Michael E. Buckland
Andrew J. Affleck
Alan J. Pearce
Catherine M. Suter- 1Department of Neuropathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- 2School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- 3College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
In this Perspective we explore the evolution of our understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and its relationship with repetitive head injury. As with many neurodegenerative conditions, there is an imperfect correspondence between neuropathology and clinical phenotype, but unlike other neurodegenerative diseases, CTE has a discrete and easily modifiable risk factor: exposure to repetitive head injury. Consequently, evaluation of the evidence regarding exposure to repetitive head injury and CTE risk should be undertaken using public or occupational health frameworks of medical knowledge. The current debate over the existence of CTE as a disease of concern is fuelled in part by immediate medico-legal considerations, and the involvement of high-profile athletes, with inevitable media interest. Moving beyond this debate has significant potential to address and reduce disease impact in the near future, and provide novel insights into mechanisms underlying abnormal protein accumulation in CTE and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Introduction
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a modern diagnosis with a long history. Reports on the long-term consequences of repetitive head injury (RHI) began appearing in the scientific literature around a century ago. At this time, fans of boxing had long noted that those boxers who sustained many blows to the head were prone to a deterioration informally known as “punch-drunk.” In the seminal medical description of punch-drunk in 1928, Martland described a spectrum of neurological and psychological decline (1). Serious consideration of the later-onset symptoms of RHI in boxers ensued in the mid-20th century, leading to more informative descriptions of punch-drunk such as “dementia pugilistica,” “traumatic dementia,” and “traumatic encephalopathy.” The precise term “chronic traumatic encephalopathy” (CTE) was popularized in 1957 by Critchley as a “suitable scientific alternative to punch-drunkenness” (2). He coined the term to describe the associated clinical features, as well as the early pathological findings of “gliosis, cortical atrophy, and internal hydrocephalus” at autopsy (3). Since then, the term CTE has been common in medical parlance, used often as a clinical description, and used increasingly in place of previous analogous terms such as dementia pugilistica.
Defining CTE
Despite its varied use as a clinical term in the historical literature, the term “chronic traumatic encephalopathy” means something quite different and definite in 2022: CTE is a post-mortem neuropathological diagnosis. It is defined by the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) in neuronal cell bodies and processes, located around small blood vessels, at the depths of cortical sulci (4). There are other pathological and immunohistochemical features that are often associated with CTE, but a definitive diagnosis absolutely requires the presence of perivascular neuronal p-tau (5).
In 2013, McKee and colleagues devised a consensus staging scheme for CTE, proposing four stages of increasing disease severity (I-IV) (6). These criteria have since been refined (by the same group) to include only two stages: “low CTE,” where neuronal p-tau, in the form of neurofibrillary tangles, is restricted to one or more neocortical areas, and “high CTE,” where similar p-tau pathology is more widely distributed throughout the neocortex as well as other brain regions such as CA1 and and CA4 of the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, and cerebellar dentate nucleus (4). This refinement in staging simplifies diagnosis, and improves consensus among neuropathologists.
Over the last 15 or so years there has been an exponential increase in scholarly reports of CTE, and a corresponding increase in media attention and public awareness. This began with the first autopsy reporting of CTE in an American football player who had suffered from cognitive impairment, mood disorder, and parkinsonian symptoms (7). This single neuropathology report in 2005 catapulted CTE into the public consciousness, and spurred hundreds of new studies into the association between repetitive head trauma [such as occurs in contact sports and the military (8, 9)] and later life neurological deficits and psychological symptoms.
CTE is a Unique Neuropathological Diagnosis of Brain Disease
A host of neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by abnormal insoluble protein aggregates in specific cellular and subcellular localizations. The anatomical distribution of the pathology usually defines the clinical phenotype, as opposed to the specific protein involved. Aggregates of different proteins may thus present with a similar phenotype when they affect similar brain regions (10), and for this reason a definitive diagnosis, even for Alzheimer's disease (AD), requires examination of the brain after death. When autopsy is used to confirm the suspected cause of neurological decline, concomitant or surprising neuropathology is often identified as the cause of decline. For example, in a recent comparison of clinical and neuropathological diagnoses of 180 individuals, more than a third of cases had a clinical diagnosis that was different from the final (definitive) neuropathological diagnosis (11). Unfortunately, medical autopsy is not often pursued in modern times, so the true population incidence for any neurodegenerative disease is likely to be imprecise.
