The role of trust in eHealth websites: the enduring power of impartiality
-
1
UCL, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, United Kingdom
-
2
Northumbria University, Department of Psychology, United Kingdom
Background: Within a year period, 72% of internet users seek health information online (Pew Research, 2014). The internet has provided a valuable alternative to physical contact with health practitioners by increasing the availability and access of information. However, with this increased access come concerns about the quality of the information source that consumers choose to trust and act upon. Understanding what causes users to trust health websites is important to understand how it leads to behavioural changed. We have studied eHealth trust during early internet adoption (Briggs et al. 2000) and from the introduction of web 2.0 (Harris et al., 2011), however more attention on the role of advice from patient experiences (PEx) (Sillence et al., 2013) and privacy concerns (Kim, 2014) on health website trust formation is needed.
Objective: The current study aimed to (1) update our existing trust questionnaire to incorporate greater consideration of PEx and the role of privacy concerns, (2) assess the factorial structure of the trust questionnaire and (2) model how these factors predicted trust, information corroboration, users’ threat perception, coping assessment and readiness to act on the advice contained within health-related websites.
Methods: Participants were asked to recall a site they had used previously to search for health information. They were then asked to complete the trust questionnaire in relation to the website and answered a number of questions assessing their threat and coping appraisal, information corroboration and checking. 1123 participants were recruited from an online panel with 56% from the USA and 44% of the UK. An online panel was chosen to recruit a demographic similar to that recruited in our existing studies as our previous recruitment platform no longer existed. The factorial structure of the eHealth web trust scale was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and then modelled how those factors predicted the outcome measures using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).
Results: EFA revealed four factors: PEx, credibility and impartiality, privacy and familiarity. In the SEM, of these four factors, only credibility and impartiality had a direct effect on trust. The role of PEx had an indirect effect through information corroboration suggesting that whilst users may not trust PEx content, corroborating such information through other sources heightens users trust. Privacy and familiarity only had indirect effects on trust. The final model accounted for the trust markers, trust in health information, information corroboration, coping and intention to act. This model achieved a good fit (GFI (.95), AGFI (.93), RMSEA (.50) and CFI (.97)) and accounted for 65% of the variance in trust, 27% of the variance in coping and 41% of the variance in intention to act.
Conclusion: In line with our existing studies (Harris et al., 2011; Sillence et al., 2013), impartiality is the only trust marker to remain a stable predictor of trust. Previous PEx work (Sillence et al., 2013) has found the content to negatively influence trust but our findings suggest it can have a positive influence on trust provided that users corroborate the information through additional sources.
References
Briggs, P., Burford, B., & Angeli, A. De. (2002). Trust in online advice. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 321-332..
Harris, P. R., Sillence, E., & Briggs, P. (2011). Perceived threat and corroboration: Key factors that improve a predictive model of trust in internet-based health information and advice. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3).
Kim, Y. (2014). Trust in health information websites: A systematic literature review on the antecedents of trust. Health Informatics Journal, 1-15.
Pew research. (2014). The social life of health information. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-health-information/).
Sillence, E., Hardy, C., & Briggs, P. (2013). Why don’t we trust health websites that help us help each other?: an analysis of online peer-to-peer healthcare. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web (pp. 396-404). ACM.
Keywords:
eHealth,
Trust,
Impartiality,
Trust formation,
Behaviour Change,
Information corroboration,
patient experiences,
privacy concerns
Conference:
3rd UCL Centre for Behaviour Change Digital Health Conference 2017: Harnessing digital technology for behaviour change, London, United Kingdom, 22 Feb - 23 Feb, 2017.
Presentation Type:
Research abstract
Topic:
Digital Health
Citation:
Blythe
JM,
Sillence
L and
Briggs
P
(2017). The role of trust in eHealth websites: the enduring power of impartiality.
Front. Public Health.
Conference Abstract:
3rd UCL Centre for Behaviour Change Digital Health Conference 2017: Harnessing digital technology for behaviour change.
doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2017.03.00056
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
22 Feb 2017;
Published Online:
22 Feb 2017.
*
Correspondence:
Dr. John M Blythe, UCL, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, United Kingdom, j.blythe@ucl.ac.uk