Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 31 January 2020
Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity
This article is part of the Research Topic Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells as Disease Modulators View all 14 articles

Editorial: Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells as Disease Modulators

  • 1School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • 2School of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, United States

Myeloid cells are a diverse family of innate immune cells with enormous functional plasticity stemming in part from the lack of genetically encoded antigen-specific receptors. Monocytes, dendritic cells and the various forms of polymorphonuclear granulocytes (eosinophils, basophils, and neutrophils) play fundamental roles in our defense against infectious agents. However, in chronic inflammatory conditions such as cancer, chronic infections, obesity, trauma and chronic stress, myeloid cells become chronically activated, develop mechanisms that suppress T cell, B cell, and even NK cell functions and have thus been named myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) (1). Similar to their normal counterparts MDSC can be monocytic (M-MDSC) or granulocytic (PMN or G-MDSC) and display a wide array of immunosuppressive mechanisms (24). In cancer, where they have been most extensively studied, MDSC can be detected early on in the malignant microenvironment (5) and increase in circulation as the tumors progress. Increases in the numbers of circulating MDSC have been associated with a decreased response to check-point immunotherapies and poor overall survival (6, 7).

The signals and mechanisms that activate and regulate normal myeloid cell function are primarily pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from infectious agents and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP's) from damaged tissues. The elimination of the infectious agent or the repair of tissues ends the response of myeloid cells which return to a quiescent stage. In contrast, diseases characterized by chronic inflammation and/or persistent tissue damage such as cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infections, result in the prolonged release of DAMP's and PAMP's and the production of cytokines such as G-CSF, GM-CSF, and IL6 that increase the release of myeloid-cells from bone marrow and promote the induction of immunosuppressive mechanisms in MDSC. More recently new data show that increased concentrations of lipids such as found in obese patients (8, 9), or increased levels of catecholamines as in chronic pain or stress also promote the activation of immunosuppressive mechanisms by MDSC (10). MDSC suppress T and NK cell function through multiple mechanisms. The depletion of amino-acids such as arginine and L-tryptophan by Arginase I and Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) induces T cell anergy, while an increased uptake of cysteine by MDSC depletes this amino-acid that is essential for T cell function. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (nitric oxide—NO) induces T cell apoptosis, while the release of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL10 and TGFβ, or the production of adenosine inhibit T and NK cell functions. Finally the expression of check-point molecules such as PD-L1 leads to T cell exhaustion, while Fas L and Galectin 9 cause T cell apoptosis. The end result is the loss of protective or therapeutic T cell responses and the escape of tumors from the immune response or the therapeutic effect of novel immunotherapies.

MDSC are therefore the focus of intense research aimed at identifying signals that increase and activate MDSC, understanding their role in different diseases, establishing unique markers that allow us to track the number and fate of these cells, and finding therapeutic approaches to block their immunosuppressive activities. The publications that are part of the series on Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells as Disease Modulators present original articles and reviews that update on the recently acquired knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the induction and function of MDSC in cancer and other diseases and discuss therapeutic approaches being tested for modulating their function with the goal of allowing the development of a protective T cell functions that resolve the disease process.

Author's Note

The authors selected and invited the scientific contributors to this collection based on their unique and pioneering discoveries on the role of MDSC in a variety of diseases, the biology of MDSC, their impact on the function of other immune cells and their effect on disease outcomes. We expect that the knowledge presented in these articles provides information for other researchers in the field and eventually helps develop novel therapeutic approaches to regulate the function of MDSC for the benefit of patients.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, Colombo MP, Frey AB, Greten TF, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Fenselau C. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: immune-suppressive cells that impair antitumor immunity and are sculpted by their environment. J Immunol. (2018) 200:422–31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Si Y, Merz SF, Jansen P, Wang B, Bruderek K, Altenhoff P, et al. Mutlidimensional imaging provides evidence for down-regulation of T cell effector function by MDSC in human cancer tissue. Sci Immunol. (2019) 4:eaaw9159. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw9159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Groth C, Hu X, Weber R, Fleming V, Altevogt P, Utikal J, et al. Immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) during tumour progression. Br J Cancer. (2019) 120:16–25. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0333-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kimura T, McKolanis JR, Dzubinski LA, Islam K, Potter DM, Salazar AM, et al. MUC1 vaccine for individuals with advanced adenoma of the colon: a cancer immunoprevention feasibility study. Cancer Prev Res. (2013) 6:18–26. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ai L, Mu S, Wang Y, Wang H, Cai L, Li W, et al. Prognostic role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. (2018) 18:1220. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5086-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wang PF, Song SY, Wang TJ, Ji WJ, Li SW, Liu N, et al. Prognostic role of pretreatment circulating MDSCs in patients with solid malignancies: a meta-analysis of 40 studies. Oncoimmunology. (2018) 7:e1494113. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1494113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid derived-suppressor cells: their role in cancer and obesity. Curr Opin Immunol. (2018) 51:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Al-Khami AA, Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC. Metabolic reprogramming of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in cancer, Oncoimmunology. (2016) 5:e1200771. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1200771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Repasky EA, Eng J, Hylander BL. Stress, metabolism and cancer: integrated pathways contributing to immune suppression. Cancer J. (2015) 21:97–103. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), cancer, immunosuppression, arginase 1 (Arg-1), chronic inflammatory diseases

Citation: Finn OJ and Ochoa AC (2020) Editorial: Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells as Disease Modulators. Front. Immunol. 11:90. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00090

Received: 07 January 2020; Accepted: 14 January 2020;
Published: 31 January 2020.

Edited and reviewed by: Francesca Granucci, University of Milano Bicocca, Italy

Copyright © 2020 Finn and Ochoa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Olivera J. Finn, b2pmaW5uJiN4MDAwNDA7cGl0dC5lZHU=; Augusto C. Ochoa, YW9jaG9hJiN4MDAwNDA7bHN1aHNjLmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.