Abstract
Autophagy is a conserved lysosomal-dependent pathway responsible for the degradation of cytoplasmic macromolecules. Based on the mechanism of cargo delivery to lysosomes, mammalian cells can undergo micro, macro, and chaperone-mediated autophagy. Other than physiological turnover of proteins and organelles, autophagy regulates cellular adaptation to different metabolic states and stressful conditions by allowing cellular survival or, when overactivated, participating to cell death. Due to their structure and function, neurons are highly dependent on autophagy efficiency and dysfunction of the pathway has been associated with neurodegenerative disorders. Glaucomatous optic neuropathies, a leading cause of blindness, are characterized by the progressive loss of a selective population of retinal neurons, i.e., the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Here we review the current literature on the role of autophagy in the pathogenic process that leads to the degeneration of RGC in various experimental models of glaucoma exploring the modulation of the pathway as a potential therapeutic intervention.
Introduction
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the last cellular element of the retinal visual pathway and the sole neurons projecting outside the retina; their axons extend through the optic nerve (ON), the chiasm, and optic tract into the midbrain, targeting the superior colliculi and the lateral geniculate nucleus (Erskine and Herrera, 2014; Figure 1). Preserving RGCs function is essential for the transmission of visual information to the central nervous system (CNS) and any damage altering the connection between eye and brain has severe consequences on vision. RGC loss occurs in several ocular pathologies, with glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy being the two major causes (Almasieh et al., 2012).
FIGURE 1
Glaucoma is a worldwide leading cause of irreversible blindness (Tham et al., 2014). The term comprises of a spectrum of ocular conditions characterized by typical alterations of the ON head and distinct visual field defects. The neurodegenerative process often extends beyond the eye into the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex, suggesting that central areas are involved (Nucci et al., 2015). Age and high intraocular pressure (IOP) are the main risk factors; however, normal tension glaucoma (NTG) occurs in patients with physiological IOP and a portion of patients show progression even if IOP is maintained in the physiological range (Mallick et al., 2016).
Several molecular mechanisms have been involved in RGC apoptosis (excitotoxicity, reduced neurotrophic support, inflammation, etc.) (Russo et al., 2009; Qu et al., 2010). Despite the wealth of preclinical studies showing efficacy for drugs targeting these pathways, almost all failed translation to the clinic, so effective treatment remains a therapeutic challenge.
Several pieces of evidence show that dysfunctional autophagy recurs in neurodegenerative diseases making this process an attractive venue for neuroprotective drug discovery (Menzies et al., 2017). Here we review the current literature linking autophagy with RGC degeneration and the controversial outcomes obtained by manipulating autophagy in experimental glaucoma.
Autophagy Pathways
Autophagy, a lysosome-mediated degradation system, degrades cytoplasmic macromolecules with the aim to maintain a correct balance in the number of cytoplasmic components. The process is particularly challenging in neurons due to their high metabolic activity, their complex structure, and their inability to dilute toxic protein aggregates by cell division; this sensitivity further increases with aging as a result of reduced autophagy efficiency (Hansen et al., 2018). Based on the mechanism of cargo delivery to lysosomes, three forms of autophagy can be distinguished: macroautophagy, chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA), and microautophagy.
Macroautophagy
Macroautophagy requires the formation of a double membrane structure that recognizes and engulfs cytoplasmic fragments, proteins, and organelles ending in the formation of a vesicle called autophagosome. Several autophagy-related genes (known as Atg) participate in different steps of macroautophagy; autophagosome formation requires two conjugation events that lead to the formation of the Atg5-12-16 complex and the lipidation of the soluble form of Atg8 (LC3 in mammals), while the initial nucleation step requires a complex formed by Atg6 (beclin-1), AMBRA1, Vps34, Vps15, and Atg14L. Mature autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes, forming the autophagolysosomes; the internal membranes of autophagosomes are degraded together with the cargo, and the degradation products are then released into the cytoplasm and recycled for new processes (Parzych and Klionsky, 2014).
Macroautophagy had initially been thought to be a bulk degradation pathway devoid of selectivity toward its substrates. It has, however, become clear that cargo sorting is present and it is conferred by cytosolic receptor proteins able to tether selective substrates to the nascent autophagosomes, acting as a bridge between the cargo and ATG8-family proteins (Zaffagnini and Martens, 2016). In mammalian cells the autophagy receptor protein binds ubiquitinated substrates; p62/sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), NBR1, NDP52 and optineurin are four of the so far identified autophagy receptors (Johansen and Lamark, 2011). Furthermore, some macroautophagy processes are selective for the specific degradation of damaged organelles like mitochondria (e.g., mitophagy).
Macroautophagy activity inversely correlates with the activation of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) that, when active, phospho-inhibits the ULK1 complex preventing autophagy (Shang and Wang, 2011). Conversely, the serine/threonine AMP activated kinase (AMPK) promotes autophagy through inhibition of mTORC1 and activation of ULK1 (Egan et al., 2011).
Mitophagy
Mitophagy mediates the physiological turnover of mitochondria and is responsible for the adaptation of the amount of mitochondria in response to environmental and metabolic changes (Palikaras et al., 2018). As a quality control mechanism, mitophagy is also responsible for the removal of defective mitochondria and it can be induced to inhibit mitochondria-dependent apoptosis (Ney, 2015).
Mitophagy regulatory pathways are distinct in that they are ubiquitination-mediated and mitophagy-receptor-mediated. The PINK-parkin pathway regulates ubiquitin-dependent mitophagy. Under normal conditions, PINK is rapidly cleaved, released into the cytosol, and degraded by proteasome; loss of mitochondrial membrane potential stabilizes PINK at the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), recruiting the E3 ligase parkin. In addition to parkin, other ubiquitin E3 ligases (i.e., Gp78, SMURF1, SIAH1, MUL1, and ARIH1) play a role in mitophagy regulation. Once localized on the mitochondrial surface, they generate ubiquitin chains that are recognized by autophagy adaptor proteins (i.e., optineurin, NBR1, and p62) that guide the engulfment of ubiquitinated mitochondria by the autophagosomes (Lazarou et al., 2015).
The receptor-mediated mitophagy relies on proteins localized at the OMM that act as mitophagy receptors and are able to interact with Atg8/LC3. In mammalian cells, OMM proteins NIX, BNIP3, and FUNDC1 – which all have an LC3-interacting region (LIR) – have been defined as mitophagy receptors and are involved in hypoxia-induced mitophagy (Lampert et al., 2019). AMBRA1, a positive regulator of autophagy that stabilizes mTORC1 and the ULK1 complex, is partially localized at the mitochondria and can also act as mitophagy receptor (Cianfanelli et al., 2015). Neurons are highly vulnerable to mitochondrial impairment, and dysfunctional mitophagy has been linked with neurodegenerative conditions like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases (Menzies et al., 2017).
Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy
Chaperone mediated autophagy differs from macro/microautophagy for several reasons: it is highly selective, it does not need the formation of vesicle for lysosomal delivery, single proteins are the only cargo, and they must be recognized by chaperones that mediate their direct translocation through the lysosomal membrane.
The high removal selectivity by CMA involves the formation of complexes between proteins bearing a CMA targeting motif (a pentapeptide sequence similar to KFERQ) and chaperones of the Hsp70 family; these complexes are recognized by the lysosome-associated membrane protein type-2A (LAMP2A) at the lysosomal membrane where the substrate proteins unfold and translocate in the lumen and are degraded by lysosomal hydrolase. Proteins that do not carry the KFERQ motif can also be degraded by CMA after post-translational modifications (Dice, 2007). LAMP2A acts as a limiting element for the activity of CMA, and changes in LAMP2A levels correlate with CMA activity (Cuervo and Dice, 2000).
Basal CMA can be detected in almost all mammalian cells, although each tissue shows a different level, suggesting that dependency on this pathway varies among cell types (Koga et al., 2011). As part of the cellular response to stressful conditions, CMA can be further induced by a variety of stimuli, like hypoxia (Hubbi et al., 2013) and oxidative stress (Kiffin et al., 2004).
Autophagy and RGC Degeneration
Elevated IOP can cause direct mechanical stress to RGC axons together with ischemic effects due to the compression of the blood vessels supplying ON head. Furthermore, it might cause damage to the dorsal attachment of astrocytes at the ON head, causing loss of metabolic support and mechanical strength to RGC axons (Dai et al., 2012).
Increased LC3 immunoreactivity at the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and accumulation of LC3II has been shown between 6 and 24 h after a transient IOP increase in rats (Piras et al., 2011; Produit-Zengaffinen et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2015). In this same model, evidence of autophagy impairment due to calpain-mediated cleavage of beclin-1 was reported in the insulted retina (Russo et al., 2011).
The mice subjected to transient retinal ischemia in our group have shown a biphasic, reperfusion-time dependent modulation of autophagy. Autophagic flux experiments demonstrated that, in the injured retina, autophagy induction reached a peak 6 h after the insult, while autophagic flux reduced after 24 h; declined autophagic turnover was suggested by a decrease of ATG proteins (ATG4, ATG12-5, BECN1) and accumulation of p62-positive bodies in RGC cytoplasm (Russo et al., 2018). In this study, increased RGC loss was observed in mice with genetic impairment of basal autophagy due to the heterozygous ablation of AMBRA1 (Russo et al., 2018).
Impairment of the autophagic flux with an accumulation of p62 and autophagic vacuoles has been reported in RGC axons following chronic IOP elevation by laser photocoagulation (Kitaoka et al., 2013). Similarly, an increase of autophagic vesicles was shown in the retina of chronic hypertensive rhesus monkeys; however, upregulation of lysosomal activity and an increase of LC3II and beclin-1 expression suggested activation, rather than impairment, of the autophagic flux (Deng et al., 2013).
Autophagy was significantly activated in a model of chronic hypertensive glaucoma induced by episcleral veins cauterization (EVC), as demonstrated by an accumulation of autophagosomes in the soma and dendrites of RGCs and upregulation of beclin-1 and LC3II/LC3I ratio. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-methyladenine (3-MA) decreased the number of apoptotic neurons in GCL, suggesting that autophagy induced cell death (Park et al., 2012, 2018). By contrast, after IOP elevation by laser photocoagulation, 3-MA exaggerated axonal degeneration, while the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin reduced axonal accumulation of p62 and exerted axonal protection against ON degeneration (Kitaoka et al., 2013).
Our group has recently shown that subchronic systemic treatment with rapamycin sustained autophagy in retinas subjected to a transient increase of IOP and reduced RGC loss (Russo et al., 2018). Accordingly, pharmacological inhibition of mTOR afforded neuroprotection to RGCs following chronic ocular hypertension and suppressed apoptosis of primary RGCs induced by glutamate (Su et al., 2014). Conversely, an acute systemic administration of rapamycin exacerbated RGC death induced by ON ischemia (Chen et al., 2016) and deletion of the negative regulator of mTOR, i.e., PTEN, in RGCs promoted ON regeneration and increased RGC survival after ON crush (Park et al., 2008).
Following ON transection, a model mimicking the impairment of retrograde axonal transport of trophic factors occurring in glaucoma, upregulation of beclin-1 and LC3II expression was reported in whole retinas and isolated RGCs (Kim et al., 2008). A subsequent study showed that autophagy is activated in axotomized retinas and suggested a cytoprotective role of this pathway; indeed, genetic downregulation of autophagy, by RGC-specific deletion of Atg5 or Atg4B knocking down, was associated with reduced RGC survival, while rapamycin treatment increased the number of surviving RGCs (Rodriguez-Muela et al., 2012).
An opposite conclusion was drawn by Koch and colleagues that showed a post-lesional Ca2+-dependent activation of autophagy with an accumulation of autophagosomes in RGC axons following ON crush; in this study, pharmacological inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA delayed axonal degradation (Koch et al., 2010).
Recently, a decrease of LC3II/LC3I ratio and increase of p62 after ON crush was shown to imply an impairment of the autophagy process in this model (Oku et al., 2019). p62 siRNA facilitates autophagy by preventing p62 aggregates accumulation (Kojima et al., 2014); in a rat model of ON crush p62 siRNA offered better preservation of visual function and greater prevention of RGC apoptosis as compared to rapamycin treatment. This was mediated by a specific deactivation of mTORC1 without inhibition of mTORC2-mediated positive effects (i.e., Akt phosphorylation, stabilization of the blood ocular barrier, M2 macrophage polarization) (Wen et al., 2019).
In DBA/2J mice, a spontaneous ocular hypertensive model of glaucoma, an increased number of autophagosomes, higher LC3II/LC3I, and decreased LAMP1 were observed in myelinated ON axons. This observation was associated with increased mitochondrial damage and no changes in PINK or parkin levels, suggesting that the degenerating organelles may not be efficiently removed by mitophagy (Coughlin et al., 2015).
More recently, Hirt and colleagues monitored autophagy in the iridocorneal angle region and retina of DBA/2J and transgenic DBA/2J:GFP-LC3 mice; in both strains decreased LAMP1 and upregulation of LC3II and p62 were reported in the angle region, while decreased levels of all three proteins were shown in the RGC bodies, suggesting an overall slowed autophagic flux (Hirt et al., 2018).
Mutation of the optineurin genes has been associated with an autosomal dominant form of hereditary NTG (Rezaie et al., 2002). Optineurin is recruited to damaged mitochondria following parkin and, subsequently, recruits LC3 resulting in autophagosomes formation around mitochondria. Alteration of these latter steps, as it has been shown for an ALS-associated optineurin mutant, leads to inefficient PINK-Parkin-associated mitophagy and pathological accumulation of damaged mitochondria (Wong and Holzbaur, 2014). The E50K mutation is the most common optineurin mutation associated to NTG; increased LC3 immunoreactivity, detection of autophagosome, and autolysosome were reported in RGCs of E50K transgenic mice (Shen et al., 2011). Furthermore, E50K altered mitochondrial dynamics and induced mitochondrial fission and mitophagy in the axon of glial lamina of aged E50K transgenic mice and cultured primary RGCs (Shim et al., 2016).
Upregulation of parkin and optineurin was reported in the GCL of hypertensive rats; in this model, the number of unhealthy mitochondria and mitophagosomes were increased and it was associated with a higher LC3II to LC3I ratio and decreased LAMP1 two weeks following IOP elevation, suggesting a reduction of autophagosome turnover and local mitochondrial recycling (Dai et al., 2018). Overexpression of parkin reduced RGC loss, promoted optineurin expression, and partially restored mitophagy dysfunction in the ON (Dai et al., 2018). The mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress and exerts neuroprotective effects by uncoupling oxygen consumption from ATP synthesis (Richard et al., 2001). Deletion of UCP2 reduced RGC death in mice with chronic elevated IOP by increasing the level of mitophagy and facilitating mitochondrial function (Hass and Barnstable, 2019).
Trabecular Meshwork Autophagic Deregulation in Glaucoma
Trabecular meshwork (TM), a tissue involved in maintaining IOP into physiological range, is constantly exposed to stresses such as oxidative, mechanical, and shear stress that, in the long term, may alter tissue function leading to higher resistance in aqueous humor outflow often associated with glaucoma. Porter and colleagues demonstrated that autophagy is induced in chronically stressed TM cells, however, the concomitant reduced acidification of the lysosomal compartment, improper cathepsin maturation, and decreased cathepsin B activity resulted in reduced autophagic flux (Porter et al., 2013). This same group compared the autophagic function of TM cells isolated from glaucomatous and age-matched donor eyes showing a mTOR-dependent dysregulation of autophagic pathway (i.e., lower basal levels of LC3II and p62) and autophagy response in glaucomatous TM cells (Porter et al., 2015). A recent study on human TM cells exposed to chronic oxidative stress reported protective effects of rapamycin that were associated with removal of damaged mitochondria, suggesting a protective role for autophagy in TM cells (He et al., 2019).
Autophagy is also activated in TM cells exposed to biaxial mechanical stretch and high pressure in a mTOR and BAG3 independent manner; interestingly, cyclic, but not static, mechanical stimulation of TM cells seems to activate a chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA) (Hirt and Liton, 2017), a selective tension-induced autophagy previously described in muscle (Ulbricht et al., 2013).
The Interplay Between Macroautophagy and CMA
Macroautophagy and CMA are both essential components of the stress response in mammalian cells and several studies suggest a reciprocal interplay so that changes in the activity of one will affect the contribution of the other to protein degradation. For instance, blockade of macroautophagy, both pharmacologically or knocking down Atg5 gene, results in CMA up-regulation under normal and stressed nutritional conditions (Kaushik et al., 2008). Furthermore, in several experimental systems, a sequential, rather than a concomitant, activation of these two forms of autophagy can be observed. For example, in liver and cultured fibroblasts, macroautophagy is activated during the first hours of starvation, while CMA takes over at later time points (Cuervo et al., 1995; Massey et al., 2006). An inverse order of activation has been reported in case of presence of misfolded proteins: CMA is activated first to degrade the substrate and, subsequently, macroautophagy comes into place to remove the multimeric complexes formed by the misfolded proteins (Ravikumar et al., 2002; Iwata et al., 2005).
The requirements for active CMA or the possibility to replace it with macroautophagy depends on the insult, the type of protein damage (aggregation versus unfolding), and the type of substrates (protein versus organelles). This implies that CMA and macroautophagy cannot completely compensate for each other’s function.
However, this interplay between macroautophagy and CMA seems to be cell-type dependent. Indeed, in aged retinas and Atg5 deficient mice reduced activity of macroautophagy was accompanied by upregulation of the CMA markers LAMP2A and Hsp70; however, in vitro downregulation of CMA did not elicit macroautophagy activation in photoreceptor cells (Rodriguez-Muela et al., 2013).
Discussion
The controversial results reported on the role of autophagy in insulted RGCs, with autophagy either protecting or promoting cell death (see Table 1), still leaves several questions on the clinical feasibility of targeting autophagy to achieve retinal neuroprotection. Interpretation of the results under an integrated hypothesis is further complicated by the use of different animal models, each mimicking a single aspect of the disease (i.e., hypoxic events, alteration of neurotrophin transportation, acute or chronic hypertension). Some of the answers may reside in the spatio-temporal regulation of the process and the interplay between the autophagy subtypes. Indeed, with autophagy being a dynamic process, the results should be interpreted considering the time selected after the initial insult and the neuronal compartment analyzed (axon versus soma). Another drawback of many publications is the lack of autophagic flux assay that limits the correct interpretation of the data (Klionsky et al., 2016). It must also be considered that several studies used in vitro and in vivo models expressing GFP-LC3, this can form aggregates that are often indistinguishable from autophagosomes by fluorescence microscopy and may also alter the physiological autophagosome turnover (Kuma et al., 2007; Hirt et al., 2018). Moreover, the available drugs modulating autophagy affect multiple pathways, making the isolation and interpretation of autophagy in the different experimental settings difficult.
TABLE 1
| Experimental model | Analyzed structure | Autophagy markers | Effects of autophagy modulators | References | |
| Retinal ischemia/reperfusion | Male wistar rats | Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ autophagosomes | 3-MA prevents neuronal loss in GCL and reduces apoptotic markers | Piras et al., 2011 |
| Male Sprague-Dawley Rats | Retina | ↑ LC3II (3 h) | Rapamycin increases the number of apoptotic cells in GCL | Produit-Zengaffinen et al., 2014 | |
| Male Sprague-Dawley Rats | Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ autophagosomes | Wei et al., 2015 | ||
| Male wistar Rats | Retina | ↓ LC3II, ↓ beclin-1 | Russo et al., 2011 | ||
| Male C57BL/6J, Ambra1+/gt31, GFP-LC3 Mice | Retina | ↑ LC3II (6h), ↓ LC3II (24 h) ↑ p62 | Rapamycin and fasting reduce RGC loss Ablation of AMBRA1 increases RGC loss | Russo et al., 2018 | |
| Laser photocoagulation | Male wistar rats | Optic nerve | ↑ LC3II, ↑ p62, ↑ autophagosomes | 3-MA increases axonal degeneration Rapamycin reduces axonal degeneration | Kitaoka et al., 2013 |
| Male and Female Rhesus Monkey | Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ LC3II/LC3I, ↑ beclin-1 ↑ autophagosomes | Deng et al., 2013 | ||
| Episcleral veins cauterization | Male Sprague-Dawley Rats | Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ LC3II/LC3I, ↑ beclin-1 | 3-MA prevents neuronal loss in GCL | Park et al., 2012 |
| Male Sprague-Dawley Rats | Retina | ↑ LC3II/LC3I, ↑ beclin-1 | 3-MA prevents RGC apoptosis | Park et al., 2018 | |
| Sprague-Dawley Rats | Retina, Primary RGCs | Rapamycin prevents RGC loss | Su et al., 2014 | ||
| Optic nerve transection | Male wistar rats | Retina, Primary RGCs | ↑ mRNA Atg5, Atg7, Atg12 ↑ beclin-1, ↑ LC3II (3 h) | Kim et al., 2008 | |
| GFP-LC3 Mice, Atg4B–/– Mice, Atg5 flox/flox Mice | Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ autophagosomes | Rapamycin reduces RGC death | Rodriguez-Muela et al., 2012 | |
| Optic nerve crush | Female wistar rats | Optic nerve | ↑ autophagosomes | 3-MA delays axonal degradation | Koch et al., 2010 |
| Male wistar rats | Retina | ↓ LC3II/LC3I, ↑ p62 | Oku et al., 2019 | ||
| Male wistar rats | Retina | ↑ mRNA p62, ↑ LC3II, ↑ LAMP1 | p62 siRNA and rapamycin prevents RGC apoptosis | Wen et al., 2019 | |
| DBA/2J Mice | Optic nerve | ↑ LC3II/LC3I, ↓ LAMP1, ↑ autophagosomes | Coughlin et al., 2015 | ||
| Retina | ↑ LC3II, ↑ p62, ↓ LAMP1 in angle region | Hirt et al., 2018 | |||
| ↓ LC3II, ↓ p62, ↓ LAMP1 in RGC bodies | |||||
Autophagy modulation in experimental models of glaucoma.
Although it is clear that modulation of autophagy represents a consistent response of RGCs to detrimental insults, the availability of selective autophagy modulators and a detailed understanding of the contribution of the different autophagy pathways are required for future translation of experimental data into glaucoma therapy.
Statements
Author contributions
AA and RR wrote the manuscript. RR, LM, and PT edited and reviewed the manuscript. VP, GB, and MC acquired the financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AlmasiehM.WilsonA. M.MorquetteB.Cueva VargasJ. L.Di PoloA. (2012). The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma.Prog. Retin. Eye Res.31152–181. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002
2
ChenG.TangL.WeiW.LiZ.LiY.DuanX.et al (2016). mTOR regulates neuroprotective effect of immunized CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in optic nerve ischemia.Sci. Rep.6:37805. 10.1038/srep37805
3
CianfanelliV.D’orazioM.CecconiF. (2015). AMBRA1 and BECLIN 1 interplay in the crosstalk between autophagy and cell proliferation.Cell Cycle14959–963. 10.1080/15384101.2015.1021526
4
CoughlinL.MorrisonR. S.HornerP. J.InmanD. M. (2015). Mitochondrial morphology differences and mitophagy deficit in murine glaucomatous optic nerve.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.561437–1446. 10.1167/iovs.14-16126
5
CuervoA. M.DiceJ. F. (2000). Unique properties of lamp2a compared to other lamp2 isoforms.J. Cell Sci.113(Pt 24), 4441–4450.
6
CuervoA. M.KnechtE.TerleckyS. R.DiceJ. F. (1995). Activation of a selective pathway of lysosomal proteolysis in rat liver by prolonged starvation.Am. J. Physiol.269C1200–C1208.
7
DaiC.KhawP. T.YinZ. Q.LiD.RaismanG.LiY. (2012). Structural basis of glaucoma: the fortified astrocytes of the optic nerve head are the target of raised intraocular pressure.Glia6013–28. 10.1002/glia.21242
8
DaiY.HuX.SunX. (2018). Overexpression of parkin protects retinal ganglion cells in experimental glaucoma.Cell Death Dis.9:88. 10.1038/s41419-017-0146-9
9
DengS.WangM.YanZ.TianZ.ChenH.YangX.et al (2013). Autophagy in retinal ganglion cells in a rhesus monkey chronic hypertensive glaucoma model.PLoS One8:e77100. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077100
10
DiceJ. F. (2007). Chaperone-mediated autophagy.Autophagy3295–299. 10.4161/auto.4144
11
EganD.KimJ.ShawR. J.GuanK. L. (2011). The autophagy initiating kinase ULK1 is regulated via opposing phosphorylation by AMPK and mTOR.Autophagy7643–644. 10.4161/auto.7.6.15123
12
ErskineL.HerreraE. (2014). Connecting the retina to the brain.ASN Neurol.6:1759091414562107. 10.1177/1759091414562107
13
HansenM.RubinszteinD. C.WalkerD. W. (2018). Autophagy as a promoter of longevity: insights from model organisms.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19579–593. 10.1038/s41580-018-0033-y
14
HassD. T.BarnstableC. J. (2019). Mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 knock-out promotes mitophagy to decrease retinal ganglion cell death in a mouse model of glaucoma.J. Neurosci.393582–3596. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2702-18.2019
15
HeJ. N.ZhangS. D.QuY.WangH. L.ThamC. C.PangC. P.et al (2019). Rapamycin removes damaged mitochondria and protects human trabecular meshwork (TM-1) cells from chronic oxidative stress.Mol. Neurobiol.566586–6593. 10.1007/s12035-019-1559-5
16
HirtJ.LitonP. B. (2017). Autophagy and mechanotransduction in outflow pathway cells.Exp. Eye Res.158146–153. 10.1016/j.exer.2016.06.021
17
HirtJ.PorterK.DixonA.MckinnonS.LitonP. B. (2018). Contribution of autophagy to ocular hypertension and neurodegeneration in the DBA/2J spontaneous glaucoma mouse model.Cell Death Discov.4:14. 10.1038/s41420-018-0077-y
18
HubbiM. E.HuH.Kshitiz, AhmedI.LevchenkoA.SemenzaG. L. (2013). Chaperone-mediated autophagy targets hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) for lysosomal degradation.J. Biol. Chem.28810703–10714. 10.1074/jbc.M112.414771
19
IwataA.ChristiansonJ. C.BucciM.EllerbyL. M.NukinaN.FornoL. S.et al (2005). Increased susceptibility of cytoplasmic over nuclear polyglutamine aggregates to autophagic degradation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10213135–13140. 10.1073/pnas.0505801102
20
JohansenT.LamarkT. (2011). Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins.Autophagy7279–296. 10.4161/auto.7.3.14487
21
KaushikS.MasseyA. C.MizushimaN.CuervoA. M. (2008). Constitutive activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy in cells with impaired macroautophagy.Mol. Biol. Cell192179–2192. 10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1155
22
KiffinR.ChristianC.KnechtE.CuervoA. M. (2004). Activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy during oxidative stress.Mol. Biol. Cell154829–4840. 10.1091/mbc.e04-06-0477
23
KimS. H.MunemasaY.KwongJ. M.AhnJ. H.MareninovS.GordonL. K.et al (2008). Activation of autophagy in retinal ganglion cells.J. Neurosci. Res.862943–2951. 10.1002/jnr.21738
24
KitaokaY.MunemasaY.KojimaK.HiranoA.UenoS.TakagiH. (2013). Axonal protection by Nmnat3 overexpression with involvement of autophagy in optic nerve degeneration.Cell Death Dis.4:e860. 10.1038/cddis.2013.391
25
KlionskyD. J.AbdelmohsenK.AbeA.AbedinM. J.AbeliovichH.Acevedo ArozenaA.et al (2016). Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).Autophagy121–222.
26
KochJ. C.KnoferleJ.TongesL.OstendorfT.BahrM.LingorP. (2010). Acute axonal degeneration in vivo is attenuated by inhibition of autophagy in a calcium-dependent manner.Autophagy6658–659. 10.4161/auto.6.5.12188
27
KogaH.Martinez-VicenteM.MacianF.VerkhushaV. V.CuervoA. M. (2011). A photoconvertible fluorescent reporter to track chaperone-mediated autophagy.Nat. Commun.2:386. 10.1038/ncomms1393
28
KojimaK.KitaokaY.MunemasaY.HiranoA.SaseK.TakagiH. (2014). Axonal protection by modulation of p62 expression in TNF-induced optic nerve degeneration.Neurosci. Lett.58137–41. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.021
29
KumaA.MatsuiM.MizushimaN. (2007). LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization.Autophagy3323–328. 10.4161/auto.4012
30
LampertM. A.OrogoA. M.NajorR. H.HammerlingB. C.LeonL. J.WangB. J.et al (2019). BNIP3L/NIX and FUNDC1-mediated mitophagy is required for mitochondrial network remodeling during cardiac progenitor cell differentiation.Autophagy151182–1198. 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580095
31
LazarouM.SliterD. A.KaneL. A.SarrafS. A.WangC.BurmanJ. L.et al (2015). The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy.Nature524309–314. 10.1038/nature14893
32
MallickJ.DeviL.MalikP. K.MallickJ. (2016). Update on normal tension glaucoma.J. Ophthal. Vis. Res.11204–208. 10.4103/2008-322X.183914
33
MasseyA. C.KaushikS.SovakG.KiffinR.CuervoA. M. (2006). Consequences of the selective blockage of chaperone-mediated autophagy.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1035805–5810. 10.1073/pnas.0507436103
34
MenziesF. M.FlemingA.CaricasoleA.BentoC. F.AndrewsS. P.AshkenaziA.et al (2017). Autophagy and neurodegeneration: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Neuron931015–1034. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.022
35
NeyP. A. (2015). Mitochondrial autophagy: origins, significance, and role of BNIP3 and NIX.Biochim. Biophys. Acta18532775–2783. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.02.022
36
NucciC.MartucciA.CesareoM.GaraciF.MorroneL. A.RussoR.et al (2015). Links among glaucoma, neurodegenerative, and vascular diseases of the central nervous system.Prog. Brain Res.22149–65. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.04.010
37
OkuH.KidaT.HorieT.TakiK.MimuraM.KojimaS.et al (2019). Tau is involved in death of retinal ganglion cells of rats from optic nerve crush.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.602380–2387. 10.1167/iovs.19-26683
38
PalikarasK.LionakiE.TavernarakisN. (2018). Mechanisms of mitophagy in cellular homeostasis, physiology and pathology.Nat. Cell Biol.201013–1022. 10.1038/s41556-018-0176-2
39
ParkH. L.KimJ. H.ParkC. K. (2018). Different contributions of autophagy to retinal ganglion cell death in the diabetic and glaucomatous retinas.Sci. Rep.8:13321. 10.1038/s41598-018-30165-7
40
ParkH. Y.KimJ. H.ParkC. K. (2012). Activation of autophagy induces retinal ganglion cell death in a chronic hypertensive glaucoma model.Cell Death Dis.3:e290. 10.1038/cddis.2012.26
41
ParkK. K.LiuK.HuY.SmithP. D.WangC.CaiB.et al (2008). Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway.Science322963–966. 10.1126/science.1161566
42
ParzychK. R.KlionskyD. J. (2014). An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation.Antioxid. Redox Signal.20460–473. 10.1089/ars.2013.5371
43
PirasA.GianettoD.ConteD.BosoneA.VercelliA. (2011). Activation of autophagy in a rat model of retinal ischemia following high intraocular pressure.PLoS One6:e22514. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022514
44
PorterK.HirtJ.StamerW. D.LitonP. B. (2015). Autophagic dysregulation in glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1852379–385. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.11.021
45
PorterK.NallathambiJ.LinY.LitonP. B. (2013). Lysosomal basification and decreased autophagic flux in oxidatively stressed trabecular meshwork cells: implications for glaucoma pathogenesis.Autophagy9581–594. 10.4161/auto.23568
46
Produit-ZengaffinenN.PournarasC. J.SchorderetD. F. (2014). Autophagy induction does not protect retina against apoptosis in ischemia/reperfusion model.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.801677–683. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_85
47
QuJ.WangD.GrosskreutzC. L. (2010). Mechanisms of retinal ganglion cell injury and defense in glaucoma.Exp. Eye Res.9148–53. 10.1016/j.exer.2010.04.002
48
RavikumarB.DudenR.RubinszteinD. C. (2002). Aggregate-prone proteins with polyglutamine and polyalanine expansions are degraded by autophagy.Hum. Mol. Genet.111107–1117. 10.1093/hmg/11.9.1107
49
RezaieT.ChildA.HitchingsR.BriceG.MillerL.Coca-PradosM.et al (2002). Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin.Science2951077–1079. 10.1126/science.1066901
50
RichardD.ClavelS.HuangQ.SanchisD.RicquierD. (2001). Uncoupling protein 2 in the brain: distribution and function.Biochem. Soc. Trans.29812–817. 10.1042/bst0290812
51
Rodriguez-MuelaN.GermainF.MarinoG.FitzeP. S.BoyaP. (2012). Autophagy promotes survival of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve axotomy in mice.Cell Death Differ.19162–169. 10.1038/cdd.2011.88
52
Rodriguez-MuelaN.KogaH.Garcia-LedoL.De La VillaP.De La RosaE. J.CuervoA. M.et al (2013). Balance between autophagic pathways preserves retinal homeostasis.Aging Cell12478–488. 10.1111/acel.12072
53
RussoR.BerliocchiL.AdornettoA.VaranoG. P.CavaliereF.NucciC.et al (2011). Calpain-mediated cleavage of Beclin-1 and autophagy deregulation following retinal ischemic injury in vivo.Cell Death Dis.2:e144. 10.1038/cddis.2011.29
54
RussoR.RotirotiD.TassorelliC.NucciC.BagettaG.BucciM. G.et al (2009). Identification of novel pharmacological targets to minimize excitotoxic retinal damage.Int. Rev. Neurobiol.85407–423. 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)85028-9
55
RussoR.VaranoG. P.AdornettoA.NazioF.TettamantiG.GirardelloR.et al (2018). Rapamycin and fasting sustain autophagy response activated by ischemia/reperfusion injury and promote retinal ganglion cell survival.Cell Death Dis.9:981. 10.1038/s41419-018-1044-5
56
ShangL.WangX. (2011). AMPK and mTOR coordinate the regulation of Ulk1 and mammalian autophagy initiation.Autophagy7924–926. 10.4161/auto.7.8.15860
57
ShenX.YingH.QiuY.ParkJ. S.ShyamR.ChiZ. L.et al (2011). Processing of optineurin in neuronal cells.J. Biol. Chem.2863618–3629. 10.1074/jbc.M110.175810
58
ShimM. S.TakiharaY.KimK. Y.IwataT.YueB. Y.InataniM.et al (2016). Mitochondrial pathogenic mechanism and degradation in optineurin E50K mutation-mediated retinal ganglion cell degeneration.Sci. Rep.6:33830. 10.1038/srep33830
59
SuW.LiZ.JiaY.ZhuoY. (2014). Rapamycin is neuroprotective in a rat chronic hypertensive glaucoma model.PLoS One9:e99719. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099719
60
ThamY. C.LiX.WongT. Y.QuigleyH. A.AungT.ChengC. Y. (2014). Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ophthalmology1212081–2090. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
61
UlbrichtA.EpplerF. J.TapiaV. E.Van Der VenP. F.HampeN.HerschN.et al (2013). Cellular mechanotransduction relies on tension-induced and chaperone-assisted autophagy.Curr. Biol.23430–435. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.064
62
WeiT.KangQ.MaB.GaoS.LiX.LiuY. (2015). Activation of autophagy and paraptosis in retinal ganglion cells after retinal ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats.Exp. Ther. Med.9476–482. 10.3892/etm.2014.2084
63
WenY. T.ZhangJ. R.KapuparaK.TsaiR. K. (2019). mTORC2 activation protects retinal ganglion cells via Akt signaling after autophagy induction in traumatic optic nerve injury.Exp. Mol. Med.51:96. 10.1038/s12276-019-0298-z
64
WongY. C.HolzbaurE. L. (2014). Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation.Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111E4439–E4448. 10.1073/pnas.1405752111
65
ZaffagniniG.MartensS. (2016). Mechanisms of selective autophagy.J. Mol. Biol.4281714–1724. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.004
Summary
Keywords
glaucoma, retinal ganglion cells, autophagy, retina, LC3, p62, CMA, mitophagy
Citation
Adornetto A, Parisi V, Morrone LA, Corasaniti MT, Bagetta G, Tonin P and Russo R (2020) The Role of Autophagy in Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:121. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00121
Received
04 December 2019
Accepted
12 February 2020
Published
04 March 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Paolo Grumati, Telethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine, Italy
Reviewed by
Denise M. Inman, University of North Texas Health Science Center, United States; Matilde Cescon, University of Padova, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Adornetto, Parisi, Morrone, Corasaniti, Bagetta, Tonin and Russo.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rossella Russo, rossella.russo@unical.it
This article was submitted to Molecular Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.