Tau aggregates are not exclusive to CTE, but rather are a common denominator in multiple neurodegenerative conditions, including AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration diseases (FTLDs), and aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG) (12). ARTAG often co-occurs with CTE, particularly with increasing age. But the pathology of the two tauopathies is distinct: the pathognomonic lesion of CTE is p-tau aggregates in neurons and neurites ± astrocytes, while ARTAG is typified by astrocytic p-tau aggregates alone (12). Furthermore, the tau isoform in aggregates in ARTAG is 4R, but in CTE neuronal aggregates are composed of both 3R and 4R isoforms, like the p-tau aggregates in AD (13). CTE is thus a pathology that shares features with other neurodegenerative disorders, but the cellular distribution and chemical make up of p-tau in CTE is distinct.
Tau filaments can incorporate different isoforms of tau, and possess multiple ultrastructures, with different neurodegenerative tauopathies usually exhibiting different tau aggregate formations (14). Recent cryo-electron microscopy on p-tau aggregates from an individual with CTE uncovered a novel ultrastructure that is distinct from the conformation of p-tau in Pick's disease and AD, even though they share the same isoform stoichiometry (15). As well as a distinctive conformation, CTE p-tau aggregates also contain a yet unknown hydrophobic non-proteinaceous cofactor. Importantly, even though the p-tau in CTE is a distinct molecule from other tauopathies, it has been shown to have the same prion-like properties of infection and self-propagation as the p-tau in AD (16, 17).
Traumatic Brain Injury Predisposes to Neurodegenerative Disease
Over the last few decades many studies have shown that a history of traumatic brain injury increases the risk for neurodegenerative disease [reviewed in Wilson et al. (18) and Bieniek et al. (19)], leading to a growing acceptance that repeated head trauma earlier in life provides a substrate for neurodegeneration later on (20). Such increased risk is seen across various neurodegenerative diseases including AD, where three meta-analyses have independently found that previous RHI confers an increased risk of AD (specifically in males), with relative-risk increases of two- to four-fold (21–23). Meta-analyses have also uncovered an association of previous RHI with increased risk of Parkinson's disease (24) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (25, 26), and two case-control studies have identified RHI as a risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (27, 28).
Contact sports such as boxing, rugby, and football are activities that carry a high risk of RHI. It is not surprising that the long-term effects of RHI have been best studied in American footballers. A large cohort study of 3,439 retired National Football League (NFL) professionals reported a significantly lower all-cause mortality in this group, which was principally attributable to their cardiovascular health (29). However, within this same cohort, mortality due to neurodegenerative disease was three times higher than that of the general population, and for AD, and ALS mortality was four times higher (30). The observed increases in neurodegenerative mortality with RHI were not only large but statistically robust. These findings were mirrored in a more recent retrospective study of 7,676 Scottish soccer players: compared to a matched non-playing control cohort of 23,000, mortality due to heart disease and other non-neurodegenerative disease was significantly lower in soccer players, but mortality due to neurodegenerative diseases was significantly higher (31). Furthermore, risk of neurodegenerative disease varies by position played, with goalkeepers having the lowest risk (32), presumably due to heading of the ball being lower among goalkeepers than players in other field positions.
It is clear that there is already a large (and still growing) body of evidence that strongly links prior RHI to increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases in later life. Moreover, in 2020, the Lancet Commission included traumatic brain injury as a definitive modifiable risk factor to target for dementia prevention (33). It should be noted however that autopsy confirmation of the clinical diagnosis was not pursued in most of the studies mentioned above. It is therefore possible that a proportion of the individuals clinically diagnosed with a neurodegenerative disease, for example AD, did not have AD, but rather CTE. Without proper neuropathological assessment we cannot know, but this possibility suggests that autopsy neuropathology should be included in cases of neurodegeneration where there is a known or suspected history of RHI.
CTE Neuropathology is Closely Linked to RHI
Compelling evidence that links post-mortem CTE pathology with RHI comes from modern immunohistochemistry of the brains of ex-boxers originally studied by Corsellis et al. (34). In this revisitation of the neuropathology of “punch-drunk.” Goldfinger et al. (35) found that most (7/10) of those ex-boxers with a diagnosis of punch-drunk also had the typical pattern of abnormal p-tau accumulation characteristic of CTE. AD neuropathology was present in two of the 10 cases, one being concomitant with CTE pathology. Importantly, neither AD nor CTE pathology was found in those ex-boxers who had suffered from RHI but were not diagnosed as punch drunk. This indicates that CTE is not an inevitable consequence of RHI, and raises questions about modifying factors.
Very little is known about factors that might modify the risk of CTE apart from RHI. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the TMEM106B gene was identified as a potentially protective allele for CTE severity and neuroinflammation in an autopsy cohort of 86 CTE cases (36). This polymorphism was investigated as it is in high linkage disequilibrium with the strongest disease-modifying allele in TDP-43-associated frontotemporal dementia. The APOE ε4 allele appears to increase the chances of co-existent beta-amyloid deposition in CTE cases (37). Alcohol abuse may worsen symptomology in CTE, as it does for many other neurological conditions, however there is no evidence that alcohol itself affects tau deposition in the brain.
CTE pathology has now been found at autopsy in multiple cohorts of individuals with a history of RHI [reviewed in Wilson et al. (18)], and in most instances previous RHI is the only clear identifiable risk factor. An apparent exception, a recent study in which “mild” CTE was found in 6 of 8 men with no known history of RHI (38), appears to be misdiagnosis of ARTAG as CTE (39). Other available evidence indicates that CTE is very rare or absent in the general population outside of a history of head trauma. A recent post-mortem study of 310 individuals found that while ARTAG was frequently found in the general aging population (incidence of 38%), CTE was absent (40).
CTE severity correlates positively with both increasing age and increasing exposure to traumatic brain injuries over time. While we do not yet have the tools to monitor p-tau progression in people living with CTE, available evidence suggests that CTE is a progressive disorder. From a neuropathological standpoint this implies a sequential “spread” of tau pathology from a few to multiple neocortical foci, followed by medial temporal lobe regions, diencephalon, and brainstem. This p-tau patterning forms the basis of the consensus CTE staging scheme (4). CTE pathology tends to be more severe in older individuals, where it often is found along with other neurodegenerative pathology. In former NFL athletes, CTE stage is most closely correlated to the years of exposure to RHI (duration of football career), the number of years after retirement from football, and age at death (5). However, early stage CTE has been observed in older individuals (41), which suggests that CTE might remain indolent in some people.
Symptomology of CTE
There is currently no clear set of criteria to diagnose CTE in life. It is however reasonable to ask whether there are specific functional deficits in a living individual later diagnosed with CTE post-mortem. Like many neurodegenerative conditions where disease confirmation occurs after death, efforts to ascribe a particular set of symptoms to CTE have been hampered by the necessarily retrospective design of research, and the confounding presence of co-morbid neurodegenerative pathology, which is particularly common in older age groups with later stage CTE (41). Nevertheless, there is compelling evidence linking CTE to neuropsychological symptoms based on studies of those individuals with “pure” CTE.
The ex-boxers described in the Corsellis series are again instructive and provide strong evidence for a link between CTE neuropathology and a spectrum of clinical symptoms. Those in the series later confirmed to have CTE exhibited an overlapping array of neuropsychological deficits encompassing behavioral, cognitive, and to a lesser extent motor problems (34, 35). No individual diagnosed with CTE was without symptoms and the majority (6/7) exhibited CTE as the sole neuropathology.
In a landmark report, Stern et al. collated clinical features from 36 individuals with sports-related RHI diagnosed with only CTE and no co-morbid neuropathology (42). Three of the 36 individuals were asymptomatic at the time of death, but the remainder of these individuals with “pure” CTE exhibited an array of neuropsychological symptoms including mood disturbances, loss of impulse control, impaired memory, headache, language deficits, visuospatial difficulties, executive dysfunction, and global cognitive decline. Stern et al. identified two clinical subgroups associated with CTE: one with younger age at symptom presentation with predominant behavioral symptoms, and another older age-at-onset more likely to present with cognitive impairment leading to dementia.
Subsequent clinicopathological studies of CTE [comprehensively reviewed in D'Ascanio et al. (43)], have supported this observation where there appears a continuum of symptoms associated with CTE stage in which changes in mood and behavior are usually the first indicators of disease. Most cases appear to exhibit progression of symptoms over time (44).
In 2014, Montenigro and colleagues proposed that features of CTE can be categorized as “traumatic encephalopathy syndrome” (TES), with mood, behavioral, cognitive, and movement subtypes (45). These TES criteria were not intended as diagnostic of CTE, but rather to facilitate CTE research. Later refinement of TES criteria has proven useful in clinical research (46), but appears more accurate in excluding a diagnosis of CTE, than positively identifying CTE (47).
CTE Denialism
In their seminal description of punch-drunk neuropathology, Corsellis et al. conclude with the statement “It is not suggested that this is a common sequence of events but that it has occurred occasionally can scarcely be denied” (34). Unfortunately in 2022, despite the very large body of evidence linking RHI to later life decline, significant skepticism and confusion remains, particularly around CTE and its relationship to sports-related RHI (48). This confusion is exemplified by views expressed by those who seek to “first do no harm” with regards to reporting on CTE (49), and those who simply reject the premise of CTE as a “real” disease (50). These views do not seriously consider the possibility that RHI has the potential to result in serious damage, and that CTE may contribute significantly to this. The possibility that prominent, popular, and lucrative sports might pose a risk to health threatens personal and commercial interests.
The debate on CTE and RHI is reminiscent of controversies on tobacco use and lung cancer risk that were fostered by tobacco companies intending to protect their business, as recently discussed in an exchange of letters (51, 52). In current times, individuals who continue to play games with high rates of head trauma deserve to have the most complete available information regarding the long-term risks. Arbitrary dismissal of evidence for those risks will impede a fuller understanding that could lead to measures that mitigate or even eliminate the risk. There are acknowledged uncertainties around CTE, mainly in its clinical description, which is currently impeded by the inability to diagnose CTE in life. However, the strong association of CTE with RHI and a range of neuropsychological symptoms that appear progressive warrants widespread recognition, and intensive research investment.
Moving Forward: CTE Recognition and Research
It could be argued that the burden of proof for CTE as a disease of concern has been placed far higher than for other neurodegenerative diseases. This is principally related to the proposed causal association with the environmental/occupational exposure to head injury, with obvious medico-legal and public health implications. Weighing of evidence in relation to CTE and RHI commonly occurs via the Oxford “Levels of Evidence” approach (53), where systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials provide the highest level of supportive evidence. But randomized controlled trials are simply infeasible with CTE, from both a practical and ethical perspective. The lack of such trials has led some to the conclusion that while there is an association with RHI, the evidence is “low-level” and hence may be in doubt (54). This sentiment is exemplified by the current international consensus statement on the management of concussion in sport (55), which states “A cause-and-effect relationship has not yet been demonstrated between CTE and SRCs (sports-related concussions) or exposure to contact sports. As such, the notion that repeated concussion or subconcussive impacts cause CTE remains unknown.” It is difficult to not interpret this statement as dismissive of CTE as a cause for real concern. Notably many of the authors of this consensus statement have professional involvement in lucrative sports, leading to strong (and potentially damaging) conflicts of interests (56).
In our opinion, weighing of evidence in relation to CTE and repetitive head injuries, like any environmental risk, needs to be performed in the framework of public and occupational health methodologies, independently of professional bodies that oversee risk management. As elegantly discussed by Brand and Finkel (57), even well-accepted causal associations in public health, such as smoking and lung cancer, still have unanswered scientific questions and encompass examples of disease incidence without exposure (lung cancer in non-smokers), as well as absence of disease despite exposure (inveterate smokers without lung cancer). None of these ambiguities negate the important causal association.
While no study has yet been performed that has precisely determined the prevalence of CTE in the general population, available evidence suggests that it is rare outside of the context of previous head trauma (40, 58). In professional American football, conservative modeling (adjusting for the most extreme selection bias), estimates the risk of CTE at ~10% (59). However, professional American footballers are not the only demographic at risk of CTE: any person who is exposed to repetitive brain injury, via any means, is at increased risk. With recent case studies reporting CTE pathology in sports outside of American football (60–63), and where community contact sports participation is high, there is a pressing need to quantify risk and then implement strategies that can best modify the risk. There is also a need to be alert to the potential for CTE in non-sports scenarios associated with RHI, particularly those that may not be so easily modifiable (such as domestic violence, combat military service, and medical conditions (such as epilepsy) associated with frequent head impacts. In our opinion, brain autopsy should be pursued when there is such a history, where possible, particularly if associated with neuropsychological symptoms.
Development of biomarkers and clinical criteria to aid CTE diagnosis in living individuals is also a pressing need (45). Advanced imaging techniques (64–66) and biomarker discovery studies (67, 68) are moving toward that goal. Large-scale prospective multimodality studies [such as DIAGNOSE-CTE (69)] are underway and hold great promise for detecting CTE during life. Together, these clinicopathological studies provide a platform for accelerating our understanding of CTE, and the mechanisms underlying CTE and its relationship to RHI.
Conclusion
CTE is a neurodegenerative pathology closely associated with a history of repetitive traumatic brain injury. Currently CTE can only be diagnosed after death, but the living signs and symptoms of those harboring CTE are indicative of RHI-induced neuropsychological decline. In addition to the obvious public health implications of a disease linked to a modifiable exposure, understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms linking RHI and neurodegeneration has potential significance for our broader understanding of neurodegeneration in general. Likewise, our understanding of CTE will increase as we continue to incorporate principles established within research of other neurodegenerative diseases.
Dismissal or downplaying of the evidence for the long-term consequences of RHI in sport, or elsewhere, does nothing to advance our understanding of either CTE, or neurodegeneration more broadly. The costs incurred by ignoring, downplaying, or denying CTE are likely to be far greater than the costs of acknowledging, researching, and acting on this preventable environmental disease as a matter of urgency.
Author Contributions
CS and MB wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors agree to be accountable for the content of the review, contributed to the article, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by NSW Health, Sydney Local Health District (CS, AA, MB).
Conflict of Interest
AP currently receives partial research salary funding from Erasmus+ strategic partnerships program (2019-1-IE01-KA202-051555). AP has previously received partial research funding from the Sports Health Check Charity (Australia), Australian Football League, Impact Technologies Inc., and Samsung Corporation, and was remunerated for expert advice to medico-legal practices.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank David IK Martin for critical comments.
References
1. Martland HS. Punch drunk. J Am Med Assoc. (1928) 91:1103–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.1928.02700150029009
2. Critchley M. Medical aspects of boxing, particularly from a neurological standpoint. Br Med J. (1957) 1:357. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5015.357
3. Brandenburg W, Hallervorden J. [Dementia pugilistica with anatomical findings]. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. (1954) 325:680–709. doi: 10.1007/BF00955101
4. Bieniek KF, Cairns NJ, Crary JF, Dickson DW, Folkerth RD, Keene CD, et al. The second ninds/nibib consensus meeting to define neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2021) 80:210–9. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlab001
5. McKee AC. The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: the status of the literature. Semin Neurol. (2020) 40:359–69. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713632
6. McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Stein TD, Alvarez VE, Daneshvar DH, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. (2013) 136:43–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws307
7. Omalu BI, DeKosky ST, Minster RL, Kamboh MI, Hamilton RL, Wecht CH. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a national football league player. Neurosurgery. (2005) 57:128–34. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000163407.92769.ED
8. Goldstein LE, Fisher AM, Tagge CA, Zhang XL, Velisek L, Sullivan JA, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model. Sci Transl Med. (2012) 4:134ra60. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004862
9. McKee AC, Daneshvar DH, Alvarez VE, Stein TD. The neuropathology of sport. Acta Neuropathol. (2014) 127:29–51. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1230-6
10. Ahmed RM, Devenney EM, Irish M, Ittner A, Naismith S, Ittner LM, et al. Neuronal network disintegration: common pathways linking neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2016) 87:1234–41. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308350
11. Selvackadunco S, Langford K, Shah Z, Hurley S, Bodi I, King A, et al. Comparison of clinical and neuropathological diagnoses of neurodegenerative diseases in two centres from the brains for dementia research (Bdr) cohort. J Neural Transm. (2019) 126:327–37. doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-01967-w
12. Gotz J, Halliday G, Nisbet RM. Molecular pathogenesis of the tauopathies. Annu Rev Pathol. (2019) 14:239–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012936
13. McKee AC, Stein TD, Kiernan PT, Alvarez VE. The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Pathol. (2015) 25:350–64. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12248
14. Shi Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Murzin AG, Falcon B, Kotecha A, et al. Structure-based classification of tauopathies. Nature. (2021) 598:359–63. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03911-7
15. Falcon B, Zivanov J, Zhang W, Murzin AG, Garringer HJ, Vidal R, et al. Novel tau filament fold in chronic traumatic encephalopathy encloses hydrophobic molecules. Nature. (2019) 568:420–3. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1026-5
16. Woerman AL, Aoyagi A, Patel S, Kazmi SA, Lobach I, Grinberg LT, et al. Tau prions from Alzheimer's disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy patients propagate in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2016) 113:E8187–96. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616344113
17. Kaufman SK, Svirsky S, Cherry JD, McKee AC, Diamond MI. Tau seeding in chronic traumatic encephalopathy parallels disease severity. Acta Neuropathol. (2021) 142:951–60. doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02373-5
18. Wilson L, Stewart W, Dams-O'Connor K, Diaz-Arrastia R, Horton L, Menon DK, et al. The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:813–25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30279-X
19. Bieniek KF, Blessing MM, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, Serie AM, Paolini MA, et al. Association between contact sports participation and chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study. Brain Pathology. (2020) 30:63–74. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12757
20. Smith DH, Johnson VE, Stewart W. Chronic neuropathologies of single and repetitive tbi: substrates of dementia? Nat Rev Neurol. (2013) 9:211–21. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.29
21. Mortimer J, Van Duijn C, Chandra V, Fratiglioni L, Graves A, Heyman A, et al. head trauma as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: a collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol. (1991) 20(Suppl. 2):S28–35. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.Supplement_2.S28
22. Fleminger S, Oliver D, Lovestone S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Giora A. Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: the evidence 10 years on; a partial replication. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2003) 74:857–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.857
23. Li Y, Li Y, Li X, Zhang S, Zhao J, Zhu X, et al. Head injury as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 observational studies. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0169650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169650
24. Jafari S, Etminan M, Aminzadeh F, Samii A. Head injury and risk of parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. (2013) 28:1222–9. doi: 10.1002/mds.25458
25. Chen H, Richard M, Sandler DP, Umbach DM, Kamel F. Head injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. (2007) 166:810–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm153
26. Watanabe Y, Watanabe T. Meta-analytic evaluation of the association between head injury and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Epidemiol. (2017) 32:867–79. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0327-y
27. Rosso S, Landweer E, Houterman M, Kaat LD, Van Duijn C, Van Swieten J. Medical and environmental risk factors for sporadic frontotemporal dementia: a retrospective case–control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2003) 74:1574–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.11.1574
28. Kalkonde YV, Jawaid A, Qureshi SU, Shirani P, Wheaton M, Pinto-Patarroyo GP, et al. Medical and environmental risk factors associated with frontotemporal dementia: a case-control study in a veteran population. Alzheimers Dement. (2012) 8:204–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.011
29. Baron SL, Hein MJ, Lehman E, Gersic CM. Body mass index, playing position, race, and the cardiovascular mortality of retired professional football players. Am J Cardiol. (2012) 109:889–96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.050
30. Lehman EJ, Hein MJ, Baron SL, Gersic CM. Neurodegenerative causes of death among retired national football league players. Neurology. (2012) 79:1970–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826daf50
31. Mackay DF, Russell ER, Stewart K, MacLean JA, Pell JP, Stewart W. Neurodegenerative disease mortality among former professional soccer players. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381:1801–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908483
32. Russell ER, Mackay DF, Stewart K, MacLean JA, Pell JP, Stewart W. Association of field position and career length with risk of neurodegenerative disease in male former professional soccer players. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:1057–63. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2403
33. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet. (2020) 396:413–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6
34. Corsellis JAN, Bruton CJ, Freeman-Browne D. The aftermath of boxing. Psychol Med. (1973) 3:270–303. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700049588
35. Goldfinger MH, Ling H, Tilley BS, Liu AKL, Davey K, Holton JL, et al. The aftermath of boxing revisited: identifying chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology in the original corsellis boxer series. Acta Neuropathol. (2018) 136:973–4. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1926-8
36. Cherry JD, Mez J, Crary JF, Tripodis Y, Alvarez VE, Mahar I, et al. Variation in Tmem106b in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. (2018) 6:115. doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0619-9
37. Stein TD, Montenigro PH, Alvarez VE, Xia W, Crary JF, Tripodis Y, et al. Beta-amyloid deposition in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol. (2015) 130:21–34. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1435-y
38. Iverson GL, Luoto TM, Karhunen PJ, Castellani RJ. Mild chronic traumatic encephalopathy neuropathology in people with no known participation in contact sports or history of repetitive neurotrauma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2019) 78:615–25. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlz045
39. McKee AC, Stein TD, Crary JF, Bieniek KF, Cantu RC, Kovacs GG. Practical considerations in the diagnosis of mild chronic traumatic encephalopathy and distinction from age-related tau astrogliopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2020) 79:921–4. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlaa047
40. Forrest SL, Kril JJ, Wagner S, Honigschnabl S, Reiner A, Fischer P, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (Cte) is absent from a european community-based aging cohort while cortical aging-related tau astrogliopathy (Artag) is highly prevalent. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2019) 78:398–405. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlz017
41. Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Kiernan PT, Abdolmohammadi B, Alvarez VE, Huber BR, et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in players of american football. JAMA. (2017) 318:360–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8334
42. Stern RA, Daneshvar DH, Baugh CM, Seichepine DR, Montenigro PH, Riley DO, et al. Clinical presentation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Neurology. (2013) 81:1122–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a55f7f
43. D'Ascanio S, Alosco ML, Stern RA. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: clinical presentation and in vivo diagnosis. Handb Clin Neurol. (2018) 158:281–96. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63954-7.00027-6
44. Stein TD, Alvarez VE, McKee AC. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a spectrum of neuropathological changes following repetitive brain trauma in athletes and military personnel. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2014) 6:4. doi: 10.1186/alzrt234
45. Montenigro PH, Baugh CM, Daneshvar DH, Mez J, Budson AE, Au R, et al. Clinical subtypes of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: literature review and proposed research diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2014) 6:68. doi: 10.1186/s13195-014-0068-z
46. Katz DI, Bernick C, Dodick DW, Mez J, Mariani ML, Adler CH, et al. National institute of neurological disorders and stroke consensus diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome. Neurology. (2021) 96:848–63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011850
47. Mez J, Alosco ML, Daneshvar DH, Saltiel N, Baucom Z, Abdolmohammadi B, et al. Validity of the 2014 traumatic encephalopathy syndrome criteria for Cte pathology. Alzheimers Dement. (2021) 7:1709–24. doi: 10.1002/alz.12338
48. Smith DH, Johnson VE, Trojanowski JQ, Stewart W. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy - confusion and controversies. Nat Rev Neurol. (2019) 15:179–83. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0114-8
49. Stewart W, Allinson K, Al-Sarraj S, Bachmeier C, Barlow K, Belli A, et al. Primum non nocere: a call for balance when reporting on Cte. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:231–3. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30020-1
50. Randolph C. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy is not a real disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. (2018) 33:644–8. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy063
51. Finkel AM, Brand KP, Caplan AL, Evans JS, Wolpe PR. First report the findings: genuine balance when reporting Cte. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:521–2. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30159-0
52. Casper ST, Golden J, Oreskes N, Largent M, Goldberg DS, Gillett G, et al. First report the findings: genuine balance when reporting Cte. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:522–3. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30158-9
53. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A. The 2011 Oxford Cebm Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document): Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2011). Available online at: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence (accessed May 1, 2022).
54. Manley G, Gardner AJ, Schneider KJ, Guskiewicz KM, Bailes J, Cantu RC, et al. A systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion. Br J Sports Med. (2017) 51:969–77. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097791
55. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Bailes J, Broglio S, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5(Th) international conference on concussion in sport held in berlin, october 2016. Br J Sports Med. (2017) 51:838–47. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699
56. Buckland ME, Pearce AJ, Suter CM. Concussion in Sport: Conflicts of Interest Drive Scandal: Medical Journal of Australia InSight+. (2022). Available online at: https://insightplus.mja.com.au/2022/13/concussion-in-sport-conflicts-of-interest-drive-scandal/ (accessed May 1, 2022).
57. Brand KP, Finkel AM. A decision-analytic approach to addressing the evidence about football and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Semin Neurol. (2020) 40:450–60. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688484
58. Noy S, Krawitz S, Del Bigio MR. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy-like abnormalities in a routine neuropathology service. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2016) 75:1145–54. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlw092
59. Binney ZO, Bachynski KE. Estimating the prevalence at death of cte neuropathology among professional football players. Neurology. (2019) 92:43–5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006699
60. Ling H, Morris H, Neal J, Lees A, Hardy J, Holton J, et al. Mixed pathologies including chronic traumatic encephalopathy account for dementia in retired association football (soccer) players. Acta Neuropathol. (2017) 133:337–52. doi: 10.1007/s00401-017-1680-3
61. Buckland ME, Sy J, Szentmariay I, Kullen A, Lee M, Harding A, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in two former australian national rugby league players. Acta Neuropathol Commun. (2019) 7:16. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0751-1
62. Pearce AJ, Sy J, Lee M, Harding A, Mobbs R, Batchelor J, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a former australian rules football player diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. (2020) 8:23. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-0895-z
63. Suter CM, Affleck AJ, Lee M, Pearce AJ, Iles LE, Buckland ME. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in australia: the first three years of the australian sports brain bank. Med J Australia. (2022). doi: 10.5694/mja2.51420 [Epub ahead of print].
64. Stern RA, Adler CH, Chen K, Navitsky M, Luo J, Dodick DW, et al. Tau positron-emission tomography in former national football league players. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:1716–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900757
65. Krishnadas N, Dore V, Lamb F, Groot C, McCrory P, Guzman R, et al. Case report: F-Mk6240 tau positron emission tomography pattern resembling chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a retired australian rules football player. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:598980. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.598980
66. Barrio JR, Small GW, Wong KP, Huang SC, Liu J, Merrill DA, et al. In vivo characterization of chronic traumatic encephalopathy using [F-18]Fddnp pet brain imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2015) 112:E2039–47. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409952112
67. Muraoka S, DeLeo AM, Yang Z, Tatebe H, Yukawa-Takamatsu K, Ikezu S, et al. Proteomic profiling of extracellular vesicles separated from plasma of former national football league players at risk for chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Aging Dis. (2021) 12:1363–75. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0908
68. Shahim P, Gill JM, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Fluid biomarkers for chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Semin Neurol. (2020) 40:411–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715095
69. Alosco ML, Mariani ML, Adler CH, Balcer LJ, Bernick C, Au R, et al. Developing methods to detect and diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy during life: rationale, design, and methodology for the diagnose Cte research project. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2021) 13:136. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00872-x
Keywords: concussion, tau, punch-drunk, neuropathology, dementia, neurodegeneration
Citation: Buckland ME, Affleck AJ, Pearce AJ and Suter CM (2022) Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy as a Preventable Environmental Disease. Front. Neurol. 13:880905. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.880905
Received: 22 February 2022; Accepted: 06 May 2022;
Published: 13 June 2022.
Edited by:
Christopher Butler, Imperial College London, United KingdomReviewed by:
Matthew J. Robson, University of Cincinnati, United StatesNeil Graham, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2022 Buckland, Affleck, Pearce and Suter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Michael E. Buckland, bWljaGFlbC5idWNrbGFuZCYjeDAwMDQwO3N5ZG5leS5lZHUuYXU=