Event Abstract

Reconstruction of oro-facial region; challenges and opportunities

  • 1 University of Glasgow, Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, United Kingdom
  • 2 University of Glasgow, Biomedical Engineering Division, School of Engineering, United Kingdom
  • 3 University of Glasgow, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, United Kingdom

Background: Surgical reconstruction of functional and aesthetic defects, particularly following ablative cancer surgery, is often compromised by limited vascularity and the associated donor site morbidity. A compromised vascular bed is a major obstacle for the successful uptake of a micro-vascular flap.

Aim: Investigate a novel approach of using an injectable scaffolding into a pedicled muscle flap for reconstruction of a critical size mandibular defect.

Materials and Methods: Under general anesthesia bone marrow was aspirated from both the rabbit’s anterior iliac crest. Cells were cultured and expanded according to a validated standard protocol before application in the surgical defect[1]. A critical size bony defect, 20mm x 15mm, was created in the rabbit’s mandibular body[2]. A fixation plate was applied at the inferior border to maintain the mandibular integrity, while the superior border was maintained. A pedicled masseter muscle flap was rotated and adapted to fill the created surgical defect. An injectable calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite scaffolding material (Cerament Spine Support) loaded with BMP-7 and mesnechymal stem cells was injected into the muscle flap to induce bone formation. Animals were sacrificed at three months following surgery. The quality of bone regeneration was assessed using Cone Beam Computerised Tomography (CBCT), micro CT and histological assessment.

Results: In all the cases sporadic areas of bone regeneration were detected within the muscle flap. In some cases the volume of newly formed bone was more than the volume of bone resected to the create the defect. Bone formation was in close proximity to the injectable scaffold material. Micro CT showed a different trabecular pattern in the regenerated bone to the native bone tissue.

Fig 1 Micro CT showing new bone formed in the defect.

Histologically, the regenerated tissue consisted of a mixture of mature bone with clear Haversion structure and areas of woven bone. Some areas of fibrous tissue “muscle metaplasia” was detected between the newly generated bone and the surrounding muscle fibres. New bone formation was either from the defect edges or 

Fig 2 Undecalcified section stained with Goldner’s trichrome, showing resorption of the graft material and new bone formation. 

Conclusions: The muscle flap acted as a bioreactor for bone induction under the influence of calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite, stem cells and BMP-7. Three months is insufficient for complete restoration of the bony defect. The new bone formation concentrated around the areas of the injected cells and material.

Randa Alfotawi was funded by King Saud University, Ministry of Higher Education; Bone Support AB (Lund, Sweden) is thanked for provision of the Cerament™ bone cements

References:
[1] Al Fotawei R, Naudi K, Tanner L, McMahon J, Ayoub Assessment of Cellular Viability on Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite Injectable Scaffolds. Journal of Tissue Engineering 2013, 204173
[2] Al Fotawei R, Barbenel J, Di Silvio L, Hunter K, McMahon J, Ayoub A. The use of Tri-Calcium Phosphate (TCP) and stem cells for the regeneration of osteoperiosteal critical-size mandibular bony defects, an in vitro and preclinical study. Eu J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2014;42:863-869

Keywords: Bone Regeneration, Cell Proliferation, Cell response, in vivo tissue engineering

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: New Frontier Oral

Topic: Regenerative medicine: biomaterials for control of tissue induction

Citation: Ayoub AA, Al Fotawi R, Tanner KE, Dalby MJ and Naudi K (2016). Reconstruction of oro-facial region; challenges and opportunities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.02491

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.