Gestational TSH and FT4 Reference Intervals in Chinese Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) change dynamically during pregnancy. Differences in geographic regions, populations, and manufacturer's methodologies can affect the reference intervals for thyroid function tests. The 2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommended 4.0 mU/L as the cut-off point for the upper limit of serum TSH in early pregnancy. A systematic review is called for to establish practical, gestational-specific TSH and FT4 reference intervals for pregnant Chinese women and to explore whether the criteria are suitable for China.

Methods: English and Chinese articles published from inception to Aug 2017 were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCIE English-language databases and the CNKI, WanFang, and CQVIP Chinese databases. The relative descent or ascent rates of serum TSH and FT4 were calculated, after which Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2.0 software was used to analyze the data.

Results: Eleven studies (6 in English and 5 in Chinese), five kits and 11,629 Chinese women from nine cities were considered in this meta-analysis. Compared with the reference ranges provided by manufacturers, serum TSH decreased in the first trimester, with the upper limit declining by 21.7% (5.0–36.6%), to a value close to 4.0 mU/L, and the lower limit declining by 85.7% (73.5–97.1%). It continued decreasing in the second trimester, with the upper limit declining by 24.0% (6.4–40.9%) and the lower limit declining by 40.7% (9.0–85.7%). For FT4, the upper limit fluctuated slightly, and the lower limit increased by 6.8% (1.0–14.6%) in the first trimester. Serum FT4 dropped gradually, with the upper limit declining by 21.8% (2.5–31.8%) and the lower limit declining by 12.7% (2.6–19.6%) in the second trimester. During the third trimester, the upper limit decreased by 25.1% (12.7–35.0%), while the lower limit decreased by 20.9% (14.8–27.3%).

Conclusions: Various regions, kits and test methods affect the gestational TSH and FT4 levels. The non-pregnant serum TSH upper limit minus 22% is very close to 4.0 mU/L, which can be used as a sub-optimal approach to represent the cut-off value for pregnant Chinese women in the first trimester.

Introduction

Thyroid hormone is essential for the growth and development of the human body. It plays a vital role in promoting the development of the skeletal, nervous, and reproductive systems (1). Pregnancy affects the thyroid gland and its function profoundly. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) significantly increases in early pregnancy, sharing the same alpha-subunits and 80%-homologous beta-subunits with TSH. Therefore, hCG can stimulate thyroid hormonogenesis, which is the negative-feedback system to TSH secretion, causing the serum TSH level to decline during early pregnancy (2, 3).

Serum TSH and FT4 vary with gestational age. Several studies and guidelines have indicated that non-pregnant reference intervals of serum TSH and FT4 are not applicable for diagnosing thyroid diseases during pregnancy. By contrast, trimester- and method-specific reference ranges for thyroid testing have been strongly recommended because of their higher accuracy (3–6). Nevertheless, the formulation of gestational reference ranges is affected by many factors, limiting their feasibility (7, 8). The 2011 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) suggested a specific upper limit cut-off (2.5 mU/L) for serum TSH in the first trimester of pregnancy (4). However, there are large differences in TSH and FT4 reference ranges between various populations, with 90% of the relevant studies having higher TSH upper limits than the TSH cut-off point of 2.5 mU/L. These inconsistencies could increase the misdiagnosis rate of overt and subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy (9). The 2017 ATA guidelines noted that if internal or transferable pregnancy-specific TSH reference intervals are unavailable, an upper reference limit of 4.0 mU/L may be used, representing the non-pregnant TSH upper limit minus 0.5 mU/L (5). However, it is uncertain whether this cut-off is appropriate for pregnant Chinese women. Similarly, gestational- and method-specific criteria are also recommended for serum FT4 (5), but the criteria for serum FT4 are as inconvenient as those of TSH to diagnose gestational hypothyroxinemia in clinical practice.

The aim of the current study was to systematically assess and summarize gestational- and method-specific serum TSH and FT4 reference ranges in various regions in China and determine their trends in early, middle and late pregnancy. We compared the differences between the reference ranges of Chinese pregnant women and the 2017 ATA guidelines recommendation of 4.0 mU/L. Finally, we aimed to provide feasible and practical reference intervals to diagnose hypothyroidism and hypothyroxinemia in pregnancy.

