Event Abstract

PEG-PLGA nanoparticles: investigation of BBB translocation according to PEG chain length using a primary endothelial cell permeability model

  • 1 Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal., Axe Analyse et Formulation du Médicament, Canada
  • 2 CR-CHUM, Université de Montréal., Laboratoire de neuroimmunologie, Canada

The Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) acts as a physical and metabolic barrier between the Central Nervous System (CNS) and the systemic circulation. This complex cell assembly results in a protective, quasi-impermeable barrier for most therapeutic molecules. Nanotechnologies have been used with various success rates to overcome this problem. In particular, nanoparticles (NP) from the FDA-approved poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), grafted with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), have been widely investigated. This alternative confers them reduced toxicity, increased circulation time and BBB penetration. However, no systematic studies have been initiated so far to explore the role of PEG chain length on endocytosis and transcytosis of NP across the BBB. This study aimed therefore to compare the translocation rate of PEG-PLGA nanoparticles across a primary endothelial cell model, according to PEG chain length.

PEGylated diblock polymers were synthesized as previously reported by DCC coupling reaction between PLGA chains (24 kDa) and mPEG chains of different lengths (1, 2, 5 and 10 kDa). Polymers were characterized by GPC, 1H-NMR and FTIR. In parallel, PLGA chains were covalently labelled with the flurorescent moiety (FLU) anthracene-9-carboxylic acid and verified by 1H-NMR. PEG-PLGA-FLU NPs were prepared by co-nanoprecipitation of PEG-PLGA and PLGA-FLU and subsequently characterized for their size, polydispersity and charge (DLS/ELS) and surface chemical composition (NMR of NP souspension). Endothelial cells were isolated from adult mice brains, then selected by puromycine (2 days) and cultivated in a home-designed conditioning medium (5 days.) Confluent cells were plated in 24-well Transwell plates. 24-h later, cells were treated with an equivalent amoount of the various PEG-PLGA-FLU NPs; FLU-PLGA NPs served as controls. Transcytosis was quantified by fluorescent detection in both compartments. Endocytosis was monitored by confocal microscopy.

A diblock polymer library was created and characterized. Expected molecular weights and PEG content were found, with an overall grafting efficiency ≥ 90%. PEG length affects NP size and surface properties. Thus, nanoprecipitation parameters were optimized to obtain a near-constant NP diameter regardless of the PEG chain lengths to eliminate the confounding effect of NP size on BBB passage.

An in vitro BBB permeability assay was designed from primary endothelial cells. Expression of P-gp, GLUT-1, OATP and CAT transporters was used to validate the biorelevancy of transport mechanisms. TEER and Lucifer yellow allowed to assess the model tightness. The effect of PEG length on endothelial cell translocation has been being investigated.

Thus, the role of PEG chain length on BBB crossing has been elucidated on an in vitro primary model of the BBB. These results warrantee further cross-validation with in vivo results. Nevertheless, this systematic approach, based on translocation mechanisms, appears useful to design efficient CNS drug delivery systems.

References:
[1] Wohlfart S, Gelperina S, Kreuter J., Transport of drugs across the blood–brain barrier by nanoparticles. Journal of Controlled Release, 2012. 161(2): p. 264-273.
[2] Li J ,Sabliov C., PLA/PLGA nanoparticles for delivery of drugs across the blood-brain barrier, in Nanotechnology Reviews. 2013. p. 241.
[3] Petros R A, DeSimone J M.,Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2010. 9(8): p. 615-627.
[4] Moghimi, S.M., Szebeni.J, Stealth liposomes and long circulating nanoparticles: critical issues in pharmacokinetics, opsonization and protein-binding properties. Progress in Lipid Research, 2003. 42(6): p. 463-478.
[5] Vonarbourg, A., et al., Parameters influencing the stealthiness of colloidal drug delivery systems. Biomaterials, 2006. 27(24): p. 4356-4373.
[6] Andrieux, K., Couvreur,P., Polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles for delivery of drugs across the blood–brain barrier. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2009. 1(5): p. 463-474.
[7] Rabanel, J.-M., et al., Effect of polymer architecture on the structural and biophysical properties of PEG-PLA nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015. 7(19): p. 10374–10385
[8] Sant, S.,et al., Effect of polymer architecture on surface properties, plasma protein adsorption, and cellular interactions of pegylated nanoparticles. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008. 87A(4): p. 885-895.
[9] Calabria, A.R., et al., Puromycin-purified rat brain microvascular endothelial cell cultures exhibit improved barrier properties in response to glucocorticoid induction. Journal of Neurochemistry, 2006. 97(4): p. 922-933.

Keywords: Drug delivery, nanoparticle, polymer, targeting delivery

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Cell-targeting biomaterials in theranostic delivery

Citation: Tehrani SF, Bernrad F, Leclair G, L’écuyer M, Prat A, Hildgen P and Roullin V (2016). PEG-PLGA nanoparticles: investigation of BBB translocation according to PEG chain length using a primary endothelial cell permeability model. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.02757

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.