Effects of Normothermic Machine Perfusion Conditions on Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of transplant kidneys allows assessment of kidney quality and targeted intervention to initiate repair processes prior to transplantation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have been shown to possess the capacity to stimulate kidney repair. Therefore, the combination of NMP and MSC therapy offers potential to repair transplant kidneys. It is however unknown how NMP conditions affect MSC. In this study the effect of NMP perfusion fluid on survival, metabolism and function of thawed cryopreserved human (h)MSC and porcine (p)MSC in suspension conditions was studied. Suspension conditions reduced the viability of pMSC by 40% in both perfusion fluid and culture medium. Viability of hMSC was reduced by suspension conditions by 15% in perfusion fluid, whilst no differences were found in survival in culture medium. Under adherent conditions, survival of the cells was not affected by perfusion fluid. The perfusion fluid did not affect survival of fresh MSC in suspension compared to the control culture medium. The freeze-thawing process impaired the survival of hMSC; 95% survival of fresh hMSC compared to 70% survival of thawed hMSC. Moreover, thawed MSC showed increased levels of reactive oxygen species, which indicates elevated levels of oxidative stress, and reduced mitochondrial activity, which implies reduced metabolism. The adherence of pMSC and hMSC to endothelial cells was reduced after the thawing process, effect which was particularly profound in in the perfusion fluid. To summarize, we observed that conditions required for machine perfusion are influencing the behavior of MSC. The freeze-thawing process reduces survival and metabolism and increases oxidative stress, and diminishes their ability to adhere to endothelial cells. In addition, we found that hMSC and pMSC behaved differently, which has to be taken into consideration when translating results from animal experiments to clinical studies.

Introduction

As the outcome of kidney transplantation has improved, the demand for kidney transplantation has increased and the donor organ pool to date is too small to supply the current need for transplant organs. The shortage in available donor kidneys (1) has led to the use of expanded criteria donor organs, that includes kidneys from older donors or from donors with hypertension, suboptimal kidney function or death resulting from stroke (2). This has resulted in a higher decline rate at time of offering and may also lead to a poorer outcome of the transplantation (3).

Currently, several techniques are being employed to improve the quality of expanded criteria kidneys and discarded kidneys to make them suitable for transplantation, including machine perfusion. Hypothermic machine perfusion of donor kidneys implies connection of the organ to a pump that perfuses the organ with a solution that provides the required components needed to maintain viability while also removing waste products released as a result of the metabolism and perfusion injury of the organ.

A more physiological way to assess viability of donor organs is continuous perfusion at normothermic temperature at 37°C with proper oxygenation and in the presence of necessary nutrients. A few years ago, the clinical feasibility and safety of 1 h normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) was demonstrated (4). Other groups decided to evaluate the feasibility of longer term NMP at 37°C, allowing more time to observe the kidney as well as intervene where possible. Recently, NMP has been successfully tested in a series of discarded donor kidneys for up to 24 h (5, 6). During NMP, using a bespoke red blood cell (RBC) enriched oxygenated and nutrient containing perfusate, the metabolism of the kidney resumes and allows monitoring during perfusion prior to transplantation (6, 7). Application of NMP for assessment and targeted intervention (8) to improve kidney quality is appealing and the effect of the therapy can potentially be monitored before the organ is transplanted. Thus, NMP is postulated as a promising platform to reduce kidney damage and initiate regeneration prior to transplantation.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are multipotent cells which are found in adult tissues where they support function and repair (9). The International Society for Cellular Therapy has established the minimum criteria that a cell must meet to be considered an MSC: in vitro attachment to plastic, expression of several cell surface markers including CD29, CD44, CD90, the absence of endothelial and hematopoietic markers and the capacity to differentiate into cell types of mesodermal origin (10). MSC provide growth factors to progenitor cells that boost their regenerative processes (11, 12). More than 800 MSC-related studies are registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov on December 2018 and some of them have shown promising results in the treatment of kidney injury from different etiologies (13).

MSC are usually intravenously (IV) administered, which inevitably leads to accumulation in the lungs and poor delivery to target organs (14, 15). Obviously, delivery of MSC to the target organ while perfused on an ex vivo stand-alone circuit may overcome this dilemma. The idea to combine NMP and MSC therapy has generated an interest in the area of kidney transplantation (16–18). It is however unknown whether MSCs are compatible with the conditions of NMP.

In addition, a significant difference exists between preparation of therapeutic MSC for pre-clinical vs. clinical trials. In pre-clinical experiments, MSC are cultured in vitro and administered directly from the culture flask to laboratory animals when the cells are ready for infusion. In the human setting, large numbers of MSC are needed to treat a patient and cells are often produced at locations distant from the place of administration. This requires storage of cells in a frozen state and infusion following a delicate thawing process (13). Existing literature points out that frozen-thawed human MSC (hMSC) have an altered gene expression profile compared to cells directly retrieved from culture flasks (19), while it also has been shown that MSC immunoregulatory properties may be impaired by the freeze-thawing process (20). If the properties of MSC are impaired after the thawing process, this would mean that the results of human studies may not have the expected outcome.

It has been described that MSC from different species will exert the same actions through different mechanisms, which could affect the efficacy of MSC in various animal models (21, 22). Human and non-human primate MSC (23, 24) show marked similarities with respect to their biological properties, but it is unknown whether their therapeutic effects are comparable. Porcine models are very suitable for organ transplant and preservation studies due to the similarity in size and physiology between human and pig. It is however unknown whether MSC from human and pig behave in the same manner under NMP conditions.

With the questions above in mind, it is important to simulate conditions of NMP and assess their effect on MSC. We have evaluated the effect of the bespoke perfusate required for NMP in combination with the condition of fresh vs. frozen-thawed MSC in suspension using cells from porcine (pMSC) and from human (hMSC) origin.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Culture of Human and Porcine MSC and Endothelial Cells

hMSC were isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue from healthy human kidney donors (n = 5) that became available during kidney donation procedures after obtaining written informed consent as approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam (MEC-2006-190). pMSC were isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue (n = 5) collected from male pigs, which were subjected to surgery for teaching purposes, as a waste product. hMSC and pMSC were isolated as described previously (25) and phenotypically characterized by the expression of CD29, CD44, CD90 and the absence of CD31 and CD45. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland) and porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAOEC) were purchased from Cell Applications Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Both hMSC and pMSC were cultured in minimum essential medium-α (MEM-α) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml) (1% P/S; Lonza), 2 mM L-glutamine (Lonza) and 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Lonza). HUVEC were cultured in endothelial growth medium 2 (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). PAOEC were cultured in porcine endothelial cell media (Cell Applications, Inc.). MSC were used at passage 3-6, HUVEC were used at passage 4-8 and PAOEC at passage 3-6.

Perfusion Fluid

The perfusion fluid was a RBC-based solution with albumin as colloid adapted from NMP experiments used by several groups and allowing stable NMP of kidneys (4, 26, 27). The composition of the perfusion fluid is listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Composition of perfusion fluid.

Survival of MSC in Perfusion Fluid

MSC were trypsinized from the culture flasks at 90% confluency or thawed after cryopreservation and re-suspended either in complete culture medium or perfusion fluid at a concentration of 500,000 MSC/ml. MSC were incubated in perfusion fluid in polypropylene tubes to avoid attachment of MSC to plastic. After 30 min or 2 h in suspension, MSC were submitted to a RBC lysis process to remove the large amount of RBC present in perfusion fluid. MSC incubated in suspension with culture medium were also subjected to RBC lysis to treat both groups in the same way. Briefly, 3 ml of red blood cell lysis buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to MSC and incubated for 20 min at room temperature (RT). MSC were then washed with PBS and stained with Annexin-V (PE) and ViaProbe (PercP) to assess the number of early and late apoptotic cells. Perfusion fluid was also added to attached MSC and incubated for the same time and then trypsinized and stained as mentioned. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Canto II, BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) and data were analyzed using Kaluza Analysis 1.5a (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

Mitochondrial Activity and Oxidative Stress of MSC

MSC metabolic activity was measured by a colorimetric assay based on the reduction of XTT [2,3-Bis-(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-Sulfophenyl)-2H-Tetrazolium-5-Carboxanilide] by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) (ThermoFisher, Manhattan, NY, USA). The reagent is reduced by NADH produced during mitochondrial metabolism which results in a color change of the XTT reagent detectable by a spectrophotometer. The concentration of the reagent is measured by absorbance measured at a wavelength of 450–500 nm. This assay was performed on MSC that were in suspension for 30 and 120 min in perfusion fluid or culture medium and on attached MSC. In addition, oxidative stress of MSC was measured using CellRox reagent (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer's manual. CellRox is oxidized by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and emits a fluorescent signal that is measured by flow cytometry.

Proliferation of MSC

In order to assess the effects of perfusion fluid on cell proliferation, MSC were fluorescently labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (ThermoFisher) which was added to the cells at a concentration of 5 mM. The cells were then incubated at 37°C for 15 min in the dark. Staining was stopped by the addition of twice the volume of FBS-containing culture medium and incubated for 5 min at RT. Cells were washed and exposed to perfusion fluid for 30 and 120 min at 37°C. After incubation with perfusion fluid, MSC were seeded in a 6-well-plate with regular culture medium and proliferation was measured at 24, 48, and 72 h by flow cytometry.

Release of Cytokines

A custom-made Luminex Multiplex Assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was designed to measure the release of the following cytokines and growth factors by hMSC after incubation with perfusion fluid:

Angiopoietin-1 (ANG-1), Angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), epidermal growth factor (EGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin 10 (IL-10), interleukin 6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), platelet derived growth factor AA (PDGFAA), Thrombospondin-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases 1 (TIMP-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-RI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Subconfluent (90%) cultures of hMSC were washed and cells were incubated in perfusion fluid for 30 and 120 min. Wells were washed again and culture medium was added. After 24 h supernatants were retrieved and the array was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Fluorescence was measured on a Luminex 100/200 system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) using Xponent software. Due to the lack of pig-specific reagents this assay was only performed in with hMSC.

Adhesion of MSC to Endothelial Cells

Confluent monolayers of endothelial cells were cultured in 24-well-plates. Culture medium was replaced by either a 1:1 mix of MSC and endothelial cell (EC) medium or perfusion fluid. 200,000 MSC were fluorescently-labeled with PKH26 (Sigma) and added to each well. After 10, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min supernatant was removed and wells were washed to eliminate all non-adherent MSC. Attached cells were trypsinized and analyzed by flow cytometry. Fluorescent signal detected by flow cytometry allowed the determination of the percentage of MSC attached.

Results

Cryopreserved MSC Show Reduced Survival in Perfusion Fluid and Medium

To examine the survival of MSC, fresh and cryopreserved MSC were incubated in suspension in perfusion fluid. Survival rates of freshly cultured and thawed pMSC were <40% after 30 min and decreased to 30% after 2 h in culture medium. Perfusion fluid had no negative impact on pMSC survival compared to culture medium except on thawed MSC after 30 min in perfusion (Figure 1A). hMSC were more resistant to suspension conditions than pMSC. Freshly cultured hMSC showed more than 95% survival in medium and in perfusion fluid. However, a significant decrease in survival to approximately 70% was observed for cryopreserved hMSC in perfusion fluid and in culture medium compared to fresh MSC. Perfusion fluid reduced survival of fresh hMSC after 2 h only minimally when compared to regular culture medium (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Effect of perfusion fluid on survival of fresh and thawed pMSC and hMSC in suspension. (A) Perfusion fluid had minimal effect on pMSC survival compared to medium. (B) Perfusion fluid had minimal effects on hMSC survival. Thawed hMSC showed a lower survival in suspension compared to fresh hMSC. Perfusion fluid reduced survival of hMSC after 2 h (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

MSC Show Impaired Adhesion to Endothelial Cells in Perfusion Fluid

To assess the function of surviving MSC in perfusion fluid, the capacity of MSC to adhere to EC was tested. In culture medium, fresh and thawed pMSC started to attach to PAOEC already 10 min after seeding. After 4 h, almost 100% of freshly cultured pMSC were attached to PAOEC while only 80% of thawed pMSC adhered (Figure 2A). Perfusion fluid strongly reduced the capacity of pMSC to attach to PAOEC regardless if they were fresh or thawed cells. Fresh hMSC adhesion to HUVEC was higher than 95% after 4 h in culture medium. In perfusion fluid, 60% of fresh hMSC were able to attach after 4 h. Cryopreserved hMSC showed 80% attachment in culture medium after 4 h and <50% of cryopreserved hMSC attached to HUVEC in perfusion fluid (Figure 2B). In general, thawed MSC showed a decreased capacity to attach to EC compared to fresh MSC, a difference that became more prominent in perfusion fluid.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Adhesion of fresh and cryopreserved pMSC and hMSC to EC in medium and perfusion fluid. (A) pMSC attachment to PAOEC over time in culture medium. pMSC show reduced binding to PAOEC in perfusion fluid. Thawed pMSC showed a further reduced ability to bind to EC in perfusion fluid. (B) Thawed hMSC showed reduced attachment to HUVEC compared to fresh hMSC either in culture medium or perfusion fluid (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. **p < 0.01.

Thawed MSC Express Higher Levels of ROS

The reduced adhesion of thawed MSC to EC could be explained by higher oxidative stress of MSC after the thawing process. The accumulation of ROS derived from the thawing process might induce damage in thawed MSC. An increased production of ROS by thawed pMSC and hMSC was observed at 30 min and 2 h after thawing both in medium and perfusion fluid (Figure 3A). Thawed hMSC produced a higher level of ROS than pMSC whereas ROS production in hMSC was boosted in perfusion fluid (Figure 3B). Thawed hMSC had elevated concentrations of ROS compared to fresh hMSC. These results indicate that freeze-thawing and perfusion fluid affects ROS production in pMSC and hMSC in the first hours after thawing.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Perfusion fluid and thawing after cryopreservation increase ROS production and reduce metabolic activity in MSC. (A) ROS production in fresh and frozen-thawed pMSC suspended in culture medium or in perfusion fluid. (B) ROS production in fresh and in frozen-thawed hMSC suspended in culture medium or in perfusion fluid. (C) Metabolic activity measured by XTT reduction by NADH of fresh and frozen-thawed pMSC after 30 min and 2 h incubation in perfusion fluid. (D) Metabolic activity measured by XTT reduction by NADH of fresh and frozen-thawed hMSC after 30 min and 2 h incubation in perfusion fluid (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Metabolic Activity of Mitochondria Is Reduced in Thawed MSC

ROS production leads to mitochondrial damage which results in reduced metabolic activity of cells. It is possible that MSC survive in suspension but are less metabolically active, which may explain the different capacity of MSC to adhere to EC after thawing or in perfusion fluid. To determine the effect of perfusion fluid and the freeze-thawing procedure on MSC metabolic activity, the conversion of XTT to its reduced state by mitochondria was measured in MSC. pMSC mitochondrial activity showed to be very stable and was not affected by cryopreservation (Figure 3C). However, perfusion fluid induced a small increase in activity after 30 min. Fresh hMSC showed a 2-fold higher mitochondrial activity than pMSC. Furthermore, fresh hMSC were more active than their thawed counterparts. After 30 min in perfusion fluid, fresh hMSC showed increased mitochondrial activity compared to culture medium (Figure 3D).

Freeze-Thawing Affects Proliferation of hMSC but Not pMSC

Proliferation of MSC was measured after initial incubation in suspension in perfusion fluid or medium for 30 min and 120 min, followed by 72 h culture in culture medium. Incubation in perfusion fluid did not affect pMSC proliferation (Figures 4A,B). Freshly cultured hMSC proliferated more than thawed hMSC after incubation in perfusion fluid or medium (Figures 4C,D).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Effect of perfusion fluid and freeze-thawing on proliferation of MSC. pMSC and hMSC were incubated in perfusion fluid for 30 and 120 min and proliferation was measured after subsequent culturing in medium after 72 h. (A) pMSC proliferation was not affected by incubation in perfusion fluid for 30 min. (B) pMSC in perfusion fluid proliferated less than pMSC in culture medium. (C,D) Fresh hMSC proliferated more than thawed hMSC and perfusion fluid did not have an effect on fresh hMSC proliferation. Thawed cells in perfusion fluid were the least proliferative (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Perfusion Fluid Increases the Proliferation of Attached MSC

MSC are adherent tissue cells and the suspension conditions in the previous experiments may affect their phenotype and function. To examine how adherent MSC respond to perfusion fluid, morphology, survival, metabolic activity and proliferation of attached MSC were studied. The morphology of MSC in culture was not affected after 30 min or 2 h culture in perfusion fluid (Figures 5A–J). Adherent pMSC and hMSC showed increased survival in perfusion fluid compared to MSC in suspension. Survival of adherent pMSC was higher than 80% in culture medium and perfusion fluid (Figures 6A,B) compared to a maximum of 40% survival in suspension (Figure 1A). hMSC showed 78% survival after 2 h in suspension in perfusion fluid, but when they were attached, survival after 2 h was 93%. No differences in survival were observed between perfusion fluid and culture medium on attached MSC (Figures 6A,B). No significant effect of perfusion fluid on mitochondrial activity was observed for attached MSC, although there was a trend toward a decline in activity of pMSC and hMSC over time when cultured in perfusion fluid (Figures 6C,D). Pre-incubation of attached pMSC in perfusion fluid increased their proliferation after 24 h compared to culture medium. This effect was observed only after 120 min pre-incubation in perfusion fluid for hMSC (Figures 6E,F).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Effect of perfusion fluid on morphology of attached MSC. (A) pMSC in regular culture medium. (B,C) pMSC in culture medium or perfusion fluid, respectively for 30 min. (D,E) pMSC cultured in culture medium or perfusion fluid, respectively for 120 min. (F) hMSC in regular culture medium. (G,H) hMSC cultured in culture medium or perfusion fluid, respectively for 30 min. (I,J) hMSC cultured in culture medium or perfusion fluid, respectively for 120 min.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Effect of perfusion fluid on attached MSC. Survival of attached pMSC (A) and hMSC (B) after 30 min in perfusion fluid. (C,D) Metabolic activity of attached pMSC (C) and hMSC (D) after 30 min in perfusion fluid measured by reduction of XTT. (E,F) Proliferation of attached pMSC (E) and hMSC (F) after 30 in perfusion fluid. Cells were trypsinized and re-seeded in a culture flask. Proliferation after 24 h was determined by CFSE fluorescence (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Secretory Profile of MSC Is Not Affected by Culture in Perfusion Fluid

The secretion of growth factors and cytokines is an important mechanism of action of MSC. To examine whether perfusion fluid would preserve the secretory profile of adherent hMSC and furthermore whether perfusion fluid induced an inflammatory response in hMSC, hMSC were incubated in perfusion fluid for 30 min or 2 h and growth factor and cytokine secretion was analyzed. We observed that the secretion of the angiogenic factors VEGF, PDGF, ANG-1, HGF and Thr2 was unaffected in perfusion fluid (Figures 7A–E). Inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and MCP-1 were increased 2-fold and 10-fold, respectively, in perfusion fluid (Figures 8A,B).

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Production of angiogenic factors by hMSC in culture medium and perfusion fluid. MSC were incubated in perfusion fluid for 30 or 120 min, washed and replaced by culture medium for 24 h. The secretion of angiogenic and growth factors was not affected by perfusion fluid. (A–E) Concentration of secreted VEGF, PDGF, ANG1, HGF and Thr2, respectively (n = 5). Results are shown as mean ± SD.

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. Production of inflammatory cytokines by hMSC in culture medium and perfusion fluid. MSC were incubated in perfusion fluid for 30 or 120 min, washed and replaced by culture medium for 24 h. (A) The secretion of IL-6 shows tendency to increase by perfusion fluid. (B) The secretion of MCP-1 by MSC is increased after incubation in perfusion fluid (n = 5). Results are shown as means ± SD. **p < 0.01.

Discussion

In the present work we have assessed the effect of a period of incubation in a perfusion fluid required for robust longer term ex vivo NMP of kidneys on MSC of both pig and human origin. Our work involved the use of cryopreserved MSC for logistic purposes, suspension conditions to deliver MSC via the renal artery using NMP and the use of an RBC-based perfusion fluid which may affect the survival and function of MSC. In order to mimic the conditions of a potential novel MSC therapy to stimulate the repair of injured kidneys while these are connected to NMP, MSC were thawed after cryopreservation and incubated in perfusion fluid in suspension. Actual infusion of MSC using NMP was not carried out as the purpose of the study was to assess the individual effect of each of the aforementioned conditions separately. In case that NMP conditions did not support MSC survival and function, future planned experimentation in the NMP setup could have been stopped, reducing economic and time costs. Nevertheless, the results of this study allow to take the next step and study MSC infusion through an NMP system, which is already planned to be carried out.

In the field of clinical MSC therapy, temporary cryopreservation and thawing along with vehicle solutions to deliver the therapy are important factors that can determine the success of MSC therapy (20, 28–30). The handling time until administration will have an impact on the survival and function of MSC. Survival of MSC is affected by the composition of storage media (31) and cytokine secretion profile of MSC can be altered, affecting MSC properties such as angiogenic potential (32). Our results show that the particular perfusion fluid used for our experiment is not detrimental for the secretion of angiogenic factors by hMSC.

The bespoke NMP perfusion fluid used in this study supports the survival of pig and human MSC. However, the function and metabolism of these cells are affected by the suspension conditions MSC were kept in. Specifically, perfusion fluid inhibited the adhesion of pMSC in suspension to PAOEC and hMSC to HUVEC. MSC have the capacity to adhere to endothelial cells in vitro under flow conditions as previously shown, especially when endothelial cells have been treated to recreate an inflammatory environment. Attachment of MSC to endothelial cells was shown to be reduced under flow compared to static conditions (33). Being in suspension in different clinically used storage solutions such as physiologic saline can influence the survival of MSC (31) and the composition of the solution that MSC are kept in modifies their metabolism and function (34, 35). Therefore, it can be deducted that the effect of MSC therapy delivered to renal grafts during ex vivo NMP will depend, among other factors, upon the composition of the perfusion fluid. A recent study perfused kidneys for 24 h using NMP. They infused MSC at different concentrations however, after 24 h they found 95% of infused MSC back in their perfusion solution (36), which indicate a very diminished adhesion capacity of MSC toward endothelial cells. Our results are consistent with existing literature and indicate that the composition of the perfusion fluid as well as the infusion process affects the functional properties and delivery efficiency of the final MSC product. Therefore, further knowledge need to be obtained regarding the effects of perfusion conditions on MSC delivery to the injured kidney.

Human and porcine MSC showed a negative response at several levels to cryopreservation, thawing and re-suspension in perfusion fluid. The effect of cryopreservation and thawing of hMSC has been a concern for the community as it can decrease the presumed efficacy of MSC therapy (19, 28, 30, 37). Our results confirmed this concern. It has recently been published that freezing-thawing MSC increases the production of ROS and compromises membrane stability and homeostasis in pMSC (38), which is also supported by our data. Viability of MSC is a key factor for treatments that require an active role of MSC. However, inactive MSC have been shown to retain their immunomodulatory properties (14, 39, 40). Therefore, the aim of MSC therapy dictates the required characteristics of MSC.

In vivo, MSC are tissue resident cells and are found in perivascular niches in a wide variety of tissues (41–43). In vitro, MSC are strictly grown as adherent cells, and for this reason MSC are cultured allowing plastic adherence to expand them (10). We demonstrated that the poor performance of MSC in perfusion fluid was primarily due to the fact that they were in suspension. Survival of both pig and human MSC cultured in adherent conditions in perfusion fluid was higher than that of MSC kept in suspension, suggesting a protective effect of adherence. Mitochondrial activity, however, was similar in MSC in suspension and attached, suggesting that MSC are active also in suspension. Proliferation of pMSC was increased after exposure to perfusion fluid which could be a response to a specific component of the perfusion fluid (31). These results suggest that the nature of MSC make them more vulnerable when they are in suspension and therefore, it should be minimized when they are administered as therapy. Being in suspension in perfusion is, however, a transient condition in the process of MSC delivery using NMP. Presumably, when MSC are delivered to the injured kidney, the damaged tissue microenvironment will help the MSC to be retained and produce regenerative factors as previously shown (44–46). We have shown that after being in contact with perfusion solution MSC can recover, proliferate and be metabolically active. In addition, the secretory profile of angiogenic factor by hMSC is not affected by perfusion fluid. Therefore, this is a promising result that hints MSC maintain their reparative potential after delivery using NMP.

Cryopreservation, thawing and suspension of MSC are inevitable conditions to infuse GMP-grade MSC to kidney transplants via NMP. These conditions are necessary to bridge differences in time and location between MSC preparation and NMP. The disadvantageous effect of these conditions on MSC has to be taken into account for the evaluation of the suitability of MSC therapy for NMP. In order to improve the viability of MSC in NMP conditions, the composition of the perfusion fluid may be adapted to provide better support for MSC survival. Another possibility is to recover MSC after thawing under favorable conditions to improve the resistance of MSC to NMP. An alternative would be to take the loss of MSC under NMP conditions into account and use higher numbers of cells, although the effect of administering large numbers of non-viable MSC to the kidney is uncertain.

Pre-clinical work in the field of transplantation is often performed using porcine models to better understand the possible behaviors of new therapies in patients. Therefore, we investigated MSC of porcine and human origin in order to determine if results can be translated. The response to the thawing process as well as to suspension conditions and perfusion fluid was quite different between MSC from both origins for the parameters studied. We are aware that differences could be related not only to species but also to age and gender, as well as site of adipose tissue harvesting from the donor. However, our results indicate that caution should be taken when interpreting in vitro studies with porcine cells toward the behavior of human cells. A safe translation from swine pre-clinical models to clinical studies is challenging when results are not reproducible between species.

Summarizing, NMP conditions will affect MSC but show sufficient support of their function and survival to consider MSC administration through NMP as a viable option in pursuit of a potentially beneficial cell therapy for the regeneration of injured organs. After these essential preliminary experiments, further study is now underway to determine the best way of joining these two exciting techniques in an optimal manner.

Author Contributions

BJ, CB, ME, RP, and MH: conception of the study; JS, AM, and MH: designed the experiments; JS: performed the experiments and the analysis of the data; JS, AM, and MH: interpreted the data. All authors contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

The MePEP project is funded by the Lundbeck Foundation under grant application no R198-2015-184.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

EC, Endothelial cells; hMSC, Human mesenchymal stromal cells; HUVEC, Human umbilical cord endothelial cells; MSC, Mesenchymal stromal cells; NADH, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NMP, Normothermic machine perfusion; PAOEC, Porcine aortic endothelial cells; pMSC, Porcine mesenchymal stromal cells; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; XTT, 2, 3-Bis-(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-Sulfophenyl)-2H-Tetrazolium-5-Carboxanilide.

References

1. Hippen B, Ross LF, Sade RM. Saving lives is more important than abstract moral concerns: financial incentives should be used to increase organ donation. Ann Thorac Surg. (2009) 88:1053–61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ojo AO. Expanded criteria donors: process and outcomes. Semin Dial. (2005) 18:463–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.00090.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Nagaraja P, Roberts GW, Stephens M, Horvath S, Kaposztas Z, Chavez R, et al. Impact of expanded criteria variables on outcomes of kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Transplantation. (2015) 99:226–31. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Nicholson ML, Hosgood SA. Renal transplantation after ex vivo normothermic perfusion: the first clinical study. Am J Transplant. (2013) 13:1246–52. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Weissenbacher A, Lo Faro L, Boubriak O, Soares MF, Roberts IS, Hunter JP, et al. Twenty-four hour normothermic perfusion of discarded human kidneys with urine recirculation. Am J Transplant. (2018) 19:178–92. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hosgood SA, Thompson E, Moore T, Wilson CH, Nicholson ML. Normothermic machine perfusion for the assessment and transplantation of declined human kidneys from donation after circulatory death donors. Br J Surg. (2018) 105:388–94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kaths JM, Hamar M, Echeverri J, Linares I, Urbanellis P, Cen JY, et al. Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion for graft quality assessment prior to transplantation. Am J Transplant. (2018) 18:580–9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Smith SF, Adams T, Hosgood SA, Nicholson ML. The administration of argon during ex vivo normothermic perfusion in an experimental model of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Surg Res. (2017) 218:202–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. (1999) 284:143–7. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. (2006) 8:315–7. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kim HK, Lee SG, Lee SW, Oh BJ, Kim JH, Kim JA, et al. A subset of paracrine factors as efficient biomarkers for predicting vascular regenerative efficacy of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells. Stem Cells. (2018) 37:77–88. doi: 10.1002/stem.2920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Azhdari Tafti Z, Mahmoodi M, Hajizadeh MR, Ezzatizadeh V, Baharvand H, Vosough M, et al. Conditioned media derived from human adipose tissue mesenchymal stromal cells improves primary hepatocyte maintenance. Cell J. (2018) 20:377–87. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2018.5288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Reinders MEJ, van Kooten C, Rabelink TJ, de Fijter JW. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. (2018) 102:35–43. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001879

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. de Witte SFH, Luk F, Sierra Parraga JM, Gargesha M, Merino A, Korevaar SS, et al. Immunomodulation by therapeutic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC) is triggered through phagocytosis of MSC by monocytic cells. Stem Cells. (2018) 36:602–15. doi: 10.1002/stem.2779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Eggenhofer E, Benseler V, Kroemer A, Popp FC, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are short-lived and do not migrate beyond the lungs after intravenous infusion. Front Immunol. (2012) 3:297. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00297

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sierra-Parraga JM, Eijken M, Hunter J, Moers C, Leuvenink H, Moller B, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells as anti-inflammatory and regenerative mediators for donor kidneys during normothermic machine perfusion. Stem Cells Dev. (2017) 26:1162–70. doi: 10.1089/scd.2017.0030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Weissenbacher A, Hunter J. Normothermic machine perfusion of the kidney. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. (2017) 22:571–6. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hamar M, Selzner M. Ex-vivo machine perfusion for kidney preservation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. (2018) 23:369–74. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000524

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hoogduijn MJ, de Witte SF, Luk F, van den Hout-van Vroonhoven MC, Ignatowicz L, Catar R, et al. Effects of freeze-thawing and intravenous infusion on mesenchymal stromal cell gene expression. Stem Cells Dev. (2016) 25:586–97. doi: 10.1089/scd.2015.0329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Moll G, Alm JJ, Davies LC, von Bahr L, Heldring N, Stenbeck-Funke L, et al. Do cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells display impaired immunomodulatory and therapeutic properties? Stem Cells. (2014) 32:2430–42. doi: 10.1002/stem.1729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lohan P, Treacy O, Morcos M, Donohoe E, O'Donoghue Y, Ryan AE, et al. Interspecies incompatibilities limit the immunomodulatory effect of human mesenchymal stromal cells in the rat. Stem Cells. (2018) 36:1210–5. doi: 10.1002/stem.2840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ling W, Zhang J, Yuan Z, Ren G, Zhang L, Chen X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells use IDO to regulate immunity in tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. (2014) 74:1576–87. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-1656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Pogozhykh O, Pogozhykh D, Neehus AL, Hoffmann A, Blasczyk R, Muller T. Molecular and cellular characteristics of human and non-human primate multipotent stromal cells from the amnion and bone marrow during long term culture. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2015) 6:150. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0146-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Izadpanah R, Trygg C, Patel B, Kriedt C, Dufour J, Gimble JM, et al. Biologic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. J Cell Biochem. (2006) 99:1285–97. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hoogduijn MJ, Crop MJ, Peeters AM, Van Osch GJ, Balk AH, Ijzermans JN, et al. Human heart, spleen, and perirenal fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells have immunomodulatory capacities. Stem Cells Dev. (2007) 16:597–604. doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.0110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hosgood SA, Nicholson ML. First in man renal transplantation after ex vivo normothermic perfusion. Transplantation. (2011) 92:735–8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822d4e04

