Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 24 April 2020
Sec. Clinical Microbiology

Calibration of an Upconverting Phosphor-Based Quantitative Immunochromatographic Assay for Detecting Yersinia pestis, Brucella spp., and Bacillus anthracis Spores

\nPingping Zhang,&#x;Pingping Zhang1,2Yuanyuan Zhang&#x;Yuanyuan Zhang3Yong Zhao,Yong Zhao1,2Yajun Song,Yajun Song1,2Chunyan NiuChunyan Niu4Zhiwei SuiZhiwei Sui4Jing WangJing Wang4Ruifu Yang,
Ruifu Yang1,2*Dong Wei
Dong Wei3*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Key Laboratory of POCT for Bioemergency and Clinic, Beijing, China
  • 3Division of Tuberculosis Vaccines, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
  • 4Center for Advanced Measurements Science, National Institutes of Metrology, Beijing, China

Yersinia pestis, Brucella spp., and Bacillus anthracis are pathogens that can cause infectious zoonotic diseases with high mortality rates. An upconverting phosphor-based quantitative immunochromatographic (UPT-LF) assay, a point-of-care testing method suitable for resource-limited areas, was calibrated to quantitatively detect pathogenic bacteria. The bacterial purity or activity were ensured via staining methods and growth curves, respectively. Growth assays showed that the classic plate-counting method underestimated bacterial numbers compared with the bacterial counting method recommended by the reference material of the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China. The detection results of the UPT-LF assay differed significantly between the bacterial cultures in liquid and solid media and between different strains. Accelerated stability assessments and freeze-thaw experiments showed that the stability of the corresponding antigens played an important role in calibrating the UPT-LF assay. In this study, a new calibration system was developed for quantitative immunochromatography for detecting pathogenic bacteria. The results demonstrated the necessity of calibration for standardizing point-of-care testing methods.

Introduction

Despite having lower sensitivities than sequencing and PCR methods, immunochromatographic assays (ICAs) are extensively employed for point-of-care testing in many developing countries and offer the first-line of defense against acute serious pandemic zoonotic diseases with high mortality rates. Such diseases include the plague, brucellosis, and anthrax, whose etiologic agents are Yersinia pestis, Brucella spp., and Bacillus anthracis, respectively. These pathogens have caused countless deaths during historical pandemics and are distributed worldwide in natural foci, each having natural reservoirs (such as rodents and fleas for Y. pestis). In addition, these pathogenic bacteria are easily acquired and reproduced for use as bioterrorism agents and pose a great potential threat to public health. Timely diagnosis and therapy is crucial for saving patients' lives owing to limited therapeutic strategies and poor prognoses. Etiological diagnoses are especially critical because of the remarkable resemblance to clinical syndromes of diseases caused by bioterrorism agents and other factors. ICAs are rapid and portable and are widely used to detect pathogenic bacteria on-site for surveillance in natural foci and handling of public health emergencies, impeding the transmission of these diseases to the greatest possible extent.

Correctly estimating the accuracy, detection limits, and comparability of ICAs is difficult because analyzing qualitative results based on naked-eye observations via the present colloidal gold ICA is unsuitable for refined calibration research. Upconverting phosphor-based technology based on the lateral flow assay (UPT-LF), a newly developed ICA method for quantitative detection, enables the establishment of a reliable calibration method for ICAs. UPT-LF assays for the detection of pathogenic bacteria have been developed and evaluated in our laboratory, and include assays to detect Y. pestis (Yan et al., 2006), B. anthracis spores (Li et al., 2006), Brucella spp. (Qu et al., 2009), Vibrio cholerae (Hao et al., 2017), Burkholderia pseudomallei (Hua et al., 2015a; Liang et al., 2017), Francisella tularensis (Hua et al., 2015b), Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Wang et al., 2007), Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and seven Salmonella spp. (Zhao et al., 2016). Our UPT-LF assays showed robust performance using many clinical and environmental samples such as biochemical reagents and various types of powders and viscera samples (Zhang P. et al., 2014; Hua et al., 2015a,b), as well as field water samples (Hao et al., 2017). After the samples are loaded onto the strip, upconverting phosphor (UCP) particles that have first been combined with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against bacteria can capture the corresponding bacteria and are then captured by the other antibodies against bacteria fixed onto the test band (T band), while the remaining UCP-mAbs complexes are captured by goat anti-mouse IgG on the control band (C band). The visible light emitted by the UCP particles under the excitation of infrared light can be transformed into electric current signals. The ratios of the T- and C-band signals, or the T/C ratio, are used as the detection results in practical applications and are proportional to the bacterial concentration (Yang, 2019). Considering the principle of UPT-LF for quantitative bacterial detection, calibration of the assay should rely on the standard curve, using the detection value and target bacterial concentrations as parameters.

However, the plate-counting method, the current international gold standard for counting bacteria, only counts live cells (Breed and Dotterrer, 1916) and thus may be unsuitable for evaluating the actual abilities of the ICA because antigens remain on the surfaces of dead cells, thus making calibration of the ICA difficult (Zhang X. et al., 2014; Gorsuch et al., 2019). Counting via microscopy or optical density measures are more exact methods for all cells. According to the Beer–Lambert law, absorbance measured via spectrophotometry can be used to quantify substances (Klumpp et al., 2009; Meyers et al., 2018), while the bacterial concentrations are proportional to the optical density at 600 nm (Dalgaard et al., 1994; Stevenson et al., 2016). The National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC, China) developed a spectrophotometric method to determine the concentrations of Y. pestis (Wei et al., 2009), Brucella spp. (Li et al., 2011), and B. anthracis (Wei et al., 2010) according to the bacteria enumerated directly via direct microscopic counts. Reference Materials for the Bacterial Content of Plague Vaccines, Brucellosis Vaccines and Anthrax Vaccines (Approval No. National Biological Reference [2013] 0049, issued by the China Food and Drug Administration), were further developed, while the optical densities for three tubes containing glass fibers correspond to three concentrations for the three bacteria, and the standard curves of the two parameters can be used to quantify the bacteria in samples (Table 1). In addition, the culture methods, including the various media and culture conditions (such as fluid medium or a solid plate) may significantly influence bacterial growth because the cellular components may differ under different conditions such as growth rate (Klumpp et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2010; Klumpp and Hwa, 2014) or temperature (Labrie et al., 2005), while heterogeneous populations may result from mutations (Schaechter and View From Here Group, 2001). In this study, a UPT-LF assay for detecting Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis was calibrated using the NIFDC bacterial reference material, and the influences of culture conditions and various strains were studied to form a solid foundation for calibrating and standardizing immunochromatographic assays.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Congruent relationship between the optical density at 600 nm of the NIFDC reference material and bacterial concentrations.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The strains used to calibrate the detection were Y. pestis 91001, Brucella abortus S19, B. anthracis Sterne, and other strains of Y. pestis, B. anthracis, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus cereus. All strains were preserved in our laboratory. The culture media, lysogeny broth (LB, including tryptone and yeast extract), Hiss agar, and brain heart infusion (BHI) were purchased from Oxoid, Ltd., Beijing Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and Becton Dickinson and Company (New Jersey, USA), respectively. Gram stain kits were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Sciences & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Reference Materials for the Bacterial Content of Plague Vaccine, Brucellosis Vaccine, and Anthrax Vaccine were obtained from the NIFDC, China. The SpectraMax M2 Microplate Reader from Molecular Devices Co., Ltd. was used to measure optical density.

UPT-LF strips for detecting Y. pestis, B. abortus, and B. anthracis were developed by our laboratory, and the UPT-LF detection kits, including strips with the corresponding sample-treatment buffer, were produced in workshops with air cleanliness up to the one million level of good manufacturing practices at Beijing Hotgen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Radiofrequency identification devices (RFID) in the UPT-LF strips recorded the strip parameters, including the detection target, cutoff, and information from the standard curves (A and B value), which were automatically recognized by a UPT-3A biosensor. The UPT-3A biosensor reads the signals and exports the detection results of the UPT-LF assay (Figures 1B–D). The monoclonal antibodies for Y. pestis on the UPT-LF strip were prepared by injecting purified F1 antigen into BALB/c mice. The monoclonal antibodies for B. abortus and the polyclonal antibodies for B. anthracis on the strip were selected based on injecting whole inactivated bacterial cells into mice or goats; therefore, the information on their corresponding antigens was unclear. The standard curves of the UPT-LF strips in the commercial detection kit for quantifying Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis were based on the detection results for Y. pestis 91001, B. abortus S19, and B. anthracis Sterne cultured in liquid medium, as well as the numbers determined via the classic plate-counting method.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The criteria program and an illustration of the UPT-LF assay. (A) Program for the UPT-LF assay criteria. (B) The photograph of UPT biosensor scanning of a strip. (C) The detection result shows the concentration of bacteria. The signal peak on the left is derived from the control band, and that on the right is derived from the test band. (D) Information stored by the UPT-LF biosensor including time, sample ID, detection target, concentration of the target, the value of the signal for the test band and control band, T/C ratio, as well as the parameters for standard curves (y = Ax + B, the logarithm of T/C-cutoff as x and the logarithm of concentration as y) for quantitation of the concentration of target bacteria, including the cut-off, A and B. Some information, with the exception of the detection result, was recorded in radiofrequency identification devices (RFID) for each commercial strip, and this can be revised through a new record after calibration.

Criteria for Culturing and Identifying the Bacteria

The program used to determine the UPT-LF assay criteria is summarized in Figure 1A.