Materials and methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

A systematic literature search (PubMed, EMBASE, SCIE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Full-text Database, Wanfang) was performed from inception to Aug 2017. The keywords “TSH” and “FT4” combined with the terms “reference range” or “reference interval,” “pregnant,” or “gestational,” and “China” or “Chinese” were used to search for potentially relevant studies in English and Chinese. The following is an example for PubMed: (((((#TSH AND #FT4))) AND ((#pregan^* OR #gestation^*)) AND ((#China OR #Chinese)) AND ((#reference range^* OR #reference interval^*)). To identify additional studies and expand our search, the reference lists of the retrieved articles were scanned.

The studies included in the meta-analysis conformed with the following conditions: All subjects were pregnant Chinese women. The study recruitment standards met the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) recommendations: (1) more than 120 subjects; (2) no TPOAb or TGAb positivity; (3) no family or personal history of thyroid disease; (4) no goiter; and (5) no medical history influencing thyroid function (except use of estrogens) (6).

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) subjects came from iodine-excessive or iodine-deficient regions; (2) the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) quality score was <6 (10); (3) serum TSH- and FT4-related information could not be extracted; and (4) the study was a repeat of an earlier study. In addition, Li et al. (11) declared that the reference intervals for non-pregnant women should be used from 4 to 6 gestational weeks. Therefore, studies including 0–6 gestational weeks or average gestational week <9.3 weeks in the first trimester were excluded to improve the accuracy of the meta-analysis.

Quality assessment

The NOS was selected to assess the quality of the included studies using the “star system.” Information regarding selection, comparability, and outcomes was evaluated with a maximum of 4 stars, 2 stars, and 3 stars, respectively. The total full score = 9. A study graded ≥6 stars was considered a high-quality study (10).

Data extraction

Two reviewers (Gao XT and Li YZ) abstracted the following data from all eligible studies independently: first author; publication year and journal; region(s) and hospital(s) of study; sample size; pregnancy stages; medians and percentiles (2.5^th and 97.5^th) of serum TSH and FT4; manufacturers; inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) in the laboratory; normal range of the detection kit; normal range of the control group; and iodine status of the region.

Statistical analysis

We summarized the lower reference limits (2.5^th) and the upper reference limits (97.5^th) of serum TSH and FT4 in early, middle and late pregnancy. We calculated the relative descent or ascent rate of serum TSH and FT4 and compared these with the normal reference ranges provided by manufacturers involved in each enrolled study. The calculation formula can be written as:

• Relative descent rate of lower limit = (2.5^th in non-pregnancy−2.5^th in pregnancy)/2.5^th in non-pregnancy × 100%;

• Relative descent rate of upper limit = (97.5^th non-pregnancy−97.5^th in pregnancy)/97.5^th non-pregnancy × 100%.

The meta-analysis of the relative descent and ascent rates for the gestational reference intervals was accomplished using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (V2.0, Biostat, Englewood, NJ). The Z test was used to compare the difference between 0 and the relative change rates of TSH and FT4 reference intervals (p < 0.05, 0.05 < p < 0.1 and p > 0.1 indicated high, medium, and no difference between relative change rate and 0, respectively).

Factors affecting gestational TSH and FT4 were age, iodine nutrition status, ethnicity, sex, and hour of the day, in addition to the conditions referred to in the NACB (12). Our meta-analysis included pregnant women of appropriate age who came from adequate-iodine regions of China, and the blood samples were taken in morning in the fasting state.

Results

Literature search and study characteristics

A total of 265 studies were initially considered for inclusion, of which 4 were excluded due to duplication, and 219 articles were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts. After more detailed evaluation of the remaining 42 articles, 31 articles were excluded. Finally, the remaining 11 studies (6 published in English and 5 in Chinese) involving 5 types of kits and including 11,629 Chinese women met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis (Figure 1). There were 4 studies on the application of Roche e600/601 with 1,920 pregnant Chinese women; 3 studies using the Bayer ADVIA Centaur with 3,441 pregnant Chinese women; 4 studies using the Beckman with 2,350 pregnant Chinese women; 2 studies using the Abbott Architect I 2,000 with 1,223 pregnant Chinese women, and 2 studies using the DPC Immulite 1,000 with 1,189 pregnant Chinese women. The qualified studies were published from 2008 to 2016 and proved to be of good quality in accordance with the NOS scoring system (Supplementary Table 1).

