Bian Y, Shang S, Siddiqui S, Zhao J, Joosten SA, Ottenhoff TH, et al. MHC Ib molecule Qa-1 presents Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptide antigens to CD8+ T cells and contributes to protection against infection. PLoS Pathog. (2017) 13:e1006384. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Hansen SG, Wu HL, Burwitz BJ, Hughes CM, Hammond KB, Ventura AB, et al. Broadly targeted CD8 T cell responses restricted by major histocompatibility complex E. Science. (2016) 351:714–20. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Hansen SG Jr., Piatak M Jr., Ventura AB, Hughes CM, Gilbride RM, Ford JC, et al. Immune clearance of highly pathogenic SIV infection. Nature. (2013) 502:100–4. doi: 10.1038/nature12519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Hansen SG, Sacha JB, Hughes CM, Ford JC, Burwitz BJ, Scholz I, et al. Cytomegalovirus vectors violate CD8 T cell epitope recognition paradigms. Science. (2013) 340:1237874. doi: 10.1126/science.1237874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Hansen SG, Zak DE, Xu G, Ford JC, Marshall EE, Malouli D, et al. Prevention of tuberculosis in rhesus macaques by a cytomegalovirus-based vaccine. Nat Med. (2018) 24:130–43. doi: 10.1038/nm.4473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. La Manna MP, Orlando V, Prezzemolo T, Di Carlo P, Cascio A, Delogu G, et al. HLA-E–restricted CD8+ T lymphocytes efficiently control Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV-1 coinfection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2020) 62:430–9. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0261OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Heczey A, Liu D, Tian G, Courtney AN, Wei J, Marinova E, et al. Invariant NKT cells with chimeric antigen receptor provide a novel platform for safe and effective cancer immunotherapy. Blood. (2014) 124:2824–33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-541235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Tian G, Courtney AN, Jena B, Heczey A, Liu D, Marinova E, et al. CD62L+ NKT cells have prolonged persistence and antitumor activity in vivo. J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:2341–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI83476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Rouxel O, Lehuen A. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells in autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases. Immunol Cell Biol. (2018) 96:618–29. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Ussher JE, Willberg CB, Klenerman P. MAIT cells and viruses. Immunol Cell Biol. (2018) 96:630–41. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Salou M, Franciszkiewicz K, Lantz O. MAIT cells in infectious diseases. Curr Opin Immunol. (2017) 48:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2017.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Haeryfar SMM, Shaler CR, Rudak PT. Mucosa-associated invariant T cells in malignancies: a faithful friend or formidable foe? Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2018) 67:1885–96. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2132-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Hill TM, Bezbradica JS, Van Kaer L, Joyce S. CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells. In: eLS. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2016). p. 1–27. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020180.pub2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Carding SR, Egan PJ. γδ T cells: functional plasticity and heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2002) 2:336–45. doi: 10.1038/nri797

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Lo Presti E, Pizzolato G, Gulotta E, Cocorullo G, Gulotta G, Dieli F, et al. Current advances in γδ T cell-based tumor immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1401. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Melero I, Berman DM, Aznar MA, Korman AJ, Gracia JLP, Haanen J. Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2015) 15:457–72. doi: 10.1038/nrc3973

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Chang W-S, Kim J-Y, Kim Y-J, Kim Y-S, Lee J-M, Azuma M, et al. Cutting edge: programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 interaction regulates the induction and maintenance of invariant NKT cell anergy. J Immunol. (2008) 181:6707–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Durgan K, Ali M, Warner P, Latchman YE. Targeting NKT cells and PD-L1 pathway results in augmented anti-tumor responses in a melanoma model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2011) 60:547–58. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0963-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Iwasaki M, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi H, Murata-Hirai K, Miyabe H, Sugie T, et al. Expression and function of PD-1 in human γδ T cells that recognize phosphoantigens. Eur J Immunol. (2011) 41:345–55. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: host-directed therapy, tuberculosis, unconventional T cells, cytotoxicity, T cell receptor

Citation: La Manna MP, Orlando V, Tamburini B, Badami GD, Dieli F and Caccamo N (2020) Harnessing Unconventional T Cells for Immunotherapy of Tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 11:2107. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02107

Received: 28 April 2020; Accepted: 04 August 2020;
Published: 03 September 2020.

Edited by:

Juraj Ivanyi, King’s College London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Goro Matsuzaki, University of the Ryukyus, Japan
Arshad Khan, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States

Copyright © 2020 La Manna, Orlando, Tamburini, Badami, Dieli and Caccamo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nadia Caccamo, bmFkaWEuY2FjY2Ftb0B1bmlwYS5pdA==

These authors share first authorship

These authors share last authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.