Fernanda Serpeloni1,2
Karl M. Radtke1,3
Tobias Hecker4
Johanna Sill1
Vanja Vukojevic5
Simone G. de Assis2Maggie Schauer1
Thomas Elbert1
Daniel Nätt6*- 1Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- 2Department of Studies in Violence and Health Jorge Careli, National School of Public Health of Rio de Janeiro – National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 3Evolutionary Biology and Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
- 4Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- 5Division of Molecular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 6Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Stress during pregnancy widely associates with epigenetic changes and psychiatric problems during childhood. Animal studies, however, show that under specific postnatal conditions prenatal stress may have other, less detrimental consequences for the offspring. Here, we studied mental health and epigenome-wide DNA methylation in saliva following intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy in São Gonçalo, a Brazilian city with high levels of violence. Not surprisingly, mothers exposed to pregnancy IPV expressed elevated depression, PTSD and anxiety symptoms. Children had similar psychiatric problems when they experienced maternal IPV after being born. More surprisingly, when maternal IPV occurred both during (prenatal) and after pregnancy these problems were absent. Following prenatal IPV, genomic sites in genes encoding the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) and its repressor FKBP51 (FKBP5) were among the most differentially methylated and indicated an enhanced ability to terminate hormonal stress responses in prenatally stressed children. These children also showed more DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like regions, which previously has been associated with stress/disease resilience. A similar relationship was seen in prenatally stressed middle-eastern refugees of the same age as the São Gonçalo children but exposed to postnatal war-related violence. While our study is limited in location and sample size, it provides novel insights on how prenatal stress may epigenetically shape resilience in humans, possibly through interactions with the postnatal environment. This translates animal findings and emphasizes the importance to account for population differences when studying how early life gene–environment interactions affects mental health.
Introduction
Psychological stress during pregnancy, like maternal depression and intimate partner violence (IPV), has widely been associated with detrimental effects in the child (Monk et al., 2012). Effects on child mental health over-represent the literature, such as increased risk of psychiatric problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, major depression and anxiety related disorders (O’Connor et al., 2005; Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015; O’Donnell et al., 2017). However, not all individuals exposed to stress develop stress-related problems. Many appear to have psychiatric resilience, showing no or better outcomes despite severe stress exposures (Rutter, 1999; Russo et al., 2012).
In animals, prenatal stress sometimes leads to general shifts toward what appears to be adaptations in the offspring to the stressful environments (Bateson et al., 2014). In these studies outcome is highly dependent on the postnatal environment, where for example prenatal stress in rodents leads to behavioral changes that are beneficial in predator rich environments but not otherwise (St-Cyr and McGowan, 2015). Analogies have been reported in several taxa including primates, but in humans they remain speculative in nature (Sheriff et al., 2009; Giesing et al., 2010; Nettle et al., 2013; Berghänel et al., 2016). The best human example can be seen in infants consistently exposed to maternal depression, both pre- and postnatally, which are protected against the negative mental effects seen in infants of mothers with depression either pre- or postnatally (but not during both periods) (Sandman et al., 2012). This indicates that an interaction between the pre- and postnatal environments may shape mental health also in humans. A reason why evidence is mostly lacking in humans could therefore be that prenatal stress studies rarely target postnatal exposures in environments with high levels of stress. Growing up in communities characterized by poverty, crime and violence predicts stress related disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and conduct problems (Elbert and Schauer, 2002; Fowler et al., 2009). Studying the consequences of prenatal stress in communities with high levels of violence could therefore yield unique insights into the interactions between the pre- and postnatal environments, insights that could be particularly important for understanding human mental disorders.
Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, are important for reprogramming the genome following early life stress (Oberlander et al., 2008; Monk et al., 2012; Babenko et al., 2015; Serpeloni et al., 2016; Vangeel et al., 2017), and are believed to shape psychiatric resilience (Rutter et al., 2006). A well-known example is the epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR; gene: NR3C1) and its chaperone FK506 binding proteins 51 (FKBP51; gene: FKBP5). Both proteins have been studied extensively for their involvement in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, a physiological pathway that mediates key elements of the stress response. GR uses the stress hormone cortisol as a ligand, and when activated represses the stress response, while FKBP51 exerts a short-loop feedback by inhibiting the nuclear translocation of GR (Zannas and Binder, 2014). Epigenetic dysregulation of NR3C1 and FKBP5 have repeatedly been observed in psychiatric disorders following early life stress (Binder et al., 2008; McGowan et al., 2009; Spijker and van Rossum, 2012; Klengel et al., 2013). The reprogramming of specific genes may, however, only represent pieces of the full epigenome-wide consequence of stress (Hunter et al., 2015). Cortisol exposure in young children is, for example, associated with genome-wide loss of DNA methylation in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions, which are genomic regions normally silenced by DNA methylation (Nätt et al., 2015). How stress-related genes and epigenome-wide mechanisms interact in shaping human mental health is poorly understood.
Here, we aimed to investigate the psychiatric and epigenome-wide consequences of prenatal stress, in the form of IPV during pregnancy, in a human population exposed to high levels of violence. IPV affects one third of the women worldwide (Devries et al., 2013). In the present study, we targeted women and children in São Gonçalo, a city located in Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil. São Gonçalo’s population exceeds one million, with high proportion of low-income families and high levels of community/domestic violence (CDV) (Assis et al., 2009). In a previous study targeting the same population, we showed that the epigenome-wide consequences of IPV and CDV in this population can be detected in grandchildren of grandmothers exposed to violence (Serpeloni et al., 2017). Here, we focus on the more immediate epigenetic and psychiatric consequences of IPV, by obtaining epigenome-wide saliva DNA methylation and psychiatric profiles of children exposed to prenatal IPV. We hypothesized that exposure to prenatal IPV in the high violence communities of São Gonçalo will have different consequences than what has been reported in studies of less violent communities.
Materials and Methods
Participants
São Gonçalo subjects, 122 grandmothers, 122 mothers, and 120 children were recruited via the “Family strategy program” of the city of São Gonçalo (Brazil) as described before (Serpeloni et al., 2017). Children (46% male) mean age were 13.1 (range = 8–18); mothers 37.9 (range = 25–51); grandmothers 64.0 (range 46–88) years. Sociodemographic variables of mothers and children can be found in Table 1.
Table 1. Selected psychiatric variables and social risk factors in the São Gonçalo subsamples.
Pre- and Postnatal Stress
All São Gonçalo participants were interviewed individually in their homes. Measures of interpersonal violence during pregnancy focused on the periods before, during, and after pregnancy, as described in Radtke et al. (2011). We used two instruments: the Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) (Hegarty et al., 1999, 2005) and the Things I Have Seen and Heard Scale (TSHS) (Richters and Martinez, 1990). CAS measures the degree of IPV through 30 items scaled from 0 (never) to 5 (daily) that together form four dimensions: severe combined abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse and harassment. An IPV/CAS score >3 was used as cut-off for generating IPV+ and IPV- groups, which previously been shown to represent consistent IPV (Hegarty et al., 2005). Life time exposure scores used the weighted summarization method described in Radtke et al. (2011). TSHS (Richters and Martinez, 1990) contains 20–26 items that measure exposures to community and domestic violence (CDV). Items are presented in a 5-point format ranking from zero (never) to four (many times). Experience of IPV is not included in TSHS, with exception of witnessing parental interpersonal violence. Trauma exposure was measured through a checklist of 16 items (e.g., natural disasters, physical assault, sexual assault) adapted from Neuner et al. (2004). Maternal care was assessed using the Parental Bonding Instrument (Parker et al., 1979).
Stress-Related Disorders
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in the children was measured using the University of California at Los Angeles Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Steinberg et al., 2004). For adults the Post-traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PSSI) was used instead (Foa, 1995). Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient-Health-Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Richardson et al., 2010) and the 7-item scale for generalized anxiety disorders (GAD-7) (Spitzer et al., 2006). Behavioral problems in children was measured using the Strength and Difficult Questionnaire (SDQ), (Goodman et al., 1998) which allocates behavioral attributes to five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior.
Generating DNA Methylation Data
For the São Gonçalo subjects, saliva samples (2 ml) were collected and DNA isolated using the Oragene-Discover (OGR-500) Collection Kit (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada). DNA was bisulfite-converted and analyzed using HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina, Inc.) at the Queen Mary University of London (United Kingdom) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Targeted bisulfite resequencing was used to technically validate 10 CpGs on the BeadChips in 33 randomly chosen individuals, using a service provided by Zymo Research Corporation (Irvine, CA, United States). This involved bisulfite conversion using EZ DNA Methylation-Lightning Kit (Zymo), followed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results and primer sequences are found in Supplementary Table S2.
Preprocessing and Quality Control of DNA Methylation Data
A chart of the full bioinformatics analysis is available in Supplementary Figure S1. Preprocessing and statistical analysis was carried out in R 3.3.2 or SPSS (IBM, v.23). An R script is available in Supplementary Text S1, which automatically performs all preprocessing steps given the input files in Supplementary Data S1–S4. Instructions on how to use the script are contained within the script itself.
The hg19 human reference genome was used in all analysis. Raw São Gonçalo bead array data (idat files) were imported and preprocessed in R using different functions available in minfi package as described in Aryee et al. (2014). Successful bisulfite conversion and hybridization were verified using minfi/qcReport. We used the recommendations by Chen et al. (2013) to filter probes known to cross-hybridize with multiple genomic locations (nprobes = 30,969), contain or neighboring common polymorphisms (nprobes = 162,255), or were annotated to the X/Y chromosomes (nprobes = 8,360). Probes with low detection signals (p > 0.01; nprobes = 5,526) in any of the samples were also excluded (Aryee et al., 2014). The final São Gonçalo dataset contained 272,636 high quality CpGs after filtering.
Confirmation that individuals were assigned to unique families was done using the 65 SNP probes available on the beadchip. We also confirmed that all subjects’ sex, age, and sample type (saliva) matched the predicted epigenetic sex, age and sample type estimated by minfi (Aryee et al., 2014). In total, the São Gonçalo dataset contained 120 children (prenatal IPV+ = 21, IPV- = 99) and 122 adult women (prenatal IPV+ = 23, IPV- = 99), of which most were mothers to the children (pregnancy IPV+ = 18; IPV- = 104; full families = 115).
Genome-Wide Differential DNA Methylation Analysis
Filtered data were quantile normalized using default settings in minfi/preprocessQuantile. Logit-transformed beta values (M-values) were subjected to a robust linear regression model to identify significantly differentially methylated (DM) probes in association with prenatal IPV, adjusted for multiple testing (Benjamini–Hochberg method), using the Limma package (Ritchie et al., 2015). To minimize the effect of outliers due to the presence of rare SNPs in target CpG sites, we used the robust method in the lmFit function in limma (for more details, see Supplementary Figure S4). For the São Gonçalo children and women the model had prenatal IPV exposure (IPV+ versus IPV-) as main effect, and age, biological sex, prenatal CDV, and prenatal trauma scores (maternal exposures during pregnancy) as covariates. Again an IPV/CAS score >3 was used as cut-off for generating prenatal IPV+ and IPV- groups (Hegarty et al., 2005). An extended model with additional covariates is present in Supplementary Table S1. The covariates in the analysis of the contrast datasets may have differed (see section “Analysis of Contrast Datasets” below).
To generate the genomic context graphs of NR3C1 and FKBP5 (Supplementary Figure S5), data were downloaded from UCSC genome browser (hg19). Histone and transcription factor binding data were taken from the default Integrated Regulation from ENCODE Track (Layered H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3, H3K27Ac, and Txn Factor ChIP) which contains data from multiple cell lines. For the Txn Factor ChIP, only the areas closest to candidate CpGs were considered, and due to the relative abundance of peaks at the NR3C1 CpG, only transcription factors with at least two peaks was retained for this gene (links to original graphs see Supplementary Figure S5). To generate heterochromatin/euchromatin coverage graphs (Figure 2D), ENCODE data for PBMC specific H3K9me3 and H3K4me3 ChIP-seq experiments were downloaded from the SYDH Histone Track in the USCS genome browser (GEO access: GSM788075 and GSM788084). To minimize differences in background noise between H3K9me3 and H3K4me3, the y-axes of these graphs were set by the average signal of the first and last bp of the 6,000 bp window (±3,000 bp relative CpG location). The same approach, but using genomic ranges downloaded from the ChromHMM Core 15 dataset (Ernst and Kellis, 2012) (Roadmap Epigenomic Project1), was used to visualize the overlap with defined chromatin states in cells present in saliva (for details, see Supplementary Figure S6). To partly control for polymorphism acting in trans we searched the mQTLdb database2 (accessed 07/15/2018) for previously identified methylation QTLs in the 31 differentially methylated CpGs reported in Table 2 (see footnote 2). The PLINK childhood (age 7) and adolescence (age 15–17) datasets (at any genomic distance) were used since these were corrected for sex, batch effects, cellular heterogeneity and genetic structure.
Table 2. Differentially methylated CpGs between São Gonçalo children exposed to prenatal IPV (n = 21) and controls (n = 99).
Stress-Induced Methylome Switching and Retrotransposon Analysis
The R script available in Supplementary Text S1 will perform a methylome switching analysis on normalized beta-values from the São Gonçalo samples (Supplementary Data S1), as well as downloaded data from the Grady Study (see section “Analysis of Contrast Datasets” below). Methylome switching was calculated by classifying each CpG into two categories: >50% or <50% methylation (hetero- and eu- chromatin-like, respectively) based on mean percent methylation of each CpG across subjects. We used K-means clustering analysis (K = 2), in the children and mothers, respectively, to validate the 50% cut-off. All classification was done within cohorts. As a result, the number of CpGs in each category differed slightly between datasets, since some CpGs may have been classified as heterochromatin-like in one cohort, but euchromatin-like in another. In downstream analysis, we further divided these two categories into those CpGs with or without a repeat region within ±50 bp, using the GenomicRanges package (Carlson et al., 2014) and repeat coordinates from RepeatMasker3. Average DNA methylation of each category were then calculated for the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs in respective dataset. We choose to rank the CpGs by Bayesian B-values instead of p-values, to circumvent any issue with p-value cut-off levels. The 1% threshold was chosen based on previous data (Nätt et al., 2015), as well as observations in Figure 2E. The progressive proportion graphs (Figure 2E) were constructed using information from RepeatMasker (repeat class; see footnote 3), and UCSC genome browser (CpG islands and exons). Since CpGs available on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips are not a random subset, we choose to normalize the graphs so that all category lines originated from a 50% ratio at the level of all probes (100% top ranked). Bootstrap resampling to generate expected distributions given the CpG panels available on the beadchip was conducted using the boot package in R. Information in RepBase (Bao et al., 2015) was used to extract probes within ±50 bp of recently active L1 retrotransposons unique to the human linage.
Cell Type and Genetic Ancestry
To control for genetic structure and cell type heterogeneity bias between IPV+ and IPV- groups in São Gonçalo children, we extracted the minfi beta-values, imported them into GLINT 1.0.3 (Rahmani et al., 2017b) and attained the factor scores from the methods listed below. Analysis within GLINT used the default settings. For genetic ancestry analysis EPISTRUCTURE was used (Rahmani et al., 2017a), while ReFACTor was used for reference free cell type analysis (Rahmani et al., 2017b). Since, saliva contains white-blood cells (Theda et al., 2018) we used the Houseman (Houseman et al., 2012) blood reference available in GLINT, as well as a custom-made reference for panel-based cell type analysis. The custom reference was built using the Houseman method (Houseman et al., 2012), but was based on CpGs differentially methylated between saliva, buccal and a pool of the other tissues available in GEO dataset GSE48472. The reference panel can be found in Serpeloni et al. (2017), imported into GLINT and integrated into Houseman pipeline for saliva cell type analysis.
