Event Abstract

Multimodal assesment of the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface

  • 1 CNRS, Laboratoire MSME UMR 8208, France

Introduction: Endosseous cementless implants are widely used in orthopaedic, maxillofacial and oral surgery. However, failures are still observed and the assessment of the biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface may improve the understanding of the osseointegration process [6],[8].

This work deals with the development of experimental multimodality approaches for the characterization of the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface. A multiphysical approach was carried out using a dedicated animal model consisting in using coin-shaped titanium implants inserted in vivo on the proximal part of the tibia of rabbits (see Fig. 1 and 2) with different healing durations.


Materials and Methods: The first objective of this study was to investigate the evolution of elastic properties of newly formed bone tissue as a function of healing time [7]. To do so, nanoindentation [5][2] and micro-Brillouin scattering [1] techniques are coupled following a multimodality approach using histological analysis, allowing to retrieve complementary information at the micrometer scales. The biomechanical properties of newly formed bone tissue were compared with that of mature bone tissue.

The second aim was to investigate the effect of bone healing on the ultrasonic response of the bone-implant interface[4]. The ultrasound response of the interface was measured in vitro at 15 MHz after 7 and 13 weeks of healing time. The average value of the ratio r between the amplitudes of the echo of the bone-implant interface and of the water-implant interface was determined.

The third objective was to retrieve the different quantities related to the bone-implant interface such as: torsional stiffness, shear modulus, maximal torsional loading, mode III fracture energy and stress intensity factor. To do so, mode III cleavage experiments were performed [3].

Results: The bone mechanical properties were measured in mature and newly formed bone tissue. Analysis of variance and Tukey–Kramer tests reveals a significant effect of healing time on the indentation modulus and ultrasonic velocities of bone tissue. The results show that bone mass density increases by 12.2% (2.2% respectively) between newly formed bone at 7 weeks (13 weeks respectively) and mature bone.

The significant decrease of the ultrasonic quantitative indicator r (p=2.10-4) as a function of healing time (from r=0.53 to r=0.49) can be explained by the increase of the BIC (from 27% to 69%).

The approach allows to estimate torsional stiffness (around 20.5 N.m.rad−1), shear modulus (around 240 MPa), maximal torsional loading (around 0.056 N.m), mode III fracture energy (around 77.5 N.m−1) and stress intensity factor (0.27 MPa m1/2).

Discussion: The dependence of bone properties on healing time may be explained by the evolution of bone microstructure and mineralization. The significant decrease of the ultrasonic reflective properties of the bone-implant interface versus healing time can be explained by the decrease of the gap of acoustical impedance as a function of healing time, as confirmed by the biomechanical measurements realized in newly formed bone tissue.

Conclusion: This study paves the way for the development of a multimodality approach to extract quantitative information from the bone-implant interface, which might help for the development and optimization of implant biomaterial, surface functionnalization and medical treatment investigations.

This work has been supported by French National Research Agency (ANR) through the PRTS program (project OsseoWave n°ANR-13-PRTS-0015-02).

References:
[1] Mathieu V., Fukui K., Matsukawa M., Kawabe M, Vayron R, Soffer JE, Anagnostou F, and Haiat G., "Micro-Brillouin Scattering Measurements in Mature and Newly Formed Bone Tissue Surrounding an Implant", J Biomech Eng. 133(2) (2011) pp 021006.
[2] Vayron R., Barthel E.., Mathieu V., Soffer JE, Anagnostou F, and Haiat G., "Variation of biomechanical properties of newly formed bone tissue determined by nanoindentation as a function of healing time", Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 14(S1) (2011) pp 139-140.
[3] Mathieu, V., Vayron, R., Barthel, E., Dalmas, D., Soffer, J.E., Anagnostou, F., and Haïat, G., "Mode III cleavage of a coin-shaped titanium implant in bone: effect of friction and crack propagation", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 8 (2012) pp 194-203.
[4] Mathieu, V., Soffer, J.E., Anagnostou, F., and Haïat, G., "Influence of healing time on the ultrasonic response of the bone-implant interface", Ultrasound Med Biol, 38(4) (2012) pp 611-618.
[5] Vayron, R., Barthel, E., Mathieu, V., Soffer, J.E., Anagnostou, F. and Haïat, G., "Nanoindentation Measurements of Biomechanical Properties in Mature and Newly Formed Bone Tissue Surrounding an Implant", J Biomech Eng, 134(2) (2012) pp 021007.
[6] Mathieu, V., Vayron, R., Richard, G., Lambert, G., Naili, S., Meningaud, JP and. Haïat, G., "Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties", J Biomech 47(1) (2014) pp 3-13.
[7] Vayron, R., Matsukawa, M., Tsubota, R., Mathieu, V., Barthel, E. and Haïat, G. "Evolution of bone biomechanical properties at the micrometer scale around titanium implant as a function of healing time", Phys Med Biol 59(6) (2014) pp 1389-1406.
[8] Haiat, G., Wang, H.L. and Brunski, J.B., "Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient's mouth", Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 11(16) (2014) pp. 187-213.

Keywords: biomaterial, surface property, biomedical application, mechanical property

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Surface and interfacial characterization

Citation: Vayron R, Bosc R and Haiat G (2016). Multimodal assesment of the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01378

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.