Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Endocrinol., 25 June 2019
Sec. Obesity

The Effect of Atorvastatin (and Subsequent Metformin) on Adipose Tissue Acylation-Stimulatory-Protein Concentration and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Overweight/Obese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

\nThozhukat SathyapalanThozhukat Sathyapalan1James P. HobkirkJames P. Hobkirk2Zeeshan JavedZeeshan Javed1Sean CarrollSean Carroll2Anne-Marie CoadyAnne-Marie Coady3Philip PembertonPhilip Pemberton4Alexander SmithAlexander Smith4Katherine CianfloneKatherine Cianflone5Stephen L. Atkin
Stephen L. Atkin6*
  • 1Department of Academic Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Obstetric Ultrasound, Hull and East Yorkshire Women's and Children's Hospital, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom
  • 4Specialist Assay Laboratories, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 5Centre de Recherche Institut Universitaire Cardiologie, Laval Université, Quebec City, QC, Canada
  • 6Weill Cornell Medical College Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar

Background: Atorvastatin has been shown to improve cardiovascular risk (CVR) indices in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Low-grade chronic inflammation of adipose tissue may link PCOS and adverse CVR. In pro-inflammatory states such as PCOS, spontaneous activation of the alternative pathway of complement results in increased generation of acylation stimulating protein (ASP) from adipocytes irrespective of body mass index.

Methods: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of atorvastatin on markers of adipose tissue dysfunction and inflammation; acylation-stimulating-protein (ASP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and monocyte-chemoattractant-protein-1 (MCP-1) in PCOS. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study where 40 medication-naive women with PCOS and biochemical hyperandrogenaemia were randomized to either atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Following the 12 week randomization; both group of women with PCOS were subsequently started on metformin 1,500 mg daily for further 12 weeks to assess whether pre-treatment with atorvastatin potentiates the effects of metformin on markers of adipose tissue function We conducted a post-hoc review to detect plasma ASP and the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6 and MCP-1 before and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment.

Results: There was significant reduction in ASP (156.7 ± 16.2 vs. 124.4 ± 14.8 ng/ml p <0.01), IL-6 (1.48 ± 0.29 vs.0.73 ± 0.34 pg/ml p = 0.01) and MCP-1 (30.4 ± 4.2 vs. 23.0 ± 4.5 pg/ml p = 0.02) after 12 weeks of atorvastatin that was maintained subsequently with 12 weeks treatment with metformin. There was a significant positive correlation between ASP levels with CRP (p < 0.01), testosterone (p < 0.01) and HOMA-IR (p < 0.01); IL-6 levels with CRP (p <0.01) and testosterone (p < 0.01) and MCP-1 with CRP (p < 0.01); testosterone (p < 0.01) and HOMA-IR (p < 0.02).

Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis revealed that 12 weeks of atorvastatin treatment significantly decreased the markers of adipose tissue dysfunction and inflammation, namely ASP, IL-6 and MCP-1 in obese women with PCOS. Changes in adipose tissue markers were significantly associative with substantial improvements in HOMA-IR, testosterone and hs-CRP levels.

ISRCTN Number: ISRCTN24474824.

Introduction

In sub-clinical? pro-inflammatory states, including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), spontaneous activation of the alternative pathway of complement results in increased generation of acylation stimulating protein (ASP) from adipocytes irrespective of body mass index (BMI) (1, 2). ASP is formed with the cleavage of Complement 3a,by carboxypeptidase B, that removes arginine at the carboxy-terminal generating C3adesArg (3). ASP contributes to storage of energy as lipids within adipose tissue by augmenting post-prandial triglyceride (TG) clearance, enhanced fatty acid esterification to triglycerides and decreased lipolysis through inhibiting hormone sensitive lipase (HSL), thereby increasing insulin resistance (2, 4, 5). ASP impacts fat storage by enhancing diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) activity, the rate limiting step in TG synthesis, stimulating glucose transporter GLUT4 translocation and indirectly enhancing LPL (lipoprotein lipase) activity in adipocytes (6, 7).