Statistical Models
For an overview of the statistical models used, see Supplementary Figure S1. Following the initial genome-wide analysis in R/limma, we applied general linear models (GLMs) in SPSS 23 for all group comparisons. Care was taken to assure that the data met GLM assumptions. For the São Gonçalo dataset, model design was the same as for genome-wide analysis, using the same IPV classification (main factor) and covariates (age, sex, prenatal trauma, and prenatal CDV). Models of the contrast datasets are presented below.
Analysis of Contrast Datasets
If not otherwise stated, sample handling, preprocessing and genome-wide analysis of the contrast datasets were performed the same way as for the São Gonçalo children and women datasets. For consistencies, we only analyzed CpGs that were in common with the São Gonçalo datasets.
Refugee children presented in Figure 3 came from war refugees that migrated to Germany between 2010 and 2016 (n = 48; 60% females; 11–19 years old; 75% middle eastern; 83% Islamic). Bisulfite converted saliva DNA was hybridized to Infinium MethylationEPIC (Illumina, Inc.), and was therefore separately analyzed compared to the other contrast datasets. 239,442 CpGs were in common with the São Gonçalo datasets after filtering. To test differences between IPV+ (n = 15) and IPV- (n = 33) we used a similar statistical model as for the São Gonçalo children, with the same IPV threshold (CAS score > 3). As covariate, instead of prenatal CDV, we used prenatal scores of organized violence calculated using the Event Checklist for War, Detention, and Torture Experiences as described in Onyut et al. (2009). Results were not affected by cell-type heterogeneity and genetic ancestry as described above.
Bisulfite converted DNA from the São Gonçalo women and the Grady datasets were hybridized to the HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina, Inc.) and was therefore analyzed together, only retaining CpGs that reached the detection signal threshold across all cohorts including the São Gonçalo children (nCpGs = 235,960). The São Gonçalo women (mothers) dataset was presented above, with the São Gonçalo children.
The Grady dataset has been described in details previously (Zannas et al., 2015). Files were downloaded as Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips raw signals from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, accession number: GSE72680). Only samples with sex, age (co-variates) and information on whether the participant had undergone psychiatric treatment (main factor) were retrained and imported into R. Quality control, filtering and normalization were performed as for the São Gonçalo dataset. The final dataset contained 367 individuals (70% females; 18–77 years old; 91% African American). Groups were generate according to psychiatric treatment of either depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD or anxiety disorder (nyes = 140, nno = 227). We did not observe group differences in cell-type heterogeneity and genetic ancestry as described above. The R script available in Supplementary Text S1 will automatically download, preprocess, and perform an epigenome-wide association and methylome switching analysis on the Grady data, using the input files in Supplementary Data S1–S4. Instructions are contained within the script.
Ethics Statement
Approvals were obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki by the Ethical Committee of the University of Konstanz (Germany; permit UNIKON IRB st No. 4/2015) and the National Commission for Ethics in Research (Brazil; permit CAAE 16375413.1.0000.5240). We obtained written informed consent from adults/parents and written assent from children.
Results
Psychiatric Burden in Children Exposed to Prenatal IPV
For an overview of all analysis, see Supplementary Figure S1. In the São Gonçalo samples, 19% of all mothers reported IPV during their pregnancy (n = 244; both maternal and grand-maternal generations included). As expected, IPV during pregnancy in the maternal generation (n = 122) was positively correlated with exposure to lifetime trauma, and community/domestic violence (CDV) other than IPV, as well as depression, PTSD and anxiety symptoms (Table 1). Children exposed to lifetime trauma, and CDV also showed the expected psychiatric problems, which validated the collection methods. Against previous findings in humans, however, children exposed to prenatal IPV did not present mental and behavioral problems (Table 1). Only a weak relationship with emotional symptoms (e.g., expressing more fears and worries) was present.
As described by Hegarty et al. (2005), an IPV score of more than 3 in CAS reliably detects IPV exposure. We used this threshold to generate groups that had or had not been exposed to IPV. Only 22% of the mothers that experienced pregnancy IPV had been exposed to prenatal IPV themselves, confirming the low correlation between pregnancy and prenatal exposures reported in Table 1. Pregnancy IPV in the São Gonçalo mothers often coincided with IPV before and/or after pregnancy (Figure 1A). Several children, however, had mothers that experienced IPV exclusively after birth. These children had similar load of maternal IPV after birth, and their mothers experienced similar lifetime IPV exposure, as children that experienced maternal IPV prenatally (Figure 1B). Nevertheless, only children experiencing maternal IPV exclusively after birth expressed elevated levels of mental symptoms compared to controls (Figure 1C). This implies that prenatal IPV in the São Gonçalo children may have led to some sort of resilience against experiencing/witnessing maternal IPV.
Figure 1. Missing psychiatric problems in São Gonçalo children following prenatal IPV. Most mothers experiencing pregnancy IPV were also exposed to IPV before conception or after giving birth (A). A substantial number of mothers experienced IPV only after birth. Despite similar maternal IPV exposures after birth in both prenatally and only postnatally exposed children, and even higher lifetime trauma exposures in mothers experiencing IPV during pregnancy (B), only children living in families with mothers exposed to IPV only postnatally expressed more depression and PTSD symptoms (C). Results in (B,C) originates from Bonferroni corrected post hoc tests, using general linear models with age, sex, pregnancy/prenatal trauma and CDV scores as covariates. Error bars indicates ±SEM. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05.
Prenatal IPV Affects Genes Relevant for Stress and Psychiatric Disorder
We next explored epigenetic biomarkers by measuring genome-wide saliva DNA methylation using Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (children = 120; women = 122; mother/children family pairs = 115). To validate the arrays, we technically replicated 10 CpGs covered by the BeadChip in 33 randomly chosen individuals (children = 18; women = 15) using targeted bisulfite resequencing, which showed strong inter-assay/subject reliability (subject mean r2 = 0.94; max = 0.96; min = 0.90; each subject had p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, we applied established practices to exclude CpGs with common polymorphisms and without reliable detection signals in all samples (see section “Materials and Methods”). Since the children samples contained both males and females, we also excluded the sex chromosomes, resulting in a final dataset of 272,636 CpGs.
After correcting for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, 31 CpGs (Table 2 and Figure 2A) were differentially methylated between children exposed to prenatal IPV (IPV+, n = 21, mean age = 13.4 ± 0.5) and controls (IPV-, n = 99, mean age = 13.7 ± 0.3 SEM) using the Hegarty threshold described above (Hegarty et al., 2005) and a false discovery adjusted p-value < 0.1. To increase specificity toward IPV, the analysis was corrected for the covariates sex and age, as well as maternal exposures to pregnancy trauma and other types of CDV. Supplementary Table S1 shows a comparison between this model and an extended model including several more possible confounds like cell-type heterogeneity, genetic structure, family income and maternal smoking/alcohol use during pregnancy, which showed limited effects on the results. Direct between group comparisons of cell-type heterogeneity (Supplementary Figure S2), genetic ancestry (Supplementary Figure S2), reported age/epigenetic age (Supplementary Figure S3), and other possible confounds (Table 1) confirmed that these variables had limited effects on the results. We also applied a statistical strategy called robust statistics, to limit loss-of-methylation site polymorphism bias between the prenatal IPV+ and IPV- groups (for more information, see Supplementary Figure S4). To partly control for distant polymorphisms affecting DNA methylation, we searched the mQTLdb/PLINK database (see footnote 2) for previously identified methylation QTLs affecting these 31 CpGs. Only one of the 31 CpGs, cg04967982, had previously been associated with trans-acting polymorphism in juvenile/adolescence samples, suggesting limited effects of this type of genomic interaction.
