Cytokine Profiling in Aqueous Humor Samples From Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis Associated With Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

Non-infectious uveitis are intraocular inflammatory conditions caused by dysregulated activation of the immune response without any detectable infectious agents. The aim of this study was to explore potential markers and therapeutic targets for two distinct types of non-infectious uveitis associated with Behçet's disease (BD) and Vogt Koyanagi Harada (VKH) disease. Concentrations of 27 cytokines were investigated in aqueous humor (AH) samples from patients with active uveitis vs. healthy controls (HC) (n = 10 patients with BD-associated uveitis; n = 10 patients with VKH-associated uveitis; n = 10 HC) using the Bio-Plex Pro^TM human cytokine group I panel. Additionally, leukocytes in AH samples were counted with hemocytometers and characterized by flow cytometry. Eleven cytokines were differentially expressed between patients with uveitis and HC with a median concentration greater than 10 pg/ml. IL-6, IP-10, G-CSF, and IFNγ showed higher concentrations in AH samples from both BD and VKH patients while IL-2, IL-8, IL-13, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra showed statistically significant higher concentrations only in AH samples from BD patients. GM-CSF was the sole cytokine with an opposite profile showing decreased levels in AH samples from BD patients. IL-1ra and IL-6 were detected at higher frequencies in AH samples from BD and VKH patients compared with those from HC while IFNγ and TNFα were not detected in HC. The concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra positively correlated with the concentrations of leukocytes in AH, suggesting that such cytokines can be produced by immune cells and/or attract and/or promote proliferation and survival of immune cells in these types of uveitis. The correlation matrix of cytokine concentrations in AH samples revealed that IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-6, G-CSF highly correlated each other. The ratios of cytokine concentrations between AH and plasma intra-individuals showed that IL-2, IL-6, IP-10, GM-CSF were increased intraocularly. In conclusion, AH sampling followed by multiplex analysis of cytokines should be fostered in non-infectious uveitis to identify cytokines dysregulated intraocularly in each individual laying the groundwork for precision medicine.

Introduction

Uveitis are fearsome forms of intraocular inflammation, potentially causing visual impairment and blindness without a prompt diagnosis and therapy. The incidence is low, estimated at 17–52/100,000 people per year. Nevertheless, they account for ~10% of blindness worldwide (1). Uveitis can derive either from infectious agents (infectious uveitis) or from aberrant, deregulated activation of immune system (e.g., against self-proteins, environmental triggers, tissue damage) in absence of any detectable infectious agents (non-infectious uveitis). An etiological diagnosis of non-infectious uveitis is possible in most cases, from 47 to 75% depending on the studies and they are frequently associated with systemic immune-mediated diseases (2–4).

The management of infectious uveitis requires specific treatments against the infectious agents. On the contrary, the management of non-infectious uveitis represents a challenge for clinicians due to disease heterogeneity, still scarce knowledge on disease pathogenesis, and paucity of randomized controlled trials assessing the real efficacy of available drugs (5). Current guidelines for non-infectious uveitis are based on non-specific immunosuppression. Corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy, followed by immunosuppressive drugs in case of relapses, and with steroid-sparing purposes (6). Traditional immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclosporine A, or mycophenolate mofetil are usually preferred in the case of posterior uveitis (7). Biological agents (e.g., those inhibiting the TNFα signaling and recombinant IFNα) are currently part of the therapeutic armamentarium (5, 8–10). In the incoming era of precision medicine, tailored treatment of uveitis remains to be defined (11).

Successful therapeutic strategies in non-infectious uveitis require to act on patients' immune responses. The identification of specific immune effectors associated to and/or responsible for the different types of uveitis is necessary in order to select the most promising among the available targeted-therapies or design new targeted-therapies on an individual basis. Immune profiling of patients with different non-infectious uveitis has indeed highlighted some immune effectors (e.g., cytokines, chemokines, immune cell subsets) in aqueous humor (AH) and peripheral blood possibly involved in uveitis pathogenesis and that may allow to differentiate the various types of uveitis (12, 13). These immune effectors could be exploited to implement precision medicine for treatment of non-infectious uveitis. However, further drivers of uveitis pathogenesis need to be discovered and data from single-center studies should be confirmed by other independent studies.

In this study we investigated the concentrations of 27 cytokines in AH from patients affected by two distinct types of non-infectious uveitis, associated with systemic inflammatory diseases: Behçet's disease (BD) and Vogt Koyanagi Harada (VKH) disease, both in active phase, to provide potential markers and therapeutic targets.

BD is a chronic systemic inflammatory vasculitis of unknown etiology characterized by recurrent episodes of oral aphthous ulcers, genital ulcers, non-granulomatous uveitis, retinal vasculitis, skin lesions, and other manifestations (14). VKH is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by bilateral granulomatous panuveitis with or without auditory, neurological, and cutaneous manifestations, partly attributed to immune responses directed against one or more antigens expressed by melanocytes and retinal pigment epithelium (15). Both BD and VKH are rare diseases.