Moreover, ASP has been shown to be raised in other insulin resistant states, such as diabetes and obesity, as well as in cardiovascular disease and is reported to be positively correlated to plasma triglycerides, LDL cholesterol and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) all of which are common in women with PCOS (5, 8). It has been suggested that high levels of ASP found in PCOS represent an ASP-resistant state, that is related to “adipose tissue dysregulation” which subsequently leads to adipose tissue inflammation, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia in these patients (9). The suggested possible underlying mechanism of ASP resistance in such patients is reduced expression of C5L2 receptor on adipose tissue (10, 11). Interestingly, this process of decreased C5L2 expression is enhanced further by increased fatty acids and high inflammatory markers present in obesity. Further, raised ASP levels itselfinduces pro-inflammatory state via increased cytokine release, as evident by both in vitro and in vivo studies (12, 13). The underlying molecular mechanisms of ASP resistance involve down regulation of intracellular response elements, especially AKT, PI3-kinase and PDK. These are also vital components of insulin response, which could link the development of insulin resistance in conditions such as PCOS (14).

It is also well-established that women with PCOS have underlying chronic low grade inflammation associated with high levels of inflammatory markers especially interleukin-6 (IL-6), macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)—that are independent of obesity (15). Metformin has been shown to reduce markers of inflammation, especially ASP levels, in non-obese PCOS women (9, 16). We have shown previously that atorvastatin therapy reduced the inflammatory marker (hs-CRP) and insulin resistance, which were positively correlated with the reduction in triglyceride levels (17). We hypothesized that the effect of atorvastatin on measures of inflammation and insulin resistance are mediated through changes in ASP that have not been explored before in women with PCOS. Accordingly, this post-hoc analysis was performed to investigate the effects of atorvastatin and metformin on inflammatory markers, including ASP in a well-characterized group of young overweight/obese females with PCOS (17).

Materials and Methods

The diagnosis of PCOS was based on all three diagnostic criteria of the Rotterdam consensus, namely clinical and biochemical evidence of hyperandrogenaemia (Ferriman-Gallwey score >8; free androgen index >8, respectively), oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea and polycystic ovaries on transvaginal ultrasound (18). Non-classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency, hyperprolactinaemia, Cushing's disease and androgen-secreting tumors were excluded by appropriate tests. All women gave their written informed consent and the study was approved by the South Humber Research Ethics committee, UK (REC reference: 04/Q1105/60).

Forty medication naïve women with PCOS and biochemical hyperandrogenaemia were randomized to atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo for 3 months (17). Following this, an extension study for both PCOS groups of women was undertaken with metformin 1,500 mg daily after completing the initial 3 months of atorvastatin or placebo (19). A Flow chart of participants through the experimental protocol is provided within Figure 1. The purpose of the extension study was to see whether pre-treatment with atorvastatin potentiates the effects of metformin on measures of inflammation and adipose tissue dysfunction

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart of participants through the study.

Thirty-seven women (atorvastatin = 19; placebo = 18) completed 6 months of this study. Compliance was monitored by counting returned medication. The biochemical assays undertaken were fully described in detail in previous publications of this investigation (17, 19). The same population is used in both this analysis and previous studies (17, 19).

ASP levels were measured in plasma C3 in plasma samples, in-house plasma controls and standard ASP were PEG precipitated (polyethylene glycol 8000, Fisher Scientific). The samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was used to assay for ASP. Plates were pre-coated with monoclonal anti-ASP antibody and blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA). PEG precipitated plasma samples and in-house plasma controls were diluted 1:40 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and added to the plate. ASP standard was also added using a concentration curve ranging from 0.156 to 10 ng/ml. After incubation, the plates were washed and incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-ASP antibody. Subsequently, goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich) was added. The color reaction was initiated by the addition of ophenylenediaminedihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) and was stopped using 1.25 M sulphuric acid. Absorbance was read at 490 nm. The intra-assay (within run) variation was 3.9%. IL-6, and MCP-1 were measured in plasma using DuoSet ELISA development kits from R&D Systems (Abingdon, UK). The intra-assay variation of IL-6 was 2.2% and MCP-1 was 2.8%.

Statistical Analysis

The paired t-test was used to compare pre-post within group changes for clinical, hormonal and metabolic variables. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to biochemical data that violated the assumptions of a normal distribution assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Between-group comparisons of percent changes of each parameters before and after treatment were performed using independent samples t-test. For all analysis, a two-tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Correlations of selected parameters were analyzed by using Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression (forward stepwise regression). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows NT, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are reported as mean ± SEM.

Results

The mean age of women was 27.7 ± 1.4 years (atorvastatin group 26.6 ± 1.2 vs. placebo group 28.8 ± 1.8; p = 0.44). The BMI were comparable in both atorvastatin and placebo groups (33.20 ± 1.4 vs. 33.92 ± 1.4 kg/m2, p = 0.62) (17). There were no significant differences in baseline parameters between the two groups. After 12 weeks of atorvastatin therapy, there were significant reductions in total cholesterol (4.6 ± 0.2 vs. 3.4 ± 0.2 mmol/liter, p < 0.01), LDL-C (2.9 ± 0.2 vs. 1.8 ± 0.2 mmol/liter, p = 0.01), triglycerides (1.34 ± 0.08 vs. 1.08 ± 0.13 mmol/liter, p < 0.01), free androgen index (FAI) (13.4 ± 0.6 vs. 8.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.01), total testosterone (4.1 ± 0.2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.1 nmol/liter, p < 0.01), hs-CRP (4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1 mg/liter, p ≤ 0.04) and insulin resistance (as measured by homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-IR) (3.3 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.4) along with significant increase in sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (31.1 ± 1.0 vs. 35.3 ± 1.2 nmol/liter, p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in any of these parameters in the placebo group (17). There was a positive correlation between reduction in HOMA-IR with improvements in FAI (r2 = 0.56; p < 0.04) and triglycerides (r2 = 0.68; p < 0.01) in the atorvastatin group (17).

The baseline ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 were comparable in both groups (Table 1). There were significant reductions in ASP (156.7 ± 10.2 vs. 124.4 ± 9.8 ng/ml; p < 0.01), IL-6 (1.48 ± 0.09 vs. 0.73 ± 0.10 pg/ml; p < 0.01) and MCP-1 levels (30.4 ± 1.2 vs. 23.0 ± 3.5 pg/ml p < 0.02) after 12 weeks of atorvastatin (Table 1). The decrease in ASP (124.4 ± 14.8 vs. 119.5 ± 23.8 ng/ml p = 0.41), IL-6 (0.73 ± 0.34 vs. 0.74 ± 0.21 pg/ml p = 0.91), and MCP-1 (23.0 ± 4.5 vs. 23.9 ± 6.2 pg/ml p = 0.63) levels were maintained following 12 weeks of metformin treatment. There were no significant changes in ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 levels in the placebo group.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of inflammatory and adipose tissue dysfunction markers at baseline, 12 weeks of atorvastatin or placebo followed by 12 weeks of metformin.

There were significant associations of ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 with hs-CRP and testosterone levels. There were also substantial correlations of ASP and MCP-1 with improvements in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); however, only ASP was shown to have positive correlation with significant improvements in triglycerides (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between changes in ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 and changes in waist circumference, cholesterol, testosterone, hs-CRP, and HOMA after atorvastatin treatment.

On multiple linear stepwise regression analysis the changes in ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 accounted for 52% of the variance in CRP and 46% of testosterone levels but only ASP and MCP-1 accounted for 40% of the variance in HOMA-IR (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Multiple linear stepwise regression model identifying independent predictors of changes in testosterone, hs-CRP, and HOMA-IR.

Discussion

This post-hoc analysis revealed that 12 weeks of atorvastatin treatment significantly decreased markers of adipose tissue dysfunction and inflammation as determined by ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 in younger, overweight obese women with PCOS. These improvements were that are related significantly with substantial improvements in HOMA-IR, testosterone and hs-CRP levels.

In this study atorvastatin treatment improved ASP sensitivity in PCOS women with hyperandrogenimia) as suggested by significant reductions in ASP levels. This suggests a potentially novel mechanism for the improved insulin sensitivity reflected in the substantial decrease in HOMA-IR with associated improvements in androgen levels and inflammatory markers. In addition, reduction in ASP levels after by atorvastatin treatment was associated (although not necessarily causal) with significant improvement in dyslipidaemia in these women as suggested by enhanced triglycerides clearance and reduced cholesterol levels.

The reduction in ASP after 12 weeks of atorvastatin treatment was associated with substantial improvements in biochemical hyperandrogenaemia—the most distinctive feature of PCOS. Additionally, low levels of SHBG also contribute to high free testosterone levels by reducing binding with testosterone (20). Several studies have reported that insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinaemia is the primary underlying cause for hyperandrogenaemia in women with PCOS. hyperandrogenaemia is induced by both decreased hepatic production of SHBG levels and increased production of androgens via ovaries and adrenal glands (21). This is evident further from intervention trials improving insulin resistance in PCOS women using different therapies e.g., weight loss, metformin, D-chiro-inositol and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARɤ)-agonists demonstrating reduced androgen levels with improved exaggerated androgenic response to ACTH, or LH stimulation tests (2224). However, the underlying mechanism related to improved hyperandrogenaemia due to reduced insulin resistance has not been explained completely. Our findings suggest that an improved ASP resistant state and related intracellular pathways lead to improved insulin sensitivity that subsequently reduce androgen levels. Our study suggests the potential for novel treatment targets related to modifying adipose tissue dysfunction for PCOS women in the future.

Women with PCOS have elevated levels of hs-CRP that is an independent risk marker of early cardiovascular disease (25). There was 25% reduction in hs-CRP levels after atorvastatin treatment in the present investigation. These changes were was also positively correlated to ASP levels suggesting improvements in underlying inflammatory environment coincided with improved ASP sensitivity, although again, it is not possible to state whether one directly impacted on the other. However, these finding are consistent with previous studies aiming at improving cardiovascular risk in women with PCOS using several interventions including weight loss, metformin and PPARɤ (26, 27).

The changes in ASP were not correlated with changes in changes in total cholesterol and triglyceride suggesting that the effects of atorvastatin in these inflammatory markers are independent of its plasma lipid lowering effects. There is increasing body of evidence that there are beneficial effects of statin other than lipid lowering, or “pleotropic effects” including improvement in endothelial dysfunction, increase nitric oxide availability, antioxidant properties, inhibition of inflammatory responses, and stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques (28). These pleitropic effects could also be partly mediated through this effect on ASP resistance.

ASP levels have been shown to be increased in patients with obesity (4). In the current study both the groups are matched for body mass and there were no significant changes in weight before and after treatment with atorvastatin. This suggests that the effect of atorvastatin in ASP levels in women with PCOS is independent of changes in obesity status. This effect needs to be evaluated with normal weight or less overweight women with PCOS.

In women with PCOS there is a significant increase in proinflammatory cytokines especially IL-6 and MCP-1. This again appears to be independent of body mass index (29, 30). IL-6 is a potent inducer of hepatic CRP and has been implicated in cardiovascular atherosclerotic risk, dyslipidemia and hypertension (31). In this study there was a 50% reduction in IL-6 after 12 weeks of atorvastatin that correlated positively with reduction in CRP. The reduction in IL-6 appeared to be independent of reduction in total cholesterol and triglycerides with atorvastatin. Furthermore, the reduction in IL-6 was not related to changes in insulin resistance, suggesting reduction of ASP by atorvastatin as the underlying mechanism for reducing inflammatory markers.

It has been suggested that increased MCP-1 levels may induce insulin resistance (32) which are increased in women with PCOS compared with weight-matched controls (30, 33, 34). In this study, changes in MCP-1 levels correlated significantly with changes in ASP levels and independently predicted changes in HOMA-IR after atorvastatin therapy. The reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines and subsequent insulin resistance could be due to improvement in underlying ASP resistance.

The reduction in ASP, IL-6 and MCP-1 was maintained after 12 weeks of metformin subsequent to atorvastatin therapy, suggesting metformin have an effect in continued suppression of these markers. Statins have also been shown to rapidly activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a protein kinase that modulates metabolic homeostasis and energy balance in individual cells and multiple organs, both in-vivo and in-vitro (35). The actions of metformin also appear to be mediated by AMPK activation (36) suggesting that this pathway is independent of the ASP modulated effects.