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Hosgood SA, Barlow AD, Hunter JP, Nicholson ML. Ex vivo normothermic perfusion for quality assessment of marginal donor kidney transplants. Br J Surg. (2015) 102:1433–40. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Moll G, Geissler S, Catar R, Ignatowicz L, Hoogduijn MJ, Strunk D, et al. Cryopreserved or fresh mesenchymal stromal cells: only a matter of taste or key to unleash the full clinical potential of MSC therapy? Adv Exp Med Biol. (2016) 951:77–98. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Francois M, Copland IB, Yuan S, Romieu-Mourez R, Waller EK, Galipeau J. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells display impaired immunosuppressive properties as a result of heat-shock response and impaired interferon-gamma licensing. Cytotherapy. (2012) 14:147–52. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2011.623691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chinnadurai R, Garcia MA, Sakurai Y, Lam WA, Kirk AD, Galipeau J, et al. Actin cytoskeletal disruption following cryopreservation alters the biodistribution of human mesenchymal stromal cells in vivo. Stem Cell Reports. (2014) 3:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Nofianti CE, Sari IN, Marlina Novialdi, Pawitan JA. Temporary storage solution for adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Investig. (2018) 5:19. doi: 10.21037/sci.2018.05.04

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Parsha K, Mir O, Satani N, Yang B, Guerrero W, Mei Z, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes are modulated by suspension time, delivery vehicle, passage through catheter, and exposure to adjuvants. Cytotherapy. (2017) 19:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Ruster B, Gottig S, Ludwig RJ, Bistrian R, Muller S, Seifried E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells display coordinated rolling and adhesion behavior on endothelial cells. Blood. (2006) 108:3938–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-025098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Xia W, Li H, Wang Z, Xu R, Fu Y, Zhang X, et al. Human platelet lysate supports ex vivo expansion and enhances osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biol Int. (2011) 35:639–43. doi: 10.1042/CBI20100361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. de Witte SFH, Lambert EE, Merino A, Strini T, Douben H, O'Flynn L, et al. Aging of bone marrow- and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells during expansion. Cytotherapy. (2017) 19:798–807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.03.071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Brasile L, Henry N, Orlando G, Stubenitsky B. Potentiating Renal Regeneration using Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Transplantation. (2018). 103:307–13. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chinnadurai R, Copland IB, Garcia MA, Petersen CT, Lewis CN, Waller EK, et al. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells are susceptible to T-cell mediated apoptosis which is partly rescued by ifngamma licensing. Stem Cells. (2016) 34:2429–42. doi: 10.1002/stem.2415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gurgul A, Romanek J, Pawlina-Tyszko K, Szmatola T, Opiela J. Evaluation of changes arising in the pig mesenchymal stromal cells transcriptome following cryopreservation and Trichostatin A treatment. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0192147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Luk F, de Witte S, Korevaar SS, Roemeling-van Rhijn M, Franquesa M, Strini T, et al. Inactivated mesenchymal stem cells maintain immunomodulatory capacity. Stem Cells Dev. (2016) 25:1342–54. doi: 10.1089/scd.2016.0068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Galleu A, Riffo-Vasquez Y, Trento C, Lomas C, Dolcetti L, Cheung TS, et al. Apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cells induces in vivo recipient-mediated immunomodulation. Sci Transl Med. (2017) 9:416. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Fraser JK, Wulur I, Alfonso Z, Hedrick MH. Fat tissue: an underappreciated source of stem cells for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. (2006) 24:150–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. (2003) 114:763–76. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00687-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Griffiths MJ, Bonnet D, Janes SM. Stem cells of the alveolar epithelium. Lancet. (2005) 366:249–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66916-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Marquez-Curtis LA, Janowska-Wieczorek A. Enhancing the migration ability of mesenchymal stromal cells by targeting the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Biomed Res Int. (2013) 2013:561098. doi: 10.1155/2013/561098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ryu CH, Park SA, Kim SM, Lim JY, Jeong CH, Jun JA, et al. Migration of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells mediated by stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 axis via Akt, ERK, and p38 signal transduction pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2010) 398:105–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Talkenberger K, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Voss-Bohme A, Deutsch A. Amoeboid-mesenchymal migration plasticity promotes invasion only in complex heterogeneous microenvironments. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:9237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09300-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar