Modeling and analysis of the neurophonic potential in the laminar nucleus of the barn owl
-
1
Humboldt University, Institute for Theoretical Biology, Germany
-
2
University of Maryland , Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, United States
-
3
RWTH Aachen, Institute for Biology II, Germany
-
4
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Germany
It is a challenge to understand how the brain represents temporal events. One of the most intriguing questions is how sub-millisecond representations can be achieved despite the large temporal variations at all levels of processing. For example, the neurophonic potential, a frequency-following potential occurring in the network formed by nucleus magnocellularis and nucleus laminaris in the brainstem of the bird, has a temporal precision below 100 microseconds.
Here we address the question of how the neurophonic potential is generated and how its remarkable temporal precision is achieved. The neurophonic potential consists of at least three spectral components [1], and our studies aim at revealing their origin. Our hypothesis is that magnocellular axons are the origin of high-frequency (> 3 kHz) component of the neurophonic. To test this hypothesis, we present an advanced analysis of in-vivo data, numerical simulations of the neurophonic potential, and analytical results. Describing the neurophonic as an inhomogeneous Poisson process (with periodic rate) that is convolved with a spike kernel, we show how the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this signaldepends on the mean rate, the vector strength, and the number of independent sources. Interestingly, the SNR is independent of the spike kernel and subsequent filtering. The SNR of the in-vivo neurophonic potential in response to acoustic stimulation with tones then reveals that the number of independent sources contributing to this signal is large. Therefore, action potentials of laminaris neurons cannot be the main source of neurophonic because neurons are sparsely distributed with a mean distance of about 70 micrometers. Synapses between magnocellular axons and laminaris neurons are assumed to contribute little to the neurophonic because neurons in the high-frequency region of laminaris are nearly spherical with a diameter in the range of 10 micrometers and they have virtually no dendritic tree. On the other hand, the summed signal from densely packed magnocellular axons can explain the high SNR of the neurophonic. This hypothesis is also supported by our finding that the stimulus frequency at which the maximum SNR is reached is lower than the unit’s best frequency (BF), which can be explained by the frequency-tuning properties of the vector strength [2] and the firing rate [3] of magnocellularis neurons.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the BMBF (Bernstein Collaboration in Computational Neuroscience: Temporal Precision, 01GQ07102).
References
1. Wagner H, Brill S, Kempter R, Carr CE: Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94(2):1655-1658.
2. Koeppl C: Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba. J Neurosci 1997, 17(9):3312-3321.
3. Koeppl C: Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba. J Neurophysiol 1997, 77(1):334-377.
Conference:
Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 30 Sep - 2 Oct, 2009.
Presentation Type:
Poster Presentation
Topic:
Sensory processing
Citation:
Kuokkanen
P,
Wagner
H,
Carr
C and
Kempter
R
(2009). Modeling and analysis of the neurophonic potential in the laminar nucleus of the barn owl.
Front. Comput. Neurosci.
Conference Abstract:
Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience.
doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.10.2009.14.150
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
28 Aug 2009;
Published Online:
28 Aug 2009.
*
Correspondence:
Paula Kuokkanen, Humboldt University, Institute for Theoretical Biology, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany, p.kuokkanen@biologie.hu-berlin.de