Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs), with large specific capacity (1,675 mAh g−1), are regarded as the most likely alternative to the traditional Lithium-ion batteries. However, the intrinsical insulation and dramatic volume change of sulfur, as well as serious shuttle effect of polysulfides hinder their practical implementation. Herein, we develop three-dimensional micron flowers assembled by nitrogen doped carbon (NC) nanosheets with sulfur encapsulated (S@NC-NSs) as a promising cathode for Li-S to overcome the forementioned obstacles. The in situ generated S layer adheres to the inner surface of the hollow and micro-porous NC shell with fruitful O/N containing groups endowing both efficient physical trapping and chemical anchoring of polysulfides. Meanwhile, such a novel carbon shell helps to bear dramatic volume change and provides a fast way for electron transfer during cycling. Consequently, the S@NC-NSs demonstrate a high capacity (1,238 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C; 1.0 C = 1,675 mA g−1), superior rate performance with a capacity retention of 57.8% when the current density increases 25 times from 0.2 to 5.0 C, as well as outstanding cycling performance with an ultralow capacity fading of only 0.064% after 200 cycles at a high current density of 5.0 C.
Introduction
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) own many advantages including high energy density (2,600 Wh kg−1, five times larger than lithium ion bateries), natural abundance, and environmental friendliness (Rehman et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). Thus, LSBs have become one of the most promising candidates for large-scale energy storage and long endurance electric vehicles applications (Seh et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Ye et al., 2018). However, the practical implement of the LSBs is impeded by several challenges, such as electronically and ionically insulating of S, large volume change (~80%) during cycling, as well as shuttle effect induced by the high solubility and mobility of the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) intermediates. To tackle with the above issues, one of the effective routes is encapsulating S into conductive carbon hosts [active carbon (Moreno et al., 2015; Li F. et al., 2017), carbon spheres (Qu et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2017), graphene (Tang et al., 2016; Du et al., 2017), carbon nanotubes (Li M. et al., 2017) and nanofibers (Liu et al., 2018)] with high porosity or/and high specific surface area to improve electron/ion conductivity, tolerate volumetric expansion and physically trap LiPSs. Nevertheless, the weak interaction between nonpolar carbon and polar LiPSs inevitably results in effusion and irreversible loss of LiPSs from the cathodes and thus rapid capacity fading during cycling. Polar metal oxides, metal sulfides, metal carbides, and metal nitrides have recently been explored as efficient host materials for S cathodes in LSBs and the S/metal oxide composites have been demonstrated to achieve improved cycle stability via chemical anchoring between the metal oxide and LiPSs in the cathodes. However, limited active sites of these polar hosts with low surface area lead to low immobilization efficiency for LiPSs (Shi et al., 2018). Recently, heteroatom doping (e.g., N, S, P) has been developed to enable carbon hosts to be polarity and retain the large surface area simultaneously, which can not only trap the LiPSs physically, but also improve conversion kinetics from LiPSs into solid Li2S (Wang X et al., 2014; Pang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015a; Wang et al., 2016, 2019; Li C. et al., 2018). Moreover, two-dimensional (2D) nanocarbon materials have drawn special attention as S hosts due to shorter ion/electron transport distance and more active sites (Chabu et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018; Wang Q et al., 2018).
In this work, we develop a hierarchical three-dimensional (3D) nano-flowers host consisting of hollow 2D nitrogen doped carbon nanosheets (NC-NSs) with micro-porosity shell as the S host. The S is encapsulated in the 2D NC-NSs (S@NC-NSs) with a thickness of 25–40 nm via in-situ oxidization of NC coated ZnS NSs (ZnS@NC-NSs) by Fe3+. Such unique hierarchical S@NC-NSs assembled by nanosheets endow several advantages as the S host for Li-S: Firstly, the NC shell with typical micro-sized pores can not only physically confine the LiPSs but also chemically anchor LiPSs via rich N/O containing functional groups; Secondly, the in situ generated S is totally encapsulated in the NC shell, resulting high utilization; Thirdly, S@NC-NSs have large inner space and the elastic carbon shell can accommodate the volume expansion of the S during lithiation; Lastly, 3D hierarchical nano-flowers structure assembled by 2D NC-NSs provides a fast conductive network, and integral structure supporters. Ultimately, the S@NC-NSs deliver a high specific capacity of 1,238 mAh g−1 at a current density of 0.2 C (1.0 C = 1,675 mA g−1), superior rate performance with a capacity retention of 57.8% when the current density increases 25 times from 0.2 to 5.0 C as well as a remarkable cycling performance with a capacity loss of 0.064% after 200 cycles at a high current density of 5.0 C.
Experimental
The ZnS NSs were fabricated through a hydrothermal method. Briefly, 0.446 g of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.114 g of CS(NH2)2 were added into an aqueous solution containing 20 mL of diethylenetriamine (DETA) and 20 mL of deionized water (DW) under magnetic stirring. Then, the mixed solution was transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and placed in an oven at 180°C for 12 h. Afterward, the ZnS NSs were obtained by filtration with absolute alcohol and DW for several times. Then, 200 mg of ZnS NSs were dispersed in the 400 mL of DW under magnetic stirring followed by adding 484 mg of Tris-HCl buffer and 400 mg of dopamine (DA) to coat ZnS with polydopamine (PDA) via chemical polymerization for 1.0 h under stirring in air. After washing with DW and filtrating for several times, the dried products were further carbonized at 700°C for 2 h to produce ZnS@NC-NSs in N2. Then, the ZnS@NC-NSs were dispersed into aqueous ferric chloride (FeCl3) solution and stirred over 12 h to convert the ZnS core into S because of the strong oxidizing ability of Fe3+. Finally, the reactant was washed with 1 M HCl solution and DW to obtain S@NC-NSs after vacuum drying over night at 60°C.
Materials characterizations
The morphology, structure and composition of ZnS NSs, ZnS@NC-NSs and S@NC-NSs were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Nova 450 Nano), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100 UHR STEM/EDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCALAB 250Xi), and X-ray diffraction [XRD, Philips X' Pert Pro (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å)]. Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer was applied to measure pore size distribution and the N2 adsorption-desorption behavior of the NC shell. The S content in the S@NC-NSs was obtained by Naichi Corporation STA449C from room temperature to 600°C with a heating rate of 10°C min−1 in Ar. The concentration of LiPSs was determined by Ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (CARY 300).
Electrochemical tests
The S@NC-NSs were mixed with acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with a weight ratio of 7:2:1 to form a homogeneous slurry in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP). Then, the slurry was uniformly coated on Al foil (15 μm) and vacuum dried at 60°C for 12 h. The coin-type cells were assembled with S@NC-NSs as cathode and Li metal foil as anode. The electrolyte consisted of 1 M lithium bis (trifluoromethane) sulfonimide (LiTFSI) in 1,3 dioxolane/1,2-dimethoxyethane (DOL/DME) (1:1, v/v) containing 0.2 M LiNO3. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the range of 100 kHz and 10 mHz and the cyclic voltammetry (CV) with a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 from 1.7 to 2.8 V were conducted on an electrochemical work station (CHI760E). The galvanostatic charging-discharging (GCD) tests were carried out on Neware battery testing system (CT-4008) with different current densities of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 5.0 C.
Results and discussions
The synthesis procedure of S@NC-NSs is illustrated in Figure 1A. The ZnS NSs with a diameter of about 3–5 μm (Figure 1B), consisting of 2D nanosheets, were fabricated via a hydrothermal route. The XRD pattern of the as-obtained product (Figure S1) can be indexed into the wurtzite phase ZnS (JCPDS Card No. 36-1450). The high resolution TEM (HR-TEM) image in Figure S2A indicates that the thickness of the ZnS NSs is 15–20 nm and discloses a lattice spacing of 0.31 nm corresponding to the (002) plane of wurtzite phase ZnS (Yao et al., 2005). Subsequently, a thin layer of amorphous C is uniformly coated on the surface of the ZnS NSs after the polymerization and annealing strategy. The ZnS@NC-NSs still maintain the flower-like morphology as can be seen from Figure 1C. During the chemical polymerization, PDA can adhere to the surface of the ZnS NSs, and further converted into the NC via annealing in N2. The HR-TEM image of the annealed product shows a typical core-shell structure with a crystal core and amorphous shell of 10–15 nm (Figure S2B). All XRD peaks of the carbon coated sample can also be assigned to the wurtzite phase ZnS (Figure S3A). And the XRD pattern (Figure S3B) and Raman spectra (Figure S3C) of the NC shell suggest that the obtained carbon shell is amorphous and has many defects. To further obtain the in situ formed S, the ZnS core of the ZnS@NC-NSs was oxidized to S by FeCl3 solution according to the reaction of ZnS (s) + 2Fe3+ (aq.) = Zn2+ (aq.) + S (s) + 2Fe2+ (aq.) (Ding et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017). After oxidization, all diffraction patterns of the sample are corresponded to the orthorhombic S (JCPDS Card No. 08-0247) and no additional ZnS peaks can be observed (Figure S4). Meanwhile, the SEM image in Figure 1D indicates that S@NC-NSs can well preserve the morphology of flowers assembled by nanosheets, which is inherited from that of ZnS and ZnS@NC. Such a microflower structure is further confirmed in Figure 2A. The elemental mappings displayed in Figure 2B indicate that C, N, and S are uniformly distributed in the micro-sized flowers. The TEM image of the S@NC-NSs (Figure 2C) discloses that the nanosheets are hollow double-shell structures with a thickness of 25–40 nm, which provide enough void for the volume expansion of sulfur upon the discharge process. EDS line scan of single S@NC-NSs demonstrates that S mainly exists in the inner wall of the hollow NC, which suggests that the in situ formed S is totally encapsulated and adhered to the inner surface of NC shell, as shown in Figure 2D. The mass loading of S in the S@NC-NSs can be optimized by varying the polymerization time. That is, the S@NC-NSs obtained at different polymerization time of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 h own different S mass loading of 65, 46.5 and 40.5% (Figure S5A), respectively. Among them, the sample polymerized 1.0 h shows the highest capacity and best cycling stability (Figure S5B), which is characterized in following study.
Figure 1
Figure 2
The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to further analyze the chemical state of the S@NC-NSs. As shown in Figure 3A, the S@NC-NSs contain C, N, O, and S and no observable Zn signal is presented. The C 1s spectrum (Figure 3B) can be devolved into three peaks centered at 284.6, 285.6, and 289.2 eV, corresponding to C–C/C = C (Li et al., 2016), C–S/C–N (Wang Z et al., 2014), and O–C = O (Yang et al., 2016), respectively. It is obvious that there are functional groups containing N/O in NC shell. The N 1s (Figure 3C) could be ascribed to three chemical states: pyridinic N (398.1 eV; Sun et al., 2012), pyrrolic N (400.1 eV; Peng et al., 2016), and quaternary N (400.8 eV; Cai et al., 2017), confirming the effective nitrogen doping of PDA derived carbon. The N doped carbon is beneficial for improving conductivity and wettability (Qiu et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015). Moreover, in Figure 3D, 163.7 and 164.9 eV are corresponding to S–S/S–C bonds (Zhou et al., 2015b). These functional groups are reported to improve the chemical adsorption ability for LiPSs (See et al., 2014; Song et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2018).
Figure 3
In order to measure the pore structures of the NC shell, the S@NC-NSs were washed in CS2 solution to remove the inner S and obtain the pure NC. The pore-sized distribution and the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the pure NC are carried out and displayed in Figure S6. The NC shell with a BET surface area of 354.6 m2 g−1 is mainly consisted of micropores, which is benefit for physically trapping LiPSs. To further evaluate the LiPSs trapping ability of the NC shell, the absorption experiment in orange Li2S6 solution was conducted. After adding 25 mg of NC shell into 5 mM Li2S6 solution (4 mL), the orange LiPSs solution turns colorless after 5.0 h (Figure 4A). Moreover, according to the UV–Vis spectra, the characteristic adsorption peaks at 310 (/) and 410 nm (; (Xiao et al., 2015; Li X. et al., 2017)) have been eliminated after adding the NC shell (Figure 4B). Such results imply the strong adsorption capability of NC shell for LiPSs. This excellent adsorption performance is attributed to the physical trapping of the micropores below 2 nm (Figure S6) and chemical immobilization effect of the NC with fruitful O and N containing functional groups (Borchardt et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2016).
Figure 4
To illustrate the remarkable Li storage performance of S@NC-NSs, the coin cell type LSBs were fabricated. And the commercial S was used as the control sample. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves of S@NC-NSs and commercial S cathode between 1.7 and 2.8 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 are presented in Figure 5A. In the cathodic process, the two reduction peaks between 1.98 and 2.30 V can be found in both samples, which are assigned to the formation of soluble long-chain Li2Sn (4 ≤ n ≤ 8) intermediates and solid lithium sulfide (Li2S2 or Li2S). In the subsequent anodic process, the CV curve of S@NC-NSs shows two individual peaks at 2.37 and 2.43 V on virtue of the reactions from lithium sulfide to Li2Sn (4 ≤ n ≤ 8) and S, while the commercial S only shows a broaden peak at 2.42 V because of the large polarization. Compared to the commercial S electrode, it is clearly seen that the oxidation and reduction peaks of the S@NC-NSs electrode are sharper and shift toward the quasi-equilibrium potential, revealing lower polarization and higher reaction kinetics. Figure 5B presents charge-discharge curves of the S@NC-NSs electrode at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 5.0 C. Two typical plateaus of the S@NC-NSs cathode can be observed at 0.2 C in discharge process delivering a high capacity of 1,238 mAh g−1. Even at a high current density of 5.0 C, a remarkable plateau at 1.9 V still exists due to the rapid kinetics of the S@NC-NSs electrode. The capacity retention of the S@NC-NSs cathode is 57.8% when the current density increases 25 times from 0.2 to 5.0 C, which is much better than that of the commercial S electrode, as shown in Figure 5C. The capacity and rate performance of S@NC-NSs are competitive among recently reported S/C composite electrodes (Xia et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017; Wang X et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2018). Furthermore, once the rate is reverted back to 0.5 C, the specific capacity of 920 mAh g−1 is obtained, revealing its excellent reversibility and rate performance. Figure 5D displays the cyclability of S@NC-NSs and commercial sulfur cathodes at the current density of 0.2 C. Although the S@NC-NSs cathode has an obvious capacity decay at first three cycles, afterwards, it delivers a high and stable capacity of 1,025 mAh g−1 over 50 cycles, which is far exceeding that of pure S. Even at a high current density of 5.0 C (Figure 5E), the S@NC-NSs cathode achieves a high capacity of 600 mAh g−1 over 200 cycles with a low decay rate of 0.064%. Furthermore, the Nyquist plots of commercial S and S@NC-NSs cathodes after 200 cycles at 5.0 C between 100 kHz and 0.01 Hz are shown in Figure S7. The equivalent impedance of the S@NC-NSs cathode is much smaller than the commercial S cathode, indicating a faster electrons/ions transportation because of special structures of S@NC-NSs assembled by micro-sized flowers with high conductivity. The outstanding cycling stability of S@NC-NSs cathodes can be attributed to dual functions of NC shell with both physical trapping and chemical immobilization of LiPSs.
Figure 5
Conclusion
In summary, a dual-shell and hollow S@NC-NSs assembled by micro-sized flowers are fabricated for LSBs via in situ oxidization process. The in situ generated S is encapsulated and adheres to the inner wall of the NC shell with abundant micropores and fruitful N or O containing function groups, which offers both physical trapping and chemical tethering to eliminate the shuttle effect of LiPSs. Moreover, the conjoint hollow NC-NSs also provide high conductive channels for electron transport and enough space for volumetric expansion of S. The S mass loading of S@NC-NSs can be easily adjusted via tuning the thickness of the carbon shell. As the Li-S battery cathode, the S@NC-NSs achieve a high capacity of 1,238 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C and outstanding rate performance with capacity retention of the 57.8% when the current density increased 25 times from 0.2 to 5.0 C. Importantly, S@NC-NSs demonstrate the excellent stability with a high capacity of 600 mAh g−1 and an ultraslow capacity decay rate of 0.064% after 200 cycles at a high current density of 5.0 C. With high conductivity, efficient physical and chemical immobilization as well as adequate inner space, the NC encapsulated in situ formed S cathode with outstanding electrochemical performance can bode well for promising application in LSBs.
Statements
Author contributions
ZG carried out the experiment and wrote the paper. BG and XF supervised this research. XL, HS, KD, and XH gave a lot of help for analyzing data. XZ, XP and JF helped writing.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51572100 and 51504171) and Major project of Technology Innovation of Hubei Province (2018AAA011).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00429/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BorchardtL.OschatzM.KaskelS. (2016). Carbon materials for lithium sulfur batteries-ten citical questions. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 7324–7351. 10.1002/chem.201600040
2
CaiQ.LiY.WangL.LiQ.XuJ.GaoB.et al. (2017). Freestanding hollow double-shell Se@CNx nanobelts as large-capacity and high-rate cathodes for Li-Se batteries. Nano Energy32, 1–9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.010
3
ChabuJ. M.ZengK.WalleM. D.YouX.ZhangM.LiY.et al. (2017). Facile fabrication of sulfur/graphene composite for high-rate lithium-sulfur batteries. ChemistrySelect2, 11035–11039. 10.1002/slct.201702336
4
ChenJ.YuanR.FengJ.ZhangQ.HuangJ.FuG.et al. (2015). Conductive lewis base matrix to recover the missing link of Li2S8 during the sulfur redox cycle in Li-S battery. Chem. Mater. 27, 2048–2055. 10.1021/cm5044667
5
ChenK.SunZ.FangR.ShiY.ChengH. M.LiF. (2018). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon anchored on graphene with multifunctional effects for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 1707592. 10.1002/adfm.201707592
6
ChenT.ZhangZ.ChengB.ChenR.HuY.MaL.et al. (2017). Self-templated formation of interlaced carbon nanotubes threaded hollow Co3S4 nanoboxes for high-rate and heat-resistant lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12710–12715. 10.1021/jacs.7b06973
7
DingN.LumY.ChenS.ChienS. W.HorT. A.LiuZ.et al. (2015). Sulfur-carbon yolk-shell particle based 3D interconnected nanostructures as cathodes for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A3, 1853–1857. 10.1039/C4TA05659K
8
DuZ.GuoC.WangL.HuA.JinS.ZhangT.et al. (2017). Atom-thick interlayer made of cvd-grown graphene film on separator for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 43696–43703. 10.1021/acsami.7b14195
9
KangW.DengN.JuJ.LiQ.WuD.MaX.et al. (2016). A review of recent developments in rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Nanoscale8, 16541–16588. 10.1039/C6NR04923K
10
LiC.XiZ.GuoD.ChenX.YinL. (2018). Chemical immobilization effect on lithium polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Small14:1701986. 10.1002/smll.201701986
11
LiF.QinF.ZhangK.FangJ.LaiY.LiJ. (2017). Hierarchically porous carbon derived from banana peel for lithium sulfur battery with high areal and gravimetric sulfur loading. J. Power Soures362, 160–167. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.038
12
LiM.CarterR.DouglasA.OakesL.PintC. L. (2017). Sulfur vapor-infiltrated 3D carbon nanotube foam for binder-free high areal capacity lithium-sulfur battery composite cathodes. ACS Nano11, 4877–4884. 10.1021/acsnano.7b01437
13
LiX.DingK.GaoB.LiQ.LiY.FuJ.et al. (2017). Freestanding carbon encapsulated mesoporous vanadium nitride nanowires enable highly stable sulfur cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy40, 655–662. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.018
14
LiY.CaiQ.WangL.LiQ.PengX.GaoB.et al. (2016). Mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystals/graphene as an efficient sulfur host material for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces8, 23784–23792. 10.1021/acsami.6b09479
15
LiuZ.LiuB.GuoP.ShangX.LvM.LiuD.et al. (2018). Enhanced electrochemical kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries by using carbon nanofibers/manganese dioxide composite as a bifunctional coating on sulfur cathode. Electrochim. Acta269, 180–187. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.160
16
MaT.ZhouF.ZhangT. W.YaoH. B.SuT. Y.YuZ. L.et al. (2017). Large-scale syntheses of zinc sulfide·(diethylenetriamine)0.5 hybrids as precursors for sulfur nanocomposite cathodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 11836–11840. 10.1002/anie.201706199
17
MorenoN.AgostiniM.CaballeroA.MoralesJ.HassounJ. (2015). A long-life lithium ion sulfur battery exploiting high performance electrodes. Chem. Commun. 51, 14540–14542. 10.1039/C5CC05162B
18
PangQ.TangJ.HuangH.LiangX.HartC.TamK. C.et al. (2015). A Nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 6021–6028. 10.1002/adma.201502467
19
PengH. J.ZhangZ. W.HuangJ. Q.ZhangG.XieJ.XuW. T.et al. (2016). A cooperative interface for highly efficient lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 9551–9558. 10.1002/adma.201603401
20
QiuY.LiW.ZhaoW.LiG.HouY.LiuM.et al. (2014). High-rate, ultralong cycle-life lithium/sulfur batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 4821–4827. 10.1021/nl5020475
21
QuH.ZhangJ.DuA.ChenB.ChaiJ.XueN.et al. (2018). Multifunctional sandwich-structured electrolyte for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Sci. 5:1700503. 10.1002/advs.201700503
22
QuY.ZhangZ.WangX.LaiY.LiuY.LiJ. (2013). A simple SDS-assisted self-assembly method for the synthesis of hollow carbon nanospheres to encapsulate sulfur for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A1, 14306–14310. 10.1039/c3ta13306k
23
RehmanS.GuoS.HouY. (2016). Rational design of Si/SiO2@hierarchical porous carbon spheres as efficient polysulfide reservoirs for high-performance Li-S battery. Adv. Mater. 28, 3167–3172. 10.1002/adma.201506111
24
SeeK. A.JunY. S.GerbecJ. A.SprafkeJ. K.WudlF.StuckyG. D.et al. (2014). Sulfur-functionalized mesoporous carbons as sulfur hosts in Li-S batteries: increasing the affinity of polysulfide intermediates to enhance performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces6, 10908–10916. 10.1021/am405025n
25
SehZ. W.SunY.ZhangQ.CuiY. (2016). Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5605–5634. 10.1039/C5CS00410A
26
ShiH.LvW.ZhangC.WangD.LingG.HeY.et al. (2018). Functional carbons remedy the shuttling of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries: confining, trapping, blocking, and breaking up. Adv. Funct. Mater. 1800508. 10.1002/adfm.201800508
27
SongJ.XuT.GordinM. L.ZhuP.LvD.JiangY. B.et al. (2014). Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high-areal-capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1243–1250. 10.1002/adfm.201302631
28
SongY.ZhaoW.ZhuX.ZhangL.LiQ.DingF.et al. (2018). Vanadium dioxide-graphene composite with ultrafast anchoring behavior of polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfac.10, 15733–15741. 10.1021/acsami.8b02920
29
SunF.TangH.ZhangB.LiX.YinC.YueZ.et al. (2018). PEO-linked MoS2-graphene nanocomposites with 2D polar-nonpolar amphoteric surfaces as sulfur hosts for high-performance Li-S batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 974–982. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03306
30
SunL.WangL.TianC.TanT.XieY.ShiK.et al. (2012). Nitrogen-doped graphene with high nitrogen level via a one-step hydrothermal reaction of graphene oxide with urea for superior capacitive energy storage. RSC Adv. 2, 4498–4506. 10.1039/c2ra01367c
31
TangC.LiB.ZhangQ.ZhuL.WangH.ShiJ.et al. (2016). CaO-templated growth of hierarchical porous graphene for high-power lithium-sulfur battery applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 577–585. 10.1002/adfm.201503726
32
WangQ.WangZ.LiR.LiuH.YangM.LiC.et al. (2018). Flower-like nitrogen-oxygen-doped carbon encapsulating sulfur composite synthesized via in-situ oxidation approach. Chem. Eng. J. 345, 271–279. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.179
33
WangX.BiX.WangS.ZhangY.DuH.LuJ. (2018). High-rate and long-term cycle stability of Li-S batteries enabled by Li2S/TiO2-impregnated hollow carbon nanofiber cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 16552–16560. 10.1021/acsami.8b03201
34
WangX.GaoT.HanF.MaZ.ZhangZ.LiJ.et al. (2016). Stabilizing high sulfur loading Li–S batteries by chemisorption of polysulfide on three-dimensional current collector. Nano Energy30, 700–708. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.049
35
WangX.YangC.XiongX.ChenG.HuangM.WangJ. H.et al. (2019). A robust sulfur host with dual lithium polysulfide immobilization mechanism for long cycle life and high capacity Li-S batteries. Energy Storage Mater.16, 344–353. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.06.015
36
WangX.ZhangZ.QuY.LaiY.LiJ. (2014). Nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur composite as cathode material for high capacity lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources256, 361–368. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.093
37
WangZ.DongY.LiH.ZhaoZ.WuH. B.HaoC.et al. (2014). Enhancing lithium-sulphur battery performance by strongly binding the discharge products on amino-functionalized reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5:5002. 10.1038/ncomms6002
38
XiaY.FangR.XiaoZ.HuangH.GanY.YanR.et al. (2017). Confining sulfur in N-doped porous carbon microspheres derived from microalgaes for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 23782–23791. 10.1021/acsami.7b05798
39
XiaoZ.YangZ.WangL.NieH.ZhongM.LaiQ.et al. (2015). A lightweight TiO2/graphene interlayer, applied as a highly effective polysulfide absorbent for fast, long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 2891–2898. 10.1002/adma.201405637
40
XuG.KushimaA.YuanJ.DouH.XueW.ZhangX.et al. (2017). Ad hoc solid electrolyte on acidized carbon nanotube paper improves cycle life of lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2544–2551. 10.1039/C7EE01898C
41
YangJ.ChenF.LiC.BaiT.LongB.ZhouX. (2016). A free-standing sulfur-doped microporous carbon interlayer derived from luffa sponge for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A4, 14324–14333. 10.1039/C6TA06250D
42
YaoW. T.YuS. H.PanL.LiJ.WuQ. S.ZhangL.et al. (2005). Flexible wurtzite-type ZnS nanobelts with quantum-size effects: a diethylenetriamine-assisted solvothermal approach. Small1, 320–325. 10.1002/smll.200400079
43
YaoX.XuJ.HongZ.LiG.WangX.LuF.et al. (2018). Metal/graphene composites with strong metal-S bondings for sulfur immobilization in Li-S batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C122, 3263–3272. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12063
44
YeY.WuF.XuS.QuW.LiL.ChenR. (2018). Designing realizable and scalable techniques for practical lithium sulfur batteries: a perspective. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1398–1414. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03165
45
ZhangQ.ChenH.LuoL.ZhaoB.LuoH.HanX. (2018). Harnessing the concurrent reaction dynamics in active Si and Ge to achieve high performance lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 669–681. 10.1039/C8EE00239H
46
ZhouG.PaekE.HwangG. S.ManthiramA. (2015a). Long-life Li/polysulphide batteries with high sulphur loading enabled by lightweight three-dimensional nitrogen/sulphur-codoped graphene sponge. Nat. Commun. 6:7760. 10.1038/ncomms8760
47
ZhouG.ZhaoY.ManthiramA. (2015b). Dual-confined flexible sulfur cathodes encapsulated in nitrogen-doped double-shelled hollow carbon spheres and wrapped with graphene for Li-S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5:1402263. 10.1002/aenm.201402263
48
ZhouH.WangD.FuA.LiuX.WangY.LiY.et al. (2017). Mesoporous carbon spheres with tunable porosity prepared by a template-free method for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Sci. Eng. B227, 9–15. 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.10.005
49
ZhuQ.ZhaoQ.AnY.AnasoriB.WangH.XuB. (2017). Ultra-microporous carbons encapsulate small sulfur molecules for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy33, 402–409. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.060
Summary
Keywords
in situ generated sulfur, nitrogen doped carbon, cathode, chemical anchoring, physical trapping, lithium-sulfur batteries
Citation
Guo Z, Feng X, Li X, Zhang X, Peng X, Song H, Fu J, Ding K, Huang X and Gao B (2018) Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanosheets Encapsulated in situ Generated Sulfur Enable High Capacity and Superior Rate Cathode for Li-S Batteries. Front. Chem. 6:429. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00429
Received
31 July 2018
Accepted
30 August 2018
Published
25 September 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
Qiaobao Zhang, Xiamen University, China
Reviewed by
Ruitao Lv, Tsinghua University, China; Xiwen Wang, Hunan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Guo, Feng, Li, Zhang, Peng, Song, Fu, Ding, Huang and Gao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoyu Feng fengxiaoyu@wust.edu.cnBiao Gao gaobiao@wust.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Nanoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.