Figure 1

Gestational-specific serum TSH and FT4 alterations

Table 1 displays the basic characteristics of the included studies regarding serum TSH. According to the median, serum TSH decreased in early pregnancy and showed an upward trend during middle and late pregnancy (Figure 2A).

Figure 2

Table 2 shows the basic characteristics of the included studies regarding serum FT4. In the first trimester, no obvious rule was derived for the serum FT4 upper limit (lower than the non-pregnant levels in six studies; higher than the non-pregnant levels in the other five studies). However, the lower limits were higher than those in non-pregnancy. In the second and third trimesters, both the upper and lower limits of serum FT4 were lower than those in non-pregnancy. The gestational serum FT4 medians exhibited a downward trend (Figure 2B).

We used the random-effects model to summarize the descending rule of serum TSH in early pregnancy and the descending and ascending rules of serum FT4 in each gestational stage by meta-analysis.

Comparison of the serum TSH upper and lower limits between pregnancy and non-pregnancy

Variations in the serum TSH reference ranges in early pregnancy

Figure 3A shows the summarized relative descent rate [85.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 84.5, 86.8%] for the serum TSH lower limit in the first trimester from 2008 to 2016. The relative descent rate in each study ranged from 73.5% (95% CI: 68.3, 78.2%) to 97.1% (95% CI: 94.5, 98.5%). This suggested that the lower limit of serum TSH decreased in the first trimester compared with that in non-pregnancy, and the descent rate was 85.7% (73.5–97.1%).

Figure 3

Figure 3B shows the summarized relative descent rate (21.7%, 95% CI: 20.4, 23.1%) for the serum TSH upper limit in the first trimester. The relative descent rate in individual studies ranged from 5.0% (95% CI: 2.9, 8.5%) to 36.6% (95% CI: 29.2, 44.8%), suggesting that, compared to the non-pregnant levels, the serum TSH upper limit decreased in early pregnancy, and the descent rate was 21.7% (5.0–36.6%).

Comparison of serum TSH upper reference limits under different conditions

Figure 4 shows the comparison of the serum TSH upper limits acquired in different conditions. If we subtract 0.5 mU/L from the upper limits provided by manufacturers (97.5th in non-pregnancy), the gestational TSH upper limits obtained (97.5th in non-pregnancy−0.5), which ranged from 3.45 to 5.14 mU/L, varied greatly, and the gaps around 4.0 mU/L, which ranged from −0.55 to 1.14 mU/L, were different from each other. The absolute values of the gaps were >1, suggesting that the fluctuation around 4.0 mU/L was obvious.

Figure 4

By contrast, if we compare 4.0 mU/L with the gestational TSH upper limit, which was 22% lower than the non-pregnant upper limit, [(1–22%) × 97.5th in non-pregnancy], ranging from 3.12 to 4.40 mU/L, the gaps ranging from −0.88 to 0.40 mU/L were narrower than those of “97.5th in non-pregnancy – 0.5” ranging from −0.55 to 1.14 mU/L. Similarly, if we replace 22% with the relative descent rate of each kit (Roche, Bayer, Abbott, DPC and Beckman were 22.7, 18.3, 24.8, 17.6 and 25.5%, respectively) listed in Supplementary Table 2, the gestational upper limits obtained [(1–descent rate) × 97.5th in non-pregnancy] ranged from 3.30 to 4.36 mU/L. The gaps between 4.0 mU/L and ‘(1–descent rate) × 97.5^th in non-pregnancy' were much narrower, which ranged from −0.70 to 0.36 mU/L. The absolute values of the gaps in both groups were less than 1, suggesting that the non-pregnant upper limit that declined by its relative descent rate was much closer to 4.0 mU/L.