In conclusion, 12 weeks of atorvastatin led to a significant reduction the adipose tissue dysfunction marker ASP and in adipocyte inflammation markers (IL-6 and MCP-1) in women with PCOS. The changes in ASP levels after atorvastatin treatment independently predicted changes in insulin resistance, androgens, and inflammatory markers. Our findings suggest that the effects of atorvastatin might be partly mediated through reducing ASP in women with PCOS.

Data Availability

All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript and/or the supplementary files.

Ethics Statement

All patients gave their written informed consent and the study was approved by the South Humber Research Ethics committee.

Author Contributions

TS, JPH, ZJ, SC, A-MC, PP, AS, KC, and SLA were involved in the study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and paper drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Pfizer. Pfizer has supplied atorvastatin 20 mg tablets and placebo for the study. Otherwise sponsors had no input into study design, its execution, or interpretation of the findings.

References

1. Cianflone K, Xia Z, Chen LY. Critical review of acylation-stimulating protein physiology in humans and rodents. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2003) 1609:127–43. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00686-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wu Y, Zhang J, Wen Y, Wang H, Zhang M, Cianflone K. Increased acylation-stimulating protein, C-reactive protein, and lipid levels in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. (2009) 91:213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cianflone KM, Sniderman AD, Walsh MJ, Vu HT, Gagnon J, Rodriguez M. Purification characterization of acylation stimulating protein. J Biol Chem. (1989) 264:426–30.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

4. Maslowska M, Vu H, Phelis S, Sniderman AD, Rhode BM, Blank D, et al. Plasma acylation stimulating protein, adipsin and lipids in non-obese and obese populations. Eur J Clin Invest. (1999) 29:679–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1999.00514.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yang Y, Lu HL, Zhang J, Yu HY, Wang HW, Zhang MX, et al. Relationships among acylation stimulating protein, adiponectin and complement C3 in lean vs obese type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes. (2006) 30:439–46. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kalant D, Cain SA, Maslowska M, Sniderman AD, Cianflone K, Monk PN. The chemoattractant receptor-like protein C5L2 binds the C3a des-Arg77/acylation-stimulating protein. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:11123–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206169200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kalant D, MacLaren R, Cui W, Samanta R, Monk PN, Laporte SA, et al. C5L2 is a functional receptor for acylation-stimulating protein. J Biol Chem. (2005) 280:23936–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406921200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cianflone K, Lu H, Smith J, Yu W, Wang H. Adiponectin acylation stimulating protein and complement C3 are altered in obesity in very young children. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). (2005) 62:567–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02260.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Oktenli C, Ozgurtas T, Dede M, Sanisoglu YS, Yenen MC, Yesilova Z, et al. Metformin decreases circulating acylation-stimulating protein levels in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. (2007) 23:710–5. doi: 10.1080/09513590701666571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lu H, Gauvreau D, Tom FQ, Lapointe M, Luo XP, Cianflone K. Inflammatory markers and adipokines alter adipocyte-derived ASP production through direct and indirect immune interaction. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. (2013) 121:194–200. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. MacLaren R, Kalant D, Cianflone K. The ASP receptor C5L2 is regulated by metabolic hormones associated with insulin resistance. Biochem Cell Biol. (2007) 85:11–21. doi: 10.1139/o06-207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tom FQ, Gauvreau D, Lapointe M, Lu H, Poursharifi P, Luo XP, et al. Differential chemoattractant response in adipocytes and macrophages to the action of acylation stimulating protein. Eur J Cell Biol. (2013) 92:61–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fisette A, Poursharifi P, Oikonomopoulou K, Munkonda MN, Lapointe M, Cianflone K. Paradoxical glucose-sensitizing yet proinflammatory effects of acute ASP administration in mice. Mediators Inflamm. (2013) 2013:713284. doi: 10.1155/2013/713284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fisette A, Lapointe M, Cianflone K. Obesity-inducing diet promotes acylation stimulating protein resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2013) 437:403–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Escobar-Morreale HF, Luque-Ramirez M, Gonzalez F. Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. (2011) 95:1048–58 e1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Paterakis T, Alexandraki K, Piperi C, Aessopos A, Katsikis I, et al. Indices of low-grade chronic inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome and the beneficial effect of metformin. Hum Reprod. (2006) 21:1426–31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sathyapalan T, Kilpatrick ES, Coady AM, Atkin SL. The effect of atorvastatin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2009) 94:103–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. (2004) 19:41–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh098

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Sathyapalan T, Kilpatrick ES, Coady AM, Atkin SL. Atorvastatin pre-treatment augments the effect of metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). (2009) 72:566–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03678.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2011) 7:219–31. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Baptiste CG, Battista M-C, Trottier A, Baillargeon J-P. Insulin and hyperandrogenism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2010) 122:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.12.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Arslanian SA, Lewy V, Danadian K, Saad R. Metformin therapy in obese adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome and impaired glucose tolerance: amelioration of exaggerated adrenal response to adrenocorticotropin with reduction of insulinemia/insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2002) 87:1555–9. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Guido M, Romualdi D, Suriano R, Giuliani M, Costantini B, Apa R, et al. Effect of pioglitazone treatment on the adrenal androgen response to corticotrophin in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. (2004) 19:534–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh145

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Romualdi D, Giuliani M, Draisci G, Costantini B, Cristello F, Lanzone A, et al. Pioglitazone reduces the adrenal androgen response to corticotropin-releasing factor without changes in ACTH release in hyperinsulinemic women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. (2007) 88:131–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Boulman N, Levy Y, Leiba R, Shachar S, Linn R, Zinder O, et al. Increased C-reactive protein levels in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a marker of cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2004) 89:2160–5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: a consensus statement by the androgen excess and polycystic ovary syndrome (AE-PCOS) society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:2038–49. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Morin-Papunen L, Rautio K, Ruokonen A, Hedberg P, Puukka M, Tapanainen JS. Metformin reduces serum C-reactive protein levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2003) 88:4649–54. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Davignon J. Beneficial cardiovascular pleiotropic effects of statins. Circulation. (2004) 109(23 Suppl 1):39–43. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131517.20177.5a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Fulghesu AM, Sanna F, Uda S, Magnini R, Portoghese E, Batetta B. Il-6 serum levels and production is related to an altered immune response in polycystic ovary syndrome girls with insulin resistance. Mediators Inflamm. (2011) 2011:389317. doi: 10.1155/2011/389317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Glintborg D, Andersen M, Richelsen B, Bruun JM. Plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha are increased in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and associated with adiposity, but unaffected by pioglitazone treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). (2009) 71:652–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03523.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Abeywardena MY, Leifert WR, Warnes KE, Varghese JN, Head RJ. Cardiovascular biology of interleukin-6. Curr Pharm Des. (2009) 15:1809–21. doi: 10.2174/138161209788186290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sell H, Eckel J. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and its role in insulin resistance. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2007) 18:258–62. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3281338546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hu WH, Qiao J, Zhao SY, Zhang XW, Li MZ. [Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and its correlation with lipoprotein in polycystic ovary syndrome]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. (2006) 38:487–91.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Hu WH, Qiao J, Li MZ. [Association of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and the clinical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome: analysis of 65 cases]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2007) 87:721–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Sun W, Lee TS, Zhu M, Gu C, Wang Y, Zhu Y, et al. Statins activate AMP-activated protein kinase in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. (2006) 114:2655–62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.630194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody J, et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest. (2001) 108:1167–74. doi: 10.1172/JCI13505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: atorvastatin, acylation-stimulating-protein, interleukin-6, monocyte-chemoattractant-protein-1, adipose tissue, PCOS

Citation: Sathyapalan T, Hobkirk JP, Javed Z, Carroll S, Coady A-M, Pemberton P, Smith A, Cianflone K and Atkin SL (2019) The Effect of Atorvastatin (and Subsequent Metformin) on Adipose Tissue Acylation-Stimulatory-Protein Concentration and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Overweight/Obese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 10:394. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00394

Received: 12 February 2019; Accepted: 03 June 2019;
Published: 25 June 2019.

Edited by:

Jing Ma, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, China

Reviewed by:

Tinh-Hai Collet, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland
Tao Tao, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Christophe Kosinski, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland, in collaboration with reviewer TC

Copyright © 2019 Sathyapalan, Hobkirk, Javed, Carroll, Coady, Pemberton, Smith, Cianflone and Atkin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Stephen L. Atkin, sla2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.