Event Abstract

Characterization and optimization of PolySTAT, an injectable hemostat for the treatment of traumatic injury

  • 1 University of Washington, Department of Bioengineering, United States
  • 2 University of Washington, Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, United States
  • 3 University of Washington, Division of Emergency Medicine, United States
  • 4 National Institute of Standards and Tehcnology, Center for Neutron Research, United States
  • 5 University of Washington, Department of Chemical Engineering, United States

Introduction: About 25% of trauma patients experience impaired clotting ability due to a depletion of clotting factors during initial bleeding[1]. To combat these effects, human-derived products (whole blood, fresh frozen plasma, and factor concentrates) as well as recombinant factors are used as systemic treatments. While they improve patient outcomes, a number of limitations plague these treatments such as short shelf-lives, stringent storage conditions, microbial contamination risks, and the risk of immunogenicity in patients. Synthetic hemostats can improve clotting function while avoiding the limitations of current treatments. We recently reported a polymer-peptide conjugate known as PolySTAT.[2] PolySTAT mimics the activity of FXIIIa by crosslinking fibrin fibers through its multivalent display of fibrin-binding peptides (FBPs) (Fig. 1)[2]. In this work, we report structure-function studies leading to optimization of PolySTAT composition. We describe the performance of PolySTAT polymers in coagulation assays, characterization of PolySTAT-fibrin clots, and in vivo injury models in rats.

Materials and Methods: PolySTAT polymers were synthesized as described previously with varying peptide loading[2]. Polymers were characterized by GPC, NMR, and UV absorbance. Clotting parameters were measured in purified fibrin systems by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). PolySTAT-treated fibrin clots were characterized by small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). PolySTAT polymers were evaluated in a rat model of trauma as described previously[2].

Results and Discussion: PolySTAT polymers with backbone repeat units of ~200 were synthesized with various peptide densities ranging from 0-10 peptides polymer polymer. In fibrin systems, a minimum peptide valency was determined for effective clot strengthening. Above this value of peptides per polymer, clotting parameters were similar. Specifically, PolySTAT treatment resulted in accelerated clotting kinetics, increased clot strength, and decreased clot lysis by ROTEM. SAXS confirmed that PolySTAT polymers did not aggregate in solution. Additionally, SANS showed that PolySTAT polymers did not significantly affect the self-assembly of fibrin at the fiber scale. Select polymers were tested in rat trauma models. PolySTAT treatment in rats reduced hemorrhage volumes and significantly improved survival.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that a minimum FBP valency for clot-enhancing effects was discovered in vitro. Select PolySTAT constructs were tested in vivo, and shown to reduce bleeding and improve survival in a rat femoral artery injury model.

This work was supported by NIH 1R21EB018637, NIH 2T32EB001650 (LWC & RJL) and an NSF GRFP (RJL).

References:
[1] Kauvar, D., et al. J. Trauma. (2006). 60: S3–S11
[2] Chan, L., et al. Sci. Transl. Med. (2015). 7: 277ra29

Keywords: biomaterial, biomedical application, Polymeric material

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: New Frontier Oral

Topic: Biomaterials in thrombosis and hemostasis

Citation: Lamm RJ, Chan LW, Wang X, Weigandt KM, Pozzo LD, White NJ and Pun SH (2016). Characterization and optimization of PolySTAT, an injectable hemostat for the treatment of traumatic injury. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.02206

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.