Materials and Methods

Cohorts of Patients and Healthy Controls

This is an exploratory, monocentric, independent study performed at the Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, one of the national reference centers for BD. A cohort of 10 patients with BD-related uveitis and a cohort of 10 patients with VKH-related uveitis, both in active disease phase were enrolled. A cohort of 10 Caucasian subjects who underwent phacoemulsification intervention for cataract (n = 6) and cornea surgery (n = 4), not affected by any other concomitant inflammatory and/or infectious diseases nor with prior history of uveitis were recruited as healthy controls (HC). All BD patients satisfied the 1990 criteria for diagnosis of Behçet's disease (16). Diagnosis of VKH was based on the revised international diagnostic criteria (17). The median age for the BD cohort was 30 years (InterQuartile Range; IQR: 25–43) and gender distribution was: 8/10 males and 2/10 females. The median age for the VKH cohort was 47 years (IQR: 36–63) and gender distribution was 1/10 male and 9/10 females. The median age for the HC cohort was 64 years (IQR: 40–79) and gender distribution was: 6/10 males and 4/10 females.

Patients were examined with slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, retinography, optical coherence tomography, fluorescein and indocyanine angiography. Patients with BD were considered as having active uveitis at ophthalmologic evaluation in case of non-granulomatous panuveitis with vitritis, or macular oedema, or occlusive retinal vasculitis, or retinal ischemia, or retinal and/or optic nerve neovascularization. Patients with VKH were considered as having active uveitis at ophthalmologic evaluation in case of granulomatous panuveitis with bilateral papillitis and exudative retinal neuroepithelium detachment with mild or absent vitreitis and choroidal granulomas. The features of uveitis for each patient are shown in Table 1. 5/10 BD patients and 2/10 VKH patients were receiving therapies at the moment of sample collection. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Reggio Emilia, Italy, protocol number 2015/0024354) in compliance with the declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all patients and HC.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with BD and VKH-associated uveitis.

Biological Sample Collection

Samples of AH (100–200 μl) were obtained by anterior chamber paracentesis (18) conducted under surgical microscope. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was added at 2 mM to prevent cell aggregation. Cell concentrations were determined by manual counting in Neubauer hemocytometers. AH samples were then centrifuged at 400 × g for 8 min. Cell pellets were analyzed by flow cytometry while cell-free supernatants were stored frozen at −80°C until cytokine profiling. Six milliliter of venous blood were collected from BD and VKH patients into EDTA coated tubes. Plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation at 1,300 × g for 20 min and stored at −80°C until use. Biosafety level 2 procedures were applied when working with patients' samples.

Flow Cytometry

AH cells were suspended in 300 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Euroclone) + 1% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher) and acquired with the FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), equipped with two lasers for excitation at 488 and 633 nm. Data were analyzed with FACSDiva 8.0.1. software. Lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes were identified according to the forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) as shown in Figure S1.

Cytokine Profiling

Concentrations of IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A, eotaxin, basic FGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFNγ, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PDGF-BB, RANTES, TNFα, and VEGF were determined in AH samples using the Bio-Plex Pro™ human cytokine group I panel, 27-Plex (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's instruction. Cell-free AH samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and then diluted 4-fold in Bio-Plex sample diluent adding bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 0.5% as recommended for samples with low content of albumin. Plasma samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C then were diluted 4-fold in Bio-Plex sample diluent. Eight serial dilutions of cytokine standards plus blanks (diluent) were included in each assay. Data were obtained with Bio-Plex MAGPIX^TM multiplex reader instrument and analyzed with Bio-Plex Manager^TM software. Standard curves were calculated with the five-parameter logistic equation regression method. Values extrapolated from the standard curves were considered not reliable and concentrations = 0.01 pg/ml were arbitrarily assigned to be able to draw graphs with logarithmic axes. The lower limits of cytokine detection are reported in Table S1.

Clustering and Pathway Analysis

Clustering was performed using the ClustVis software (19) consisting of the following data pre-processing: (1) logarithmic transformation [ln (x+1)]; (2) row centering; (3) no scaling and applying the Euclidean complete distance for rows and columns. Pathway analysis was performed using REACTOME and PANTHER analysis software (reactome.org; pantherdb.org).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software. In order to compare two groups, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used for quantitative variables, while Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons was used to compare cytokine concentrations in AH samples. Spearman's correlation was chosen to determine correlations between quantitative variables followed by the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. P < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant.

Results

Cytokine Concentrations in AH Samples From BD and VKH Patients Compared to HC

To better understand ocular inflammatory milieu of patients with non-infectious uveitis, concentrations of 27 cytokines were determined in AH samples from patients with BD and VKH-associated uveitis in comparison with HC.

IL-6, IP-10, G-CSF, and IFNγ showed higher concentrations in AH samples from both BD and VKH patients (Table 2 and Figure 1A). IL-6 and IP-10 were detected in all the patients' samples: IL-6 had 116-fold difference between BD and HC (p = 0.0004) and 48-fold difference between VKH and HC (p = 0.0153); IP-10 had 83 fold difference between BD and HC (p = 0.0001) and 20-fold difference between VKH and HC (p = 0.0063). Moreover, IL-2, IL-4, IL-8, IL-13, TNFα, MIP-1α, eotaxin, IL-1ra showed statistically significant higher concentrations in AH samples from BD patients compared to HC (Table 2 and Figure 1B). GM-CSF was the unique cytokine with an opposite profile, revealing lower concentrations in AH samples from BD patients compared to HC (Table 2). AH samples from VKH patients showed a bimodal distribution regarding GM-CSF and 6/10 patients had concentrations lower than HC (Figure 1C).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Cytokines differentially expressed in AH from patients with BD- and VKH-associated uveitis compared to HC. Dot plot visualization of cytokine concentrations (pg/ml) in AH from patients with BD (n = 10), VKH (n = 10), and HC (n = 10). (A) Cytokines expressed at higher levels both in BD and VKH. (B) Cytokines expressed at higher levels only in BD. (C) Cytokines expressed at lower levels in BD. Horizontal lines show the median ± IQR. Dotted lines indicate the lower limits of cytokine detection. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Concentrations of cytokines in AH from BD patients, VKH patients and HC.

IL-1β, IL-5, IL-7, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-15, IL-17, MCP-1, MIP-1β, PDGF-BB, RANTES, VEGF, basic FGF showed comparable levels among groups (Table 2 and Figure S2). Moreover, no differences in AH cytokine levels were found between BD and VKH patients (Table 2).

It must be underlined that some patients were receiving immunosuppressive therapies at the moment of AH collection despite the presence of active uveitis. To investigate if therapies affected cytokine concentrations, we compared AH samples from patients with and without therapies. This analysis was feasible only in the cohort of BD patients which included 5 patients under therapies and 5 patients naïve from therapies (Table 1). MCP-1, IL-7, IL-8, G-CSF, MIP-1α, MIP-1α, TNFα, IFNγ showed higher concentrations and GM-CSF showed lower concentrations in AH from patients without therapies (Figure S3) but the statistical significances were not maintained after correction for multiple testing.

To investigate if some cytokines were detected more frequently in AH from patients than from HC, the percentages of AH samples with detectable levels of cytokines were compared among the cohorts. IL-1ra, IL-4, IL-6, IFNγ, and TNFα were detected at higher frequencies in AH samples from BD and VKH patients compared with those from HC (Table 3). In particular, IL-4, IFNγ and TNFα were not detected in any of the samples from HC.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Presence of cytokines in AH from BD patients, VKH patients and HC.

No differences in terms of frequencies of cytokine detection in AH samples were found between BD and VKH patients (Table 3).

Subsequent analyses were focused on the 11 cytokines which resulted differentially expressed between patients with uveitis and HC and, to have a higher degree of confidence, which showed median concentrations greater than 10 pg/ml. To identify cytokines with similar profiles, we calculated the correlation matrix of cytokine concentrations in the AH samples. IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-6, G-CSF highly correlated each other (p < 10⁻⁶) (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Correlation matrix of cytokine concentrations in AH samples from patients with BD- and VKH-associated uveitis.

To investigate which cytokines had higher levels in the ocular environment, cytokine concentrations in AH were compared to those in plasma intra-individuals. GM-CSF and IL-6 showed higher levels in AH from all the patients, IL-2 from 19/20 patients and IP-10 from 16/20 patients. Specifically, IL-2 was detected only in AH samples from 18 patients and IL-6 was detected only in AH samples from 12 patients. On the contrary, eotaxin showed lower levels in AH from 16/20 patients and was detected only in plasma from 6 patients. The other cytokines showed heterogeneous patterns (Table 5). Looking at the AH over plasma cytokine profiles across patients, BD patient#9 displayed higher concentrations in AH of all the cytokines while BD patient#2, BD patient#7 and VKH patient#7 showed higher concentrations in AH of 10/11 cytokines with the exception of eotaxin (Table 5).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Ratios between cytokine concentrations in AH and plasma for each patient.

Correlation Between Cytokine Concentrations and Loads of Inflammatory Cells in AH Samples

Concentrations of leukocytes in AH samples were assessed by manual counting with hemocytometers while concentrations of lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes (neutrophils) were semi-quantitatively estimated applying their percentages obtained by flow cytometry (Figure S1). Samples were heterogeneous in terms of concentrations of infiltrating leukocytes and two samples did not show any cells (Table 6). The median concentration of leukocytes in AH from BD patients did not differ from that of VKH patients (24,700 cells/ml, IQR: 470–63,375 vs. 3,750 cells/ml, IQR: 1,004–16,050). Concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra positively correlated with concentrations of leukocytes. Among them, IP-10 and IL-8 showed the best correlations (p = 0.0011, r = 0.82 and r = 0.76). Instead IL-2, IL-13, and GM-CSF levels did not correlate with leukocyte concentrations (Figure 2).

TABLE 6

Table 6. Characteristics of the immune cells present in the AH samples.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Correlation of cytokine concentrations with the load of leukocytes in AH. Correlations between log-scale cytokine concentrations and leukocyte concentrations in AH samples are depicted (n = 20). Spearman's correlation was determined. P-values after the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing are shown.

Correlation analyses between cytokine concentrations and leukocyte subsets (Table 6) showed that IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra concentrations positively correlated also with the semi-quantitative degrees of lymphocytes/ml, monocytes/ml and neutrophils/ml in AH. Higher correlations (lower p-values and higher r values) were found with the degrees of monocytes and neutrophils compared to those of lymphocytes (Figures S4–S6). In particular, the best correlations (p = 0.0011, r = 0.75) were shown by IL-8 and IFNγ with the semi-quantitative densities of neutrophils/ml.

Finally, cytokine concentrations did not correlate with the percentages of lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils in AH (data not shown).

Unsupervised Cluster Analysis and Pathway Analysis

To explore possible clustering of the subjects based on the 27 cytokine profiles in AH samples, unsupervised cluster analysis was performed (Figure 3). Subjects were clustered in 2 major groups: the first one composed of all HC plus 7 BD and VKH patients; the second one composed only of BD and VKH patients (n = 13). Within such two groups other two clusters appeared. In particular, cluster II contained 9/10 HCs and BD#8 whose AH sample derived from a blinded eye with few leukocytes/ml (Table 6). 5/7 patients in cluster I-II vs. 2/13 patients in cluster III-IV were receiving therapies at the moment of AH sampling (p = 0.0223, Fisher's exact test). Patients in cluster I-II had lower leukocytes/ml than patients in cluster III-IV (470 cells/ml, IQR: 0–3,750 vs. 24,400 cells/ml, IQR: 8,750–79,250; p = 0.0011, Mann-Whitney U-test). Finally, cluster III included 5/6 patients with higher neutrophils/ml (score = +++, Table 6). We were unable to find other common clinical characteristics (Table 1) in the clustered patients.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Unsupervised clustering. Clustering was performed with ClustVis software.

Cytokines were clustered in two major groups: the first one included cytokines with the highest fold difference in concentrations between patients with uveitis and controls: IL-6, IL-8, IFNγ, TNFα, IP-10, G-CSF, IL-1ra (Figure 3).

To appreciate cytokine profiles in the clinical diagnostic clusters, a heatmap displaying cytokine concentrations in AH from each subject classified as BD, VKH and HC was drawn (Figure S7).

Loading the list of the 11 dysregulated cytokines in REACTOME and PANTHER software produced respectively the “interleukin-10 signaling pathway” as top over-represented pathway and “granulocyte and leukocyte chemotaxis” as biological process.

Discussion

The present study proposes multiplex analysis of cytokine concentrations in AH from patients with non-infectious uveitis vs. HC, as a tool to identify cytokines deregulated intraocularly in each individual, in order to gain insight in uveitis pathogenesis and explore potential targets for the development of tailored treatments.

Concentrations of the deregulated cytokines: IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra positively correlated with the levels of inflammatory cells in AH. This was expected supposing that cytokines in AH from patients with uveitis are produced by leukocytes and/or attract leukocytes and/or sustain leukocyte survival and proliferation. Moreover it is in line with findings by other authors regarding positive correlations between cytokine levels in AH and disease activity in patients with BD- and VKH-associated uveitis, graded according to the criteria of the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group (20–23). Such cytokines can be produced by and/or attract monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils. This is consistent with the stronger correlations found between cytokine levels and the degrees of monocytes and granulocytes in AH, which points to a possible role of the innate immune system in BD- and VHK-associated uveitis.

Concentrations of IL-2 and IL-13 did not correlate with the loads of inflammatory cells. That was unexpected because CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells are the major sources of IL-2, while CD4+ T cells, NKT cells, mast cells, basophils and eosinophils are the major sources of IL-13. However, these findings could be explained by production of IL-2 and IL-13 also by ocular cells, supported by the fact that IL-2 and IL-13 were detected also in AH from HC that normally did not contain leukocytes. Thus, we might speculate that IL-2 and IL-13 play a role not only in inflammation but also in ocular homeostasis.

Another cytokine which could be produced also by ocular cells is GM-CSF, being highly detected in AH from HC. The decreased levels of GM-CSF in AH from patients with non-infectious uveitis may suggest eye-protective, anti-inflammatory effects of such a cytokine. GM-CSF can be secreted by both immune cells (e.g., macrophages, T lymphocytes, NK cells) and stromal cells (e.g., endothelial cells and fibroblasts). It is generally thought as a pro-inflammatory cytokine playing as a growth and differentiation factor for granulocytes and macrophages. However, it can also promote immunological tolerance (24, 25) and induce the expression of the immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1 dampening immune responses (26). We may suppose that GM-CSF is involved in the maintenance of ocular immune privilege, a phenomenon restraining local immune and inflammatory responses in order to preserve vision through physical barriers (i.e., blood–ocular barrier), soluble and surface-bound molecules and modulation of systemic immune responses (27).

The detection of a cytokine does not imply that it plays a role in disease pathogenesis. However the identification of which cytokines are deregulated in each patients can provide a rationale to select targeted therapies, in particular the exclusion of the drugs whose targets are not deregulated or detected in individual patients.

The specific presence of IFNγ and TNFα in AH samples only from patients with uveitis renders these cytokines promising targets in a therapeutic perspective. Indeed, biological drugs anti-TNFα have been proven to be effective in non-infectious uveitis and have been approved by FDA and EMEA for therapy (6, 10, 28–32). Inhibitors of IFNγ (e.g., AMG811; Fontolizumab, Emapalumab) are being evaluated in clinical trials on immune mediated diseases. Our results suggest that they might be also evaluated for treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis.

To be noted, administration of recombinant IFNα which belongs to the type I interferons, has been proved to be effective in patients with BD-related uveitis refractory to conventional immunosuppressive treatment (33, 34). IFNα has anti-viral, anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activities and can modulate the immune system. Although there are not evidences that BD results from direct infection by viruses or bacteria, many data suggest an important role for infective agents as triggers of the immune-responses observed in BD (35). Administration of IFNα seems to (1) shape polarization of CD4+ lymphocytes toward Th2; (2) decrease Th17 lymphocytes, γδ T lymphocytes and NK cells; (3) reduce the expression of Toll-like receptors on CD4+ T lymphocytes and monocytes; (4) inhibit neovascularization; (5) enhance functions of blood-ocular barrier (36–39).

The great differences in the concentrations of IP-10, IL-6, and G-CSF between AH from patients with uveitis and HC (at least 20-fold), in the majority of the patients, make them top candidate therapeutic targets as well. Therefore it could be interesting to test whether biological drugs such as anti-IP10 (e.g., eldelumab BMS-936557, MDX-1100), anti-IL-6 (e.g., tocilizumab, sarilumab, siltuximab, sirukumab, olokizumab, clazakizumab), anti-G-CSF (e.g., CSL324) might be beneficial in non-infectious uveitis. In support of such hypothesis, the anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab has already shown some efficacy in patients with non-infectious uveitis (40–42).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about an increased production of IL-1ra in BD-associated uveitis. IL-1ra is a natural endogenous inhibitor of the pro-inflammatory effect of IL-1β through the binding IL-1 receptor. IL-1ra is mainly produced by monocytes, neutrophils, epithelial cells, and keratinocytes. An increased production of IL-1ra has been documented also in AH from patients with HLA-B27-associated anterior uveitis (43). The increased production of an inhibitor of inflammation could represent a feedback loop to dampen the inflammatory responses. The biological drug Anakinra is a recombinant, slightly modified version of IL-1ra and its efficacy has been reported in the management of BD-related uveitis (44). Whether Anakinra efficacy might depend on the baseline levels of IL-1ra in AH is unknown. Since AH cytokine levels were heterogeneous among patients, clinical trials are strongly needed to verify the hypothesis of beneficial effects of different class of biological therapies in patients with non-infectious uveitis based on the levels of the respective targets in AH.

To identify which cytokines can be consistently dysregulated in AH from patients with uveitis associated with BD and VKH, we compared our data with literature data (Table 7). IL-1ra, G-CSF, IL-9, PDGF, and basic FGF were investigated for the first time in the present work, whereas the other cytokines have been previously investigated by other groups. Increased levels of IL-6, IL-8, IFNγ, IP-10 are confirmed respectively by four, nine, six and three independent studies (20–22, 45, 46, 48–56). Three studies confirm higher levels of TNFα in AH (20, 47, 48), while three studies are discordant with our results (45, 46, 49).

TABLE 7

Table 7. Literature data about the expression of the investigated cytokines in AH from patients with BD- and VKH- associated uveitis compared to HC.

The profile of the other cytokines is heterogeneous in the literature and not consistently in line with our results (Table 7). Differences in the results can derive from technical aspects (e.g., types of assays used to quantify the cytokines; processing of AH samples: cell-free AH samples vs. whole AH samples) and from differences in the clinical characteristics of the cohorts of patients (e.g., therapies at the moment of sample collection; degree of uveitis). Efforts are needed (1) to standardize the protocols inter-laboratories using common cytokine standards to have data which can be compared among laboratories; (2) to define the range of cytokine concentrations in AH from HC to have references of non-inflammatory conditions; (3) to promote multicentric studies.

Merging our data with literature data (Table 7) pointed out that IL-8 could be an additional promising target for therapies in non-infectious uveitis. IL-8 can induce chemotaxis in neutrophils and other granulocytes, stimulate phagocytosis and promote angiogenesis. Inhibitors of IL-8 (e.g., BMS-986253), currently in development for treatment of some solid tumors, might be also tested in non-infectious uveitis.

Limits of the present study are (1) the small number of patients (although that is in line with the other studies on cytokine profiling in AH from patients with non-infectious uveitis); (2) the heterogeneity in terms of treatment schedule and degree of ocular inflammation at the moment of AH sample collection.

On the other hand, the strengths of the study mainly consist in the accurate clinical evaluation performed by expert rheumatologists and immune-ophthalmologists for defining BD activity and uveitis activity respectively, apart from simultaneous profiling of several cytokines and the characterization of the immune cells in AH by manual counting and flow cytometry, which has been rarely performed in other studies.

To resume, AH sampling followed by cytokine profiling allows identifying potential therapeutic targets for non-infectious uveitis and could help stratify patients for tailored treatments. IP-10, IFNγ, IL-6, G-CSF, TNFα IL-8, IL-1ra, and GM-CSF emerged as the most promising cytokines to be further investigated for treatment of BD- and VKH-associated uveitis.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee (Reggio Emilia, Italy, protocol number 402 2015/0024354). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AS, LC, and SC designed the experimental protocol. AS, LC, LD, EB, FG, FM, LF, and CS recruited patients. MB, SC, and MN performed the experiments. MB, LB, AZ, CS, and SC interpreted the data. SC wrote the manuscript. All authors drafted the manuscript or revised it critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version to be published.

Funding

This study has been supported by the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR, 2015/2016 Grant for Young Researchers appointed to AS), and by the National Association of Patients Affected by Behçet's Disease (S.I.M.B.A.).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Association of Patients Affected With Behçet's Disease (S.I.M.B.A.) for supporting the project.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00358/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Jabs DA. Epidemiology of uveitis. Ophthal Epidemiol. (2008) 15:283–4. doi: 10.1080/09286580802478724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Barisani-Asenbauer T, Maca SM, Mejdoubi L, Emminger W, Machold K, Auer H. Uveitis- a rare disease often associated with systemic diseases and infections- a systematic review of 2619 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2012) 7:57. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Bertrand PJ, Jamilloux Y, Ecochard R, Richard-Colmant G, Gerfaud-Valentin M, Guillaud M, et al. Uveitis: autoimmunity and beyond. Autoimmun Rev. (2019) 18:102351. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Prete M, Dammacco R, Fatone MC, Racanelli V. Autoimmune uveitis: clinical, pathogenetic, and therapeutic features. Clin Exp Med. (2016) 16:125–36. doi: 10.1007/s10238-015-0345-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shahab MA, Mir TA, Zafar S. Optimising drug therapy for non-infectious uveitis. Int Ophthalmol. (2019) 39:1633–50. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0984-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dick AD, Rosenbaum JT, Al-Dhibi HA, Belfort R Jr, Brezin AP, Chee SP, et al. Guidance on noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory therapy in noninfectious uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) initiative. Ophthalmology. (2018) 125:757–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hatemi G, Christensen R, Bang D, Bodaghi B, Celik AF, Fortune F, et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. (2018) 77:808–18. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bodaghi B, Gendron G, Wechsler B, Terrada C, Cassoux N, Huong du LT, et al. Efficacy of interferon alpha in the treatment of refractory and sight threatening uveitis: a retrospective monocentric study of 45 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. (2007) 91:335–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.101550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hassan M, Karkhur S, Bae JH, Halim MS, Ormaechea MS, Onghanseng N, et al. New therapies in development for the management of non-infectious uveitis: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2019) 47:396–417. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Touhami S, Diwo E, Seve P, Trad S, Bielefeld P, Sene D, et al. Expert opinion on the use of biological therapy in non-infectious uveitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2019) 19:477–90. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1595578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Airody A, Heath G, Lightman S, Gale R. Non-infectious uveitis: optimising the therapeutic response. Drugs. (2016) 76:27–39. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0502-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Park UC, Kim TW, Yu HG. Immunopathogenesis of ocular Behcet's disease. J Immunol Res. (2014) 2014:653539. doi: 10.1155/2014/653539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Agrawal R, Iyer J, Connolly J, Iwata D, Teoh S. Cytokines and biologics in non-infectious autoimmune uveitis: bench to bedside. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2014) 62:74–81. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.126187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Davatchi F, Chams-Davatchi C, Shams H, Shahram F, Nadji A, Akhlaghi M, et al. Behcet's disease: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2017) 13:57–65. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1205486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lavezzo MM, Sakata VM, Morita C, Rodriguez EE, Abdallah SF, da Silva FT, et al. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: review of a rare autoimmune disease targeting antigens of melanocytes. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2016) 11:29. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0412-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. International Study Group for Behcet's Disease. Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet's disease. Lancet. (1990) 335:1078–80.

Google Scholar

17. Read RW, Holland GN, Rao NA, Tabbara KF, Ohno S, Arellanes-Garcia L, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: report of an international committee on nomenclature. Am J Ophthalmol. (2001) 131:647–52. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)00925-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Cimino L, Aldigeri R, Parmeggiani M, Belloni L, Zotti CA, Fontana L, et al. Searching for viral antibodies and genome in intraocular fluids of patients with Fuchs uveitis and non-infectious uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2013) 251:1607–12. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2287-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. (2015) 43:W566–70. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. El-Asrar AM, Struyf S, Kangave D, Al-Obeidan SS, Opdenakker G, Geboes K, et al. Cytokine profiles in aqueous humor of patients with different clinical entities of endogenous uveitis. Clin Immunol. (2011) 139:177–84. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.01.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. El-Asrar AM, Al-Obeidan SS, Kangave D, Geboes K, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. CXC chemokine expression profiles in aqueous humor of patients with different clinical entities of endogenous uveitis. Immunobiology. (2011) 216:1004–9. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Abu El-Asrar AM, Berghmans N, Al-Obeidan SA, Mousa A, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. The cytokine interleukin-6 and the chemokines CCL20 and CXCL13 are novel biomarkers of specific endogenous uveitic entities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2016) 57:4606–13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19758

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Abu El-Asrar AM, Berghmans N, Al-Obeidan SA, Gikandi PW, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. Local cytokine expression profiling in patients with specific autoimmune uveitic entities. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2019). doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1604974. [Epub ahead of print].

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bhattacharya P, Thiruppathi M, Elshabrawy HA, Alharshawi K, Kumar P, Prabhakar BS. GM-CSF: an immune modulatory cytokine that can suppress autoimmunity. Cytokine. (2015) 75:261–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Bhattacharya P, Budnick I, Singh M, Thiruppathi M, Alharshawi K, Elshabrawy H, et al. Dual role of GM-CSF as a pro-inflammatory and a regulatory cytokine: implications for immune therapy. J Interferon Cytokine Res. (2015) 35:585–99. doi: 10.1089/jir.2014.0149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang TT, Zhao YL, Peng LS, Chen N, Chen W, Lv YP, et al. Tumour-activated neutrophils in gastric cancer foster immune suppression and disease progression through GM-CSF-PD-L1 pathway. Gut. (2017) 66:1900–11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Taylor AW. Ocular immune privilege and transplantation. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:37. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Fabiani C, Vitale A, Lopalco G, Iannone F, Frediani B, Cantarini L. Different roles of TNF inhibitors in acute anterior uveitis associated with ankylosing spondylitis: state of the art. Clin Rheumatol. (2016) 35:2631–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3426-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Fabiani C, Vitale A, Emmi G, Vannozzi L, Lopalco G, Guerriero S, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Behcet's disease-related uveitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Clin Rheumatol. (2017) 36:183–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3480-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Schwartzman S, Schwartzman M. The use of biologic therapies in uveitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2015) 49:307–16. doi: 10.1007/s12016-014-8455-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Niccoli L, Nannini C, Benucci M, Chindamo D, Cassara E, Salvarani C, et al. Long-term efficacy of infliximab in refractory posterior uveitis of Behcet's disease: a 24-month follow-up study. Rheumatology. (2007) 46:1161–4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Fabiani C, Vitale A, Rigante D, Emmi G, Bitossi A, Lopalco G, et al. Comparative efficacy between adalimumab and infliximab in the treatment of non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis: a retrospective observational study of 107 patients. Clin Rheumatol. (2019) 38:407–15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4228-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Eser-Ozturk H, Sullu Y. The results of interferon-alpha treatment in Behcet uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2019). doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1587473. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hasanreisoglu M, Cubuk MO, Ozdek S, Gurelik G, Aktas Z, Hasanreisoglu B. Interferon alpha-2a therapy in patients with refractory Behcet uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2017) 25:71–5. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2015.1133835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Leccese P, Alpsoy E. Behcet's disease: an overview of etiopathogenesis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1067. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Albayrak O, Oray M, Can F, Uludag KG, Gul A, Tugal-Tutkun I, et al. Effect of interferon alfa-2a treatment on adaptive and innate immune systems in patients with Behcet disease uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2019) 60:52–63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Aydinoglu-Candan O, Araz-Ersan B, Gul A, Badur S, Tugal-Tutkun I. Anti-interferon alpha antibodies and autoantibodies in patients with Behcet's disease uveitis treated with recombinant human interferon alpha-2a. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2015) 253:457–65. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2856-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Treusch M, Vonthein R, Baur M, Gunaydin I, Koch S, Stubiger N, et al. Influence of human recombinant interferon-alpha2a (rhIFN-alpha2a) on altered lymphocyte subpopulations and monocytes in Behcet's disease. Rheumatology. (2004) 43:1275–82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Gillies MC, Su T. Interferon-alpha 2b enhances barrier function of bovine retinal microvascular endothelium in vitro. Microvasc Res. (1995) 49:277–88. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1995.1024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Thomas AS. Biologics for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis: current concepts and emerging therapeutics. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (2019) 30:138–50. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000562

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sepah YJ, Sadiq MA, Chu DS, Dacey M, Gallemore R, Dayani P, et al. Primary (Month-6) outcomes of the STOP-uveitis study: evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with noninfectious uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. (2017) 183:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lopalco G, Fabiani C, Sota J, Lucherini OM, Tosi GM, Frediani B, et al. IL-6 blockade in the management of non-infectious uveitis. Clin Rheumatol. (2017) 36:1459–69. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3672-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zhao B, Chen W, Jiang R, Zhang R, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. Expression profile of IL-1 family cytokines in aqueous humor and sera of patients with HLA-B27 associated anterior uveitis and idiopathic anterior uveitis. Exp Eye Res. (2015) 138:80–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.06.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Fabiani C, Vitale A, Emmi G, Lopalco G, Vannozzi L, Guerriero S, et al. Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition with anakinra and canakinumab in Behcet's disease-related uveitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Clin Rheumatol. (2017) 36:191–7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3506-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Priya CG, Rathinam SR, Muthukkaruppan V. Evidence for endotoxin as a causative factor for leptospiral uveitis in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2008) 49:5419–24. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Curnow SJ, Falciani F, Durrani OM, Cheung CM, Ross EJ, Wloka K, et al. Multiplex bead immunoassay analysis of aqueous humor reveals distinct cytokine profiles in uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2005) 46:4251–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Abu El-Asrar AM, Berghmans N, Al-Obeidan SA, Gikandi PW, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. Expression of interleukin (IL)-10 family cytokines in aqueous humour of patients with specific endogenous uveitic entities: elevated levels of IL-19 in human leukocyte antigen-B27-associated uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol. (2019) 97:e780–4. doi: 10.1111/aos.14039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Ahn JK, Yu HG, Chung H, Park YG. Intraocular cytokine environment in active Behcet uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. (2006) 142:429–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Takase H, Futagami Y, Yoshida T, Kamoi K, Sugita S, Imai Y, et al. Cytokine profile in aqueous humor and sera of patients with infectious or noninfectious uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2006) 47:1557–61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0836

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Lacomba MS, Martin CM, Chamond RR, Galera JM, Omar M, Estevez EC. Aqueous and serum interferon gamma, interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, and IL-10 in patients with uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. (2000) 118:768–72. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.6.768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Bae JH, Lee SC. Effect of intravitreal methotrexate and aqueous humor cytokine levels in refractory retinal vasculitis in Behcet disease. Retina. (2012) 32:1395–402. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31823496a3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Simsek M, Cakar OP, Akbiyik F, Citirik M, Berker N, Ozdamar EY, et al. Aqueous humor IL-8, IL-10, and VEGF levels in Fuchs' uveitis syndrome and Behcet's uveitis. Int Ophthalmol. (2019) 39:2629–36. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01112-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pei M, Liu X, Zhao C, Gao F, Tao Y, Zhang M. Chemokine and adhesion molecule profiles in aqueous humor of clinically quiescent uveitic cataracts. Curr Eye Res. (2019) 44:194–9. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1532012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. El-Asrar AMA, Berghmans N, Al-Obeidan SA, Gikandi PW, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. Differential CXC and CX3C chemokine expression profiles in aqueous humor of patients with specific endogenous uveitic entities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2018) 59:2222. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Kim TW, Chung H, Yu HG. Chemokine expression of intraocular lymphocytes in patients with Behcet uveitis. Ophthalmic Res. (2011) 45:5–14. doi: 10.1159/000313546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Paroli MP, Teodori C, D'Alessandro M, Mariani P, Iannucci G, Paroli M. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in aqueous humor and serum of patients with quiescent uveitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. (2007) 17:938–42. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. El-Asrar AM, Berghmans N, Al-Obeidan SA, Gikandi PW, Opdenakker G, Van DJ, et al. The CC chemokines CCL8, CCL13 and CCL20 are local inflammatory biomarkers of HLA-B27-associated uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol. (2019) 97:e122–8. doi: 10.1111/aos.13835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar