A Comparison of ERP Data Cleaning Strategies for Neuroergonomic Error Detection
-
1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
-
2
University of Central Florida, Department of Industrial Engineering, United States
-
3
University of Central Florida, Department of Psychology, United States
-
4
Stetson University, United States
The decision to employ postprocessing on electroencephalographic (EEG) data, toward the removal of undesirable artifacts, is associated with concerns of inadvertently filtering brain process data of interest to the research question. The rich data provided by multichannel EEGs supports a variety of postprocessing approaches. Brain process characteristics are often already well-studied1,2, and so the approach often impractical terms involves applying a postprocessing technique, and determining if the aggregate signal representing the brain process of interest matches those previously reported in the literature. However, as increased interest in real-time approaches to characterizing brain processes dominates the applied neuroergonomic literature, it is worth considering the absolute merits of various postprocessing techniques.
For example, in event related potential/evoked response potential (ERP) work analyzed after collection it is common to utilize independent component analysis (ICA), which relies upon this statistical independence of variance accounted for by artifacts and separates them from variance accounted for by brain activity. ICA techniques, in effect, “clean” the waveform for analysis, preserving epics of interest. This is, however, a relatively computationally “expensive” approach for real-time applications. A relatively simple technique, moving window peak-to-peak amplitude detection (P2PW), uses differences between the highest and lowest voltages within successive epics of time to flag artifacts for removal. P2PW, therefore, does not preserve epics of interest, instead removes them entirely. The present work compares the performance of these two approaches in data collected by Sawyer et al.2,3 during an experiment which, for the first time, demonstrated
the detection of the error related negativity (ERN) ERP in visual search for complex stimuli. In this work, participants completed tasks during 8 channel EEG recording, which was then analysed using ICA post-processing3. Successfully elicitation and detection of this ERN in visual search of complex images opens the door to applied neuroergonomics ‘in the field’ (as in Fedota & Parasuraman, 2010) 1,3. The question of how best to process data “on-the-fly”, however, is relevant specifically because of the context: computation costs power, which is heavy and expensive to carry in the field.
For example, in event related potential/evoked response potential (ERP) work analyzed after collection it is common to utilize independent component analysis (ICA), which relies upon this statistical independence of variance accounted for by artifacts and separates them from variance accounted for by brain activity. ICA techniques, in effect, “clean” the waveform for analysis, preserving epics of interest. This is, however, a relatively computationally “expensive” approach for real-time applications. A relatively simple technique, moving window peak-to-peak amplitude detection (P2PW), uses differences between the highest and lowest voltages within successive epics of time to flag artifacts for removal. P2PW, therefore, does not preserve epics of interest, instead removes them entirely. The present work compares the performance of these two approaches in data collected by Sawyer et al.2,3 during an experiment which, for the first time, demonstrated
the detection of the error related negativity (ERN) ERP in visual search for complex stimuli. In this work, participants completed tasks during 8 channel EEG recording, which was then analysed using ICA post-processing3. Successfully elicitation and detection of this ERN in visual search of complex images opens the door to applied neuroergonomics ‘in the field’ (as in Fedota & Parasuraman, 2010) 1,3. The question of how best to process data “on-the-fly”, however, is relevant specifically because of the context: computation costs power, which is heavy and expensive to carry in the field.
Figure 1: Waveform data for errors and non-errors are shown across a simple letter flanker task and a complex motorcycle conspicuity task, separated by three postprocessing strategies, A) ICA B) P2PW, and C) raw data. These average time-locked ERP waveforms for are represented with negitive plotted down, and relative to a 50ms baseline time-locked against participant response by keypress. A full 100ms of pre response activity is shown here for evaluative purposes. The waveforms for ICA (A) show the clearest ERN pattern, but the negative trend of erroneous results and separation between correct and error trials can be clearly seen in the P2PW (A) and raw data (C) waveforms.
Table 1 Task data loss by post-processing type
References
1. Fedota JR, Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics and human error. TIES. 2010; 11(5):402-421.
2. Sawyer BD, Karwowski W, Xanthopoulos P, Hancock PA. Detection of error-related negativity in complex visual stimuli: a new neuroergonomic arrow in the practitioner’s quiver. Ergonomics 2016; 1-7.
3. Sawyer, B. D., Karwowski, W., Xanthopoulos, P. and Hancock, P. A. (2016). Applied Potential: Neuroergonomic Error Detection in Single Electrode Electroencephalography in R. Parasuraman & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Neuroergonomics, New York, NY.: Columbia University Press.
4. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput.1995; 7(6): 1129-1159.
Keywords:
Electroencephalography,
error detection,
event related potentials (ERP),
Error related negativity (ERN),
independent component analysis (ICA),
peak to peak amplitude detection
Conference:
2nd International Neuroergonomics Conference, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 27 Jun - 29 Jun, 2018.
Presentation Type:
Oral Presentation
Topic:
Neuroergonomics
Citation:
Sawyer
BD,
Karwowski
W,
Xanthopoulos
P and
Hancock
PA
(2019). A Comparison of ERP Data Cleaning Strategies for Neuroergonomic Error Detection.
Conference Abstract:
2nd International Neuroergonomics Conference.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2018.227.00004
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
16 May 2018;
Published Online:
27 Sep 2019.
*
Correspondence:
Dr. Ben D Sawyer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States, bsawyer@mit.edu