Figure 2. A methylome switch in the São Gonçalo children. (A) Manhattan plot showing the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs (Supplementary Data S1) in the São Gonçalo children exposed to prenatal IPV (IPV+) compared to controls (IPV–). Green dots show the significant CpGs from Table 2. (B) Differentially methylated CpGs in São Gonçalo children correlated across subjects. Asterisks here represent at least p < 0.05 significant Pearson correlations between target CpGs. (C) DNA methylation strongly correlated between São Gonçalo children and women. Small blue dots show average DNA methylation of each analyzed CpG in children and women, respectively (n = 272,636). A 50% cut-off in DNA methylation efficiently caught two distinct clusters verified with K-means cluster analysis (see main text). (D) The >50% DNA methylation cluster associated with the H3K9me3 heterochromatin marker, while the <50% cluster associated with the H3K4me3 euchromatin marker, as measured in previous ChIP-seq experiments of white blood cells. (E) Line graphs showing an accumulation of hypermethylated CpGs in heterochromatin-like regions of the top most differentially methylated CpGs between prenatal IPV+ and IPV– children (top graph). This was accompanied by a reduction of hypermethylated CpGs in euchromatin-like regions (lower graph). CpGs were categorized by being within ±50 bp of repetitive genomic features (SINE, LINE, LTR, DNA transposon, other repeats) or gene associated features (exons and/or CpG islands; no repeat within ±50 bp). (F) Comparing the observed number of hypermethylated CpGs in the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs with confidence intervals of the expected distributions generated by resampling 1% randomly from all analyzed CpGs (10,000 resamples), confirmed that the prenatal IPV+ children had more hypermethylated CpGs in heterochromatin-like regions, and less hypermethylated CpGs in euchromatin-like regions, compared to controls. (G) Averaging the top 1% CpGs into either heterochromatin-like CpGs with or without repeats (±50 bp), and euchromatin-like CpGs with or without repeats, showed that the effects were more pronounced in repetitive regions. (H) Prenatal IPV also led to more methylation in CpGs within ±50 bp of recently active retrotransposons. Error bars indicates ±SEM. Asterisks in (G,H) represent results from general linear models with age, sex, prenatal CDV, and prenatal trauma scores as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01.
Ranked 1 of 272,636 CpGs analyzed was a CpG in the gene body of FKBP5 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S4), which codes for FKBP51, the chaperone protein for GR which was presented in the text above. Also, a CpG in the promoter of the gene coding for GR, NR3C1, was top ranked (rank 39; Table 2). In both genes, the significant CpGs were in regions previously characterized by histone H3K27 acetylation and H3K4 mono/tri-methylation, which are histone marks commonly associated with active transcription (Supplementary Figure S5). While DNA methylation at the NR3C1 CpG supported an active promoter, by being poorly methylated, FKBP5 showed higher levels of DNA methylation, suggesting local silencing (Table 2). The FKBP5 CpG, however, showed substantial variation, and has a plausible binding site for the activator protein 1 (AP1) complex: a potent activator of gene transcription following dimerization of c-Fos and c-Jun (Supplementary Figure S5). A qualitative guess is therefore that the FKBP5 site is located within an enhancer region, but more evidence is needed.
Many other differentially methylated CpGs were located in or close to genes previously associated with stress and psychiatric disorders, such as the genes for oxytocin (OXT) and DLG Associated Protein 2 (DLGAP2) that have commonly been associated with deficits in social behavior and autism spectrum disorder (Marshall et al., 2008; Feldman et al., 2016). Furthermore, a subunit for GABA receptor 1B (GABBR1), DTW Domain Containing 2 (DTWD2), and DISC1-Binding Zinc-Finger Protein (ZNF365), have been associated with multiple often comorbid disorders, including addiction, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia (Ayyappan et al., 2009; Fatemi et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2013; Augier et al., 2018). Of interest for our study, polymorphism in DTWD2 has shown to interact with FKBP5 in trans (Ellsworth et al., 2013) and GABBR1 has been associated with DNA methylation changes in newborns following maternal anxiety during pregnancy (Vangeel et al., 2017). Furthermore, the high number of psychiatrically relevant genes may indicate co-regulation involving, for example, common transcription factors. This was consistent with high inter-subject correlations across many of the differentially methylated sites (Figure 2B).
Since the maternal generation was also assessed for genome-wide DNA methylation, we cross-examined the children results in their mothers. No correlations within families (n = 115 mother/child pairs) were found for the 31 significant CpGs identified in the children, providing evidence against either genetic or intergenerational epigenetic inheritance. Changes in the children following prenatal IPV were therefore likely independent of the changes following the same exposures in their mothers.
Stress Tolerance and Methylome Switching in São Gonçalo Children
Similar changes in FKBP5 and NR3C1 DNA methylation reported by others (Binder et al., 2008; McGowan et al., 2009; Spijker and van Rossum, 2012; Klengel et al., 2013; Zannas and Binder, 2014) suggest that prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children would have higher availability of GR, resulting in enhanced negative feedback of the HPA-axis, and therefore faster stress recovery than controls. While this may explain why these children seemed protected from the psychiatric consequences of prenatal IPV, only studying brain receptor function may fully addressed this hypothesis. Considering the challenges to study the São Gonçalo population this was out of our scope. Furthermore, while DNA methylation in NR3C1 and FKBP5 have been suggested to be indicators of mental burden, inconsistencies between studies have questioned their biomarker potential (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore epigenetic indicators of stress tolerance that are not dependent on single CpGs, but instead averages information across genomes. Analyzing our data this way, would make our observation more robust against technical noise and decrease the risk of making false discoveries due to multiple testing.
Exposures to stress, aging and disease have been shown to associate with genome-wide losses of DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like genomic regions rich in DNA methylation (Jones et al., 2015; Nätt et al., 2015; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). More DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like regions would therefore indicate stress/disease resilience and deaccelerated aging. Based on this, we simply categorized all analyzed CpGs into hyper (>50%) or hypo- (<50%) methylated (Figure 2C). The seemingly arbitrary 50% cut-off overlapped to >98.7% with two clusters, independently replicated in the São Gonçalo children and women, and unbiasedly generated using K-means clustering analysis (K = 2). Clusters were also inversely associated with the heterochromatin marker H3K9me3, and euchromatin marker H3K4me3, as previously measured in mono nuclear leucocytes (Figure 2D). Inversed chromatin states of these clusters were also confirmed in relevant cell types using ChromHMM data downloaded from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project, which reports chromatin states based on machine learning of five different chromatin markers (Supplementary Figure S6).
Exploring the hetero- and eu-chromatin-like clusters revealed a never described phenomena following prenatal stress in humans. In heterochromatin-like regions, the number of hypermethylated CpGs in prenatal IPV exposed children compared to controls progressively increased the closer to the top most differentially methylated CpGs that was targeted (top graph Figure 2E). The gain in DNA methylation of heterochromatin-like regions was accompanied by a rebound in euchromatin-like regions (bottom graph Figure 2E). This resulted in what appeared to be a methylome switch, where prenatal IPV exposure led to more methylation in heterochromatin-like and less methylation in euchromatin-like regions of the top regions affected by prenatal IPV. The switch affected many types of genomic regions but was most pronounced in several classes of transposons and other repetitive genomic elements (Figure 2E). Poorly methylated exons and CpG islands depleted of repetitive regions appeared slightly protected against the switch, at least in euchromatin-like regions.
Given the explorative findings in Figure 2E, we looked more closely at the 1% top differentially methylated CpGs between IPV+ and IPV- children (Supplementary Data S1). The proportion of hypermethylated regions in IPV+ children was far greater than what was expected by confidence intervals generated using 10,000 bootstrap resamples of the original 272,636 analyzed CpGs post filtering (top graph Figure 2F). While not as pronounced, the opposite relationship was observed in the eu-chromatin like regions (bottom graph Figure 2F). This confirms statistically the overrepresentation observed in Figure 2E, and that the switch was not biased by the CpG panel chosen for the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.
A methylome switch was also present when averaging the DNA methylation levels over heterochromatin-like repetitive and non-repetitive, as well as euchromatin-like repetitive and non-repetitive regions (Figure 2G). Again, the most pronounced effect was found in repetitive regions.
Stress and age-related loss of DNA methylation in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions may partly involve a mechanism that reactivates intact retrotransposons (Wood and Helfand, 2013; Gorbunova et al., 2014; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). These virus-like elements are often found in repetitive genomic regions and are normally silenced by DNA methylation. It is believed that when this epigenetic control mechanism is compromised, these elements may reactivate, spread to other genomic locations, leading to disruption of genome integrity, and increased nuclear instability (Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). Since the strongest effect by prenatal IPV was found within repetitive heterochromatin-like regions (Figures 2E–G), we therefore limited our analysis to only involve known recently active L1 retrotransposons specific to the human linage. As expected, prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children showed more DNA methylation in these regions, suggesting that these children may have stronger protection against nuclear instability caused by reactivation of retrotransposons compared to the controls (Figure 2H).
Children Exposed to Both Prenatal IPV and Postnatal Violence Share a Unique Relationship
To put the findings in the São Gonçalo children into a wider context, we compared the results with three other datasets relevant for prenatal IPV and psychiatric burden.
Firstly, we tried to validate the main analysis in saliva samples from an independent juvenile cohort of war immigrants with primarily Middle Eastern origin (IPV+ = 15, mean age = 14.7 ± 0.6; IPV- = 33, mean age = 15.4 ± 0.4 SEM). This cohort had also experienced high levels of violence both in the maternal and juvenile generations (Figure 3A). While the refugee children did not present as pronounced resilience in their psychiatric profiles following prenatal IPV as their São Gonçalo counterparts (Figure 3B), the data still showed a similar methylome switch with the strongest effect observed in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions, thus replicating the Brazilian results despite the limited sample size (Figure 3C).
Figure 3. A methylome switch in prenatally stressed war-exposed refugees. Graphs show results from an independent study in refugees primarily born in countries of the Middle East which migrated to Germany between 2010 and 2016. (A) Refugee mothers and children had higher life-time exposure to violence than reference groups born in Germany. Community violence scores used for the São Gonçalo samples was not available here. Instead graphs indicate organized violence scored using the Event Checklist for War, Detention, and Torture Experiences, as described in Onyut et al. (2009). (B) Using the same methods for scoring symptoms of PTSD and depression as were used for the São Gonçalo samples, refugee children that experienced prenatal IPV (IPV+) did not show more symptoms of PTSD and depression compared to controls (IPV–). (C) Just like the São Gonçalo children, refugee children that experienced prenatal IPV had more DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like repetitive regions than controls, accompanied with what appeared to be a rebound in euchromatin-like repetitive regions. Analysis was done on CpGs in common post filter between refugees and São Gonçalo cohorts (n = 239,442). General linear models were used with age, sex and prenatal exposure to trauma and organized violence as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05.
Secondly, we used the material collected for the São Gonçalo maternal generation, and investigated prenatal IPV in adult São Gonçalo women, where the grand-maternal generation was exposed to IPV during pregnancy (IPV+ = 23, mean age = 37.5 ± 1.3; IPV- = 99, mean age = 38.3 ± 0.6 SEM). Surprisingly, women in this population showed the opposite methylome switch (Figure 4A) compared to the São Gonçalo children (Figure 4B) following prenatal IPV. These inversed relationships were, however, only present when the analysis was done on the 1% top differentially methylated CpGs identified within each cohort. Thus, São Gonçalo children did not express a methylome switch on the CpGs affected by prenatal stress in adult women, and vice versa. This result indicates that prenatal IPV may have unique epigenome-wide consequences across lifespan.
Figure 4. Comparison of the methylome switches in São Gonçalo children and women. Graphs show the methylome switch analyses of the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs affected by prenatal IPV in (A) saliva of São Gonçalo children, where the maternal generation was exposed to pregnancy IPV, and (B) in saliva of São Gonçalo women, where the grand-maternal generation was exposed to pregnancy IPV. Analyses were done using CpGs in common across all datasets (n = 235,960). General linear models were used with age, sex and prenatal exposure to trauma and community violence as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01.
Thirdly, to explore how a methylome switch may appear in subjects with confirmed psychiatric burden we acquired a freely available subset of the Grady dataset (Zannas et al., 2015). This dataset contains 367 individuals, primarily of African-American origin, with white blood cell DNA methylation profiles and information on whether the participants have undergone treatment for psychiatric disorders or not (for more information, see Supplementary Figure S7). We motivated a comparison between blood and saliva with a high density of white blood cells previously observed in saliva (Theda et al., 2018), something that was confirmed in our samples (Supplementary Figure S2). We hypothesized that if a methylome switch truly is a suggestive biomarker for stress exposure and psychiatric vulnerability, patients with a documented history of psychiatric disorders (nyes = 140, nno = 227) should show the opposite relationship compared to the São Gonçalo children. As hypothesized, psychiatric burden in the Grady cohort showed a similar methylome switch as the São Gonçalo women (Supplementary Figure S7), which was the inverted relationship compared to the São Gonçalo children (Figures 2G, 4B), and the refugee replication cohort (Figure 3C). For regenerating the complete Grady/São Gonçalo comparison, we provide an automated R script in Supplementary Text S1.
Importantly, as indicated by the women/children comparison in Figure 4, the methylome switch observed across the different cohorts were induced at independent genomic sites, where each cohort generated highly unique top 1% subsets with very few overlaps across cohorts (Supplementary Figure S8). In fact, none of the differentially methylated CpGs following prenatal IPV in the São Gonçalo children (Table 1) where among the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs in the other cohorts. This confirms what others have indicated, that single CpGs are relatively poor biomarkers for stress and psychiatric burden (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017).
Discussion
We provide both psychiatric and molecular evidence that prenatal stress in humans may have different consequences on mental health depending on the postnatal environment. Children living in the high violence communities of São Gonçalo seemed more resilient to the epigenome-wide and psychiatric consequences of prenatal IPV reported repeatedly by others (Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015). We found similar effects in an independent sample of children exposed to war violence. Furthermore, consistent with prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children showing more resilience, these children presented the opposite relationships in their epigenetic profiles compared to United States patients with documented history of psychiatric disorders. Together these effects involved hundreds of subjects and thousands of methylation sites, where a clear impact was found in two well established stress response genes, FKBP5 and NR3C1.
The FKBP5 and NR3C1 findings are consistent with a reprogramming of the HPA-axis, resulting in an enhanced negative feedback and a faster stress recovery in prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children (Zannas and Binder, 2014). This interpretation should be made with caution, firstly since HPA axis feedback is primarily mediated at the levels of the pituitary, hypothalamus and hippocampus, and secondly since these candidate CpGs are poorly characterized in terms of mechanism. Support for this interpretation is, however, found in our study of peripheral cells populations. Specifically, São Gonçalo children whose mothers were exposed to IPV during pregnancy had more DNA methylation in retrotransposons and heterochromatin-like regions, profiles that previously have been associated with slower aging and lower risk of disease (Wood and Helfand, 2013; Gorbunova et al., 2014; Jones et al., 2015; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). Chronic cortisol exposures in children (Nätt et al., 2015) and endogenous hypercortisolism (Glad et al., 2017), also associates with similar changes in DNA methylation, which links our findings more directly with stress physiology. It must be noticed, however, that while most studies have reported a relatively linear relationship between stress exposure and age acceleration, one recent finding shows that war-veterans with PTSD can show epigenetic age-deceleration (Verhoeven et al., 2018). Thus, under some circumstances, what appears to be resilience on a molecular level may be associated with a psychiatric disorder on the macro level, which may indicate a non-linear relationship.
If interactions between the prenatal and postnatal environments are important for shaping mental resilience, this may explain the absence of stress-related mental illness in other prenatal stress studies targeting juvenile populations exposed to violence (Roth et al., 2014) or other types of postnatal stress (Sandman et al., 2012). It must, however, be emphasized that although we believe we have one of the first and largest epigenome-wide studies targeting cohorts with consistently high exposures to prenatal IPV, defined as a Hegarty IPV score >3 (Hegarty et al., 2005), each individual cohort represented only a limited amount of prenatal IPV exposed cases. As such, our study should be considered a pilot study for a much larger study involving thousands of subjects, differing on their exposures to prenatal and postnatal violence. Given the available evidence and without acknowledging possible molecular mechanism, we propose three models that should be further investigated in such future research.
Programmed epigenetic resilience suggests that the effects of prenatal IPV always turn from being advantageous in childhood to becoming disadvantageous in adulthood. This would explain the inversed relationships seen between São Gonçalo women and São Gonçalo children living in the same environments, but will have a hard time explaining the differences with previous research (Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015).
Temporal environmental resilience suggests that the São Gonçalo communities have changed dramatically during the last decades, thus the environmental factors that shape present day youth were not present when the adult women were in the same age.
The third model we call, Dynamic environmental resilience. Here, the present-day São Gonçalo communities must be viewed as a composite of juvenile and adult subcultures, which clearly separates the generations and provide opposite environmental feedbacks to the epigenome. According to previous research (Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015), prenatal stress associates with more emotionally impulsive behavior and less response to social cues (including suffering of others), which likely are advantageous traits in juvenile subcultures influenced by gang mentality. Our results indicate that prenatal stress may epigenetically affect emotional behavior (Table 1) and genes controlling social behavior, such as the oxytocin gene (Table 2). Social and emotional problems may, however, be disadvantageous in more societally accepted adult and juvenile subcultures (e.g., work environments), characterized by needs for adhering to social norms, following through with tasks and reacting emotionally to the plight of others. Thus, in this model prenatal stress originally induces the same early life phenotypes across populations (e.g., deficits in social and emotional behavior), which later may be shaped into problems by feedbacks from the postnatal environment (e.g., bullying and social exclusion). While we think this model holds promises for a novel syntheses in molecular psychology, it is in desperate need of further support.
We did not observe any difference in exposures to maternal behavior between prenatal IPV exposed children and controls (Table 1). While our genetic structure analysis (EPISTRUCTURE) partly controls for genetic paternal effects, the effect of the father is a possible confound that also needs to be better addressed in future studies. That the paternal contribution would explain the suggestive effects on psychiatric resilience in the São Gonçalo children is, however, a controversial idea that conflicts with the consensus within child/adolescence psychiatry. This would imply that the fathers, which often are the perpetrators in IPV, may have (epi)genetic benefits in relation to fathers of controls.
We are aware that our results may be viewed as evidence for the Predictive Adaptive Hypothesis (PAR) (Bateson et al., 2014), suggesting that the prenatal environment, experienced by the mother, prepares/adapts the fetus for postnatal life. While we acknowledge this possibility, we recommend caution here. Firstly, our data were collected in humans and therefore are correlational in nature. Secondly, we have no evidence that our observations are adaptive over a life cycle. Thirdly, due to the complexity of human social behavior, subcultures that promote behavioral phenotypes generated by suboptimal brain development (maladaptive traits) are likely to occur. As outlined by the Dynamic environmental resilience model, the violent juvenile subcultures that we studied here may represent such a niche.
CpGs previously associated with stress and psychiatric disorders, including CpGs in NR3C1 and FKBP5, replicates poorly across studies (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017) and have so far failed to translate into reliable clinical tests. Our result confirms this. We have here presented a novel marker that appears to associate with mental burden, namely the stress-induced methylome switch. Fully developed this marker may provide a more robust alternative to candidate CpGs. Like the epigenetic clock (Horvath, 2013), the methylome switch relies on broad epigenome signatures, making it less affected by populational structure and measurement artifacts, such as fluctuations in cell-type heterogeneity. Used properly this marker allow for epigenome studies in relation to more stochastic models of stress and aging, such as the allostatic load (McEwen and Stellar, 1993) and epigenetic drift (Jones et al., 2015) concepts. In such models, it is expected that broad genomic mechanisms, such as a loss of genome integrity, can disassociate the impact of stress at single CpGs (Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). While our methylome switch marker is robust for this kind of stochasticity, it instead suffers from a small effect size. A successful biomarker, however, should primarily rely on the power to detect a true difference. Whether it shows a 0.5% or 50% effect size does not matter given that precision is high. The precision of the methylome switch is high since it summarizes hundreds of measurements at individual CpGs. Future studies must therefore aim to evaluate and refine our suggestive biomarker, rather than dismiss it for being biologically irrelevant due to a low effect size.
Conclusion
We provide human evidence that children exposed to prenatal stress may experience resilience driven by epigenome-wide interactions. This plausibly translates animal findings and suggests that prenatal psychiatric risk factors may have different, and maybe even opposite, consequences in different world populations. Our findings therefore call for more research on personalizing psychiatric practices according to social and community backgrounds. By studying the gene–environment interactions in some of these world populations, we have also discovered a novel phenomenon that may be refined into a biomarker for mental burden, namely the stress-induced methylome switch. We hope that this discovery may lead to innovative molecular diagnostic tools in psychiatry, with profound impact on our understanding and treatment of mental disorders.
Author Contributions
TE, DN, FS, MS, and SA: conceptualization. FS, JS, and KR: investigation/sample collection. TE, DN, and SA: supervision. DN, FS, and KR: formal analysis. TE, DN, FS, and TH: methodology. JS and VV: validation. TE, DN, and FS: funding acquisition and writing – original draft preparation. TE, DN, SA, and VV: resources. All authors reviewed and/or edited the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (ERC) advanced grant (323977 to TE), CAPES/DAAD (to FS), Swedish Brain Foundation (to DN), and Swedish Society for Medical Research (to DN).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We specially thank Prof. Markus Heilig and Assoc. Prof. Annika Thorsell (Linköping University, Sweden), Prof. Elizabeth Wieling (University of Minnesota, United States), Dr. Joviana Avanci (Claves ENSP/FIOCRUZ, Brazil), Dr. Susanne Schaal and Jeanine Narrog (University of Konstanz, Germany) for support and comments. We are grateful to the participating families, NGO Mulheres em Movimento, the Estratégia de Saúde da Família, and the supportive health agents in São Gonçalo.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00269/full#supplementary-material
Datasheet 1.pdf contains Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Tables.
Datasheet 2.zip contains the script and data for reproducing some of the analysis of this paper, this includes: Supplementary Text S1 which contains the R script that will reproduce our analysis using Supplementary Data S1–S4; Supplementary Text S2 explains the column names in Supplementary Data S1; Supplementary Data S1 is the result table with beta-values for the top 1 % most differentially methylated CpGs between IPV+ and IPV- São Gonçalo children and women; Supplementary Data S2 contains the factors and co-variates for São Gonçalo children and women; Supplementary Data S3 contains the factors and co-variates for the Grady data downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus; Supplementary Data S4 contains a list of excluded CpGs/probes as described in the Materials and Methods. For possible updates to the R script in Supplementary Text S1 check https://github.com/Danis102 or contact the corresponding author.
Footnotes
- ^https://egg2.wustl.edu/roadmap/web_portal/chr_state_learning.html
- ^http://www.mqtldb.org/
- ^http://www.repeatmasker.org
References
Argentieri, M. A., Nagarajan, S., Seddighzadeh, B., Baccarelli, A. A., and Shields, A. E. (2017). Epigenetic pathways in human disease: the impact of DNA methylation on stress-related pathogenesis and current challenges in biomarker development. EBioMedicine 18(Suppl. C), 327–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.044
Aryee, M. J., Jaffe, A. E., Corrada-Bravo, H., Ladd-Acosta, C., Feinberg, A. P., Hansen, K. D., et al. (2014). Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30, 1363–1369. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049
Assis, S. G. D., Avanci, J. Q., Pesce, R. P., and Ximenes, L. F. (2009). The situation of Brazilian children and adolescents with regard to mental health and violence. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 14, 349–361. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232009000200002
Augier, E., Barbier, E., Dulman, R. S., Licheri, V., Augier, G., Domi, E., et al. (2018). A molecular mechanism for choosing alcohol over an alternative reward. Science 360, 1321–1326. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1157
Ayyappan, A., Kazuhiko, N., Kazuo, Y., Yoshimi, I., Tomoko, T., Nori, T., et al. (2009). Association studies and gene expression analyses of the DISC1-interacting molecules, pericentrin 2 (PCNT2) and DISC1-binding zinc finger protein (DBZ), with schizophrenia and with bipolar disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. B 150B, 967–976. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30926
Babenko, O., Kovalchuk, I., and Metz, G. A. S. (2015). Stress-induced perinatal and transgenerational epigenetic programming of brain development and mental health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 48, 70–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.013
Bao, W., Kojima, K. K., and Kohany, O. (2015). Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mobile DNA 6:11. doi: 10.1186/s13100-015-0041-9
Bateson, P., Gluckman, P., and Hanson, M. (2014). The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. J. Physiol. 592(Pt 11), 2357–2368. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271460
Berghänel, A., Heistermann, M., Schülke, O., and Ostner, J. (2016). Prenatal stress effects in a wild, long-lived primate: predictive adaptive responses in an unpredictable environment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1304
Binder, E. B., Bradley, R. G., Liu, W., Epstein, M. P., Deveau, T. C., and Mercer, K. B. (2008). Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. JAMA 299, 1291–1305. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1291
Carlson, M., Aboyoun, P., and Pages, H. (2014). An Introduction to Genomic Ranges Classes. Available at: https://bioconductor.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/packages/3.2/bioc/vignettes/GenomicRanges/inst/doc/GenomicRangesIntroduction.pdf
Chaste, P., Klei, L., Sanders, S. J., Hus, V., Murtha, M. T., Lowe, J. K., et al. (2015). A genome-wide association study of autism using the simons simplex collection: Does reducing phenotypic heterogeneity in autism increase genetic homogeneity? Biol. Psychiatry 77, 775–784. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.017
Chen, Y.-A., Lemire, M., Choufani, S., Butcher, D., Grafodatskaya, D., and Zanke, B. (2013). Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8, 203–209. doi: 10.4161/epi.23470
Chertkow-Deutsher, Y., Cohen, H., Klein, E., and Ben-Shachar, D. (2010). DNA methylation in vulnerability to post-traumatic stress in rats: evidence for the role of the post-synaptic density protein Dlgap2. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 13, 347–359. doi: 10.1017/S146114570999071X
Dempster, E. L., Pidsley, R., Schalkwyk, L. C., Owens, S., Georgiades, A., Kane, F., et al. (2011). Disease-associated epigenetic changes in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 4786–4796. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr416
Dempster, E. L., Wong, C. C. Y., Lester, K. J., Burrage, J., Gregory, A. M., Mill, J., et al. (2014). Genome-wide methylomic analysis of monozygotic twins discordant for adolescent depression. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 977–983. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.013
Devries, K. M., Mak, J. Y. T., García-Moreno, C., Petzold, M., Child, J. C., Falder, G., et al. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science 340, 1527–1528. doi: 10.1126/science.1240937
Du, P., Zhang, X., Huang, C.-C., Jafari, N., Kibbe, W. A., Hou, L., et al. (2010). Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11:587. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-587
Egger, G., Roetzer, K. M., Noor, A., Lionel, A. C., Mahmood, H., Schwarzbraun, T., et al. (2014). Identification of risk genes for autism spectrum disorder through copy number variation analysis in Austrian families. Neurogenetics 15, 117–127. doi: 10.1007/s10048-014-0394-0
Elbert, T., and Schauer, M. (2002). Psychological rauma: burnt into memory. Nature 419:883. doi: 10.1038/419883a
Elia, J., Glessner, J. T., Wang, K., Takahashi, N., Shtir, C. J., Hadley, D., et al. (2011). Genome-wide copy number variation study associates metabotropic glutamate receptor gene networks with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Genet. 44, 78–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.1013
Ellsworth, K. A., Moon, I., Eckloff, B. W., Fridley, B. L., Jenkins, G. D., Batzler, A., et al. (2013). FKBP5 genetic variation: association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 23, 156–166. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835dc133
Ernst, J., and Kellis, M. (2012). ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat. Methods 9, 215–216. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1906
Fatemi, S. H., Folsom, T. D., and Thuras, P. D. (2011). Deficits in GABA(B) receptor system in schizophrenia and mood disorders: a postmortem study. Schizophr. Res. 128, 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.12.025
Felder, B., Radlwimmer, B., Benner, A., Mincheva, A., Tödt, G., Beyer, K. S., et al. (2009). FARP2, HDLBP and PASK are downregulated in a patient with autism and 2q37. 3 deletion syndrome. Am. J. Med.Genet. A 149, 952–959. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32779
Feldman, R., Monakhov, M., Pratt, M., and Ebstein, R. P. (2016). Oxytocin pathway genes: evolutionary ancient system impacting on human affiliation. Soc. Psychopathol. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.008
Ferguson, J. N., Young, L. J., Hearn, E. F., Matzuk, M. M., Insel, T. R., and Winslow, J. T. (2000). Social amnesia in mice lacking the oxytocin gene. Nat. Genet. 25:284. doi: 10.1038/77040
Fine, R., Zhang, J., and Stevens, H. E. (2014). Prenatal stress and inhibitory neuron systems: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 641–651. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.35
Foa, E. B. (1995). Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Fowler, P. J., Tompsett, C. J., Braciszewski, J. M., Jacques-Tiura, A. J., and Baltes, B. B. (2009). Community violence: a meta-analysis on the effect of exposure and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents. Dev. Psychopathol. 21, 227–259. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000145
Giesing, E. R., Suski, C. D., Warner, R. E., and Bell, A. M. (2010). Female sticklebacks transfer information via eggs: effects of maternal experience with predators on offspring. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 278, 1753–1759. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1819
Glad, C. A. M., Andersson-Assarsson, J. C., Berglund, P., Bergthorsdottir, R., Ragnarsson, O., and Johannsson, G. (2017). Reduced DNA methylation and psychopathology following endogenous hypercortisolism – a genome-wide study. Sci. Rep. 7:44445. doi: 10.1038/srep44445
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., and Bailey, V. (1998). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 7, 125–130. doi: 10.1007/s007870050057
Gorbunova, V., Boeke, J. D., Helfand, S. L., and Sedivy, J. M. (2014). Sleeping dogs of the genome: retrotransposable elements may be agents of somatic diversity, disease and aging. Science 346, 1187–1188. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3177
Hegarty, K., Bush, R., and Sheehan, M. (2005). The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence Vict. 20, 529–547. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.2005.20.5.529
Hegarty, K., Sheehan, M., and Schonfeld, C. (1999). A multidimensional definition of partner abuse: development and preliminary validation of the composite abuse scale. J. Fam. Violence 14, 399–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1022834215681
Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14:3156. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Houseman, E. A., Accomando, W. P., Koestler, D. C., Christensen, B. C., Marsit, C. J., Nelson, H. H., et al. (2012). DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics 13:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86
Hunter, R. G., Gagnidze, K., McEwen, B. S., and Pfaff, D. W. (2015). Stress and the dynamic genome: steroids, epigenetics, and the transposome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 6828–6833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411260111
Jarick, I., Volckmar, A. L., Pütter, C., Pechlivanis, S., Nguyen, T. T., Dauvermann, M. R., et al. (2012). Genome-wide analysis of rare copy number variations reveals PARK2 as a candidate gene for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 19:115. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.161
Jones, M. J., Goodman, S. J., and Kobor, M. S. (2015). DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell 14, 924–932. doi: 10.1111/acel.12349
Klengel, T., Mehta, D., Anacker, C., Rex-Haffner, M., Pruessner, J. C., Pariante, C. M., et al. (2013). Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene-childhood trauma interactions. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 33–41. doi: 10.1038/nn.3275
Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., and Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 434–445. doi: 10.1038/nrn2639
Marshall, C. R., Noor, A., Vincent, J. B., Lionel, A. C., Feuk, L., Skaug, J., et al. (2008). Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82, 477–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.009
McEwen, B. S., and Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 153, 2093–2101. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004
McGowan, P., Sasaki, A., D’Alessio, A. C., Dymov, S., Labonte, B., and Szyf, M. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 342–348. doi: 10.1038/nn.2270
Monk, C., Spicer, J., and Champagne, F. A. (2012). Linking prenatal maternal adversity to developmental outcomes in infants: the role of epigenetic pathways. Dev. Psychopathol. 24, 1361–1376. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000764
Nätt, D., Johansson, I., Faresjö, T., Ludvigsson, J., and Thorsell, A. (2015). High cortisol in 5-year-old children causes loss of DNA methylation in SINE retrotransposons: a possible role for ZNF263 in stress-related diseases. Clin. Epigenet. 7, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13148-015-0123-z
Nätt, D., and Thorsell, A. (2016). Stress-induced transposon reactivation: a mediator or an estimator of allostatic load? Environ. Epigenet. 2:dvw015. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvw015
Nettle, D., Frankenhuis, W. E., and Rickard, I. J. (2013). The evolution of predictive adaptive responses in human life history. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 280:20131343. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1343
Neuner, F., Schauer, M., Karunakara, U., Klaschik, C., Robert, C., and Elbert, T. (2004). Psychological trauma and evidence for enhanced vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder through previous trauma among West Nile refugees. BMC Psychiatry 4:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-4-34
Oberlander, T. F., Weinberg, J., Papsdorf, M., Grunau, R., Misri, S., and Devlin, A. M. (2008). Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics 3, 97–106. doi: 10.4161/epi.3.2.6034
O’Connor, T. G., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Heron, J., Golding, J., Adams, D., and Glover, V. (2005). Prenatal anxiety predicts individual differences in cortisol in pre-adolescent children. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.032
O’Donnell, K. J., Michael, J., and Meaney. (2017). Fetal origins of mental health: the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 319–328. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020138
Onyut, L. P., Neuner, F., Ertl, V., Schauer, E., Odenwald, M., and Elbert, T. (2009). Trauma, poverty and mental health among Somali and Rwandese refugees living in an African refugee settlement – an epidemiological study. Confl. Health 3:6. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-3-6
Palma-Gudiel, H., Córdova-Palomera, A., Leza, J. C., and Fañanás, L. (2015). Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) methylation processes as mediators of early adversity in stress-related disorders causality: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 55, 520–535. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.016
Pan, Y., Luo, X., Liu, X., Wu, L.-Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., et al. (2013). Genome-wide association studies of maximum number of drinks. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47, 1717–1724. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.07.013
Parker, G., Tupling, H., and Brown, L. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 52, 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x
Radtke, K. M., Ruf, M., Gunter, H. M., Dohrmann, K., Schauer, M., Meyer, A., et al. (2011). Transgenerational impact of intimate partner violence on methylation in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor. Transl. Psychiatry 1:e21. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.21
Rahmani, E., Shenhav, L., Schweiger, R., Yousefi, P., Huen, K., Eskenazi, B., et al. (2017a). Genome-wide methylation data mirror ancestry information. Epigenet. Chromatin 10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13072-016-0108-y
Rahmani, E., Yedidim, R., Shenhav, L., Schweiger, R., Weissbrod, O., Zaitlen, N., et al. (2017b). GLINT: a user-friendly toolset for the analysis of high-throughput DNA-methylation array data. Bioinformatics 1:3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx059
Richardson, L. P., McCauley, E., Grossman, D. C., McCarty, C. A., Richards, J., Russo, J. E., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics 126, 1117–1123. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0852
Richters, J. E., and Martinez, P. (1990). Things I Have Seen and Heard: A Structured Interview for Assessing Young Children’s Violence Exposure. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., et al. (2015). limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Roth, M., Neuner, F., and Elbert, T. (2014). Transgenerational consequences of PTSD: risk factors for the mental health of children whose mothers have been exposed to the Rwandan genocide. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 8:12. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-12
Russo, S. J., Murrough, J. W., Han, M.-H., Charney, D. S., and Nestler, E. J. (2012). Neurobiology of resilience. Nat. Neurosci. 15:1475. doi: 10.1038/nn.3234
Rutter, M. (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: implications for family therapy. J. Fam. Ther. 21, 119–144. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.00108
Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., and Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 47, 226–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01557.x
Sandman, C. A., Davis, E. P., and Glynn, L. M. (2012). Prescient human fetuses thrive. Psychol. Sci. 23, 93–100. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422073
Serpeloni, F., Radtke, K., de Assis, S. G., Henning, F., Natt, D., and Elbert, T. (2017). Grandmaternal stress during pregnancy and DNA methylation of the third generation: an epigenome-wide association study. Transl. Psychiatry 7:e1202. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.153
Serpeloni, F., Radtke, K. M., Hecker, T., and Elbert, T. (2016). “Epigenetic biomarkers of prenatal maternal stress,” in Epigenetics and Neuroendocrinology : Clinical Focus on Psychiatry, Vol. 2, eds D. Spengler and E. Binder (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 177–196. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29901-3_8
Sheriff, M. J., Krebs, C. J., and Boonstra, R. (2009). The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 1249–1258. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01552.x
Spijker, A. T., and van Rossum, E. F. C. (2012). Glucocorticoid sensitivity in mood disorders. Neuroendocrinology 95, 179–186. doi: 10.1159/000329846
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. W., and Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the gad-7. Arch. Internal Med. 166, 1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
St-Cyr, S., and McGowan, P. O. (2015). Programming of stress-related behavior and epigenetic neural gene regulation in mice offspring through maternal exposure to predator odor. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:145. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00145
Steinberg, A. M., Brymer, M. J., Decker, K. B., and Pynoos, R. S. (2004). The University of California at Los Angeles post-traumatic stress disorder reaction index. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 6, 96–100. doi: 10.1007/s11920-004-0048-2
Theda, C., Hwang, S. H., Czajko, A., Loke, Y. J., Leong, P., and Craig, J. M. (2018). Quantitation of the cellular content of saliva and buccal swab samples. Sci. Rep. 8:6944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25311-0
Uddin, M., Unda, B. K., Kwan, V., Holzapfel, N. T., White, S. H., Chalil, L., et al. (2018). OTUD7A regulates neurodevelopmental phenotypes in the 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 278–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.01.006
Vangeel, E. B., Pishva, E., Hompes, T., van den Hove, D., Lambrechts, D., Allegaert, K., et al. (2017). Newborn genome-wide DNA methylation in association with pregnancy anxiety reveals a potential role for GABBR1. Clin. Epigenet. 9:107. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0408-5
Verhoeven, J. E., Yang, R., Wolkowitz, O. M., Bersani, F. S., Lindqvist, D., Mellon, S. H., et al. (2018). Epigenetic age in male combat-exposed war veterans: associations with posttraumatic stress disorder status. Mol. Neuropsychiatry 4, 90–99. doi: 10.1159/000491431
Wood, J. G., and Helfand, S. L. (2013). Chromatin structure and transposable elements in organismal aging. Front. Genet. 4:274. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00274
Yamazaki, F., Møller, M., Fu, C., Clokie, S. J., Zykovich, A., Coon, S. L., et al. (2015). The Lhx9 homeobox gene controls pineal gland development and prevents postnatal hydrocephalus. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 1497–1509. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0740-x
Zannas, A., and Binder, E. (2014). Gene–environment interactions at the FKBP5 locus: sensitive periods, mechanisms and pleiotropism. Genes Brain Behav. 13, 25–37. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12104
Keywords: prenatal stress, intimate partner violence, NR3C1, FKBP5, psychiatric resilience, DNA methylation, retrotransposon, heterochromatin
Citation: Serpeloni F, Radtke KM, Hecker T, Sill J, Vukojevic V, Assis SG, Schauer M, Elbert T and Nätt D (2019) Does Prenatal Stress Shape Postnatal Resilience? – An Epigenome-Wide Study on Violence and Mental Health in Humans. Front. Genet. 10:269. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00269
Received: 18 September 2018; Accepted: 12 March 2019;
Published: 16 April 2019.
Edited by:
Ryan Yuen, Hospital for Sick Children, CanadaReviewed by:
Hehuang Xie, Virginia Tech, United StatesConnie J. Mulligan, University of Florida, United States
Copyright © 2019 Serpeloni, Radtke, Hecker, Sill, Vukojevic, Assis, Schauer, Elbert and Nätt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel Nätt, ZGFuaWVsLm5hdHRAbGl1LnNl