Figure 4 also shows that the comparison between 4.0 mU/L and the TSH upper limits of the first trimester in Chinese women (97.5^th in T1). If we subtract “97.5^th in T1” from 4.0 mU/L, the gaps ranged from −0.85 to 1.0 mU/L. The absolute values of the gaps were ≤1. These results suggest that regardless of efforts to standardize the reference ranges, there were still differences in comparison to the real TSH upper limits of pregnant Chinese women, while the differences were not very significant.

Variations in the serum TSH reference ranges in middle pregnancy

Figure 5A shows the summarized relative descent rate (40.7%, 95% CI: 38.9, 42.5%) for the serum TSH lower limit in the second trimester. The relative descent rate in each study ranged from 9.0% (95% CI: 7.3, 10.9%) to 85.7% (95% CI: 81.3, 89.2%). This suggests that the lower limit of serum TSH decreased in the second trimester compared with that in non-pregnancy, and the descent rate was 40.7% (9.0–85.7%).

Figure 5

Figure 5B shows the summarized relative descent rate (24.0%, 95% CI: 22.6, 25.5%) for the serum TSH upper limit in the second trimester. The relative descent rate in individual studies ranged from 6.4% (95% CI: 5.0, 8.1%) to 40.9% (95% CI: 35.5, 46.5%), suggesting that, compared to the non-pregnant levels, the serum TSH upper limit decreased in middle pregnancy, and the descent rate was 24.0% (6.4–40.9%).

Variations in the serum TSH reference ranges in late pregnancy

Table 1 lists the changing characteristics of the serum TSH lower limit in the third trimester. Seven studies showed that the lower limit increased compared with non-pregnant levels. By contrast, the lower limit decreased in the other 5 studies. The fluctuation range varied from down by 51.43% to up by 120.59%. Therefore, there was no definite change rule regarding the TSH lower limit in late pregnancy, and the fluctuation range was wide.

Table 1 also lists the changing characteristics of the serum TSH upper limit in late pregnancy. Five studies showed that the upper limit increased compared with non-pregnant levels. By contrast, the upper limit decreased in the other 7 studies. The fluctuation range varied from down by 34.46% to up by 27.33%. Therefore, there was no definite change rule regarding the TSH upper limit in the third trimester, and the fluctuation range was wide.

Comparison of the serum FT4 upper and lower limits between pregnancy and non-pregnancy

Variations in the serum FT4 reference ranges in early pregnancy

Figure 6 shows the summarized relative ascent rate (6.8%, 95% CI: 5.9, 7.7%) for the serum FT4 lower limit in the first trimester. The relative ascent rate in all studies ranged from 1.0% (95% CI: 0.2, 4.9%) to 14.6% (95% CI: 9.7, 21.4%), suggesting that the serum FT4 lower limit increased in early gestation compared to the non-pregnant levels, and the ascent rate was 6.8% (1.0–14.6%).

Figure 6

Table 2 lists the changing characteristics of the serum FT4 upper limit in the first trimester. Six studies showed that the upper limit decreased compared with non-pregnant levels. By contrast, the upper limit increased in the other 5 studies. The fluctuation range varied from down by 16.65% to up by 8.76%. Therefore, there was no definite change rule regarding the FT4 upper limit in early pregnancy, and the fluctuation range was small.

Variations in the serum FT4 reference ranges in middle pregnancy

Figure 7A summarizes the relative descent rate (12.7%, 95% CI: 11.5, 14.0%) with regard to the serum FT4 lower limit during the second trimester. The relative descent rate in the included studies ranged from 2.6% (95% CI: 1.4, 4.8%) to 19.6% (95% CI: 15.5, 24.4%). This suggested that the serum FT4 lower limit decreased in middle pregnancy compared with non-pregnant levels, and the descent rate was 12.7% (2.6–19.6%).

Figure 7

Figure 7B summarizes the relative descent rate (21.8%, 95% CI: 20.3, 23.5%) for the serum FT4 upper limit in the second trimester. The relative descent rate in the included studies ranged from 2.5% (95% CI: 1.0, 6.5%) to 31.8% (95% CI: 28.9, 34.7%). This suggested that the serum FT4 upper limit decreased in middle pregnancy compared with the non-pregnant levels, and the descent rate was 21.8% (2.5–31.8%).

Variations in the serum FT4 reference ranges in late pregnancy

Figure 8A shows the summarized relative descent rate (20.9%, 95% CI: 19.5, 22.3%) for the serum FT4 lower limit in the third trimester. The relative descent rate in the included studies ranged from 14.8% (95% CI: 11.5, 18.8%) to 27.3% (95% CI: 22.8, 32.4%). This suggested that the lower limit of serum FT4 decreased in the third trimester of pregnancy compared with the non-pregnant levels, and the descent rate was 20.9% (14.8–27.3%).

Figure 8

Figure 8B shows the summarized relative descent rate (25.1%, 95% CI: 23.6, 26.7%) for the serum FT4 upper limit in the third trimester. The relative descent rate in all studies ranged from 12.7% (95% CI: 9.5, 16.7%) to 35.0% (95% CI: 28.7, 41.8%), suggesting that the serum FT4 upper limit declined in late gestation compared with non-pregnant levels, and the descent rate was 25.1% (12.7–35.0%).

Discussion

Compared with the non-pregnant reference ranges provided by manufacturers, serum TSH showed a downward trend during early pregnancy, with the upper limit decreasing by 21.7% and the lower limit decreasing by 85.7%. It maintained this descending trend in middle pregnancy, with the upper limit decreasing by 24.0% and the lower limit decreasing by 40.7%. Then, in late pregnancy, serum TSH gradually increased to non-pregnant levels. For serum FT4, the upper limit changed slightly, with the lower limit increasing by 6.8% compared to non-pregnant levels in early pregnancy. Then, serum FT4 gradually declined, with the upper limit decreasing by 21.8% and the lower limit decreasing by 12.7% in the second trimester. It kept decreasing in the third trimester, with the upper limit decreasing by 25.1% and the lower limit decreasing by 20.9%.

Pregnancy causes increases in renal iodine excretion, thyroxine binding proteins, and thyroid hormone production. A healthy thyroid adjusts thyroid hormone metabolism, iodine uptake, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis to mediate such changes. The peak rise in hCG also occurs during early pregnancy (13, 14). Maternal hCG plays a direct role in stimulating the TSH receptor to produce thyroid hormone, resulting in a decrease in serum TSH. Thus, serum hCG increases in association with a corresponding reduction in serum TSH (2, 3). Starting at gestational 6–8 weeks, maternal serum estrogens increase progressively until term, which is accompanied by total T4 increasing, FT4 decreasing, and TSH progressively increasing throughout the pregnancy (15). Therefore, the non-pregnant reference ranges for thyroid function tests are not applicable to pregnant women. National guidelines throughout the world have recommended the use of gestational- and population-specific serum TSH and FT4 reference ranges to diagnose thyroid disease during pregnancy (4, 5) (16–20). According to the 2017 ATA guidelines, 2.5 mU/L was no longer used as the serum TSH upper limit cut-off value to diagnose hypothyroidism in early pregnancy, and 4.0 mU/L was recommended when internal or transferable pregnancy-specific TSH reference intervals were unavailable (5). Since the serum TSH upper limit in the American general population is usually 4.5 mU/L, it generally decreased by 0.5 mU/L in the first trimester, resulting in the cut-off value of 4.0 mU/L (6).

Although the 2017 ATA guidelines provided a convenient and feasible method for determining the serum TSH upper limit in early pregnancy, whether 4.0 mU/L is suitable for pregnant Chinese women needs to be explored. First, serum TSH reference ranges vary among different ethnicities due to cultural, environmental, geographic and genetic factors (21–23). Second, sex differences exist in TSH circadian rhythms. Third, serum TSH values change throughout the 24-h cycle and progressively increase with age (12). Fourth, iodine is the main ingredient in the synthesis of thyroid hormones. Since the implementation of mandatory universal salt iodization in 1996, China has eliminated iodine deficiency and become an iodine-sufficient country (24). Epidemiological studies also found that the resident's average serum TSH level has risen due to the effects of increased iodine intake (25). A similar epidemiological survey reported by Korea showed that there was high iodine intake in Korea, resulting in serum TSH exhibiting a right-shifted distribution in that population (26).

TSH is regarded as one of the principal indicators to diagnose primary hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Our study compared the gestational upper and lower limits for serum TSH with the non-pregnant reference intervals provided by the test manufacturers. We found that regardless the kind of kit or test method, the serum TSH upper limit decreased by ~22% and the lower limit decreased by ~85% in early pregnancy. What we found especially interesting was that the non-pregnant upper limit declined by 22% was very close to 4.0 mU/L. However, the difference between 4.0 mU/L and the non-pregnant TSH upper limit minus 0.5 mU/L, according to the 2017 ATA guideline's recommendation (5), was obvious. Although the difference between 4.0 mU/L and the real TSH upper limits of pregnant Chinese women cannot be eliminated, the difference was not significant. Our findings further suggest that if we use 4.0 mU/L as a sub-optimal approach to identify serum TSH upper limit in early pregnancy, this limit represents a relative descent rate in the non-pregnant TSH upper reference limit of 22% rather than a reduction of ~0.5 mU/L.

However, we must stress that the population of a local institute or laboratory and pregnancy-specific serum TSH reference ranges should optimally define the gestational-specific serum TSH reference range. If unavailable, pregnancy-specific TSH reference ranges obtained from similar patient populations and detected by similar test assays should be the alternatives. If the above two conditions are not available, 4.0 mU/L or the serum TSH upper limit, which is 22% lower than the non-pregnant level, may be used as a sub-optimal approach to identify the serum TSH reference ranges in pregnancy for diagnosing gestational thyroid diseases.

T4 is considered an important index for the diagnosis of overt gestational hypothyroidism and hypothyroxinemia. At present, serum FT4 is used as a diagnostic indicator for hypothyroidism and hypothyroxinemia in the majority of clinical laboratories. The 2017 ATA guidelines declared that the accuracy of detecting serum FT4 by indirect analog immunoassays was influenced by pregnancy and manufacturer diversity. Gestational- and method-specific serum FT4 reference ranges should be established, but they are difficult to implement (5). According to the studies we included, serum FT4 showed an upward trend in the first trimester compared to non-pregnant levels. The upper limit fluctuated slightly, while the lower limit increased by ~7.0%. Serum FT4 decreased in the second trimester, with the upper limit decreasing by ~20% and the lower limit decreasing by ~15%. Subsequently, serum FT4 declined more profoundly in the third trimester, with the upper limit decreasing by ~25% and the lower limit decreasing by ~20%. Thus, by comparing with the non-pregnant reference ranges provided by manufacturers or measurements in the local population, we can diagnose hypothyroxinemia once the serum FT4 lower limit decreases by more than 15% in middle pregnancy and 20% in late pregnancy.

Our analysis of the included studies found that the gestational TSH reference ranges are broader than those of the non-pregnant population, mainly because the serum TSH upper limit decreased less than the lower limit. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that women with subclinical hypothyroidism have an impaired thyroidal response to hCG stimulation, and women with a lower thyroid functional capacity may already have high-normal TSH concentrations going into pregnancy (27). So, in the whole population, the TSH upper limit probably does not decrease steeply. The upper and lower limit of serum FT4 almost synchronously declined in pregnancy, resulting in no obvious change in the breadth of the reference range.

Limitations

Our study had some limitations. We only included the studies from China, without considering other countries or ethnic groups. Our study represented the serum TSH and FT4 reference ranges of a pregnant Chinese population; due to the paucity of studies calculating good population-based reference ranges for non-pregnancy, we did not acquire accurate normal TSH and FT4 reference ranges, which can be seen as the gold standard for comparison (8). In addition, our meta-analysis only included kits published and meeting inclusion criteria. Kits such as the Bayer ASC 180, LIAISON, and TOSOH were not included because of few or no publications; A minimum of approximately 400 women is required, due to the high interindividual variability and skewness for TSH but also to some extent FT4 (9). In our meta-analysis, the number of women included in most of the studies was lower than 400.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis found that serum TSH decreased in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and exhibited an upward trend to non-pregnant levels in the third trimester. Furthermore, serum FT4 increased slightly in the first trimester and decreased gradually in the second and third trimesters. The relative descent or ascent rate compared with the non-pregnant reference intervals may explain the change rules of gestational serum TSH and FT4. In the first trimester, using 4.0 mU/L as the cut-off point of the serum TSH upper limit is a sub-optimal approach for pregnant Chinese women. Generally, this limit represents a relative descent rate in the non-pregnant TSH upper reference limit of 22%.

References

• 1

  HuangSANevesLADC. Thyroid Hormone Metabolism: Dekker, New York, NY: Chemical Rubber Company Press (1986).

  • Google Scholar

• 2

  GlinoerD. What happens to the normal thyroid during pregnancy?Thyroid Offic J Am Thyr Assoc. (1999) 9:631.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  GlinoerD. The regulation of thyroid function in pregnancy: pathways of endocrine adaptation from physiology to pathology. Endocr Rev. (1997) 18:404. 10.1210/edrv.18.3.0300

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  StagnaroGreenAAbalovichMAlexanderEAziziFMestmanJNegroRet al. Guidelines of the American thyroid association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid (2011) 21:1081. 10.1089/thy.2011.0087

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AlexanderEKPearceENBrentGABrownRSChenHDosiouCet al. 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid (2017) 27:315–89. 10.1089/thy.2016.0457

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  DemersLMSpencerCA. Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol. (2003) 58:138–40. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01681.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  SpringerDBartosVZimaT. Reference intervals for thyroid markers in early pregnancy determined by 7 different analytical systems. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. (2014) 74:95–101. 10.3109/00365513.2013.860617

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  KorevaarTIMChakerLPeetersRP. Improving the clinical impact of randomised trials in thyroidology. Lancet Diabet Endocrinol. (2017) 6:523–5. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30316-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  MediciMKorevaarTIVisserWEVisserTJPeetersRP. Thyroid function in pregnancy: what is normal?Clin Chem (2015) 61:704–13. 10.1373/clinchem.2014.236646

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  StangA. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  LiCShanZMaoJWangWXieXZhouWet al. Assessment of thyroid function during first-trimester pregnancy: what is the rational upper limit of serum TSH during the first trimester in Chinese pregnant women?J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:73–9. 10.1210/jc.2013-1674

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  EhrenkranzJBachPRSnowGLSchneiderALeeJLIlstrupSet al. Circadian and circannual rhythms in thyroid hormones: determining the TSH and free T4 reference intervals based upon time of day, age, and sex. Thyroid (2015) 25:954–61. 10.1089/thy.2014.0589

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  CarrSR. Medical complications during pregnancy. JAMA (1995) 274:1247. 10.1001/jama.1995.03530150071041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  RobbinsJ. Thyroxine-binding proteins. Prog Clin Biol Res (1976) 1:331–55.

  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BenvengaSDi BariFGraneseRBorrielliIGiorgianniGGrassoLet al. Circulating thyrotropin is upregulated by estradiol. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. (2018) 11:11–7. 10.1016/j.jcte.2018.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  MajiRNathSLahiriSDasMSBhattacharyyaARDasHN. Establishment of trimester-specific reference intervals of serum TSH & fT4 in a Pregnant Indian population at North Kolkata. Indian J Clin Biochem. (2014) 29:167–73. 10.1007/s12291-013-0332-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  MoonHWChungHJParkCMHurMYunYM. Establishment of trimester-specific reference intervals for thyroid hormones in Korean pregnant women. Ann Lab Med. (2015) 35:198–204. 10.3343/alm.2015.35.2.198

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BestwickJPJohnRMainaAGuaraldoVJoomunMWaldNJet al. Thyroid stimulating hormone and free thyroxine in pregnancy: expressing concentrations as multiples of the median (MoMs). Clin Chim Acta (2014) 430:33–7. 10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  TuazonMAvan RaaijJMHautvastJGBarbaCV. Energy requirements of pregnancy in the Philippines. Lancet (1987) 2:1129–31.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Bocos-TerrazJPIzquierdo-ÁlvarezSBancalero-FloresJLÁlvarez-LahuertaRAznar-SaucaAReal-LópezEet al. Thyroid hormones according to gestational age in pregnant Spanish women. BMC Res Notes (2009) 2:1–9. 10.1186/1756-0500-2-237

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  PriceAObelOCresswellJCatchIRutterSBarikSet al. Comparison of thyroid function in pregnant and non-pregnant Asian and western Caucasian women. Clin Chim Acta (2001) 308:91–8. 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00470-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  SurksMIBoucaiL. Age- and race-based serum thyrotropin reference limits. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:496. 10.1210/jc.2009-1845

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  KorevaarTIMediciMde RijkeYBVisserWSmKSJaddoeVWet al. Ethnic differences in maternal thyroid parameters during pregnancy: the Generation R study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2013) 98:3678–86. 10.1210/jc.2013-2005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  ShanZChenLLianXLiuCShiBShiLet al. Iodine status and prevalence of thyroid disorders after introduction of mandatory universal salt iodization for 16 years in china: a cross-sectional study in 10 cities. Thyroid (2016) 26:1125. 10.1089/thy.2015.0613

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LiuPLiuLShenHJiaQWangJZhengHet al. The standard, intervention measures and health risk for high water iodine areas. PLoS ONE (2014) 9:e89608. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089608

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  JeonMKimWGKwonHKimMParkSOhHSet al. Excessive iodine intake and TSH reference interval: data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Thyroid (2017) 27:967–72. 10.1089/thy.2017.0078

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  KorevaarTISteegersEAde RijkeYBVisserWEJaddoeVWVisserTJet al. Placental angiogenic factors are associated with maternal thyroid function and modify hCG-mediated FT4 stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100:E1328–34. 10.1210/jc.2015-2553

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  LiuJYuXXiaMCaiHChengGWuLet al. Development of gestation-specific reference intervals for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Northeast Chinese women: What is the rational division of gestation stages for establishing reference intervals for pregnancy women?Clin Biochem (2017) 50:309–17. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.11.036

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  WangQYuBHuangRCaoFZhuZSunDet al. Assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy: the advantage of self-sequential longitudinal reference intervals. Arch Med Sci Ams (2011) 7:679–84. 10.5114/aoms.2011.24139

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  XuSJFanJXYangSTaoJQianWHanMet al. Variations in different thyroid stimulating hormone and free thyroxine detection kits for evaluating thyroid function during pregnancy. Chinese J Perinat Med. (2015) 18:81–6. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2015.02.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  DuanYPengLCuiYJiangY. Reference Intervals for Thyroid Function and the Negative Correlation between FT4 and HbA1c in Pregnant Women of West China. Clin Lab. (2015) 61:777–83. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.141235

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  FanJXHanMTaoJLuoJSongMFYangSet al. Reference intervals for common thyroid function tests, during different stages of pregnancy in Chinese women. Chin Med J. (2013) 126:2710–4. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130767

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  LiJTengWPShanZYLiCYZhouWWGaoBet al. Gestational month-specific reference ranges for TSH and thyroxine in Han nationality women in iodine sufficient area of China. Chinese J Endocrinol Metab. (2008) 24:605–8. 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6699.2008.06.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ChenQQWangZC. Establishment of reference intervals of thyroid hormones in pregnant women for Ningbo city. Chinese J Gen Pract. (2016) 14:1013–6. 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.06.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ChenLChangKPuXYLuoSFPengZYChenMet al. Gestation-specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests and the clinical significance for thyroid function monitoring through different periods of pregnancy. Chinese J Lab Med. (2016) 39:511–5. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2016.07.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  YanYQDongZLDongLWangFRYangXMJinXYet al. Trimester- and method-specific reference intervals for thyroid tests in pregnant Chinese women: methodology, euthyroid definition and iodine status can influence the setting of reference intervals. Clin Endocrinol. (2011) 74:262–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03910.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  YuLYuanHKLinHYWuWY. Reference interval in preliminary investigation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy in Shenzhen China. Natl Med J China (2014):3175–8. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.40.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar