Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurosci., 05 May 2021
Sec. Neural Technology
Volume 15 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.687972

Corrigendum: The After-Effect of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation at Different Session Intervals

This article is a correction to:

  1. The After-Effect of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation at Different Session Intervals

    1. Read original article
\nFengyun Yu,&#x;Fengyun Yu1,2†Xinwei Tang&#x;Xinwei Tang1†Ruiping Hu&#x;Ruiping Hu1†Sijie LiangSijie Liang2Weining WangWeining Wang2Shan TianShan Tian1Yi WuYi Wu1Ti-Fei Yuan, Ti-Fei Yuan3,4*Yulian Zhu Yulian Zhu1*
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 2School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 4Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China

A Corrigendum on
The After-Effect of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation at Different Session Intervals

by Yu, F., Tang, X., Hu, R., Liang, S., Wang, W., Tian, S., et al. (2020). Front. Neurosci. 14:576. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00576

In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 5(C) and Figure 6(D) as published. It should be “iTBS600×3*30,” but it was written incorrectly to “iTBS×3*10.” The correct legend appears below.

Figure 5. Individual response to iTBS after 1800 pulses stimulation in three different intervals. (A) iTBS1800 (B) iTBS600 × 3*10 (C) iTBS600 × 3*30.

Figure 6. The percentage of subjects that responded to different iTBS conditions. (A) one blocks of iTBS (B) iTBS1800 (C) iTBS600 × 3*10 (D) iTBS600 × 3*30.

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. The corrected Table 2 appears below. The SI1mv data for iTBS600×3*10 was incorrectly filled in as 198.2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Subjects' baseline RMT, MEP amplitude, SI1mv, and LICI when started three different iTBS conditions.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: theta burst stimulation, accelerated, motor cortex, cortical plasticity, stimulation interval

Citation: Yu F, Tang X, Hu R, Liang S, Wang W, Tian S, Wu Y, Yuan T-F and Zhu Y (2021) Corrigendum: The After-Effect of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation at Different Session Intervals. Front. Neurosci. 15:687972. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.687972

Received: 30 March 2021; Accepted: 06 April 2021;
Published: 05 May 2021.

Edited and reviewed by: Jinhui Wang, South China Normal University, China

Copyright © 2021 Yu, Tang, Hu, Liang, Wang, Tian, Wu, Yuan and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ti-Fei Yuan, ytf0707@126.com; Yulian Zhu, zyljully@163.com

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.