Brigitte M. Pützer
Kanaga Sabapathy- 1Institute of Experimental Gene Therapy and Cancer Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
- 2Department Life, Light & Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- 3Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, Humphrey Oei Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 4Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
Editorial on the Research Topic
Multidisciplinary Approaches in Exploring Cancer Heterogeneity, TME and Therapy Resistance: Perspectives for Systems Medicine
Despite significant advances that have shattered previous dogmas about the causes of tumor metastasis, the development of therapies to treat or prevent aggressive disease progression has not kept pace and remains the most important challenge. Cancer heterogeneity, to a large extent accounting for the incomplete and temporary efficacy of current anticancer measures, is still poorly understood at the molecular level. While early tumor stages are shaped by the accumulation of driver mutations, advanced cancers have a number of key adaptations or hallmarks that can contribute to metastasis (Birkbak and McGranahan, 2020).
Coherences between epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the emergence of cancer stem cells highlight that the metastatic process is driven by epigenetic programming that involves short and long non-coding RNAs (Meier et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Logotheti et al., 2020a). These events are usually cell- or tissue-specific and regulated at different developmental stages or in response to extracellular stimuli (Vanharanta and Massagué, 2013; Khan et al., 2017). Furthermore, combinatorial de novo activation of multiple distinct and developmentally distant transcriptional modules appears to be a recurrent mechanistic pattern (Rodrigues et al., 2018). In this regard, co-option of programs of tissue homeostasis and normal embryonic development, including off-context expression of tissue-restricted genes or reactivation of cell differentiation pathways in the cancer context (Logotheti et al., 2020b) emerge as predictors of poor patient outcome across various cancers. Another layer of heterogeneity and complexity that promotes disease progression arises from reciprocal cross-talks of cancer cell subpopulations with cellular and molecular components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) which massively influences the treatability of metastasis-prone cancer cells.
The p53 family of transcription factors (p53, p63, p73) that includes tumor suppressor proteins and their N-terminally truncated or mutant isoforms, is critically important for orchestrating the above processes. They cover a wide range of non-oncogenic and oncogenic functions by switching duties depending on the cellular and molecular background (Vikhanskaya et al., 2007; Crum and McKeon 2010; Toh et al., 2010; Steder et al., 2013; Vera et al., 2013; Engelmann and Pützer 2014; Dulloo et al., 2015; Engelmann et al., 2015; Nemajerova et al., 2018; Melino, 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Rozenberg et al., 2021).
This Research Topic creates a conceptual framework for systems medicine approaches using information from multiple disciplines, such as developmental biology, cancer research and tumor immunology, to understand disease phenotypes based on common mechanisms and in an integrative manner. A total of 11 articles were received, of which 6 are original research and 5 are review articles.
Based on latest achievements in the field, suggesting that cancer acquires metastatic potential and evolves via co-opting gene regulatory networks of embryonic development and tissue homeostasis frequently conserved among species, Marquardt et al. focused on tumor evolution, specifically on metastatic potential in relation to organismal evolution. The authors analyzed the first appearance of tumors and the transition between non-metastatic and metastatic tumors during the evolution of phylogenetic taxa using bioinformatic tools in species-specific cancer phenotypes, multi-omics data, developmental phenotypes of knockout mice, and molecular phylogenetics. This systems-based approach provides evidence that the presence of metastasis coincides with agnatha-to-gnathostome transition, and that genes indispensable for jaw development are co-opted in tumor progression. The in-silico pipeline developed here enables prediction of putative metastatic drivers and targeting of evolutionary traits in the evolving tumor.
The relevance of lncRNAs in competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanisms and cancer regulatory networks is addressed by Zhang et al. This study highlights the effects of lncRNA somatic mutations in miRNA response elements on the expression of target mRNAs (ceM) and how this affects tumor heterogeneity. Multivariate multiple regression models showed a significant effect of 162 high-frequency mutations on the expression of ceMs and low-frequency mutations resulted in perturbation of 1624 ceMs in pan-cancer. The authors provide data underlining the impact of lncRNA mutations on changes in oncogenic functions and patient survival.
Other excellent contributions investigate context-specific mechanisms of treatment resistance, with emphasis on immunotherapy to define markers for improved responses and clinical need in different cancer settings but mainly melanoma. Considering the potentially essential role of tumor-associated B (TAB) cells in T cell-based anti-tumor immunity, Chen et al. explored the developmental changes of B cells during melanoma progression. By using seven color multiplex immunohistochemistry and automated tissue imaging, the authors analyzed the six major B cell and antibody secreting cell (ASC) subpopulations and their spatiotemporal dynamics in whole tumor sections of a large set of human melanoma samples. Their data point to a metastasis-, tumor stage-, and age-associated distribution of subpopulations with decreased memory-like TAB in metastasizing primary melanomas, but increased numbers at locoregional metastatic sites, and an enrichment for plasmablast and plasma cell-like ASC at distant metastatic sites.
The work of Lai et al. is dedicated to the improvement of dentritic cell (DC)-based vaccines in the tumor microenvironment. Authors constructed a multi-compartment Ordinary Differential Equation model representing different stages of DC immunotherapy, such as spreading and bio-distribution of intravenously injected DCs, biochemical reactions regulating DC maturation and activation, and DC-mediated T cell activation to analyze DC- and T cell-associated molecules and signaling pathway predicting the optimal targets for enhancing DC bioactivity and melanoma-specific cell therapy. Their key finding is that modulating the NF-kB inhibitor IκBα may improve differentiation of memory T (Tmem) cells.
Toy et al. uncover molecular markers of cancer radioresistance based on high-throughput gene expression data. They applied a bioinformatics approach using different methods and computational pipelines to publicly available transcriptome datasets. Results show a set of 36 differentially expressed genes primarily linked to DNA damage repair, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in common radioresistant-relevant pathways. These findings and their value as potential diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets can be validated by in vivo experimental studies to improve treatment outcomes.
Furthermore, several cutting-edge review articles provide an updated overview of the roles of p73, p53 and p63 as key drivers of phenotypic and functional plasticity in the context of cellular reprogramming, tissue remodeling and cancer progression, connecting intracellular events with complex and dynamic microenvironments. Focusing on published genome-wide studies, Woodstock et al. outline recent findings of a cooperative, instead of the originally known, competing interplay between p53 and Δp63, and explore how p53 family members that share common binding sites and target genes coordinate their effects on cell fate.
Laubach et al. highlight the impact of non-canonical functions of p53 family proteins in a plethora of biological processes, and refer specifically to studies that demonstrate the roles of p53, p63, and p73 in lipid and iron metabolism. Lipids are important for many cellular functions including structure, signaling, and the inflammatory response, as pointed out by recent publications. Authors discuss the similarities and differences of all three proteins in regulating these metabolic processes and their relevance to disease.
The function of p73 beyond its well-established tumor suppression effect is comprehensively addressed in the review of Maeso-Alonso et al. They summarize latest evidence for the role of p73 as a tissue architect that governs the organization and homeostasis of different microenvironments, supporting processes like multiciliogenesis, hippocampal neurogenesis, and spermatid development. This function is considered to be a conserved trait inherited from the p63/p73 hybrid-like gene ancestor at the beginning of epithelial tissue evolution tracing back to Placozoans and Cnidaria. Via integration of ChIP- and RNA-seq data, studies analyzed are further linked to their own data on p73-mediated regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics, corroborating their hypothesis.
Focusing on the structure and variegated functions of p73 isoforms, the work of Logotheti et al. characterizes the significance of TP73 in controlling development and differentiation, and how this activity can be hijacked during cancer progression or in the tumor microenvironment, with emphasis on neoneurogenesis as emerging cancer hallmark. Using melanoma as a paradigm, they provide new insight into molecular mechanisms underlying the pleiotropic effects of p73 based on the nature of p73 isoforms, the presence of interactors, the architecture of target promoters, and subcellular localization. The authors envision that dysregulation of one or more of these parameters in tumors promote aggressive metastatic stages by reactivating p73 isoforms and/or p73-regulated differentiation programs, in a spatiotemporally inappropriate manner.
Interdisciplinary work and the combination of wet- and dry-lab skills are ideal requirements for future translational research. The contributions collected in this Research Topic provide deeper insights into cancer etiology, molecular mechanisms, heterogeneity, and the role of the tumor microenvironment in metastasis. This will influence the development of individualized next-generation cancer therapeutics. Moreover, advances in biomaterial and 3D cell culture technologies like spheroids, organoids, and organs-on-chip techniques are opening new opportunities for testing patient-specific therapies.
Author Contributions
BMP wrote the editorial with the input from KS.
Funding
This research was funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe 70112353), the German Research Foundation (DFG PU188/17-1), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research e:Med MelAutim (BMBF 01ZX1905D), the European Union Structural Fund (ESF/14-BM-A55-0026/18-A01) (BMP), and by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Investigatorship Research Programme (NRF-NRFI2015-07), the National Medical Research Council of Singapore and the NCCS Cancer Fund (KS).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Birkbak, N. J., and McGranahan, N. (2020). Cancer Genome Evolutionary Trajectories in Metastasis. Cancer Cell 37 (1), 8–19. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.004
Crum, C. P., and McKeon, F. D. (2010). p63in Epithelial Survival, Germ Cell Surveillance, and Neoplasia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 5, 349–371. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102117.20078223
Dulloo, I., Phang, B. H., Othman, R., Tan, S. Y., Vijayaraghavan, A., Goh, L. K., et al. (2015). Hypoxia-inducible TAp73 Supports Tumorigenesis by Regulating the Angiogenic Transcriptome. Nat. Cell Biol 17 (4), 511–523. doi:10.1038/ncb3130
Engelmann, D., Meier, C., Alla, V., and Pützer, B. M. (2015). A Balancing Act: Orchestrating Amino-Truncated and Full-Length P73 Variants as Decisive Factors in Cancer Progression. Oncogene 34 (33), 4287–4299. doi:10.1038/onc.2014.365
Engelmann, D., and Pützer, B. M. (2014). Emerging from the Shade of P53 Mutants: N-Terminally Truncated Variants of the P53 Family in EMT Signaling and Cancer Progression. Sci. Signal. 7 (345), re9. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2005699
Khan, F. M., Marquardt, S., Gupta, S. K., Knoll, S., Schmitz, U., Spitschak, A., et al. (2017). Unraveling a Tumor Type-specific Regulatory Core Underlying E2F1-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition to Predict Receptor Protein Signatures. Nat. Commun. 8 (1), 198. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00268-2
Logotheti, S., Marquardt, S., Gupta, S. K., Richter, C., Edelhäuser, B. A. H., Engelmann, D., et al. (2020). LncRNA-SLC16A1-AS1 Induces Metabolic Reprogramming during Bladder Cancer Progression as Target and Co-activator of E2F1. Theranostics 10 (21), 9620–9643. doi:10.7150/thno.44176
Logotheti, S., Marquardt, S., Richter, C., Sophie Hain, R., Murr, N., Takan, I., et al. (2020). Neural Networks Recapitulation by Cancer Cells Promotes Disease Progression: A Novel Role of P73 Isoforms in Cancer-Neuronal Crosstalk. Cancers 12 (12), 3789. doi:10.3390/cancers12123789
Meier, C., Hardtstock, P., Joost, S., Alla, V., and Pützer, B. M. (2016). p73 and IGF1R Regulate Emergence of Aggressive Cancer Stem-like Features via miR-885-5p Control. Cancer Res. 76 (2), 197–205. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1228
Melino, G. (2020). Molecular Mechanisms and Function of the P53 Protein Family Member - P73. Biochem. Mosc. 85 (10), 1202–1209. doi:10.1134/S0006297920100089
Nemajerova, A., Amelio, I., Gebel, J., Dötsch, V., Melino, G., and Moll, U. M. (2018). Non-oncogenic Roles of TAp73: from Multiciliogenesis to Metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 25 (1), 144–153. doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.178
Rodrigues, P., Patel, S. A., Harewood, L., Olan, I., Vojtasova, E., Syafruddin, S. E., et al. (2018). NF-κB-Dependent Lymphoid Enhancer Co-option Promotes Renal Carcinoma Metastasis. Cancer Discov. 8 (7), 850–865. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1211
Rozenberg, J. M., Zvereva, S., Dalina, A., Blatov, I., Zubarev, I., Luppov, D., et al. (2021). Dual Role of P73 in Cancer Microenvironment and DNA Damage Response. Cells 10, 3516. doi:10.3390/cells10123516
Steder, M., Alla, V., Meier, C., Spitschak, A., Pahnke, J., Fürst, K., et al. (2013). DNp73 Exerts Function in Metastasis Initiation by Disconnecting the Inhibitory Role of EPLIN on IGF1R-Akt/stat3 Signaling. Cancer Cell 24 (4), 512–527. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.023
Toh, W. H., Nam, S. Y., and Sabapathy, K. (2010). An Essential Role for P73 in Regulating Mitotic Cell Death. Cell Death Differ. 17 (5), 787–800. doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.181
Vanharanta, S., and Massagué, J. (2013). Origins of Metastatic Traits. Cancer Cell 24 (4), 410–421. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.007
Vera, J., Schmitz, U., Lai, X., Engelmann, D., Khan, F. M., Wolkenhauer, O., et al. (2013). Kinetic Modeling-Based Detection of Genetic Signatures that Provide Chemoresistance via the E2F1-p73/DNp73-miR-205 Network. Cancer Res. 73 (12), 3511–3524. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4095
Vikhanskaya, F., Toh, W. H., Dulloo, I., Wu, Q., Boominathan, L., Ng, H. H., et al. (2007). p73 Supports Cellular Growth through C-jun-dependent AP-1 Transactivation. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (6), 698–706. doi:10.1038/ncb1598
Wang, C., Teo, C. R., and Sabapathy, K. (2020). p53-Related Transcription Targets of TAp73 in Cancer Cells-Bona Fide or Distorted Reality? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (4), 1346. doi:10.3390/ijms21041346
Wang, Y., Alla, V., Goody, D., Gupta, S. K., Spitschak, A., Wolkenhauer, O., et al. (2016). Epigenetic Factor EPC1 Is a Master Regulator of DNA Damage Response by Interacting with E2F1 to Silence Death and Activate Metastasis-Related Gene Signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (1), 117–133. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv885
Keywords: cancer heterogeneity, tumor immune microenvironment, development and homeostasis, cancer evolution, p53 family transcription factors, phenotypic plasticity, computational methods and data mining, biomarkers and personalized therapeutics
Citation: Pützer BM and Sabapathy K (2022) Editorial: Multidisciplinary Approaches in Exploring Cancer Heterogeneity, TME and Therapy Resistance: Perspectives for Systems Medicine. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:842596. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.842596
Received: 23 December 2021; Accepted: 12 January 2022;
Published: 03 February 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Ramani Ramchandran, Medical College of Wisconsin, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Pützer and Sabapathy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Brigitte M. Pützer, brigitte.puetzer@med.uni-rostock.de