B. anthracis, B. atrophaeus, B. subtilis, and B. cereus spores were prepared and identified. For preincubation, 0.2 mL of bacteria were incubated in 5 mL of LB broth at −80°C, then cultured at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 15.5 h. The bacteria were collected via centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 5 min, then inoculated onto nutrient agar plates from Roche bottles (~30 × 15 cm) after being suspended in 2 mL of LB broth. The bacteria were cultured for 7–8 days, then suspended in normal saline to prepare the spores. To determine the spore quality, the bacteria were scraped into 0.2 mL of normal saline and stained with malachite green and crystal violet-iodine on slides treated with 3% hydrochloric acid. For the malachite green staining, a mixture of 0.1 mL of bacteria and 0.1 mL of malachite green were boiled at 100°C for 25 min, then 75% ethyl alcohol was used as a wash buffer after heat-fixing and staining. Using a Gram stain kit, the bacteria were stained with crystal violet for 1 min, washed, then soaked in iodine solution for 1 min, and washed in 20 mL of water.

Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 were used for plotting growth curves. For preincubation, 0.2 mL of bacterial solution containing 30% glycerol preserved at −80°C was inoculated into tubes containing 5 mL of medium, then cultured at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for different times. The optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) were detected three times each, using LB medium as the blank for Y. pestis 91001 and BHI medium as the blank for B. abortus S19. The preincubation time that resulted in an optical density of ~1.0 was considered the optimal preincubation time for the culture. For incubation, 1 mL of preincubated culture was inoculated into three Erlenmeyer flasks containing 19 mL of LB medium, and the OD600 of the culture for all three flasks was measured via spectrophotometry for 1 or 2 h.

The optical density of the bacteria was measured both in normal saline and culture medium. Three parallel Erlenmeyer flasks containing Y. pestis 91001 were preincubated for 16 h (to an OD600 of ~1.0) and then cultured. At 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h, 0.4 mL of the bacterial culture was extracted and divided into two samples. One sample of the bacterial culture was used to directly measure the optical density with LB as a blank, and the other sample was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm at 4°C for 8 min to harvest the bacteria. The supernatant was then removed and the pellet was suspended in saline solution to the same volume as that used to measure the optical density. The optical density was then measured using saline solution as a blank. Similarly, three flasks of B. abortus S19 were preincubated for 17.5 h and cultured for 7.3, 8.3, and 9.5 h in BHI medium or normal saline, then the optical densities of the bacteria from the three flasks were measured using BHI medium and normal saline as the blanks, respectively.

Comparing Counting Methods for Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19

The standard curves for counting Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis were plotted using the OD600 for each NIFDC reference material for different bacterial contents (including low, medium, and high concentrations) and measured three times using a spectrophotometer. The optical densities were determined for Y. pestis 91001 after a 16 h preincubation and 6 h incubation, B. abortus S19 after a 17.5 h preincubation and 7.3 h incubation, and B. anthracis stern spores after being collected and suspended in normal saline. After measuring their optical densities, their concentrations were calculated from the standard curve of the NIFDC reference material.

For the plate-counting method, the bacterial cultures mentioned above for plotting the standard curves of NIFDC reference material were serially diluted 10-fold according to pre-estimated concentrations based on experience. The dilutions containing the final three low concentrations were inoculated onto Hiss agar plates containing 5% goat blood for Y. pestis, BHI plates containing 5% goat blood for B. abortus S19, and LB plates containing 5% goat blood for B. anthracis stern spores. The concentrations of each of the three flasks were measured for repetition. Plates containing 30–300 colony-forming units were used to calculate the bacterial concentrations in the original flask cultures based on the fold dilutions.

UPT-LF Assay for Detecting Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 Cultured in Liquid and Solid Media

First, different solid media were used to evaluate the bacterial growth states, then 0.2 mL of Y. pestis 91001 after a 16 h preincubation was smeared and cultured on LB and Hiss agar plates, while B. abortus S19 after a 17.5 h preincubation was smeared on BHI, BHI containing 5% goat blood, LB, and LB containing 5% goat blood. All bacteria were then cultured at 37°C. After 24 h, the bacteria on the plates were scraped into tubes containing 0.8 mL of normal saline. The bacteria in the liquid medium were then prepared according to the above-mentioned method for plotting the standard curves of NIFDC reference material.

After harvesting from liquid or solid media and suspending in normal saline, the optical densities of the bacteria were measured, then their concentrations were determined from the standard curves of the NIFDC reference material. After dilution with sample-treatment buffer, 0.1 mL of Y. pestis 91001 at 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, and 1 × 108 cells ml−1, B. abortus S19 at 1 × 106, 1 × 107, 1 × 108, and 1 × 109 cells mL−1, and B. anthracis Sterne at 1 × 105, 1 × 106, and 1 × 107 cells mL−1 were directly applied to the UPT-LF strips. To read the signals on the strips, the detection results, T/C ratios, and bacterial concentrations were retrieved directly using the UPT-3A biosensor.

Inclusivity of the UPT-LF Assay

After plate culturing and calibration of the concentrations using the NIFDC reference material, the Y. pestis strains 91001, EV, 0614F, Otten, Tjiusidej(R), MII, and M23 at concentrations of 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, and 1 × 108 cells mL−1, Brucella suis S2, Brucella melitensis M5, and B. abortus S19 and 104M at 1 × 106, 1 × 107, and 1 × 108 cells mL−1, and B. anthracis Sterne, A16R, and CTN-1 at 1 × 105, 1 × 106, and 1 × 107 cells mL−1 were diluted with sample-treatment buffer and detected via the UPT-LF assay. All Y. pestis and Brucella spp. strains were also detected via a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (CG-ICA). For Y. pestis detection, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL−1 of F1 antigen were extracted and purified from the bacteria for use as a positive control and were tested via the UPT-LF assay.

Antigen Stability

Y. pestis and Brucella spp. (1 × 108 cells mL−1) were prepared and divided into three samples: the first was used as a control, the second was stored at 37°C for 5 d, and the third was freeze-thawed three times. After treatment, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, and 1 × 107 cells mL−1 of Y. pestis 91001, EV, 0614F, Otten, and Tjiusidej(R), and 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 cells mL−1 of B. abortus 104M, B. suis S2, and B. melitensis M5, were diluted with sample-treatment buffer and detected via the UPT-LF assay.

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated three times. The statistical data were compared via paired-sample t-tests with a 95% confidence interval using Origin 8.0 software from OriginLab Corporation (MA, USA).

Results

Criteria for Culturing and Identifying Bacteria

Y. pestis 91001, B. abortus S19, and B. anthracis Sterne were used for the calibration. The bacterial purity and activity, including the cellular integrity and surface constituents, were critical for evaluating the accuracy of the immunoassay. This study primarily focused on the bacterial quality for calibration because the specificity of the UPT-LF assay for detecting Y. pestis, B. abortus S19, and B. anthracis had been demonstrated in a previous study (Zhang P. et al., 2014). For B. anthracis, B. atrophaeus, B. subtilis, and B. cereus, the bacterial spores can be dyed green by malachite green stain, whereas for the Gram-positive bacteria, their vegetative forms were recognized via crystal violet-iodine using a Gram stain. Both staining methods were used for identification to ensure the purity of spores after preparation (Figure 2). The spore spheres were viewed by microscopy (Figures 2A,B). The spore culturing time should be extended if vegetative forms of the bacteria are visible, which appear as long rods after Gram staining (Figure 2C). Both the vegetative form and spores of B. subtilis could be recognized after culturing and Gram staining (Figures 2D,E). The B. anthracis spores with the highest purity were used as the foundation for calibrating the UPT-LF assay.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Staining of the spores and vegetative forms of B. anthracis. B. anthracis Sterne (A) and B. cereus 41 (B) spores stained with malachite green. (C) Vegetative form of B. anthracis Sterne among spores stained with crystal violet-iodine. (D) Vegetative form of B. subtilis stained with crystal violet-iodine. (E) B. subtilis spores stained with crystal violet-iodine.

After determining the optimal preincubation times by measuring the optical density at 600 nm, growth curves were plotted for Y. pestis 91001 in LB medium and B. abortus S19 in BHI medium at 37°C to ensure the bacteria were in an active state. The optimal preincubation times for Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 were 16 and 17.5 h, respectively, and the logarithmic phases lasted 3–10 and 7–15 h, respectively (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Preincubation times and growth curves for Y. pestis 91001 (A,C) and B. abortus S19 (B,D) in the LB and BHI media.

Comparison of the Optical Densities in Normal Saline and Culture Media

The optical densities of the bacteria in normal saline were measured because normal saline is the blank control used for the NIFDC reference material. After 16 and 17.5 h of preincubation, the optical densities of the Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 cultures incubated for different times were determined, using LB and BHI as blanks. The same cultures were also resuspended in normal saline after centrifugation and the optical densities were measured using normal saline as a blank. Paired-sample t-tests at the 0.05 level showed minimal differences between the two groups in terms of optical density for Y. pestis 91001, whereas the optical densities differed significantly for B. abortus S19 (Figure 4). Interestingly, the optical density of Y. pestis 91001 in medium was higher than that in normal saline and vice versa for B. abortus S19, emphasizing that the optical densities differ for different bacteria and media.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Optical densities of Y. pestis 91001(A) and B. abortus S19 (B) in LB or BHI medium and normal saline. Asterisks denote significant differences in OD value (t-test; p < 0.05; n = 3).

Comparison of Bacterial Counting Methods

The bacteria were counted via two methods, namely, plate counts and counting based on the NIFDC reference material (Figure 5A). Standard curves were constructed showing the optical densities at 600 nm for each reference material and the concentrations of Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis (Figures 5B–D), and the concentrations of the bacterial solutions, were confirmed when their optical densities were measured. The concentrations determined by the two counting methods were compared (Figure 5E). Although the method using the reference material yielded slightly higher numbers than the plate-counting method for B. abortus, the differences between the two methods for B. abortus S19, and between the two plate types for B. anthracis Sterne were not significant. Paired-sample t-tests revealed that Y. pestis 91001 and B. anthracis Sterne spores differed significantly in number, and the numbers obtained with the reference material method were 11- and 5-fold higher than those of the plate-count method. The differences between the two methods for counting Y. pestis may have partly resulted from the culture temperature being 37°C for the production of the F1 antigen, whereas 28°C is the best temperature for preparing the reference material. B. anthracis Sterne spores are considered more stable than those of other bacteria; however, we suspended and stored the spores in normal saline before counting, which resulted in low concentrations being determined via the plate-counting method because the NaCl in normal saline significantly influenced the number of viable cells (Wei et al., 2012). Thus, the number of dead cells in a culture may significantly influence the detection results of a quantitative immunoassay.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Comparison of different bacterial counting methods. (A) Reference Material for Bacterial Content of the Plague Vaccine, Brucellosis Vaccine, and Anthrax Vaccine from NIFDC. Standard curves of the reference material for counting Y. pestis (B), Brucella spp. (C), and B. anthracis (D) were plotted based on optical density. (E) Comparison of the bacterial concentrations determined by the reference material method and the plate-counting method (Hiss agar plate containing 5% goat blood for Y. pestis 91001, BHI plate containing 5% goat blood for B. abortus S19, and LB plate and LB plate containing 5% goat blood for B. anthracis Stern spores). Asterisks denote significant differences in bacterial concentrations determined by the counting methods (t-test; p < 0.05; n = 3).

Differences in the Detection Results of the UPT-LF Assay After Culturing in Liquid or Solid Media

First, Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 were cultured on different types of solid media. The growth rates of Y. pestis 91001 on LB plates were higher than those on LB inclined-plane medium, BHI inclined-plane medium, and Hiss agar plates (Figure 6A), while the growth rates of B. abortus S19 on BHI containing blood were higher than those on BHI and both LB plates (Figure 6B). However, bacteria cultured on plates containing goat blood were not used for the UPT-LF assay because goat blood cells may affect the results of the assay. Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 cultured on LB and BHI plates, as well as in the corresponding liquid media, were used for the UPT-LF assays after their concentrations had been determined from the NIFDC reference material (Figures 6C,D). Most of the T/C ratios for Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 grown in the liquid medium were significantly lower than those grown on solid medium, demonstrating that the amounts of certain antigens on the bacteria differed under different culture conditions. This phenomenon was consistent with previous reports (Klumpp et al., 2009; Klumpp and Hwa, 2014), inferring that culture methods should be screened for immunoassay calibration. After calibration, the standard curves for quantifying Y. pestis 91001, B. abortus S19, and B. anthracis Sterne spores (Figures 6E–G) were plotted to calculate the concentrations. The quantification results showed approximately 1.5- and 0.5-fold differences between the results with or without calibration for most Y. pestis 91001 and B. abortus S19 concentrations (data not shown).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Differences in the UPT-LF detection results for Y. pestis 91001, B. abortus S19, and B. anthracis Sterne cultured in liquid and solid media. The growth conditions for Y. pestis (A) and B. abortus (B) differed on different solid media. UPT-LF detection results for Y. pestis differed significantly between liquid LB broth and LB plates (C) and for B. abortus S19 between the liquid BHI medium and BHI plates (D). All bacterial concentrations were determined using the NIFDC reference material, and the standard curves for the UPT-LF assay for quantifying Y. pestis 91001 (E), B. abortus S19 (F), and B. anthracis Sterne spores (G) were plotted after calibration. Asterisks denote significant differences in UPT-LF results for bacterial culture of liquid and solid medium (t-test; p < 0.05; n = 3).

Inclusivity Evaluation for the UPT-LF Assay

After culturing on plates, the concentrations of bacteria were determined according to the reference material, and seven Y. pestis, four Brucella spp., and three B. anthracis strains of different concentrations were detected via the UPT-LF assay (Figure 7). The sensitivities of the assay for Y. pestis strains 91001, EV, Otten, 0614F, and Tjiusidej(R) were 105 cells mL−1, while MII and M23 yielded negative results. Y. pestis M23 is a F1-negative strain that lacks the virulence determinant of the F1 envelope antigen (Burrows and Bacon, 1958; Seguin et al., 1987). Although its F1 genes (caf1, caf1A, caf1M, and caf1R) are 100% identical to those of Y. pestis 91001, Y. pestis MII is an attenuated strain with fewer surface proteins than those of other Y. pestis vaccine strains (Lei et al., 1997). B. suis S2, B. abortus 104M, and B. melitensis M5 can be detected with similar T/C ratios to that of B. abortus S19, which was the same for B. anthracis A16R and CTN-1 compared with B. anthracis Sterne. For most stains, the qualitative results were consistent between the CG-ICA assay and the UPT-LF assay (Figure 7). Considering the inclusivity of the immunoassay, the quantitative performance of the bacterial concentrations using immunoassays should be defined more precisely for calibration. Using standard curves for each bacterial strain is impractical for an on-site detection method. The standard curves of the UPT-LF assay for quantifying Y. pestis were determined for Y. pestis 91001 in our laboratory. In conclusion, for calibration, the standard curves for quantifying concentrations were based on certain bacteria, while the true concentration for a specific bacterium hinges on the amount of F1 antigen on its surface.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Detection results for different Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis strains. (A) Detection results for Y. pestis stains and the F1 antigen via a UPT-LF assay and CG-ICA. (B) Detection results for Brucella spp. strains via UPT-LF and CG-ICA methods. (C) Detection results for B. anthracis strains via a UPT-LF assay.

Antigen Stability on the Bacterial Surface Corresponded With the Results of the UPT-LF Assay

The stability of the antigen to which an immunoassay is targeted is a pivotal factor that influences the accuracy of the detection results. Because degradant levels are more than 100-fold greater under higher temperatures than under lower temperatures according to the Arrhenius equation (Waterman, 2011), we evaluated the stability of antigens stored at 37°C for 5 days, as well as after three freeze-thaw cycles to assess the accelerated stability (Figure 8). The recovery rates, or the proportionality between the T/C ratios of the bacteria after treatment and those of the control, were all higher than 97% (Table 2). In conclusion, the treatment had little influence on the results of the UPT-LF assay for Y. pestis strains 91001, EV, 0614F, Otten, and Tjiusidej(R), or Brucella spp., at various concentrations.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Detection results for the UPT-LF assay for Y. pestis (A) and Brucella spp. strains (B) in accelerated stability assessments.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Recovery rate* for each strain under various parameters in accelerated stability assessments.

Discussion

In this study, we developed a comprehensive immunochromatographic calibration method for quantitatively detecting bacteria. Our findings confirmed that: (1) bacterial purity and activity could be guaranteed via staining and growth curves, respectively. (2) Bacterial numbers should be confirmed using the NIFDC reference material, not plate-counting methods. (3) Antigen amounts differed significantly between cultures in liquid and solid media; therefore, the culture method should be fixed for calibration. (4) The amounts of specific antigen differed between each Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis strain, therefore the stains should be specified for calibration. (5) The stability of the corresponding antigens indicated the stability of the immunoassay, with surface antigens greatly influencing the assay results. After calibration, the UPT-LF assay yielded more exact bacterial quantification results, and all of the factors that influenced the detection results in this calibration method should be considered when performing other immunochromatographic assays.

Because pathogenic bacteria responsible for serious infectious diseases can induce infections in several cell types and lead to death or disease breakouts, qualitative detection results are often sufficient. However, calibration of a quantification immunoassay may still have practical significance for diagnosing bacteria. First, it can help standardize pathogen detection and precisely evaluate the detection limits and inclusivity of an immunoassay. Second, the bacterial concentrations should be exactly determined for vaccine production, which can be achieved by a rapid quantification immunochromatographic method. Third, such an assay could be applied to detect foodborne bacteria, whose detection limits differ among various foods.

In this study, the sensitivities of the UPT-LF assay for Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis were about 1 × 104-105 cells mL−1, 1 × 104-1 × 105 cells mL−1, 1 × 103-1 × 104 cells mL−1, respectively, which were at least 10-fold lower than that of the UPT-LF assay developed in our laboratory (Li et al., 2006; Yan et al., 2006; Qu et al., 2009). This may be because commercial, mass-produced UPT-LF strips were used for the calibration method for practicality reasons, but these strips may be of inferior quality, thereby resulting in decreased sensitivities. Nevertheless, UPT-LF detection in which the sample is directly added to the strip without any need for pre-treatment is especially useful as a field assay in resource-limited areas of developing countries, and meaningful calibration results can still be obtained. For example, the UPT-LF assay is practical for the surveillance of infected animals in natural foci for Y. pestis, Brucella spp., and B. anthracis, when the samples being tested (such as dead animals) contain a large number of bacteria. Furthermore, the sample volume for the UPT-LF assay is 100 μL, in other words, only 103 bacterial cells are applied to the strip when the concentration of the bacterial sample is 104 cells mL−1. For comparison, the sensitivities of real-time or isothermal recombinase PCR are about 10 copies per reaction for Y. pestis (Qu et al., 2010), B. anthracis (Antwerpen et al., 2008; Bentahir et al., 2018), and Brucella spp. (Zeybek et al., 2019), which is equivalent to 2 × 103-1 × 104 cells mL−1 in a 1–5 μL sample volume of template for each PCR, thereby enrichment of the target bacteria by culturing or extraction of nucleic acid is often required (Kane et al., 2019). Enrichment of the target bacteria, for example, by centrifugation, could be applied during sample preparation for the UPT-LF assay. Although low concentrations of bacteria could not be tested in this study, all of the factors addressed in the calibration method are relevant to other immunochromatographic assays, including the determination of bacterial purity and activity, the bacterial counting method, culturing conditions, and the different amounts of antigen between strains.

Antibody fabrication limits the inclusivity of immunoassays for bacterial detection. For example, the F1 antigen is one of four virulence determinants for Y. pestis determined by the World Health Organization in 1970, but some low-virulence vaccine Y. pestis strains, such as M23 and MII, which lack or contain minimal amounts of the F1 antigen, were determined to be negative via the UPT-LF assay fabricated with antibodies against F1. Owing to the great differences in antigens on the surfaces of the various strains for one bacterial type, false-negative results are unavoidable for an immunoassay based on one or a few antibodies. Multiple detection chips based on various monoclonal antibodies against different antigens on the surfaces of some bacteria, as well as new bacterial biomarkers, could be used to promote the development of more accurate immunoassays. The relative limitations of a detection reagent should be illustrated in the instruction manual.

Conclusion

This study is the first to establish a calibration method for an upconverting phosphor-based quantitative immunochromatographic assay to detect pathogenic bacteria, which included guaranteeing the bacterial purity and activity, accurately counting the bacteria, and determining the antigen amounts under different culture conditions. It also ensured the inclusivity of the assay and the stability of the corresponding antigens. The results indicated that the bacterial preincubation and incubation times, the liquid and solid culturing methods, the bacterial counting method, quantification of different strains of a species, and antigen stability, should all be considered in calibrating immunochromatographic assays. In particular, bacterial strains, culturing and counting methods should be standardized for immunochromatographic assays.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics Statement

BALB/c mice (8 weeks old) and goats were used for the production of antibodies. The Committee of Welfare and Ethics of Laboratory Animals, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (Beijing, China) reviewed and approved the animal care and experimental protocols concerning the preparation of antibodies (Permit No. IACUC-DWZX-2018- 006). All animal experiments were in compliance with the Guidelines for the Welfare and Ethics of Laboratory Animals of China.

Author Contributions

RY, DW, and PZ designed the experiments. PZ, YZhang, YZhao, YS, CN, ZS, and JW performed the experiments. PZ, RY, and DW analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1200502) and The National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2018ZX10101003-002-010).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yujun Cui and Yarong Wu for helping us analyze the F1 genes of Y. pestis M23 and MII.

References

Antwerpen, M. H., Zimmermann, P., Bewley, K., Frangoulidis, D., and Meyer, H. (2008). Real-time PCR system targeting a chromosomal marker specific for Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Cell. Probes. 22, 313–315. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2008.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentahir, M., Ambroise, J., Delcorps, C., Pilo, P., and Gala, J. L. (2018). Sensitive and specific recombinase polymerase amplification assays for fast screening, detection, and identification of Bacillus anthracis in a field setting. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e00506–e00518. doi: 10.1128/aem.00506-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breed, R. S., and Dotterrer, W. D. (1916). The number of colonies allowable on satisfactory agar plates. J. Bacteriol. 1, 321–331.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Burrows, T. W., and Bacon, G. A. (1958). The effects of loss of different virulence determinants on the virulence and immunogenicity of strains of Pasteurella pestis. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 39, 278–291.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Dalgaard, P., Ross, T., Kamperman, L., Neumeyer, K., and Mcmeekin, T. A. (1994). Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23, 391–404. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90165-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gorsuch, J. P., Jones, Z., Saint, D. L., and Kitts, C. L. (2019). Enumeration of industrial Bacillus assemblages in commercial products with customized plate-counting assays. J. Microbiol. Methods 164:105682. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105682

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, M., Zhang, P., Li, B., Liu, X., Zhao, Y., Tan, H., et al. (2017). Development and evaluation of an up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral flow assay for the rapid, simultaneous detection of Vibrio cholerae serogroups O1 and O139. PloS ONE 12:e0179937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua, F., Zhang, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2015a). Development and systematical evaluation of an up-converting phosphor technology based lateral flow assay for quantitative detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Clin. J. Prev. Med. 49, 166–171. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2015.02.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua, F., Zhang, P., Zhang, F., Zhao, Y., Li, C., Sun, C., et al. (2015b). Development and evaluation of an up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral flow assay for rapid detection of Francisella tularensis. Sci. Rep. 5:17178. doi: 10.1038/srep17178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kane, S. R., Shah, S. R., and Alfaro, T. M. (2019). Development of a rapid viability polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Yersinia pestis. J. Microbiol. Methods 162, 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klumpp, S., and Hwa, T. (2014). Bacterial growth: global effects on gene expression, growth feedback and proteome partition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 28, 96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klumpp, S., Zhang, Z., and Hwa, T. (2009). Growth rate-dependent global effects on gene expression in bacteria. Cell 139, 1366–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Labrie, S., Bart, C., Vadeboncoeur, C., and Moineau, S. (2005). Use of an alpha-galactosidase gene as a food-grade selection marker for Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 2341–2347. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72912-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lei, G., Tuerdi, R., Chu, D., Rehemu, A., and Xu, B. (1997). The contents of murine toxin in Y. pestis attenuated strains and illustrated by SDS-PAGE. Bull. Endem. Dis. 12, 32–33.

Google Scholar

Li, K., Dong, W., Wang, B., Pei, M., Li, X., and Wang, G. (2011). Establishment of spectrophotometric method for determining the concentration of Brucellosis vaccine. Chin. Pharmaceut. Affairs 25, 233–235. doi: 10.16153/j.1002-7777.2011.03.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Hu, K., Wang, J., Yao, L., et al. (2006). Development of up–converting phosphor immunochromatography for fast and quantitive detection of Bacillus anthracis spore. Chin. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 26, 761–764.

Google Scholar

Liang, Z., Wang, X., Zhu, W., Zhang, P., Yang, Y., Sun, C., et al. (2017). Upconversion nanocrystals mediated lateral-flow nanoplatform for in vitro detection. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 3497–3504. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b14906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyers, A., Furtmann, C., and Jose, J. (2018). Direct optical density determination of bacterial cultures in microplates for high-throughput screening applications. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 118, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, Q., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Zhong, Z., Zhao, J., Qiao, F., et al. (2009). Rapid and quantitative detection of Brucella by up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral-flow assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 79, 121–123. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, S., Shi, Q., Zhou, L., Guo, Z., Zhou, D., Zhai, J., et al. (2010). Ambient stable quantitative PCR reagents for the detection of Yersinia pestis. PLoS Negl Trop. Dis. 4:e629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaechter M. View from Here Group. (2001). Escherichia coli and Salmonella 2000: the view from here. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 119–130. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.119-130.2001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scott, M., Gunderson, C. W., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z., and Hwa, T. (2010). Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 330, 1099–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1192588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seguin, M. C., Harrison, D. N., and Williams, J. E. (1987). A rapid and safe procedure for preparing the murine toxins of the plague bacillus (Yersinia pestis). Toxicon 25, 989–994. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(87)90162-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevenson, K., Mcvey, A. F., Clark, I. B. N., Swain, P. S., and Pilizota, T. (2016). General calibration of microbial growth in microplate readers. Sci. Rep. 6:38828. doi: 10.1038/srep38828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Zhou, L., Li, W., Hu, K., Chen, W., Yan, Z., et al. (2007). Development of UCP-immunochromatography test for rapid detection of E. coli O157. Chin. J. Food Hyg. 35, 41–44.

Google Scholar

Waterman, K. C. (2011). The application of the Accelerated Stability Assessment Program (ASAP) to quality by design (QbD) for drug product stability. AAPS PharmSciTech. 12, 932–937. doi: 10.1208/s12249-011-9657-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, D., Li, K., and Wang, G. (2012). “The influence of dilution buffer and sodium chloride in medium to count of B. anthracis vaccine,” in Proceeding of Chinese Medical Congress in 2012 (Beijing).

Google Scholar

Wei, D., Wang, B., Li, K., Pei, M., Li, X., and Wang, G. (2009). Establishment of spectrophotometric method for determining the concentration of plague vaccine. Chin. Med. Biotechnol. 4, 119–122.

Google Scholar

Wei, D., Wang, B., Li, K., Pei, M., Li, X., and Wang, G. (2010). Determination of concentration of anthrax vaccine by spectrophotometry. Chin. J. Biol. 23, 894–893. doi: 10.13200/j.cjb.2010.08.108.weid.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Zhou, L., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Huang, L., Hu, K., et al. (2006). Rapid quantitative detection of Yersinia pestis by lateral-flow immunoassay and up-converting phosphor technology-based biosensor. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 119, 656–663. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.01.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, R. (2019). Principles and Applications of Up-Converting Phosphor Technology. Berlin: Springer.

Google Scholar

Zeybek, H., Aclkgoz, Z. C., Dal, T., and Durmaz, R. (2019). Optimization and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Folia. Microbiol. 65, 353–361. doi: 10.1007/s12223-019-00731-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Liu, X., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., Hua, F., Li, C., et al. (2014). Evaluation of up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral flow strips for rapid detection of Bacillus anthracis Spore, Brucella spp., and Yersinia pestis. PLoS ONE 9:e105305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Bi, Y., Kou, Z., Zhou, J., Cui, Y., et al. (2014). Kinetics of memory B cell and plasma cell responses in the mice immunized with plague vaccines. Scand. J. Immunol. 79, 157–162. doi: 10.1111/sji.12146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, P., Sun, C., Wang, X., Wang, X., et al. (2016). Rapid multiplex detection of 10 foodborne pathogens with an up-converting phosphor technology-based 10-channel lateral flow assay. Sci. Rep. 6:21342. doi: 10.1038/srep21342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: immunochromatographic assay, calibration, pathogen, quantitative detection, biodefense

Citation: Zhang P, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Song Y, Niu C, Sui Z, Wang J, Yang R and Wei D (2020) Calibration of an Upconverting Phosphor-Based Quantitative Immunochromatographic Assay for Detecting Yersinia pestis, Brucella spp., and Bacillus anthracis Spores. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:147. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00147

Received: 20 November 2019; Accepted: 19 March 2020;
Published: 24 April 2020.

Edited by:

Daniel Pletzer, University of Otago, New Zealand

Reviewed by:

Herbert Tomaso, Friedrich Loeffler Institut, Germany
Zhanhui Wang, China Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Song, Niu, Sui, Wang, Yang and Wei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ruifu Yang, ruifuyang@gmail.com; Dong Wei, weidong1994@sina.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.