Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains hard to diagnose early and cure due to a lack of accurate biomarkers and effective treatments. Hence, it is necessary to explore the tumorigenesis and tumor progression of HCC to discover new biomarkers for clinical treatment. We performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to explore hub genes that have high correlation with clinical information. In this study, we found 13 hub genes (GTSE1, PLK1, NCAPH, SKA3, LMNB2, SPC25, HJURP, DEPDC1B, CDCA4, UBE2C, LMNB1, PRR11, and SNRPD2) that have high correlation with histologic grade in HCC by analyzing TCGA LIHC dataset. All of these 13 hub genes could be used to effectively distinguish high histologic grade from low histologic grade of HCC through analysis of the ROC curve. The overall survival and disease-free survival information showed that high expression of these 13 hub genes led to poor prognosis. Meanwhile, these 13 hub genes had significantly different expression in HCC tumor and non-tumor tissues. We downloaded GSE6764, which contains corresponding clinical information, to validate the expression of these 13 hub genes. At the same time, we performed quantitative real-time PCR to validate the differences in the expression tendencies of these 13 hub genes between HCC tumor tissues and non-tumor tissues and high histologic grade and low histologic grade. We also explored mutation and methylation information of these 13 hub genes for further study. In summary, 13 hub genes correlated with the progression and prognosis of HCC were discovered by WGCNA in our study, and these hub genes may contribute to the tumorigenesis and tumor progression of HCC.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most malignant tumors and is the third leading cause of cancer death in the world (Altekruse et al., 2009; GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators, 2016; Li et al., 2017). HCC is extremely hard to diagnose at an early stage, and there are currently no effective treatments for patients with advanced-stage HCC. Surgery remains the most common treatment for HCC; nevertheless, the decade survival rate is not increasing obviously (Waghray et al., 2015; Wallace et al., 2015). HBV infection is one of the most common factors in HCC in the world (de Martel et al., 2015). Patients with higher TNM stage and histologic grade have a worse prognosis compared with those for whom they are lower (Ikeda et al., 1993). It is crucial to reach an understanding of the pathological changes from normal liver to HCC. Meanwhile, effective early detection and diagnostic methods are urgently needed for improving the prognosis and treatment of HCC patients.
The use of microarray as a high-throughput platform for gene expression analysis has been soaring in recent years (Murakami et al., 2006; Li et al., 2018). Large numbers of changed genes can be detected easily by this technology, and these can be analyzed to identify critical significant genes as biomarkers (Giulietti et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2018). There are plenty of public free databases, such as TCGA and the GEO, from which abundant information can be excavated via various bioinformatics methods. WGCNA, a method of building a multiple gene co-expression model, can be used to cluster similarly expressed genes and analyze the relationships of differential character and phenotype within modules (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008; Giulietti et al., 2016; Wang Y. et al., 2019). WGCNA can divide genes into a model or network based on pairwise correlations between genes based on their similar expression profiles, and these models can correlate to different information on HCC. Compared to conventional methods, WGCNA establishes a more meaningful correlation between gene expression and clinical information. In this study, we identified 13 hub genes that have strong relationships with histologic grade in HCC by WGCNA, using the TCGA LIHC dataset. The ROC curve showed that almost all hub genes could effectively identify high histologic grade and low histologic grade. Meanwhile, the overall survival and disease-free survival of almost hub genes have significance in 10 years. Almost all of these 13 hub genes had higher expression in HCC tumor tissues compared with non-tumor tissues. After downloading GSE6764, we validated that these hub genes had the same expression tendencies as shown by the results of TCGA. Quantitative real-time PCR was also used to validate the differential expression of these hub genes between HCC tumor tissues and non-tumor tissues and high histologic grade and low histologic grade.
Materials and Methods
Study Approval
None of the patients had been subjected to any neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. The protocols used in this study were approved by the Protection of Human Subjects Committee of Zhongnan Hospital. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data Collection and Processing
The brief study design is shown in Figure 1. The RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data and corresponding clinical information for HCC were downloaded from TCGA LIHC dataset, which included 371 tumor samples and 50 adjacent tumor samples. The clinical information was comprised of event, TNM stage, histologic grade, new event, diagnosis age, and HBV infection. Due to some clinical information being missing, we used not available (NA) to replace the missing values for WGCNA. After normalization and filtering with the “edgeR” package (Wilson and Miller, 2005; Robinson et al., 2010), p-value < 0.05 and | logFC (FC)| > 1 were used for screening DEGs. The validation dataset GSE6764, which contained 10 normal liver tissues, 8 very early HCC tissues, 10 early HCC tissues, 7 advanced HCC tissues, and 10 very advanced HCC tissues, was downloaded from the GEO.
FIGURE 1
GO Enrichment and KEGG Pathway Analysis
The GO database, which is comprised of MF, BP, and CC, is used for observing gene annotation (Harris et al., 2004). The KEGG is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and utilities of the biological system (Kanehisa et al., 2016). DAVID1 is an online website that can provide a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools through which investigators can understand the biological meaning behind a large list of genes (Huang da et al., 2009). In this study, DAVID 6.7 was used to analyze the GO enrichment and KEGG pathways of all DEGs. The p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Construction
We selected the top 25% variance genes, which included 4938 genes, to construct a co-expression network with the “WGCNA” package in R. Elimination of outliers is the first step in this analysis. Next, we select an appropriate soft-thresholding power that would ensure scale-free topology, R2 = 0.9. The adjacency was then transformed into a TOM by using TOM similarity and the corresponding dissimilarity (dissTOM). Finally, at least 30 co-expressed genes were aggregated into different MEs by the dynamic tree cut method. We decided on a cut line (<0.25) for merging highly similar modules to make the modules more compact. A cluster dendrogram was used to show the result.
Identification of Clinical Significant Modules
The correlations between clinical information and MEs were calculated by WGCNA in R. We selected the most significant and correlated modules with HCC. In this study, the genes in blue and turquoise MEs with the histologic grade of HCC were our next research objects. Meanwhile, two concepts of GS and MM were proposed in our study. Genes that have high significance for clinical information and MM were confirmed by these two parameters.
Hub Gene Identification and Verification
The connectivity of genes was measured by the absolute value of the Pearson’s correlation. Genes with high within-module connectivity were considered to be hub genes of the modules (cor.geneModuleMembership > 0.85). Hub genes in given modules tended to have a strong correlation with certain clinical information, which was measured by the absolute value of the Pearson’s correlation (cor.geneTraitSignificance > 0.2). Next, we intersected hub genes in MEs with all DEGs via the edgeR package. At the same time, we eliminated some hub genes that have been researched multiple times in HCC. We definitely considered these hub genes significant by this filter. To validate the functions of these hub genes, the GSE6764 microarray was downloaded from the GEO database in NCBI.
Survival Analysis and ROC Analysis of Hub Genes
To identify whether these hub genes have deeper value, we searched the GEPIA website2 for overall survival and disease-free survival analysis of all of the hub genes (Tang et al., 2017). The log-rank test was used to show statistical significance. Meanwhile, the AUC, calculated by R, was used to differentiate different histologic grades (high histologic and low histologic) of HCC.
Mutation and Methylation Information of Hub Genes
We searched the cBioPortal website3 to identify whether these hub genes have epigenetics information about mutation and methylation (Cerami et al., 2012). The corresponding figures were downloaded from that website.
Immunohistochemical Information of Hub Genes
To explore the expression of these hub genes in HCC and normal tissues, we searched the Human Protein Atlas public database4 for IHC information.
Tissue Collection and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
A total of 16 pairs of HCC and corresponding adjacent tissues were obtained from 16 HCC patients after surgery in Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University. The histologic grades of all HCC tissues were identified by the pathology department in our hospital. All samples were stored with RNA protective reagent at −80°C. Total RNA was extracted from HCC tissues by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). Extracted total RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Inc.) at 260 and 280 nm. RNA was used for reverse transcription when A260/A280 = 2.0. The reverse transcription was processed with the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNAEraser (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with the SYBR Green PCR kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) using the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, United States) after setting up the appropriate protocol. The GAPDH was used as an internal control. The 2–ΔΔCt method was used to analyze the results of quantitative real-time PCR. All the primers were designed by the website PrimerBank5 and are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Results
Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes
After data processing, a total number of 2356 significant DEGs, including 789 down-regulated and 1567 up-regulated genes, were identified between HCC tissue and adjacent tumor tissue by the “edgeR” package in R. Volcano and heatmap plots were used to show this result (Figures 2A,B).
FIGURE 2
GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis of DEGs
To obtain a deeper understanding of the annotation and function of all of the DEGs, we put all of these DEGs into DAVID to analyze significant GO and KEGG pathways. The up-regulated DEGs were remarkably enriched in cell cycle, M phase, M phase of mitotic cell cycle, mitotic cell cycle, and other BP (Figure 3A). The KEGG enrichment analysis identified cell cycle, DNA replication, pathways in cancer, and other pathways (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, the down-regulated DEGs were mainly enriched in response to wounding, acute inflammatory response, oxidation–reduction, and other BP (Figure 3C). The KEGG enrichment results of down-regulated DEGs are complement and coagulation cascades, fatty acid metabolism, PPAR signaling pathway, and other pathways (Figure 3D). It seems that the disorder of these pathways possibly reflected the intricate pathological mechanism of HCC.
FIGURE 3
Weight Gene Co-expression Network Construction and Key Module Identification
After downloading the FPKM value expression matrix of all HCC samples, we selected the top 25% variance genes, including 4938 for WGCNA. To eliminate outliers, we chose 130 for the cut tree height for the samples (Figure 4A). The number of HCC samples under the red line was 352 after clustering. The sample dendrogram and trait heatmap of 352 samples in our study are shown in Figure 4B. We chose the power of β = 5 (scale-free R2 = 0.92, slope = −1.52) as the soft-thresholding to construct a scale-free network (Figures 4C,D). By gathering similarly expressed genes, a total of nine modules were identified, namely black module [947], blue module [748], brown module [735], gray module [160], magenta module [35], pink module [160], red module [460], turquoise module [1023], and yellow module [670] (Figure 5A). The MEs in the blue and turquoise modules showed a higher correlation with histologic grade of HCC (R2 = 0.33, p = 3e−10; R2 = 0.34, p = 3e−11) (Figure 5B). We therefore chose these two modules for further research. The module membership and gene significance for LIHC stage in turquoise and blue module were showed in Figures 6A,B. The relationship between connectivity in modules and gene significance was showed in Figure 6C.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
Identification of Hub Genes
By setting up cor.geneModuleMembership > 0.85 and cor.geneTraitSignificance > 0.2, there are 9 hub genes in the blue module and 46 hub genes in the turquoise module (Supplementary Table 2). The PPI networks of all genes in the two modules were, respectively, constructed by Cytoscape. We used the cytoHubba app to calculate the degree of each node. The nine hub genes were included in the top 20 hub genes in the blue module according to cytoHubba (Figure 6D). The 46 hub genes were also included in the top 50 hub genes in the turquoise module according to cytoHubba (Figure 6E). Next, we took the 44 intersecting genes from the two module hub genes and all DEGs in HCC (Figure 7A). Considering that some of the hub genes have already been reported on and researched in HCC, such as NCAPG, TTK, TOP2A, CDC20, CDK1, and so on (Wong et al., 2009; Li et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018), we finally chose 13 hub genes (GTSE1, PLK1, NCAPH, SKA3, LMNB2, SPC25, HJURP, DEPDC1B, CDCA4, UBE2C, LMNB1, PRR11, and SNRPD2) on which little research had been done regarding HCC to continue our deeper exploration.
FIGURE 7
Validation of Hub Genes
To validate the expression of these 13 hub genes in tumor tissue and adjacent tissue, we downloaded GSE6764, in which there are 11 hub genes that have the same tendency and statistical significance compared with the TCGA database (Figures 7C,D). All of these hub genes belonged to the set of adverse factors in HCC (Figure 7B). To validate different histologic grade expression, four groups (very early HCC, early HCC, advanced HCC, and very advanced HCC) in GSE6764 were considered to approximate histologic grades I–IV, and most of the hub genes had significance in a one-way ANOVA test (Figures 8A,B).
FIGURE 8
Survival and ROC Analysis
The overall survival and disease-free survival of these 13 hub genes were analyzed by using the GEIPA online database. Nearly all of them had a poor prognosis when highly expressed on the basis of log-rank test analysis (Supplementary Figures 1–5). The ROC curve was used to measure early HCC (Grades I and II) and advanced HCC (Grades III and IV). The AUC of almost all hub genes exceed 0.65, which meant that these hub genes could effectively differentiate early HCC and advanced HCC (Supplementary Figures 6–8. The AUCs of hub genes are listed in Figure 9A).
FIGURE 9
Mutation and Methylation Information
To find deeper information on these hub genes, we searched the cBioPortal website to identify whether these hub genes have epigenetics information about mutation and methylation available. Unfortunately, all hub genes had no obvious mutation events (Figure 9B). Meanwhile, PRR11 had more amplifications compared with the other hub genes, which could explain its high expression in HCC. The mRNA expressions (Z-scores) of more than half of the 13 hub genes had negative correlations (Pearson correlation > | −0.3|, p < 0.05) with methylation (HM450) (Supplementary Figures 9, 10). Among these results, the correlation of DEPDC1B even reached −0.52, which revealed that methylation of the promoter region of DEPDC1B probably regulated expression of the corresponding mRNA.
Immunohistochemical Information
To obtain precise results, we chose the same antibody for each hub gene between HCC and normal tissue. The results of the IHC analysis and figures are shown in Supplementary Figures 11, 12.
Tissue Validation by Quantitative Real-Time PCR
The results of quantitative real-time PCR showed that 12 hub genes had significantly different expressions in HCC tissues and adjacent tissues on the basis of paired t-test. However, PRR11 showed no significant differential expression between HCC tissues and adjacent tissues (Supplementary Figures 13, 14). Meanwhile, the expression of 13 hub genes in high histologic grade was higher than that in low histologic grade, except SKA3, which demonstrated that the results of WGCNA made sense (Supplementary Figure 14).
Discussion
Hepatocellular carcinoma seriously impacts human health, and it is likely to recur after surgery combined with other therapy (Worns and Galle, 2010). The 10-year survival rate of patients will observably decrease when metastasis is found, even if optimal treatments are used. It is crucial to explore the etiological and biological mechanisms involved in the occurrence and development of HCC. Better biomarkers for predictive and prognostic molecules for HCC are urgently required. The RNA-seq-expression and clinical information of HCC from the TCGA database are correlated by WGCNA.
In this study, we constructed protein–protein networks to show the top 20 and 50 genes in the blue and turquoise modules by calculating degree in Cytoscape. Through identification of DEGs, WGCNA, and filtering out some of the genes, we finally screened out 13 hub genes on which few studies had been conducted in HCC. These hub genes were not only expressed differently in HCC and adjacent tissue but also had significance with overall survival and disease-free survival. Meanwhile, almost all of the hub genes could effectively distinguish early grade HCC from advanced HCC, which implied that these hub genes play an important role in the progress of HCC. Genome-wide DNA methylation is well known, but its emergence and development mechanisms remain mysterious (Meissner et al., 2008; Lister et al., 2009). By searching cBioPortal, we found that the correlation between DEPDC1B expression and corresponding methylation reached −0.52 in HCC. DEPDC1B, as a protein that accumulates in G2, coordinates de-adhesion events and cell-cycle progression at mitosis (Marchesi et al., 2014). A previous study showed that DEPDC1B was a guanine nucleotide exchange factor and induced both cell invasion and migration in oral cell lines (Su et al., 2014). However, the function of DEPDC1B in HCC has not been reported yet.
When the expressions of the subset of the hub genes were validated in GSE6764, we found that GTSE1 and PRR11 showed no obvious differences between HCC and normal tissues. At the same time, GTSE1, SKA3, LMNB2, and PRR11 had no obvious tendency between different histologic grades. GTSE1 and PRR11 have been reported in various types of tumor. High expression of GTSE1 can promote breast cancer growth and metastasis. Moreover, GTSE1 can cause multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells (Lin et al., 2019). In Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TSCC) cells, PRR11 can promote proliferation and invasion by regulating p21, p27, CDK2, and Cyclin A to facilitate S phase progression (Wang C. et al., 2019). Recently, a study showed that down-regulation of SKA3 could inhibit HCC proliferation and invasion in vivo and in vitro. On the basis of gene enrichment analysis (GSEA), SKA3 was enriched in the cell cycle and P53 signaling pathways and these results were verified (Hou et al., 2019). Moreover, it has been reported that SKA3 can facilitate PI3K/AKT signaling pathway to promote cell cycle and progression in cervical cancer (Hu et al., 2018).
Compared with the HCC samples in the TCGA database, GSE6764 had few samples in each group, which may lead to this incomplete result. Besides, we could not find paired patient samples of HCC and normal tissue for immunohistochemistry due to the limitation of the Human Protein Atlas database. By quantitative real-time PCR in 16 paired tissues, we found that all hub genes had significance between tumor tissues and non-tumor tissues except PRR11. Meanwhile, all hub genes except SKA3 had significance for distinguishing high histologic grade from low histologic grade in HCC.
It is necessary for us to enlarge our sample set to validate the expression levels of these hub genes. However, we could not proceed further with the research because of various limitations. We hope that other researchers will be able to uncover the specific functions and mechanisms of these 13 hub genes in HCC, especially DEPDC1B.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study aimed to identify hub genes involved in HCC by WGCNA of data from the TCGA database and concluded that 13 functional genes (GTSE1, PLK1, NCAPH, SKA3, LMNB2, SPC25, HJURP, DEPDC1B, CDCA4, UBE2C, LMNB1, PRR11, and SNRPD2) are highly differentially expressed in tumor and non-tumor tissues. Further bioinformatic analysis showed that these hub genes can act as biomarkers of HCC progression and prognosis. At the same time, experimental assay was performed to validate these hub genes. However, further molecular experiments on these hub genes in HCC, in vivo and in vitro, need to be carried out.
Statements
Data availability statement
The RNA-seq data and corresponding clinical information of HCC were downloaded from TCGA. The validation dataset accession GES6764 microarray was downloaded from GEO database in NCBI. All remaining raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Protection of Human Subjects Committee of Zhongnan Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
YG, QL, and ZL designed this study. YG, JL, DG, and KY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. YG, BC, PL, and YX conducted the quantitative real-time PCR. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We express our great gratitude to the TCGA and GEO databases for providing free access. We would also like to acknowledge the KEGG database, developed by Kanehisa Laboratories.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.00153/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
- AUC
area under curve
- BP
biological process
- CC
cellular component
- DEGs
differentially expressed genes
- dissTOM
dissimilarity topological overlap matrix
- FC
fold change
- FPKM
fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped
- GEIPA
Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis
- GEO
Gene Expression Omnibus
- GO
Gene Ontology
- GS
gene significance
- HBV
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- IHC
immunohistochemical
- KEGG
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- MEs
module eigengenes
- MF
molecular function
- MM
module membership
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- PPI
protein–protein interaction
- ROC
receiver operating characteristic
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- TOM
topological overlap matrix
- WGCNA
Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.
Footnotes
1.^https://david-d.ncifcrf.gov/
2.^http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/
References
1
AltekruseS. F.McGlynnK. A.ReichmanM. E. (2009). Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005.J. Clin. Oncol.271485–1491. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7753
2
CeramiE.GaoJ.DogrusozU.GrossB. E.SumerS. O.AksoyB. A.et al (2012). The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data.Cancer Discov.2401–404. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
3
de MartelC.Maucort-BoulchD.PlummerM.FranceschiS. (2015). World-wide relative contribution of hepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology621190–1200. 10.1002/hep.27969
4
GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators (2016). Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015.Lancet3881459–1544. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1
5
GiuliettiM.OcchipintiG.PrincipatoG.PivaF. (2016). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis reveals key genes involved in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma development.Cell Oncol.39379–388. 10.1007/s13402-016-0283-7
6
GiuliettiM.RighettiA.PrincipatoG.PivaF. (2018). LncRNA co-expression network analysis reveals novel biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.Carcinogenesis391016–1025. 10.1093/carcin/bgy069
7
HarrisM. A.ClarkJ.IrelandA.LomaxJ.AshburnerM. (2004). The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.Nucleic Acids Res.32D258–D261.
8
HouY.WangZ.HuangS.SunC.ZhaoJ. (2019). SKA3 Promotes tumor growth by regulating CDK2/P53 phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cell Death Dis.10:929. 10.1038/s41419-019-2163-3
9
HuR.WangM. Q.NiuW. B.WangY. J.LiuY. Y.LiuY.et al (2018). SKA3 promotes cell proliferation and migration in cervical cancer by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Cancer Cell Int.18:183. 10.1186/s12935-018-0670-4
10
Huang daW.ShermanB. T.LempickiR. A. (2009). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.Nat. Protoc.444–57. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211
11
IkedaK.SaitohS.TsubotaA.AraseY.ChayamaK.KumadaH.et al (1993). Risk factors for tumor recurrence and prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer7119–25. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930101)71:1¡19::aid-cncr2820710105¿3.0.co;2-i
12
KanehisaM.SatoY.KawashimaM.FurumichiM.TanabeM. (2016). KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation.Nucleic Acids Res.44D457–D462. 10.1093/nar/gkv1070
13
LangfelderP.HorvathS. (2008). WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis.BMC Bioinformatics9:559. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
14
LiJ.GaoJ. Z.DuJ. L.HuangZ. X.WeiL. X. (2014). Increased CDC20 expression is associated with development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.Int. J. Oncol.451547–1555. 10.3892/ijo.2014.2559
15
LiK.WangH. T.HeY. K.GuoT. (2017). New idea for treatment strategies for barcelona clinic liver cancer stages based on a network meta-analysis.Medicine96:e6950. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006950
16
LiN.LiL.ChenY. (2018). The identification of core gene expression signature in hepatocellular carcinoma.Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.2018:3478305. 10.1155/2018/3478305
17
LinF.XieY. J.ZhangX. K.HuangT. J.XuH. F.MeiY.et al (2019). GTSE1 is involved in breast cancer progression in p53 mutation-dependent manner.J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.38:152. 10.1186/s13046-019-1157-4
18
ListerR.PelizzolaM.DowenR. H.HawkinsR. D.HonG.Tonti-FilippiniJ.et al (2009). Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences.Nature462315–322. 10.1038/nature08514
19
LiuX.LiaoW. J.YuanQ.OuY.HuangJ. (2015). TTK activates Akt and promotes proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.Oncotarget634309–34320. 10.18632/oncotarget.5295
20
MarchesiS.MontaniF.DeflorianG.D’AntuonoR.CuomoA.BolognaS.et al (2014). DEPDC1B coordinates de-adhesion events and cell-cycle progression at mitosis.Dev. Cell31420–433. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.09.009
21
MeissnerA.MikkelsenT. S.GuH. C.WernigM.HannaJ.SivachenkoA.et al (2008). Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells.Nature454766–U791. 10.1038/nature07107
22
MurakamiY.YasudaT.SaigoK.UrashimaT.ToyodaH.OkanoueT.et al (2006). Comprehensive analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues.Oncogene252537–2545. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209283
23
RobinsonM. D.McCarthyD. J.SmythG. K. (2010). edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.Bioinformatics26139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
24
SuY. F.LiangC. Y.HuangC. Y.PengC. Y.ChenC. C.LinM. C.et al (2014). A putative novel protein, DEPDC1B, is overexpressed in oral cancer patients, and enhanced anchorage-independent growth in oral cancer cells that is mediated by Rac1 and ERK.J. Biomed. Sci.21:67. 10.1186/s12929-014-0067-1
25
TangJ. N.KongD. G.CuiQ. X.WangK.ZhangD.GongY.et al (2018). Prognostic genes of breast cancer identified by gene co-expression network analysis.Front. Oncol.8:13. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00374
26
TangZ.LiC.KangB.GaoG.LiC.ZhangZ.et al (2017). GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses.Nucleic Acids Res.45W98–W102. 10.1093/nar/gkx247
27
WaghrayA.MuraliA. R.MenonK. N. (2015). Hepatocellular carcinoma: from diagnosis to treatment.World J. Hepatol.71020–1029. 10.4254/wjh.v7.i8.1020
28
WallaceM. C.PreenD.JeffreyG. P.AdamsL. A. (2015). The evolving epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global perspective.Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.9765–779. 10.1586/17474124.2015.1028363
29
WangC.YuL.RenX.WuT.ChenX.HuangY.et al (2019). The oncogenic potential of PRR11 gene in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells.J. Cancer102541–2551. 10.7150/jca.29265
30
WangY.ChenL.WangG.ChengS.QianK.LiuX.et al (2019). Fifteen hub genes associated with progression and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma identified by coexpression analysis.J. Cell Physiol.23410225–10237. 10.1002/jcp.27692
31
WilsonC. L.MillerC. J. (2005). Simpleaffy: a bioconductor package for affymetrix quality control and data analysis.Bioinformatics213683–3685. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti605
32
WongN.YenW.WongW. L.WongN. L. Y.ChanK. Y.MoF. K.et al (2009). TOP2A overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with early age onset, shorter patients survival and chemoresistance.Int. J. Cancer124644–652. 10.1002/ijc.23968
33
WornsM. A.GalleP. R. (2010). Future perspectives in hepatocellular carcinoma.Dig. Liver Dis.42 (Suppl. 3), S302–S309. 10.1016/S1590-8658(10)60521-X
34
WuC. X.WangX. Q.ChokS. H.ManK.TsangS. H. Y.ChanA. C. Y.et al (2018). Blocking CDK1/PDK1/beta-Catenin signaling by CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 increased the efficacy of sorafenib treatment by targeting cancer stem cells in a preclinical model of hepatocellular carcinoma.Theranostics83737–3750. 10.7150/thno.25487
35
ZhangQ.SuR. X.ShanC.GaoC.WuP. (2018). Non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (NCAPG) is a novel mitotic gene required for hepatocellular cancer cell proliferation and migration.Oncol. Res.26269–276. 10.3727/096504017X15075967560980
Summary
Keywords
quantitative real-time PCR, bioinformatics, weighted gene co-expression network analyses, hepatocellular carcinoma, biomarker
Citation
Gu Y, Li J, Guo D, Chen B, Liu P, Xiao Y, Yang K, Liu Z and Liu Q (2020) Identification of 13 Key Genes Correlated With Progression and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis. Front. Genet. 11:153. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00153
Received
04 December 2019
Accepted
10 February 2020
Published
28 February 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Zhixiang Lu, Harvard Medical School, United States
Reviewed by
Yi Peng, Northwestern Medicine, United States; Manal Said Fawzy, Suez Canal University, Egypt
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Gu, Li, Guo, Chen, Liu, Xiao, Yang, Liu and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhisu Liu, spss2005@126.comQuanyan Liu, spsslqy@vip.126.com
This article was submitted to Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.