Abstract
Opioid receptors comprise μ (MOP), δ (DOP), κ (KOP), and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptors. Opioids are agonists of MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors, whereas nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is an agonist of NOP receptors. Activation of all four opioid receptors in neurons can induce analgesia in animal models, but the most clinically relevant are MOP receptor agonists (e.g., morphine, fentanyl). Opioids can also affect the function of immune cells, and their actions in relation to immunosuppression and infections have been widely discussed. Here, we analyze the expression and the role of opioid receptors in peripheral immune cells and glia in the modulation of pain. All four opioid receptors have been identified at the mRNA and protein levels in immune cells (lymphocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages) in humans, rhesus monkeys, rats or mice. Activation of leukocyte MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors was recently reported to attenuate pain after nerve injury in mice. This involved intracellular Ca2+-regulated release of opioid peptides from immune cells, which subsequently activated MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors on peripheral neurons. There is no evidence of pain modulation by leukocyte NOP receptors. More good quality studies are needed to verify the presence of DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors in native glia. Although still questioned, MOP receptors might be expressed in brain or spinal cord microglia and astrocytes in humans, mice, and rats. Morphine acting at spinal cord microglia is often reported to induce hyperalgesia in rodents. However, most studies used animals without pathological pain and/or unconventional paradigms (e.g., high or ultra-low doses, pain assessment after abrupt discontinuation of chronic morphine treatment). Therefore, the opioid-induced hyperalgesia can be viewed in the context of dependence/withdrawal rather than pain management, in line with clinical reports. There is convincing evidence of analgesic effects mediated by immune cell-derived opioid peptides in animal models and in humans. Together, MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors, and opioid peptides in immune cells can ameliorate pathological pain. The relevance of NOP receptors and N/OFQ in leukocytes, and of all opioid receptors, opioid peptides and N/OFQ in native glia for pain control is yet to be clarified.
Introduction
Opioid receptors comprise four members, the classical μ (MOP), δ (DOP), and κ (KOP) receptors, and the non-classical nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor [reviewed by (1)] (Table 1). They belong to the superfamily of seven transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptors, are encoded by the four respective genes [(2–5), reviewed by (6)], and their structures have been cleared by crystal analysis (7–10). The classical opioid receptors are sensitive to the antagonist naloxone and their endogenous agonists are opioid peptides, such as β-endorphin, enkephalins (Met-, Leu-enkephalin), and dynorphins (dynorphin A, B, α-neoendorphin). β-endorphin and enkephalins bind MOP and DOP receptors, whereas dynorphin A 1-17 preferentially acts at KOP receptors. Opioid peptides derive from the respective precursors, proopiomelanocortin (POMC) (11, 12), proenkephalin (PENK) (13, 14), and prodynorphin (PDYN) (15–17). Endomorphins (endomorphin-1,−2) are additional, putative endogenous opioid peptides with high selectivity at MOP receptors (18); their precursor has not yet been identified [reviewed by (19)]. NOP receptors are insensitive to antagonism by naloxone, have low affinity for opioid peptides, and their selective endogenous agonist is nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), which derives from prepro-N/OFQ (ppN/OFQ) [(20, 21) reviewed by (6)] (Table 1).
Table 1
| Opioid receptor | Endogenous agonists | Exogenous ligands* | Effects on pain | Side effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precursor | Peptide | Agonists | Antagonists | |||
| MOP | POMC Not identified | END# EM-1 EM-2 | Morphine Fentanyl Oxycodone Methadone DAMGO | Naloxone Naltrexone CTAP CTOP β-FNA | Analgesia | Respiratory depression, sedation, constipation, nausea, vomiting, reward/euphoria, dependence/withdrawal |
| DOP | PENK | ENKs# | DPDPE DELTs SNC80 | Naloxone Naltrexone Naltrindole ICI 174,864 | Analgesia | Convulsions, reward |
| KOP | PDYN | DYNs | Bremazocine U50,488 U69,593 | Naloxone Naltrexone NorBNI | Analgesia | Aversion/dysphoria, sedation, diuresis, psychotomimesis (abnormal perception of space, time and visual experience, self-control loss, depersonalization) |
| NOP | ppN/OFQ | N/OFQ | Ro 64-6198 SCH 221510 | J-113397 SB-612111 | Analgesia Hyperalgesia/anti-opioid action (brain) | Sedation, constipation, diuresis, hypotension, bradycardia, learning and memory impairment, motor disturbance |
Characterization of the opioid system.
Listed are selected ligands most often used in humans or tested in animals.
END also binds DOP receptors; ENKs also bind MOP receptors.
β-FNA, β-funaltrexamine; CTAP, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2; CTOP, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2; DAMGO, [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin; DELTs, deltrophins (deltorphin I, II); DPDPE, D-Pen2, D-Pen5-enkpephalin; DYNs, dynorphins (dynorphin A, B, α-neoendorphin); EM, endomorphin; END, β-endorphin; ENKs, enkephalins (Met-, Leu-enkephalin); ICI 174,864, N,N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu; J-113397, 1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one; N/OFQ, nociceptin/orphanin FQ; NorBNI, norbinaltorphimine; PDYN, prodynorphin; PENK, proenkephalin; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; ppN/OFQ, prepro-nociceptin/orphanin FQ; Ro 64-6198, (1S,3aS)-8-(2,3,3a,4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triaza-spiro[4.5]decan-4-one; SB-612111, (2)-cis-1-methyl-7-[[4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5Hbenzocyclohepten-5-ol; SCH 221510, [3-endo-8-[bis(2-methylphenyl)methyl]-3-phenyl-8-azabicyclo [3.2.1]octan-3-ol]; SNC80, 4-(alpha-(4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl)-N,N-diethylbenzamide; U50,488, trans-(±)3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]-benzeneacetamide; U69,593, (+)-(5α,7α,8β)-N-Methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]-benzeneacetamide.
Neuronal opioid receptors are widely distributed throughout the peripheral (trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia) and central (spinal cord, brain) nervous system. All four opioid receptors mediate analgesia in animal models. However, the majority of clinically used opioids for pain treatment are MOP receptor agonists (e.g., morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone). Centrally acting KOP receptor agonists are of limited utility due to dysphoric and psychotomimetic effects (22–24), whereas DOP and NOP receptor agonists are not available for clinical use. Mechanistically, following acute activation by an agonist (endogenous or exogenous), opioid receptors couple to the pertussis toxin-sensitive heterotrimeric Gi/o proteins, which dissociate into Gαi/o and Gβγ subunits to interact with various intracellular effectors (Figure 1A). Activation of all four MOP, DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors can result in the Gαi/o-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclases (AC) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) formation [reviewed by (25, 26)]. However, the exact pathway in which these actions result in pain inhibition has only been described for MOP receptors. Hence, the decreased cAMP production leads to the inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) activity, which results in the suppression of various ion channels involved in pain facilitation. These channels include the heat sensor transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC), and voltage-gated Na+ (Nav) channels (27–31). Through the Gβγ, all four receptors close voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels (32–34) and open G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying K+ (GIRK or Kir3) channels (35–39), whereas MOP and DOP receptors also activate adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+ (KATP) channels [(40), reviewed by (26, 41)]. Additionally, MOP receptors inhibit heat-sensing transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 3 (TRPM3) (42). These opioid receptor-mediated actions lead to the hyperpolarization and decreased excitability of central and peripheral sensory neurons, as well as to the diminished release of excitatory mediators from these neurons, including substance P (43–48), calcitonin gene-related peptide (45, 49–51), and glutamate (52, 53). In addition, activation of MOP receptors in the brain activates descending noradrenergic pathways, which leads to increased release of noradrenaline in the spinal cord (54, 55). All above described effects underlay the opioid receptor-induced analgesia [reviewed by (26, 41, 56–60)]. Additionally, the activation of NOP receptors in the brain can lead to hyperalgesia or anti-opioid actions in animal models (20, 21, 61). NOP receptors also couple to pertussis toxin-insensitive Gαs, Gαz, or Gα16 proteins (62, 63), but the role of these pathways in pain modulation is unknown.
Figure 1
Neuronal opioid receptors also mediate numerous side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, reward/euphoria, dependence/withdrawal (MOP), convulsions (DOP), aversion/dysphoria, psychotomimesis (KOP), learning and memory impairment, motor disturbance, hypotension, bradycardia (NOP), sedation (MOP, KOP, NOP), constipation (MOP, NOP), and diuresis (KOP, NOP) [reviewed by (56, 57, 64–67)]. The main efforts are currently directed toward the development of novel ligands that exert analgesia with reduced side effects [reviewed by (57, 68, 69)].
Opioids (endogenous and exogenous) can also affect the function of immune cells, including proliferation, maturation, chemotaxis, trafficking, phagocytosis, cytokine, and chemokine receptor expression, cytokine synthesis and secretion. These effects were predominately assessed in vitro and the results were often contradictory, which depended on experimental conditions (e.g., cultured cell types, lines or clones, duration of cultures, media composition, doses and timing of opioid exposure) [reviewed by (70, 71)]. The immunomodulatory actions of opioids in the context of immunosuppression and infections have been widely reviewed (72–77).
In this article, we analyze the expression of opioid receptors in peripheral immune cells and glia, and discuss their contribution to the modulation of pain. Specifically, we address peripheral immune cells, such as lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages and granulocytes in the blood and peripheral tissue. Although in pathological pain conditions some of these cells also infiltrate central nervous system (78–81), they have not been examined for the expression of opioid receptors. Glia represent immune cells of the nervous system and they include microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the spinal cord and brain, satellite glial cells in trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia, and Schwann cells in peripheral nerves [reviewed by (82, 83)]. Of these cells, microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes were so far tested for the presence of opioid receptors, and they are addressed in the following sections. Additionally, we describe the relevance of opioid peptides and N/OFQ derived from immune and glial cells to pain control.
Expression of Opioid Receptors in Immune and Glial Cells
Expression and function of opioid receptors have been extensively examined in vitro using cell lines or cultured primary immune and glial cells. Since the results obtained in such conditions often vary with experimental setups, including cell origin and density (84–86), and do not reflect the in vivo situation, we focus on ex vivo studies which examined tissue or freshly isolated, not cultured primary immune and glial cells.
Immune Cells
Expression of opioid receptors in peripheral immune cells has been postulated since the early 1980s [reviewed by (71, 76, 87)], but some findings still remain controversial. For example, some authors using various methods, such as radioligand binding, flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) did not detect MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) or all blood cells from healthy human donors; only NOP receptor mRNA was found by PCR and qPCR (88, 89). Similarly, MOP and DOP mRNAs were not identified in healthy human blood lymphocytes or monocytes (90, 91), and MOP and KOP mRNAs were not found in mouse splenocytes and T lymphocytes (90) (Table 2).
Table 2
| Opioid receptor | mRNA, protein | Cell types | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes, PBMC or whole blood cells Mouse splenocytes, T lymphocytes Rat, mouse spinal cord microglia Rat spinal cord or nucleus accumbens astrocytes | (88, 89, 91) (90) (92, 93) (93, 94) |
| Protein | Human PBMC Mouse spinal cord microglia Mouse spinal cord astrocytes | (88) (92, 95) (95) | |
| DOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes Human PBMC, whole blood cells Rat nucleus accumbens microglia Rat nucleus accumbens astrocytes | (90) (88, 89) (94) (94) |
| KOP | mRNA | Human PBMC, whole blood cells Mouse splenocytes, T lymphocytes | (88, 89) (90) |
| NOP | Protein | Human PBMC | (88) |
Studies that did not detect opioid receptors in native, not cultured immune and glial cells.
However, many other studies did detect MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in immune cells of various species (Table 3). MOP receptor mRNA was identified by PCR in blood CD4+ T lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages and granulocytes from healthy human donors, in PBMC and granulocytes from rhesus monkeys (96), and in rat peritoneal macrophages (98). Decreased levels of MOP receptor mRNA were found in blood lymphocytes of heroin addicts on methadone maintenance compared to healthy controls (97). In the latter study, similar results were obtained for DOP receptor mRNA (97). DOP receptor mRNA was additionally found in mouse splenocytes and enriched T lymphocyte fraction (90, 109), in lymph node dendritic cells and CD4+ T lymphocytes of mice immunized with ovalbumin (but not in non-immunized mice) (110), and in human blood lymphocytes (assessed by Northern blot) (91). Also KOP receptor mRNA was detected by PCR or Northern blot in blood lymphocytes (90, 91), monocytes (111), PBMC and CD4+ T lymphocytes from healthy human donors, and in PBMC from rhesus monkeys (113). In rheumatoid arthritis patients, KOP receptor mRNA was found in blood T and B lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages and natural killer cells. Analysis of the whole blood cell samples revealed that the mRNA levels were lower in patients with high pain scores compared to those with less severe pain (112). For all three receptors, the mRNA transcripts were cloned and sequenced, and found to be nearly (98%) or completely (100%) homologous to the human, rat or mouse brain receptors (90, 91, 96, 98, 109, 113). Additionally, qPCR revealed mRNAs of MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in blood leukocytes, and at higher levels in leukocytes (comprising macrophages, neutrophils and T lymphocytes) isolated from injured sciatic nerves in a mouse model of neuropathic pain. Activation of each receptor by selective agonists led to the secretion of opioid peptides from immune cells isolated from wild-type mice, but not from the MOP, DOP or KOP receptor knockout mice [(99); see also below]. This suggests that leukocyte MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors were functional and encoded by the same genes as neuronal receptors (99). NOP receptor mRNA was identified by PCR or qPCR in blood lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes from healthy human donors (88, 115, 116). The qPCR showed decreased NOP receptor mRNA levels in blood granulocytes from patients with sepsis (117), and comparable levels in blood eosinophils in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers (118). The sequencing of PCR products revealed that NOP receptor transcripts from immune cells and brain were identical (115, 116). Some studies detected the NOP receptor mRNA transcripts in leukocytes at levels comparable to those in human cerebral cortex (115), whereas others found them at very low amounts (88, 121). Together, opioid receptor mRNAs appear to be expressed at relatively low levels in immune cells as compared to neuronal tissue or opioid receptor-expressing immune cell lines (88–91, 109, 110, 121, 122). Additionally, opioid receptor mRNA levels in immune cells can be modified (elevated or diminished) by pathological conditions or pharmacological treatments in vivo (97, 99, 110, 112, 117). These issues need to be considered in order to obtain sufficient amount of tissue (leukocyte numbers) for the analysis.
Table 3
| Opioid receptor | mRNA, protein | Cell types | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages or granulocytes Rhesus monkey blood PBMC, granulocytes Rat peritoneal macrophages Mouse blood and injured nerve immune cells* Rat nucleus accumbens, human brain, rat, mouse brain or spinal cord microglia | (96, 97) (96) (98) (99) (94, 100) |
| Protein | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes or granulocytes Rat splenocytes Rat, mouse brain or spinal cord microglia Mouse brain or spinal cord astrocytes Mouse brain oligodendrocytes | (101, 102) (103) [(100, 104)#, (105)#, (106)#] [(106)#, (107, 108)#] (108)# | |
| DOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes Mouse splenocytes, T lymphocytes Mouse lymph node dendritic cells, CD4+ T lymphocytes Mouse blood and injured nerve immune cells* | (91, 97) (90, 109) (110) (99) |
| Protein | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes or granulocytes Rat splenocytes Mouse brain astrocytes | (101, 102) (103) (108)# | |
| Mouse brain oligodendrocytes | (108)# | ||
| KOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes or natural killer cells Rhesus monkey blood PBMC Mouse blood and injured nerve immune cells* Rat nucleus accumbens microglia Rat nucleus accumbens astrocytes | (90, 91, 111–113) (113) (99) (94) (94) |
| Protein | Mouse peritoneal macrophages Mouse brain astrocytes Mouse brain oligodendrocytes | (114) (108)# (108)# | |
| NOP | mRNA | Human blood lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes or eosinophils Rat brain microglia Fetal human brain, adult and postnatal rat brain astrocytes | (88, 115–118) (119) (119, 120) |
| Protein | Human blood granulocytes Fetal human brain, postnatal rat brain astrocytes | (116, 121) (120)# |
Expression of opioid receptors in native, not cultured immune and glial cells.
Include monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and T lymphocytes.
Indicates that the antibody staining specificity was not convincingly verified or not tested at all.
Detection of MOP, DOP, and KOP receptor proteins is more challenging due to the low expression levels mentioned above and poor specificity of antibodies (123–125). Nevertheless, a few studies described stereospecific and high-affinity opioid binding sites in leukocytes (Table 3). The binding of radiolabeled naloxone displaceable by naltrexone was found in healthy human blood lymphocytes (97), although the receptor type is unclear, since these ligands do not distinguish MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors (Table 1). In contrast, binding of radiolabeled MOP receptor agonist (dihydromorphine) or of radiolabeled DOP receptor agonist (deltorphin I) suggested the presence of MOP receptors in monocytes and granulocytes, and of DOP receptors in granulocytes from blood of healthy human donors (101, 102). In rat splenocytes, MOP receptors were detected using radiolabeled agonist DAMGO whose binding was displaced by the antagonist CTAP, both MOP receptor selective ligands. Similarly, DOP receptors were identified using its selective ligands, the radiolabeled antagonist naltrindole whose binding was displaced by the agonist SNC80 (103). KOP receptor protein was found in mouse peritoneal macrophages by flow cytometry and fluorescently labeled KOP receptor agonist, and the labeling intensity was diminished by the selective antagonist norBNI (114) (see also Table 1 for ligands). NOP receptor protein detection appears variable, with high affinity radiolabeled N/OFQ binding in granulocytes (116), but lack of such binding in PBMC (88) from human blood. The latter research group recently detected NOP receptor binding (reversible by selective NOP receptor antagonist SB-612111) in human blood granulocytes using a novel fluorescent probe for the receptor (a red fluorophore-ATTO594 conjugated to the N/OFQ) (121).
In summary, all four MOP, DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors have been identified ex vivo at the mRNA and protein levels in various types of immune cells in humans, rhesus monkeys, rats and mice (Table 3).
Glia
Compared to peripheral immune cells, the expression of opioid receptors in glia has been less examined, most studies focused on MOP receptors, and the findings are contradictory. MOP receptor mRNA was not detected in microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord of rats chronically treated with vehicle or morphine, using in situ hybridization for MOP receptor mRNA combined with immunofluorescent staining of microglia and astrocyte markers (93). MOP receptor mRNA was also not found using qPCR in astrocytes isolated from nucleus accumbens of rats after acute injection with vehicle or morphine (94). It was also undetected by transcriptomic profiling of microglia from the spinal cord of naïve or morphine-treated mice (92). Additionally, double-immunofluorescence did not detect MOP receptor protein in spinal cord microglia and astrocytes following single application of vehicle or morphine in mice (95). Similarly, MOP receptor mRNA or protein were not found in spinal cord microglia of naïve transgenic mice with fluorescently labeled microglia (CX3CR1-eGFP) or with fluorescently tagged MOP receptors (MOP-mCherry) (92) (Table 2).
In contrast, several other studied have identified MOP receptors in human and rodent microglia (Table 3). Using qPCR, very low MOP receptor mRNA levels were found in microglia isolated from nucleus accumbens of rats acutely treated with vehicle or morphine (94). Transcriptomic analysis revealed MOP receptor mRNA in microglia in cerebral cortex of humans with no pain history, and in various brain areas and spinal cord of naïve mice or rats. Using immunofluorescence in transgenic mice expressing MOP receptors in microglia (CX3CR1-eGFP–MOP-mCherry), the percentage of MOP receptor-positive microglial cells ranged between 35 and 52% in brain, and between 37 and 42% in the spinal cord. The presence of MOP receptor protein in Golgi apparatus suggested that the receptors might be synthetized by microglia (100). Utilizing MOP-mCherry mice and double labeling in wild-type mice using astrocyte marker and MOP receptor antibodies (whose staining specificity was confirmed in MOP receptor knockout mice), MOP receptor protein was detected in astrocytes in various brain regions (107). Additional studies detected MOP receptor protein in naïve rat and mouse microglia or astrocytes in the spinal cord, or in mouse brain astrocytes and oligodendrocytes using antibody-based double labeling of the glial cell markers and MOP receptors, but the staining specificity of antibodies was not convincingly verified or not tested at all (104–106, 108).
Only a few studies assessed DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors in glia. No DOP receptor mRNA and low levels of KOP receptor mRNA were detected by qPCR in microglia and astrocytes isolated from nucleus accumbens of rats acutely injected with vehicle or morphine (94). NOP receptor mRNA was found in microglia and astrocytes in adult rat brain (119) or in astrocytes in rat brain until the third postnatal week, and in fetal human brain (120) by in situ hybridization for NOP receptor mRNA combined with immunofluorescent staining of microglia and astrocyte markers. Proteins of DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors were detected in astrocytes or oligodendrocytes in mouse or rat brain, but the staining specificity of antibodies was not unequivocally proven or not tested (108, 120).
Together, although there is still a controversy (Table 2), MOP receptors might be expressed in microglia and astrocytes, but more well-controlled studies are needed to verify the presence of DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors in native glia (Table 3).
Modulation of Pain by Opioid Receptors in Immune and Glial Cells
Immune Cells
A recent study expands the classical model of neuronal opioid receptor-mediated analgesia by showing the contribution of MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in immune cells to the amelioration of pain (99). The activation of leukocyte opioid receptors led to the secretion of opioid peptides (β-endorphin, Met-enkephalin and dynorphin A 1-17), which subsequently acted at peripheral neuronal opioid receptors in injured tissue, and relieved pain (Figure 1B). Specifically, in a mouse model of the sciatic nerve injury, exogenous agonists selective at MOP (DAMGO), DOP (DPDPE), and KOP receptors (U50,488; Table 1) inhibited mechanical hypersensitivity following injection at the damaged nerve infiltrated by immune cells (neutrophils, macrophages, T lymphocytes). The analgesia was attenuated by opioid peptide antibodies injected at the injured nerve or by leukocyte depletion in wild-type mice. This effect was also diminished in mice lacking opioid peptides (β-endorphin-, PENK-, PDYN-knockout) compared to wild-type mice. This decrease in analgesia was restored by the transfer of wild-type, but not opioid receptor-lacking leukocytes (from MOP, DOP, or KOP receptor knockout mice). Ex vivo, exogenous opioids triggered the release of opioid peptides from immune cells isolated from damaged nerves of wild-type mice, measured by immunoassays. The release was dependent on Gαi/o and Gβγ proteins, phospholipase C (PLC), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors and intracellular Ca2+. This exogenous opioid-induced secretion of opioid peptides did not occur in immune cells isolated from nerves of mice lacking opioid peptides or receptors, which confirmed the specificity of opioid peptide antibodies used in immunoassays. Importantly, the opioid receptor-coupled intracellular Ca2+ pathway in immune cells mediated analgesia in vivo (99). Together, in addition to opioid receptors on peripheral sensory neurons [e.g., (99, 126–130)], analgesia can be mediated by MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in immune cells (99). In contrast to the conventional action of neuronal opioid receptors (i.e., the inhibition of the release of pain-inducing mediators; analyzed in the introduction), analgesia mediated by leukocyte opioid receptors involves the secretion of pain-inhibiting opioid peptides (99). These effects may explain the enhanced analgesia of intra-articular morphine in patients with synovial tissue infiltrated by immune cells, following knee surgery (131). There are currently no data on the modulation of pain by leukocyte NOP receptors.
Glia
The actions of opioids on glial cells are typically discussed in relation to analgesic tolerance and paradoxical hyperalgesia termed opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Analgesic tolerance represents a progressive decrease of analgesia with prolonged agonist use or the need to increase the agonist dose to maintain analgesia. The OIH is usually described as hypersensitivity to painful stimuli upon chronic opioid use [reviewed by (132, 133)]. Nevertheless, since the abrupt discontinuation of prolonged opioid use can result in a withdrawal syndrome, including enhanced pain, the OIH may in fact represent the opioid withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia [reviewed by (134)]. The majority of studies have focused on the effects of morphine and on MOP receptors, but only a few directly addressed the microglia following chronic morphine treatment, and showed that tolerance and/or OIH were reduced by microglia depletion (105, 135) (Figure 1C). The former study proposed that morphine activated MOP receptors on spinal cord microglia to increase the expression of purinergic P2X4 receptors, which triggered the (MOP receptor-independent) release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) from microglia. The secreted BDNF induced downregulation of the K+-Cl− co-transporter KCC2 in GABAergic neurons, which resulted in their disinhibition. These actions were implied to mediate OIH, but not tolerance (105). Hayashi et al. (135) suggested that both tolerance and OIH involved microglia MOP receptor-induced secretion of arachidonic acid (AA) and subsequent activation of microglial large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BK) channels in the spinal cord. Several other studies showed the correlation between tolerance or OIH and the involvement of spinal cord microglia and/or astrocytes in morphine-treated animals. These observations were based on the increased glia numbers or elevated expression of nuclear factors and protein kinases in these glial cells (95, 136–138). Similar indirect effects were reported for other opioids acting at MOP receptors, including remifentanil, fentanyl and buprenorphine (139–141). Agonists of DOP and KOP receptors have not been tested. One study found elevated expression of astrocytes, but not microglia, in the spinal cord following N/OFQ treatment (142).
Nevertheless, it is unclear how opioids or N/OFQ would affect the glia, since the expression of opioid receptors in native glia is still debatable (see above), most of those studies did not directly examine the involvement of glial MOP or NOP receptors, OIH was observed in triple MOP, DOP, and KOP receptor knockout mice (143, 144), and the effects of morphine on toll-like receptor 4 in glia remain controversial [reviewed by (133)]. Furthermore, except for Chang et al. (141) who used postoperative pain model, all other studies exclusively tested naïve mice or rats. Additionally, opioids were used at unconventional ultra-low doses or high doses which exceeded the analgesic doses used in pathological pain models, they were sometimes injected repetitively every few minutes, and hyperalgesia was measured 12 h, 24 h or 4 days following the last dose, which indicates opioid withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia (95, 105, 135–142). Therefore, these effects can be viewed in the context of dependence rather than pain management, which is in line with clinical findings [reviewed by (134, 145)]. It is thus essential to examine actions of opioids on glia in models of pathological pain using analgesia-relevant paradigms. Accordingly, clinical studies suggested that OIH may not be a significant concern if opioids are used at regular doses in pathological pain conditions, and when their use is discontinued gradually (146, 147).
Opioid Peptides and N/OFQ in Immune and Glial Cells
Immune Cells
Immune cells also contain endogenous ligands of opioid receptors. The opioid peptide-containing leukocytes have been extensively investigated over the last decades [reviewed by (58, 148, 149)] and will only be briefly addressed here. Transcripts of POMC, PENK and PDYN, as well as enzymes required for POMC and PENK processing are expressed in T and B lymphocytes, macrophages or granulocytes in peripheral inflamed tissue in rats and mice (150–154). Consequently, the corresponding opioid peptides β-endorphin, enkephalins and dynorphin A 1-17 were detected in various immune cells from blood, lymph nodes or peripheral injured tissue in rats, mice and humans (99, 155–158). Opioid peptide-containing immune cells extravasate using adhesion molecules (P- and E-selectins, integrins α4 and β2, intercellular adhesion molecule-1) and chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2/3) to accumulate in damaged tissue. Subsequently, the leukocytes secrete opioid peptides spontaneously or in response to stressful stimuli (experimental stress, surgery) and releasing agents, such as corticotropin-releasing factor, IL-1β, chemokines CXCL1, and CXCL2/3, noradrenaline, mycobacteria, and exogenous opioids. The released opioid peptides activate opioid receptors on peripheral sensory neurons and locally inhibit pain. Such analgesic actions have been demonstrated in rodent models of somatic and visceral inflammatory, neuropathic and bone cancer pain (99, 156, 159–170), as well as in patients with arthritis undergoing knee surgery (171–173). Notably, due to the continuous presence of immune cell-derived opioid peptides and enhanced MOP receptor recycling, the analgesic tolerance at peripheral MOP receptors in inflamed tissue is greatly reduced, in animals and humans (131, 174).
The mRNA of the N/OFQ precursor, ppN/OFQ, was detected in porcine splenocytes, blood granulocytes and eosinophils from healthy volunteers and patients with sepsis or asthma (117, 118, 175). Additionally, the ppN/OFQ mRNA was found in blood neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes from healthy donors, and neutrophils secreted the N/OFQ upon degranulation ex vivo (176). However, the functional relevance of immune cell-derived N/OFQ in vivo has not been elucidated.
Glia
There are numerous studies reporting expression of opioid peptides or their precursors in cultured glia [reviewed by (177)], but very few examined native tissue. The laboratory of Wang suggested analgesic effects of spinal cord microglia-derived β-endorphin and dynorphin A in rat models of inflammatory, neuropathic and bone cancer pain. However, they examined opioids in cultured microglia or in the spinal cord homogenates (178–180). Only in one study, β-endorphin was shown in spinal cord microglia ex vivo, but the staining specificity of the antibody was not tested (179). Therefore, the conclusive data on the expression of opioid peptides in native glia and their contribution to pain inhibition are still needed. The mRNA and protein of PENK were detected in cerebellum astrocytes in young rats (181), whereas N/OFQ was found in astrocytes of postnatal rat and fetal human brains (120), suggesting their role in brain development. The PDYN mRNA and protein were shown in astrocytes in human cerebral cortex, but their biological significance was not addressed (182).
Collectively, there is convincing evidence of analgesic actions mediated by immune cell-derived opioid peptides in animal models and in humans. The role of immune cell-derived N/OFQ and glia-derived opioids and N/OFQ in the context of pain is yet to be elucidated.
Conclusions
The classical opioid receptors MOP, DOP, and KOP, and their endogenous ligands opioid peptides are expressed in immune cells accumulating in peripheral inflamed tissue. Activation of all three leukocyte opioid receptors by exogenous opioids has been shown to release opioid peptides, which acted at peripheral neuronal receptors to diminish pain. This has wide clinical implications, since most painful conditions are associated with immune response, including inflammatory neuropathies, arthritis, cancer and postoperative pain. Therefore, the broad-spectrum inhibition of immune responses should be avoided, as this may exacerbate pain and diminish exogenous opioid analgesia. Furthermore, as these actions occur in peripheral tissue, the detrimental side effects resulting from the activation of MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors in the brain are precluded. It will be interesting to find out whether this can also apply to NOP receptors and N/OFQ. First, however, the involvement of immune cell NOP receptors and N/OFQ in pain modulation needs to be shown. The widely discussed OIH is often linked to the actions of opioids (mostly morphine) via glia (primarily microglia, but also astrocytes). Nevertheless, even if these effects are mediated (indirectly or directly) via glial MOP receptors, they seem to be related to dependence/withdrawal rather than pain treatment, in line with clinical findings. More well-controlled studies are needed to verify the presence of DOP, KOP, and NOP receptors, opioid peptides and N/OFQ in native glia, and to elucidate their role in vivo. Considering that there is strong evidence of discrepancies between in vivo and in vitro conditions, which is particularly relevant to the immune system, examination of native cells and tissue, without culturing, is preferable whenever possible. Factors that can influence the expression of the opioid system in immune and glial cells, and that may contribute to the inconsistencies among the studies include the examined cell population (e.g., lymphocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, microglia or astrocytes), their subpopulations (e.g., T or B lymphocytes, T helper 1 or T helper 2 lymphocytes, M1 or M2 macrophages or microglia), the tissue they originate from, the in vivo physiological vs. pathological conditions, type and duration of the pathological state, and in vivo pharmacological treatments. Furthermore, methodological procedures need to be carefully designed, including protocols to obtain sufficient number of cells, verification of cell viability, the isolation techniques that enable high RNA and protein yields without contaminants (e.g., DNA contamination, remaining sample preparation reagents, excessive protein amounts), optimal design of PCR primers and probes for efficient qPCR, and the use of stringent controls to avoid false positive or negative results (e.g., no-RT controls for qPCR, antibody staining specificity controls for immunostaining) [(183); Celik and Machelska, submitted].
Statements
Author contributions
HM conceptualized and wrote the manuscript with the input from MC. MC prepared the figure. HM and MC approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors were supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MA 2437/4-1, MA 6432/2-1) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EC1403E).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
CoxBMChristieMJDeviLTollLTraynorJR. Challenges for opioid receptor nomenclature: IUPHAR Review 9. Br J Pharmacol. (2015) 172:317–23. 10.1111/bph.12612
2.
EvansCJKeithDEJrMorrisonHMagendzoKEdwardsRH. Cloning of a delta opioid receptor by functional expression. Science. (1992) 258:1952–5. 10.1126/science.1335167
3.
SimoninFGavériaux-RuffCBefortKMatthesHLannesBMichelettiGet al. kappa-Opioid receptor in humans: cDNA and genomic cloning, chromosomal assignment, functional expression, pharmacology, and expression pattern in the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1995) 92:7006–10. 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7006
4.
KiefferBLBefortKGaveriaux-RuffCHirthCG. The delta-opioid receptor: isolation of a cDNA by expression cloning and pharmacological characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1992) 89:12048–52. 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12048
5.
MestekAHurleyJHByeLSCampbellADChenYTianMet al. The human mu opioid receptor: modulation of functional desensitization by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C. J Neurosci. (1995) 15:2396–406. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-02396.1995
6.
MogilJSPasternakGW. The molecular and behavioral pharmacology of the orphanin FQ/nociceptin peptide and receptor family. Pharmacol Rev. (2001) 53:381–415.
7.
GranierSManglikAKruseACKobilkaTSThianFSWeisWIet al. Structure of the δ-opioid receptor bound to naltrindole. Nature. (2012) 485:400–4. 10.1038/nature11111
8.
ThompsonAALiuWChunEKatritchVWuHVardyEet al. Structure of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor in complex with a peptide mimetic. Nature. (2012) 485:395–9. 10.1038/nature11085
9.
HuangWManglikAVenkatakrishnanAJLaeremansTFeinbergENSanbornALet al. Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature. (2015) 524:315–21. 10.1038/nature14886
10.
CheTMajumdarSZaidiSAOndachiPMcCorvyJDWangSet al. Structure of the nanobody-stabilized active state of the kappa opioid receptor. Cell. (2018) 172:55–67.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.011
11.
NakanishiSInoueAKitaTNakamuraMChangACCohenSNet al. Nucleotide sequence of cloned cDNA for bovine corticotropin-beta-lipotropin precursor. Nature. (1979) 278:423–7. 10.1038/278423a0
12.
LiCHChungDDoneenBA. Isolation, characterization and opiate activity of β-endorphin from human pituitary glands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1976) 72:1542–7. 10.1016/S0006-291X(76)80189-1
13.
HughesJSmithTWKosterlitzHWFothergillLAMorganBAMorrisHR. Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature. (1975) 258:577–80. 10.1038/258577a0
14.
NodaMTeranishiYTakahashiHToyosatoMNotakeMNakanishiSet al. Isolation and structural organization of the human preproenkephalin gene. Nature. (1982) 297:431–4. 10.1038/297431a0
15.
KakidaniHFurutaniYTakahashiHNodaMMorimotoYHiroseTet al. Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for porcine beta-neo-endorphin/dynorphin precursor. Nature. (1982) 298:245–9. 10.1038/298245a0
16.
GoldsteinAFischliWLowneyLIHunkapillerMHoodL. Porcine pituitary dynorphin: complete amino acid sequence of the biologically active heptadecapeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1981) 78:7219–23. 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7219
17.
KangawaKMinaminoNChinoNSakakibaraSMatsuoH. The complete amino acid sequence of alpha-neo-endorphin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1981) 99:871–8. 10.1016/0006-291X(81)91244-4
18.
ZadinaJEHacklerLGeLJKastinAJ. A potent and selective endogenous agonist for the mu-opiate receptor. Nature. (1997) 386:499–502. 10.1038/386499a0
19.
AkilHOwensCGutsteinHTaylorLCurranEWatsonS. Endogenous opioids: overview and current issues. Drug Alcohol Depend. (1998) 51:127–40. 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00071-4
20.
MeunierJCMollereauCTollLSuaudeauCMoisandCAlvineriePet al. Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature. (1995) 377:532–5. 10.1038/377532a0
21.
ReinscheidRKNothackerHPBoursonAArdatiAHenningsenRABunzowJRet al. Orphanin FQ: a neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science. (1995) 270:792–4. 10.1126/science.270.5237.792
22.
PfeifferABrantlVHerzAEmrichHM. Psychotomimesis mediated by kappa opiate receptors. Science. (1986) 233:774–6. 10.1126/science.3016896
23.
RimoyGHWrightDMBhaskarNKRubinPC. The cardiovascular and central nervous system effects in the human of U-62066E. A selective opioid receptor agonist. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. (1994) 46:203–7. 10.1007/BF00192549
24.
WalshSLStrainECAbreuMEBigelowGE. Enadoline, a selective kappa opioid agonist: comparison with butorphanol and hydromorphone in humans. Psychopharmacology. (2001) 157:151–62. 10.1007/s002130100788
25.
StandiferKMPasternakGW. G proteins and opioid receptor-mediated signalling. Cell Signal. (1997) 9:237–48. 10.1016/S0898-6568(96)00174-X
26.
SchröderWLambertDGKoMCKochT. Functional plasticity of the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system determines analgesic properties of NOP receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol. (2014) 171:3777–800. 10.1111/bph.12744
27.
VetterIWyseBDMonteithGRRoberts-ThomsonSJCabotPJ. The μ opioid agonist morphine modulates potentiation of capsaicin-evoked TRPV1 responses through a cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A pathway. Mol Pain. (2006) 2:22. 10.1186/1744-8069-2-22
28.
Endres-BeckerJHeppenstallPAMousaSALabuzDOkscheASchäferMet al. Mu-opioid receptor activation modulates transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) currents in sensory neurons in a model of inflammatory pain. Mol Pharmacol. (2007) 71:12–8. 10.1124/mol.106.026740
29.
CaiQQiuCYQiuFLiuTTQuZWLiuYMet al. Morphine inhibits acid-sensing ion channel currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res. (2014) 1554:12–20. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.042
30.
GoldMSLevineJD. DAMGO inhibits prostaglandin E2-induced potentiation of a TTX-resistant Na+ current in rat sensory neurons in vitro. Neurosci Lett. (1996) 212:83–6. 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12791-9
31.
IngramSLWilliamsJT. Opioid inhibition of Ih via adenylyl cyclase. Neuron. (1994) 13:179–86. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90468-5
32.
SchroederJEFischbachPSZhengDMcCleskeyEW. Activation of mu opioid receptors inhibits transient high- and low-threshold Ca2+ currents, but spares a sustained current. Neuron. (1991) 6:13–20. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90117-I
33.
BorglandSLConnorMChristieMJ. Nociceptin inhibits calcium channel currents in a subpopulation of small nociceptive trigeminal ganglion neurons in mouse. J Physiol. (2001) 536:35–47. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.t01-1-00035.x
34.
AcostaCGLópezHS. δ opioid receptor modulation of several voltage-dependent Ca(2+) currents in rat sensory neurons. J Neurosci. (1999) 19:8337–48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-19-08337.1999
35.
GrudtTJWilliamsJT. κ-Opioid receptors also increase potassium conductance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1993) 90:11429–32. 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11429
36.
VaughanCWChristieMJ. Increase by the ORL1 receptor (opioid receptor-like1) ligand, nociceptin, of inwardly rectifying K conductance in dorsal raphe nucleus neurones. Br J Pharmacol. (1996) 117:1609–11. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15329.x
37.
SchneiderSPEckertWAIIILightAR. Opioid-activated postsynaptic, inward rectifying potassium currents in whole cell recordings in substantia gelatinosa neurons. J Neurophysiol. (1998) 80:2954–62. 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2954
38.
LuoCKumamotoEFurueHYoshimuraM. Nociceptin-induced outward current in substantia gelatinosa neurones of the adult rat spinal cord. Neuroscience. (2001) 108:323–30. 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00398-0
39.
MarkerCLLujánRLohHHWickmanK. Spinal G-protein-gated potassium channels contribute in a dose-dependent manner to the analgesic effect of mu- and delta- but not kappa-opioids. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:3551–9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4899-04.2005
40.
CunhaTMRoman-CamposDLotufoCMDuarteHLSouzaGRVerriWAJret al. Morphine peripheral analgesia depends on activation of the PI3Kgamma/AKT/nNOS/NO/KATP signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:4442–7. 10.1073/pnas.0914733107
41.
OcañaMCendánCMCobosEJEntrenaJMBaeyensJM. Potassium channels and pain: present realities and future opportunities. Eur J Pharmacol. (2004) 500:203–19. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.07.026
42.
DemblaSBehrendtMMohrFGoeckeCSondermannJSchneiderFMet al. Anti-nociceptive action of peripheral mu-opioid receptors by G-beta-gamma protein-mediated inhibition of TRPM3 channels. Elife. (2017) 6:e26280. 10.7554/eLife.26280
43.
YakshTLJessellTMGamseRMudgeAWLeemanSE. Intrathecal morphine inhibits substance P release from mammalian spinal cord in vivo. Nature. (1980) 286:155–6. 10.1038/286155a0
44.
HirotaNKuraishiYHinoYSatoYSatohMTakagiH. Met-enkephalin and morphine but not dynorphin inhibit the noxious stimuli-induced release of substance P from rabbit dorsal horn in situ. Neuropharmacology. (1985) 24:567–70. 10.1016/0028-3908(85)90065-6
45.
HelyesZNemethJPinterESzolcsanyiJ. Inhibition by nociceptin of neurogenic inflammation and the release of SP and CGRP from sensory nerve terminals. Br J Pharmacol. (1997) 121:613–5. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701209
46.
KondoIMarvizonJCSongBSalgadoFCodeluppiSHuaXYet al. Inhibition by spinal μ- and δ-opioid agonists of afferent-evoked substance P release. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:3651–60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0252-05.2005
47.
BeaudryHDuboisDGendronL. Activation of spinal μ- and δ opioid receptors potently inhibits substance P release induced by peripheral noxious stimuli. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:13068–77. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1817-11.2011
48.
YakshTL. Substance P release from knee joint afferent terminals: modulation by opioids. Brain Res. (1988) 458:319–24. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90474-X
49.
KhasabovaIAHarding-RoseCSimoneDASeyboldVS. Differential effects of CB1 and opioid agonists on two populations of adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:1744–53. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4298-03.2004
50.
PatwardhanAMBergKAAkopainANJeskeNAGamperNClarkeWPet al. Bradykinin-induced functional competence and trafficking of the δ-opioid receptor in trigeminal nociceptors. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:8825–32. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0160-05.2005
51.
BörzseiRPozsgaiGBagolyTElekesKPintérESzolcsányiJet al. Inhibitory action of endomorphin-1 on sensory neuropeptide release and neurogenic inflammation in rats and mice. Neuroscience. (2008) 152:82–8. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.005
52.
UedaMSugimotoKOyamaTKuraishiYSatohM. Opioidergic inhibition of capsaicin-evoked release of glutamate from rat spinal dorsal horn slices. Neuropharmacology. (1995) 34:303–8. 10.1016/0028-3908(94)00160-T
53.
JinYHNishiokaHWakabayashiKFujitaTYoneharaN. Effect of morphine on the release of excitatory amino acids in the rat hind instep: pain is modulated by the interaction between the peripheral opioid and glutamate systems. Neuroscience. (2006) 138:1329–39. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.049
54.
TakagiHShiomiHKuraishiYFukuiKUedaH. Pain and the bulbospinal noradrenergic system: pain-induced increase in normetanephrine content in the spinal cord and its modification by morphine. Eur J Pharmacol. (1979) 54:99–107. 10.1016/0014-2999(79)90412-6
55.
BouazizHTongCYoonYHoodDDEisenachJC. Intravenous opioids stimulate norepinephrine and acetylcholine release in spinal cord dorsal horn. Systematic studies in sheep and an observation in a human. Anesthesiology. (1996) 84:143–54. 10.1097/00000542-199601000-00017
56.
YakshTL. Pharmacology and mechanisms of opioid analgesic activity. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (1997) 41:94–111. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04623.x
57.
MachelskaHCelikMÖ. Advances in achieving opioid analgesia without side effects. Front Pharmacol. (2018) 9:1388. 10.3389/fphar.2018.01388
58.
SteinCMachelskaH. Modulation of peripheral sensory neurons by the immune system: implications for pain therapy. Pharmacol Rev. (2011) 63:860–81. 10.1124/pr.110.003145
59.
MillanMJ. Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol. (2002) 66:355–474. 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00009-6
60.
OssipovMHDussorGOPorrecaF. Central modulation of pain. J Clin Invest. (2010) 120:3779–87. 10.1172/JCI43766
61.
PanZHirakawaNFieldsHL. A cellular mechanism for the bidirectional pain-modulating actions of orphanin FQ/nociceptin. Neuron. (2000) 26:515–22. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81183-6
62.
ChanJSYungLYLeeJWWuYLPeiGWongYH. Pertussis toxin-insensitive signaling of the ORL1 receptor: coupling to Gz and G16 proteins. J Neurochem. (1998) 71:2203–10. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71052203.x
63.
KlukovitsATekesKGündüz CinarOBenyheSBorsodiADeákBHet al. Nociceptin inhibits uterine contractions in term-pregnant rats by signaling through multiple pathways. Biol Reprod. (2010) 83:36–41. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.082222
64.
KapustaDR. Opioid mechanisms controlling renal function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. (1995) 22:891–902. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1995.tb02324.x
65.
LambertDG. The nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor: a target with broad therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2008) 7:694–710. 10.1038/nrd2572
66.
ImamMZKuoAGhassabianSSmithMT. Progress in understanding mechanisms of opioid-induced gastrointestinal adverse effects and respiratory depression. Neuropharmacology. (2017) 131:238–55. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.032
67.
DarcqEKiefferBL. Opioid receptors: drivers to addiction?Nat Rev Neurosci. (2018) 19:499–514. 10.1038/s41583-018-0028-x
68.
HunterP. New therapies to relieve pain: The search for more efficient and safer alternatives to opioid pain killers. EMBO Rep. (2018) 19:e46925. 10.15252/embr.201846925
69.
NegusSSFreemanKB. Abuse potential of biased mu opioid receptor agonists. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 39:916–9. 10.1016/j.tips.2018.08.007
70.
SacerdotePLimiroliEGaspaniL. Experimental evidence for immunomodulatory effects of opioids. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2003) 521:106–16.
71.
SharpBM. Multiple opioid receptors on immune cells modulate intracellular signaling. Brain Behav Immun. (2006) 20:9–14. 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.02.002
72.
SalzetMVieauDDayR. Crosstalk between nervous and immune systems through the animal kingdom: focus on opioids. Trends Neurosci. (2000) 23:550–5. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01642-8
73.
WeltersID. Is immunomodulation by opioid drugs of clinical relevance?Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. (2003) 16:509–13. 10.1097/00001503-200310000-00011
74.
FinleyMJHappelCMKaminskyDERogersTJ. Opioid and nociceptin receptors regulate cytokine and cytokine receptor expression. Cell Immunol. (2008) 252:146–54. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.008
75.
Al-HashimiMScottSWThompsonJPLambertDG. Opioids and immune modulation: more questions than answers. Br J Anaesth. (2013) 111:80–8. 10.1093/bja/aet153
76.
NinkovićJRoyS. Role of the mu-opioid receptor in opioid modulation of immune function. Amino Acids. (2013) 45:9–24. 10.1007/s00726-011-1163-0
77.
PleinLMRittnerHL. Opioids and the immune system - friend or foe. Br J Pharmacol. (2018) 175:2717–25. 10.1111/bph.13750
78.
SweitzerSMHickeyWFRutkowskiMDPahlJLDeLeoJA. Focal peripheral nerve injury induces leukocyte trafficking into the central nervous system: potential relationship to neuropathic pain. Pain. (2002) 100:163–70. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00257-9
79.
CostiganMMossALatremoliereAJohnstonCVerma-GandhuMHerbertTAet al. T-cell infiltration and signaling in the adult dorsal spinal cord is a major contributor to neuropathic pain-like hypersensitivity. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:14415–22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4569-09.2009
80.
SorgeREMapplebeckJCRosenSBeggsSTavesSAlexanderJKet al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nat Neurosci. (2015) 18:1081–3. 10.1038/nn.4053
81.
LopesDMMalekNEdyeMJagerSBMcMurraySMcMahonSBet al. Sex differences in peripheral not central immune responses to pain-inducing injury. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:16460. 10.1038/s41598-017-16664-z
82.
JiRRChamessianAZhangYQ. Pain regulation by non-neuronal cells and inflammation. Science. (2016) 354:572–7. 10.1126/science.aaf8924
83.
AllenNJLyonsDA. Glia as architects of central nervous system formation and function. Science. (2018) 362:181–5. 10.1126/science.aat0473
84.
Stiene-MartinAZhouRHauserKF. Regional, developmental, and cell cycle-dependent differences in μ, δ, and κ-opioid receptor expression among cultured mouse astrocytes. Glia. (1998) 22:249–59. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199803)22:3<249::AID-GLIA4>3.0.CO;2-0
85.
SharpBMLiMDMattaSGMcAllenKShahabiNA. Expression of delta opioid receptors and transcripts by splenic T cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2000) 917:764–70. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05441.x
86.
BeutnerCLinnartz-GerlachBSchmidtSVBeyerMMallmannMRStaratschek-JoxAet al. Unique transcriptome signature of mouse microglia. Glia. (2013) 61:1429–42. 10.1002/glia.22524
87.
BidlackJMKhimichMParkhillALSumaginSSunBTiptonCM. Opioid receptors and signaling on cells from the immune system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2006) 1:260–9. 10.1007/s11481-006-9026-2
88.
WilliamsJPThompsonJPMcDonaldJBarnesTACoteTRowbothamDJLambertDG. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells express nociceptin/orphanin FQ, but not mu, delta, or kappa opioid receptors. Anesth Analg. (2007) 105:998–1005. 10.1213/01.ane.0000278865.11991.9d
89.
Al-HashimiMMcDonaldJThompsonJPLambertDG. Evidence for nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) but not μ (MOP), δ (DOP) or κ (KOP) opioid receptor mRNA in whole human blood. Br J Anaesth. (2016) 116:423–9. 10.1093/bja/aev540
90.
GaveriauxCPelusoJSimoninFLaforetJKiefferB. Identification of κ- and δ-opioid receptor transcripts in immune cells. FEBS Lett. (1995) 369:272–6. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00766-3
91.
WickMJMinnerathSRRoySRamakrishnanSLohHH. Differential expression of opioid receptor genes in human lymphoid cell lines and peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Neuroimmunol. (1996) 64:29–36. 10.1016/0165-5728(95)00144-1
92.
CorderGTawfikVLWangDSypekEILowSADickinsonJRet al. Loss of μ opioid receptor signaling in nociceptors, but not microglia, abrogates morphine tolerance without disrupting analgesia. Nat Med. (2017) 23:164–73. 10.1038/nm.4262
93.
KaoSCZhaoXLeeCYAtianjohFEGaudaEBYasterMet al. Absence of μ opioid receptor mRNA expression in astrocytes and microglia of rat spinal cord. Neuroreport. (2012) 23:378–84. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283522e1b
94.
SchwarzJMSmithSHBilboSD. FACS analysis of neuronal-glial interactions in the nucleus accumbens following morphine administration. Psychopharmacology. (2013) 230:525–35. 10.1007/s00213-013-3180-z
95.
SannaMDGhelardiniCGaleottiN. Activation of JNK pathway in spinal astrocytes contributes to acute ultra-low-dose morphine thermal hyperalgesia. Pain. (2015) 156:1265–75. 10.1097/j.pain.000000000000016
96.
ChuangTKKillamKFJrChuangLFKungHFShengWSChaoCCet al. Mu opioid receptor gene expression in immune cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1995) 216:922–30. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2709
97.
ToskulkaoTPornchaiRAkkarapatumwongVVatanatunyakumSGovitrapongP. Alteration of lymphocyte opioid receptors in methadone maintenance subjects. Neurochem Int. (2010) 56:285–90. 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.10.013
98.
SedqiMRoySRamakrishnanSEldeRLohHH. Complementary DNA cloning of a μ-opioid receptor from rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1995) 209:563–74. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1538
99.
CelikMÖLabuzDHenningKBusch-DienstfertigMGaveriaux-RuffCKiefferBLet al. Leukocyte opioid receptors mediate analgesia via Ca(2+)-regulated release of opioid peptides. Brain Behav Immun. (2016) 57:227–42. 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.04.018
100.
MadunaTAudouardEDembéléDMouzaouiNReissDMassotteDet al. Microglia express mu opioid receptor: insights from transcriptomics and fluorescent reporter mice. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 9:726. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00726
101.
LopkerAAboodLGHossWLionettiFJ. Stereoselective muscarinic acetylcholine and opiate receptors in human phagocytic leukocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. (1980) 29:1361–5. 10.1016/0006-2952(80)90431-1
102.
StefanoGBMelchiorriPNegriLHughesTKJrScharrerB. [D-Ala2]deltorphin I binding and pharmacological evidence for a special subtype of delta opioid receptor on human and invertebrate immune cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1992) 89:9316–20. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9316
103.
BoyadjievaNIChaturvediKPoplawskiMMSarkarDK. Opioid antagonist naltrexone disrupts feedback interaction between mu and delta opioid receptors in splenocytes to prevent alcohol inhibition of NK cell function. J Immunol. (2004) 173:42–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.42
104.
HorvathRJRomero-SandovalEADe LeoJA. Inhibition of microglial P2X4 receptors attenuates morphine tolerance, Iba1, GFAP and mu opioid receptor protein expression while enhancing perivascular microglial ED2. Pain. (2010) 150:401–13. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.042
105.
FerriniFTrangTMattioliTALaffraySDel'GuidiceTLorenzoLEet al. Morphine hyperalgesia gated through microglia-mediated disruption of neuronal Cl? homeostasis. Nat Neurosci. (2013) 16:183–92. 10.1038/nn.3295
106.
VaccaVMarinelliSLuvisettoSPavoneF. Botulinum toxin A increases analgesic effects of morphine, counters development of morphine tolerance and modulates glia activation and μ opioid receptor expression in neuropathic mice. Brain Behav Immun. (2013) 32:40–50. 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.01.088
107.
NamMHHanKSLeeJBaeJYAnHParkSet al. Expression of μ-opioid receptor in CA1 hippocampal astrocytes. Exp Neurobiol. (2018) 27:120–8. 10.5607/en.2018.27.2.120
108.
Stiene-MartinAKnappPEMartinKGurwellJARyanSThorntonSRet al. Opioid system diversity in developing neurons, astroglia, and oligodendroglia in the subventricular zone and striatum: impact on gliogenesis in vivo. Glia. (2001) 36:78–88. 10.1002/glia.1097
109.
SharpBMShahabiNMcKeanDLiMDMcAllenK. Detection of basal levels and induction of delta opioid receptor mRNA in murine splenocytes. J Neuroimmunol. (1997) 78:198–202. 10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00101-X
110.
JaumeMLaffontSChapeyEBlanpiedCDietrichG. Opioid receptor blockade increases the number of lymphocytes without altering T cell response in draining lymph nodes in vivo. J Neuroimmunol. (2007) 188:95–102. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.06.013
111.
Gavériaux-RuffCPelusoJBefortKSimoninFZillioxCKiefferBL. Detection of opioid receptor mRNA by RT-PCR reveals alternative splicing for the δ- and κ-opioid receptors. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. (1997) 48:298–304. 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00109-5
112.
GunjiNNagashimaMAsanoGYoshinoS. Expression of κ-opioid receptor mRNA in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and the relationship between its expression and the inflammatory changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. (2000) 19:95–100. 10.1007/s002960050110
113.
ChuangLFChuangTKKillamKFJrQiuQWangXRLinJJet al. Expression of κ opioid receptors in human and monkey lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1995) 209:1003–10. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1597
114.
IgnatowskiTABidlackJM. Differential κ-opioid receptor expression on mouse lymphocytes at varying stages of maturation and on mouse macrophages after selective elicitation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (1999) 290:863–70.
115.
PelusoJLaForgeKSMatthesHWKreekMJKiefferBLGavériaux-RuffC. Distribution of nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor transcript in human central nervous system and immune cells. J Neuroimmunol. (1998) 81:184–92. 10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00178-1
116.
SerhanCNFierroIMChiangNPouliotM. Cutting edge: nociceptin stimulates neutrophil chemotaxis and recruitment: inhibition by aspirin-triggered-15-epi-lipoxin A4. J Immunol. (2001) 166:3650–4. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3650
117.
ThompsonJPSerrano-GomezAMcDonaldJLadakNBowreySLambertDG. The Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ system is modulated in patients admitted to ICU with sepsis and after cardiopulmonary bypass. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e76682. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076682
118.
SinghSRSulloNMatteisMSpazianoGMcDonaldJSaundersRet al. Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) modulates immunopathology and airway hyperresponsiveness representing a novel target for the treatment of asthma. Br J Pharmacol. (2016) 173:1286–301. 10.1111/bph.13416
119.
ZhaoHHuangHWWuGCCaoXD. Effect of orphanin FQ on interleukin-1beta mRNA transcripts in the rat CNS. Neuroscience. (2002) 114:1019–31. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00233-6
120.
MeyerLCPaisleyCEMohamedEBigbeeJWKordulaTRichardHet al. Novel role of the nociceptin system as a regulator of glutamate transporter expression in developing astrocytes. Glia. (2017) 65:2003–23. 10.1002/glia.23210
121.
BirdMFGuerriniRWilletsJMThompsonJPCalóGLambertDG. Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) conjugated to ATTO594: a novel fluorescent probe for the N/OFQ (NOP) receptor. Br J Pharmacol. (2018) 175:4496–506. 10.1111/bph.14504
122.
BénardACavaillèsPBouéJChapeyEBayryJBlanpiedCet al. μ-Opioid receptor is induced by IL-13 within lymph nodes from patients with Sézary syndrome. J Invest Dermatol. (2010) 130:1337–44. 10.1038/jid.2009.433
123.
ScherrerGImamachiNCaoYQContetCMennickenFO'DonnellDet al. Dissociation of the opioid receptor mechanisms that control mechanical and heat pain. Cell. (2009) 137:1148–59. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.019
124.
NiwaHRowbothamDJLambertDG. Evaluation of primary opioid receptor antibodies for use in western blotting. Br J Anaesth. (2012) 108:530–2. 10.1093/bja/aes015
125.
SchmidtYGavériaux-RuffCMachelskaH. μ-Opioid receptor antibody reveals tissue-dependent specific staining and increased neuronal μ-receptor immunoreactivity at the injured nerve trunk in mice. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e79099. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079099
126.
ObaraIParkitnaJRKorostynskiMMakuchWKaminskaDPrzewlockaBet al. Local peripheral opioid effects and expression of opioid genes in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Pain. (2009) 141:283–91. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.006
127.
HerveraANegreteRLeánezSMartín-CamposJMPolO. Peripheral effects of morphine and expression of m-opioid receptors in the dorsal root ganglia during neuropathic pain: nitric oxide signaling. Mol Pain. (2011) 7:25. 10.1186/1744-8069-7-25
128.
Gaveriaux-RuffCNozakiCNadalXHeverXCWeibelRMatifasAet al. Genetic ablation of delta opioid receptors in nociceptive sensory neurons increases chronic pain and abolishes opioid analgesia. Pain. (2011) 152:1238–48. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.031
129.
KeïtaHKayserVGuilbaudG. Antinociceptive effect of a kappa-opioid receptor agonist that minimally crosses the blood-brain barrier (ICI 204448) in a rat model of mononeuropathy. Eur J Pharmacol. (1995) 277:275–80. 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00122-2
130.
LabuzDMachelskaH. Stronger antinociceptive efficacy of opioids at the injured nerve trunk than at its peripheral terminals in neuropathic pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2013) 346:535–44. 10.1124/jpet.113.205344
131.
SteinCPflügerMYassouridisAHoelzlJLehrbergerKWelteCet al. No tolerance to peripheral morphine analgesia in presence of opioid expression in inflamed synovia. J Clin Invest. (1996) 98:793–9. 10.1172/JCI118852
132.
HutchinsonMRShavitYGracePMRiceKCMaierSFWatkinsLR. Exploring the neuroimmunopharmacology of opioids: an integrative review of mechanisms of central immune signaling and their implications for opioid analgesia. Pharmacol Rev. (2011) 63:772–810. 10.1124/pr.110.004135
133.
RoeckelLALe CozGMGavériaux-RuffCSimoninF. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience. (2016) 338:160–82. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.029
134.
AngstMSClarkJD. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. (2006) 104:570–87. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00025
135.
HayashiYMorinagaSZhangJSatohYMeredithALNakataTet al. BK channels in microglia are required for morphine-induced hyperalgesia. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:11697. 10.1038/ncomms11697
136.
TumatiSLargent-MilnesTMKeresztesAIYamamotoTVanderahTWRoeskeWRet al. Tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist co-administration attenuates opioid withdrawal-mediated spinal microglia and astrocyte activation. Eur J Pharmacol. (2012) 684:64–70. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.03.025
137.
BaiLZhaiCHanKLiZQianJJingYet al. Toll-like receptor 4-mediated nuclear factor-κB activation in spinal cord contributes to chronic morphine-induced analgesic tolerance and hyperalgesia in rats. Neurosci Bull. (2014) 30:936–48. 10.1007/s12264-014-1483-7
138.
JokinenVSidorovaYViisanenHSuleymanovaITiilikainenHLiZet al. Differential spinal and supraspinal activation of glia in a rat model of morphine tolerance. Neuroscience. (2018) 375:10–24. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.048
139.
GerholdKJDrdla-SchuttingRHonsekSDForsthuberLSandkühlerJ. Pronociceptive and antinociceptive effects of buprenorphine in the spinal cord dorsal horn cover a dose range of four orders of magnitude. J Neurosci. (2015) 35:9580–94. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0731-14.2015
140.
YeLXiaoLYangSYDuanJJChenYCuiYet al. Cathepsin S in the spinal microglia contributes to remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia in rats. Neuroscience. (2017) 344:265–75. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.030
141.
ChangLYeFLuoQTaoYShuH. Increased hyperalgesia and proinflammatory cytokines in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion after surgery and/or fentanyl administration in rats. Anesth Analg. (2018) 126:289–97. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002601
142.
MicheliLLucariniECortiFCiccocioppoRCalòGRizziAet al. Involvement of the N/OFQ-NOP system in rat morphine antinociceptive tolerance: Are astrocytes the crossroad?Eur J Pharmacol. (2018) 823:79–86. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.01.039
143.
WaxmanARAroutCCaldwellMDahanAKestB. Acute and chronic fentanyl administration causes hyperalgesia independently of opioid receptor activity in mice. Neurosci Lett. (2009) 462:68–72. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.061
144.
JuniAKleinGPintarJEKestB. Nociception increases during opioid infusion in opioid receptor triple knock-out mice. Neuroscience. (2007) 147:439–44. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.04.030
145.
FletcherDMartinezV. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. (2014) 112:991–1004. 10.1093/bja/aeu137
146.
ChuLFD'ArcyNBradyCZamoraAKYoungCAKimJEet al. Analgesic tolerance without demonstrable opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sustained-release morphine for treatment of chronic nonradicular low-back pain. Pain. (2012) 153:1583–92. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.028
147.
McPhersonSLederhos SmithCDobschaSKMorascoBJDemidenkoMIMeathTHAet al. Changes in pain intensity after discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain. Pain. (2018) 159:2097–104. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001315
148.
SteinCSchäferMMachelskaH. Attacking pain at its source: new perspectives on opioids. Nat Med. (2003) 9:1003–8. 10.1038/nm908
149.
HuaS. Neuroimmune interaction in the regulation of peripheral opioid-mediated analgesia in inflammation. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:293. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00293
150.
PrzewlockiRHassanAHSLasonWEpplenCHerzASteinC. Gene expression and localization of opioid peptides in immune cells of inflamed tissue. Functional role in antinociception. Neuroscience. (1992) 48:491–500. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90509-Z
151.
MousaSAShakibaeiMSitteNSchäferMSteinC. Subcellular pathways of beta-endorphin synthesis, processing, and release from immunocytes in inflammatory pain. Endocrinology. (2004) 145:1331–41. 10.1210/en.2003-1287
152.
ChadzinskaMStarowiczKScislowska-CzarneckaABileckiWPierzchala-KoziecKPrzewlockiRet al. Morphine-induced changes in the activity of proopiomelanocortin and prodynorphin systems in zymosan-induced peritonitis in mice. Immunol Lett. (2005) 101:185–92. 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.05.009
153.
SitteNBuschMMousaSALabuzDRittnerHGoreCet al. Lymphocytes upregulate signal sequence-encoding proopiomelanocortin mRNA and beta-endorphin during painful inflammation in vivo. J Neuroimmunol. (2007) 183:133–45. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.033
154.
MaddilaSCBusch-DienstfertigMSteinC. B lymphocytes express Pomc mRNA, processing enzymes and β-endorphin in painful inflammation. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2017) 12:180–6. 10.1007/s11481-016-9715-4
155.
CabotPJCarterLSchäferMSteinC. Methionine-enkephalin- and Dynorphin A-release from immune cells and control of inflammatory pain. Pain. (2001) 93:207–12. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00322-0
156.
RittnerHLBrackAMachelskaHMousaSABauerMSchäferMet al. Opioid peptide-expressing leukocytes: identification, recruitment, and simultaneously increasing inhibition of inflammatory pain. Anesthesiology. (2001) 95:500–8. 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00036
157.
MousaSAStraubRHSchäferMSteinC. Beta-endorphin, Met-enkephalin and corresponding opioid receptors within synovium of patients with joint trauma, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2007) 66:871–9. 10.1136/ard.2006.067066
158.
SchreiterAGoreCLabuzDFournie-ZaluskiMCRoquesBPSteinCet al. Pain inhibition by blocking leukocytic and neuronal opioid peptidases in peripheral inflamed tissue. FASEB J. (2012) 26:5161–71. 10.1096/fj.12-208678
159.
SteinCGramschCHerzA. Intrinsic mechanisms of antinociception in inflammation: local opioid receptors and beta-endorphin. J Neurosci. (1990) 10:1292–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-04-01292.1990
160.
SchäferMCarterLSteinC. Interleukin-1 beta and corticotropin-releasing-factor inhibit pain by releasing opioids from immune cells in inflamed tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1994) 91:4219–23. 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4219
161.
MachelskaHCabotPJMousaSAZhangQSteinC. Pain control in inflammation governed by selectins. Nat Med. (1998) 4:1425–8. 10.1038/4017
162.
MachelskaHMousaSABrackASchopohlJKRittnerHLSchäferMet al. Opioid control of inflammatory pain regulated by intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:5588–96. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05588.2002
163.
MachelskaHBrackAMousaSASchopohlJKRittnerHLSchäferMet al. Selectins and integrins but not platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 regulate opioid inhibition of inflammatory pain. Br J Pharmacol. (2004) 142:772–80. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705837
164.
RittnerHLLabuzDSchaeferMMousaSASchulzSSchäferMet al. Pain control by CXCR2 ligands through Ca2+-regulated release of opioid peptides from polymorphonuclear cells. FASEB J. (2006) 20:2627–9. 10.1096/fj.06-6077fje
165.
RittnerHLHackelDVoigtPMousaSStolzALabuzDet al. Mycobacteria attenuate nociceptive responses by formyl peptide receptor triggered opioid peptide release from neutrophils. PLoS Pathog. (2009) 5:e1000362. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000362
166.
BinderWMousaSASitteNKaiserMSteinCSchäferM. Sympathetic activation triggers endogenous opioid release and analgesia within peripheral inflamed tissue. Eur J Neurosci. (2004) 20:92–100. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03459.x
167.
BaamondeALastraAJuarezLGarcia-SuarezOMeanaAHidalgoAet al. Endogenous β-endorphin induces thermal analgesia at the initial stages of a murine osteosarcoma. Peptides. (2006) 27:2778–85. 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.07.004
168.
LabuzDSchmidtYSchreiterARittnerHLMousaSAMachelskaH. Immune cell-derived opioids protect against neuropathic pain in mice. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:278–86. 10.1172/JCI36246C1
169.
LabuzDSchreiterASchmidtYBrackAMachelskaH. T lymphocytes containing β-endorphin ameliorate mechanical hypersensitivity following nerve injury. Brain Behav Immun. (2010) 24:1045–53. 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.04.001
170.
BouéJBassoLCenacNBlanpiedCRolli-DerkinderenMNeunlistMet al. Endogenous regulation of visceral pain via production of opioids by colitogenic CD4(+) T cells in mice. Gastroenterology. (2014) 146:166–75. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.020
171.
SteinCHassanAHSLehrbergerKGiefingJYassouridisA. Local analgesic effect of endogenous opioid peptides. Lancet. (1993) 342:321–4. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91471-W
172.
KagerIMousaSASieperJSteinCPipamWLikarR. Blockade of intra-articular adrenergic receptors increases analgesic demands for pain relief after knee surgery. Rheumatol Int. (2011) 31:1299–306. 10.1007/s00296-010-1489-z
173.
LikarRMousaSASteinkellnerHKoppertWPhilippitschGSteinCet al. Involvement of intra-articular corticotropin-releasing hormone in postoperative pain modulation. Clin J Pain. (2007) 23:136–42. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210954.93878.0d
174.
ZöllnerCMousaSAFischerORittnerHLShaquraMBrackAet al. Chronic morphine use does not induce peripheral tolerance in a rat model of inflammatory pain. J Clin Invest. (2008) 118:1065–73. 10.1172/JCI25911
175.
PampuschMSSerieJROsinskiMASeyboldVSMurtaughMPBrownDR. Expression of nociceptin/OFQ receptor and prepro-nociceptin/OFQ in lymphoid tissues. Peptides. (2000) 21:1865–70. 10.1016/S0196-9781(00)00332-6
176.
FisetMEGilbertCPoubellePEPouliotM. Human neutrophils as a source of nociceptin: a novel link between pain and inflammation. Biochemistry. (2003) 42:10498–505. 10.1021/bi0300635
177.
HauserKFKnappPE. Opiate drugs with abuse liability hijack the endogenous opioid system to disrupt neuronal and glial maturation in the central nervous system. Front Pediatr. (2018) 5:294. 10.3389/fped.2017.00294
178.
GongNXiaoQZhuBZhangCYWangYCFanHet al. Activation of spinal glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors specifically suppresses pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci. (2014) 34:5322–34. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4703-13.2014
179.
WuHYMaoXFTangXQAliUApryaniELiuHet al. Spinal interleukin-10 produces antinociception in neuropathy through microglial β-endorphin expression, separated from antineuroinflammation. Brain Behav Immun. (2018) 73:504–19. 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.06.015
180.
LiTFFanHWangYX. Aconitum-derived Bulleyaconitine A exhibits antihypersensitivity through direct stimulating dynorphin A expression in spinal microglia. J Pain. (2016) 17:530–48. 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.015
181.
SpruceBACurtisRWilkinGPGloverDM. A neuropeptide precursor in cerebellum: proenkephalin exists in subpopulations of both neurons and astrocytes. EMBO J. (1990) 9:1787–95. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08303.x
182.
BazovISarkisyanDKononenkoOWatanabeHTaqiMMStålhandskeLet al. Neuronal expression of opioid gene is controlled by dual epigenetic and transcriptional mechanism in human brain. Cereb Cortex. (2018) 28:3129–42. 10.1093/cercor/bhx181
183.
SchmidtYMachelskaH. Immunohistochemical analysis of opioid receptors in peripheral tissues. Methods Mol Biol. (2015) 1230:155–65. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1708-2_12
Summary
Keywords
analgesia, astrocytes, microglia, nociceptin/orphanin FQ, oligodendrocytes, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid peptides, opioid receptor signaling
Citation
Machelska H and Celik MÖ (2020) Opioid Receptors in Immune and Glial Cells—Implications for Pain Control. Front. Immunol. 11:300. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00300
Received
15 May 2019
Accepted
06 February 2020
Published
04 March 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Sabita Roy, University of Miami, United States
Reviewed by
Lawrence Toll, Florida Atlantic University, United States; Eyup Akgun, University of Minnesota, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Machelska and Celik.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Halina Machelska halina.machelska@charite.de
This article was submitted to Inflammation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.