Treating Steroid Refractory Intestinal Acute Graft-vs.-Host Disease With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Pilot Study

Patients with steroid refractory gastrointestinal (GI) tract graft- vs.-host disease (GvHD) face a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. To accurately assess the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in treating steroid refractory GI tract GvHD, we conducted a pilot study involving eight patients. Having received FMTs, all patients' clinical symptoms relieved, bacteria enriched, and microbiota composition reconstructed. Compared to those who did not receive FMT, these eight patients achieved a higher progression-free survival. FMT can serve as a therapeutic option for GI tract aGVHD, but its effectiveness and safety need further evaluations.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03148743.

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potential curative strategy for patients with hematological malignancy and its complications, including infections, multi-organ failure, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (1, 2). GvHD, especially acute GvHD (aGvHD), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Gut-GvHD-related complications also appear as the most common causes of post-transplantation death (1). Apart from abdominal pain, satiety, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting, diarrhea is the most significant symptom of GvHD and the most expected risk of gut GvHD-related mortality (3, 4). Currently, the first-line therapy for GvHD is use of glucocorticoids, but almost half of the patients do not respond efficiently (5). By far, no second-line treatment has been established. Therefore, effective treatments are urgently needed to treat patients with steroid refractory aGvHD (6).

Recent studies have verified the changed intestinal diversity in patients with GvHD. Through evaluating the entire spectrum of aGvHD, these studies corroborated that gut microbiota may modulate systemic alloimmune responses (7–11). Under a normal physiological condition, microbes of highly diversity in the human GI tract participate in intestinal inflammation and immune responses (12). However, after allo-HSCT, the abnormal gut microbiota damages GI mucosa, and eventually collapses the intestinal microbiota diversity (10, 11).

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), a therapy that restores microbiota system through infusing a fecal suspension from a healthy donor into a receiver's GI tract (13), has been proven effective for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (14). Scientists have used this therapy to cure other human diseases (such as inflammatory bowel disease). Considering the poor prognosis of steroid refractory GI tract aGvHD and limited therapeutic options, we speculated that FMT might be effective to cope with these challenges. Therefore, we conducted this pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of FMT in treating steroid refractory GI tract aGvHD.

Patients and Methods

Study Design and Patient Eligibility

Eight patients with steroid refractory GI tract aGvHD were enrolled in the study. Protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All patients had been informed the possible adverse reactions and had signed written informed consent to receive FMT voluntarily. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03148743. The severity of GI aGVHD was graded according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) criteria (15). The patients were treated with standard first-line treatment with corticosteroids and at least 1 s-line therapy. They were diagnosed with steroid refractory gut aGVHD if any of the following characteristics presented: (a) progression of acute GvHD or lack of response to a treatment using 2 mg/kg per day or more methylprednisolone for at least 72 h; (b) progression of GI tract aGvHD even after a treatment using 2 mg/kg per day or additional methylprednisolone for at least 48 h; (c) progression of GI tract aGvHD to stage 4 after 24 h of daily 2 mg/kg or additional methylprednisolone (16).

Patients with uncontrollable infection, irreversible organ failure, and other abnormal conditions that might interfere with informed consent or evaluation were excluded. Efficacy endpoints were defined when aGvHD overall grade, organ response, or overall survival (OS) showed a turning point. For each patient, the safety evaluation stopped at 90 days after the first FMT, or any moment when the patient died or quitted.

FMT Procedures

Frozen fecal microbiota was obtained from China fmtBank (Nanjing, China). The two donors included in our research were females aged 23 years. Forty to fifty milliliters frozen fecal microbiota were suspended in 200 ml of warm normal saline every time and delivered into intestine within 2–4 min through a nasoduodenal tube.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment

FMT efficacy and safety were evaluated according to the severity of symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea (frequency and volume), and bloody purulent stool in 2 weeks. Clinical remission was defined if diarrhea and intestinal spasms and/or bleeding disappeared, or stool volume decreased by ≥500 mL on average in 3 days. Clinical improvement was defined if the stool volume decreased by < 500 mL, and the enterosepsis and bleeding relieved. Safety was evaluated according to adverse events during FMT and follow-up. Other events, such as death, GvHD of other organs, active infection of CMV, or EB virus within 90 days after the diagnosis of steroid refractory GI tract GvHD, were also recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as no progress with GI-GvHD, no death, no other organs appeared GVHD, no new infection with CMV and EBV during these 90 days. Period from GI-GVHD was diagnosed to July 2017 was as the statistical time of OS.

Stool Sample Collection and Microbial Community Analysis

Fecal samples from patients and donors were collected and stored at −80°C. Then, 16s rRNA sequencing was used for microbiota analysis. The phylum- and family-level analyses were used to show the composition of fecal bacteria. Moreover, the Shannon diversity index was used to depict the diversity of microbiota (17).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0. Comparison between the two groups was conducted using Student's t-test. Comparison between PFS and OS rates was presented in a Kaplan–Meier curve. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients Characteristics

Eight patients with steroid refractory GI tract aGvHD were enrolled in this study (mean age of 35.6 years, ranging 20–48 years; male/female ratio, 3/5; Table 1). Clostridium difficile infection was not observed among all patients. The mean time of the onset of GI tract aGvHD (days after allo-HSCT) was +79.7, ranging from +21 to +369 (Table 1). Immunosuppressant were given to all patients (Table 2). All eight patients were diagnosed with GI tract GvHD, including two with combined liver GvHD and five with skin GvHD (Table 3). The mean stool volume of all patients was 1,777 mL/day, ranging from 1,100 to 3,000 mL/day. The mean stool frequency was 11.5 times/day, ranging from 5 to 20 times/day (Table 4, Figures 1A,B).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients treated with FMT.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Immunosuppressants given to all patient with introduction of FMTs.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Factor related FMT in patients with FMT treated.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Clinical response to FMT.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Clinical response to FMT. (A) Stool volumes of all 8 patients pre FMT and 13 days post FMT. (B) Stool frequency of all 8 patients pre FMT and 13 days post FMT. (C) Abdominal pain score at baseline and 13 days follow-up after FMT (n = 4).

Case Serials and FMT Outcomes

Table 4 exhibits the clinical efficacy of FMT. FMT was applied in four patients once and four patients twice (Table 3). In the subsequent follow-up, because of the recurrent or new emergent complications of GvHD, two patients gave up the treatment and quickly died (at day 12 and 50 after FMT, respectively). One patient died of cerebral hemorrhage caused by thrombocytopenia (at day 9 after FMT). In addition, due to economic reasons, one patient gave up the treatment at day 9 after FMT and died (Table 4).

Figure 1 shows that all the patients achieved clinical symptomatic remission after the first FMT. Among patients with diarrhea, their stool volumes and frequencies were reduced to 3–4 times/day after FMT (Figures 1A,B). However, diarrhea relapsed to one patient at day 11 (patient II). One week after the first FMT, abdominal pain was also decreased. At day 9, abdominal pain and stool frequency of patient VIII increased (Figures 1A,C). In the 2-week follow-up after the first FMT, two patients' diarrhea and all the other five patients' abdominal pain disappeared (the left three died; Table 4).

Fecal Microbiota Analysis

The change of intestinal microbiota was analyzed with fecal samples from six patients (before FMT and a week after the first FMT). Lacking 16s sequencing data of two patients, the change in the two patients could not be evaluated.

Figure 2 illustrates that prior to FMT the diversity of fecal microbiota in fecal samples of the patients decreased compared with that of the donors (Figures 2A,B). At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were three major bacteria found in the fecal microbiota of the donors. However, the ratio of Firmicutes to Proteobacteria got imbalanced in the fecal microbiota of patients with steroid refractory GI tract GvHD, and ratio of Bacteroidetes significantly decreased (Figure 3A).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Analysis of fecal microbiota in donor and 6 patients. (A) The diversity of fecal microbiota in all sample (Shannon's diversity index). Px means patient number, Dx means donor number, xD means day after FMT. (B) Shannon's diversity index change in donor group, pre-FMT and post-FMT samples. **p < 0.01.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Change of fecal microbiota before and after FMT. (A) Analysis of fecal microbiota composition in all samples at the phylum level. (B) Analysis of fecal microbiota composition in all samples at the genus level. Difference of fecal microbiota composition between pre-FMT and post-FMT at the phylum level (C). (D) Genus level.

The results of 16s rRNA gene sequencing also confirmed that the bacterial diversity improved 1 week after FMT (Figure 2B). Similar to these results, the microbiota composition was reconstructed, showing a trend back to normal (Figures 3A,B). Moreover, pre-FMT samples had a significantly high level of Firmicutes (Figure 3A) and Enterococcaceae (Figure 3B). Post-FMT samples had a significantly high level of Bacteroidetes (Figure 3C) and Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae (Figure 3D). Beneficial bacteria, such as Bacteroides, were dominant in these cases after FMTs (Figure 3C).

Efficacy and Safety of FMT

No severe adverse events were observed during and after FMT. To further clarify the safety and efficacy of FMT, we simultaneously conducted a retrospective study with another eight patients who had been diagnosed with steroid refractory GI tract GvHD but not received FMT in our center (Supplement Table 1). Figure 4 exhibits that, within 90 days after the diagnosis of refractory and steroid-insensitive GI tract GvHD, progression-free survival (PFS) improved in the FMT group (p = 0.003; Figure 4A), OS showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.419) during the period from GI-GVHD was diagnosed to July 2017 (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Efficacy and safety of FMT. (A) Progression free survival (PFS) between patients treated with FMT and without FMT in 90 days after the steroid refractory GI-GvHD being diagnosed. (B) Overall survival (OS) in the refractory and steroid- insensitive GI-GvHD patients who treated with FMT/without FMT were shown. Days means day after the steroid refractory GI-GvHD being diagnosed.

Discussion

Patients with steroid refractory GI tract GvHD face a high mortality and limited therapeutic options (6). Recent data found that loss of intestinal bacterial diversity in GvHD, manifested with the enriching Enterococci, was also observed in GI-aGVHD patients after allo-HSCT (9) and the microbial metabolites in this condition can directly influence target tissues (13, 18).

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a process of transferring normal fecal microorganisms into a patient's GI tract to restore his/her microbiota (13). In our pilot study, all the eight patients diagnosed with steroid refractory GI tract GvHD were given FMT when immunosuppressive therapy and other novel treatments failed. Consequently, relieved clinical symptoms were observed among all patients (e.g., decreased stool volume and frequency and milder abdominal pain), which may be associated with the increased microbial richness. The microbiota composition was also restored after FMTs. After FMT, diversity of microbiota of the patients neared that of the donors. Beneficial bacteria were dominant after FMT.

In our research, we did not observe any adverse event, such as hypoxia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), transplant-associated lower gastrointestinal bleeding, cholestatic liver damage. One patient experienced thrombocytopenia after FMT, an event that could not be completely ruled out. During FMT, we temporarily suspended the prophylactic antibiotics to protect the transplanted microbiome, and did not observe any immediate procedure-related infections. In the FMT group, PFS kept improving during the 90 days' follow-up. OS showed no significant difference during the observation period between the groups with and without FMT. However, to more accurately assess the efficacy and safety of FMT in treating steroid refractory GI tract GvHD, large-sample research is needed.

In summary, the diversity of intestinal microbiota can be undermined by allo-HSCT. Previous findings (10, 11) and our present data corroborate that interventions should be taken to simultaneously maintain intestinal diversity and improve outcomes of allo-HSCT. FMT can serve as a therapeutic option for GI tract aGVHD, but its effectiveness and safety need further evaluations.

Author Contributions

XQ and DW contributed to the study concept and design. XL, YZ, XW, FC, and XM collected the clinical samples. XQ and FZ performed the experiments. XQ, XL, and YZ performed bioinformatics analyses. XQ, XL, and YZ wrote the manuscript. DW supervised the study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Pan Li for expert technical assistance.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02195/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Copelan EA Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. (2006) 354:1813–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tuncer HH, Rana N, Milani C, Milani C, and Al-Homsi SA Gastrointestinal and hepatic complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. (2012) 18:1851–60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Weber D, Oefner PJ, Hiergeist A, Koestler J, Gessner A, Weber M, et al. Low urinary indoxyl sulfate levels early after transplantation reflect a disrupted microbiome and are associated with poor outcome. Blood (2015) 126:1723–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-638858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wu D, Hockenberry DM, Brentnall TA, Baehr PH, Kuver R, et al. Persistent nausea and anorexia after marrow transplantation: a prospective study of 78 patients. Transplantation (1998) 66:1319–24. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199811270-00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. McDonald GB How I treat acute graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract and the liver. Blood (2016) 127:1544–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-612747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Martin PJ, Rizzo JD, Wingard JR, Ballen K, Curtin PT, Cutler C, et al. First- and second-line systemic treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: recommendations of the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2012) 18:150–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GD, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical Frontier. Gut (2016) 65:330–9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Taur Y, Jenq RR, Perales MA, Littmann ER, Morjaria S, Ling LL, et al. The effects of intestinal tract bacterial diversity on mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood (2014) 124:1174–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-554725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Holler E, Butzhammer P, Schmid K, Hundsrucker CH, Koestler J, Peter K, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the stool microbiome in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation: loss of diversity is associated with use of systemic antibiotics and more pronounced in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2014) 20:640–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Spindelboeck W, Schulz E, Uhl B, Kashofer K, Aigelsreiter A, Zinke-Cerwenka W, et al. Repeated fecal microbiota transplantations attenuate diarrhea and lead to sustained changes in the fecal microbiota in acute, refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host-disease. Haematologica (2017) 102:210–3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.154351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kakihana K, Fujioka Y, Suda W, Najima Y, Kuwata G, Sasajima S, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with steroid-resistant/dependent acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut. Blood (2016) 128:2083–88. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-717652

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Buffie CG, Pamer EG. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance against intestinal pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:790–801. doi: 10.1038/nri3535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Nood EV, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. (2013) 368:407–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kelly CR, Khoruts A, Staley C, Sadowsky MJ, Alani M, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrence in multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. (2016) 165:609–16. doi: 10.7326/M16-0271

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rowlings PA, Przepiorka D, Klein JP, Gale RP, Passweg JR, Henslee-Downey PJ, et al. Severity Index for grading acute graft-versus-host disease: retrospective comparison with Glucksberg grade. Br J Haematol. (1997) 97:855–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1112925.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. (1995) 15:825–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

17. Cui B, Li P, Xu L, Zhao Y, Wang H, Peng Z, et al. Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy: a pilot study for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. J Transl Med. (2015) 13:298–309. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0646-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mathewson ND, Jenq R, Mathew AV, Koenigsknecht M, Hanash A, Toubai T, et al. Gut microbiome-derived metabolites modulate intestinal epithelial cell damage and mitigate graft-versus-host disease. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:505–13. doi: 10.1038/ni.3400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar